[00:01] mwhudson: And I'm done. *Much* faster. Thanks; I need to keep that in mind in the future! [00:01] korpios: cool === sm is now known as sm-food === ursula_ is now known as Ursinha === sm-food is now known as sm === thekorn_ is now known as thekorn [09:10] Whats the correct procedure when doing something in a PPA to test something for a specific user? I would like to rebuild a package for him to test, but I have some other guys using my PPA and i dont particulary want them to get the package. does PPA cater for this, or should i be getting him the .debs some other way? [09:11] you need another PPA [09:11] or "some other way" :) [09:13] bigjools: I really think it would make more sense to allow people to customise components. [09:13] indeed - it will happen at some point [09:13] Oh. Last I heard it wasn't going to happen because it was wrong or similar. [09:14] we're going to add the ability for multiple PPAs per person first probably [09:14] Um. [09:14] Didn't you deliberately remove that just before they hit beta? [09:14] (I'm glad it's back on the cards) [09:15] hey bigjools [09:15] hey [09:15] bigjools, how goes it [09:16] wgrant, well, if you really want to have "fun" customizing your PPA, you can upload replacement dpkgs and such with higher versions, and during the build, it should upgrade [09:17] NCommander: great, yourself? [09:17] bigjools, I'm bootstrapping Ubuntu amd64-pie, and doing archive rebuilds [09:17] Sanity is at a premium ;-) [09:33] Is there a good reason for not showing links to pending PPA binary packages? They're there for deleted packages, and are easily accessible if one is able to add 1 to fairly large number... But links would be nice. [09:57] wgrant: it's hard because of the way the data model works, the binaries are not even in a "pending" state until just before publishing [09:57] bigjools: Oh. [09:57] It seems odd that they're not at least linked to on the build page. [09:58] just wait up to 20 minutes :) [09:59] But it's so nice having things built just a couple of minutes after uploading. [10:01] wgrant: we might increase the publishing frequency, watch this space [10:01] bigjools: I was about to ask about that... [10:01] So it doesn't scale with total published package count? [10:02] wgrant: it depends on pending count [10:02] Right, makes sense. [10:04] So that's why the archive gets horribly broken sometimes... [10:04] it does? [10:04] Occasionally something will go insane and several checksums will be wrong. [10:06] hmmm that's not good, do you know if it was reported? [10:06] It was. [10:06] ok [10:06] IIRC the solution was to clear the apt-ftparchive cache in one instance, and reupload things in the other. [10:10] yayz === mrevell is now known as mrevell-lunch === salgado-afk is now known as salgado [13:55] Why hello there. The xserver-xgl package has been removed from the archives. Is there any easy way to close all bugs against it? === mrevell-lunch is now known as mrevell === fta_ is now known as fta [14:15] RAOF_, you can use python-launchpad-bugs or (with a bit of hacking) launchpadlib [15:19] siretart: Around? [15:52] siretart: Unping, never mind. === salgado is now known as salgado-brb [16:46] <\sh> bah...sometimes I hate python === salgado-brb is now known as salgado [18:03] gmb: now I'm here [18:08] siretart: Thanks; all sorted now, not to worry. [18:08] (plugin-related question, but I found the answer elsewhere) === matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch [18:14] * gmb -> food === matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara [19:25] I'm trying to find the tags for https://code.launchpad.net/mysql-server [19:25] are they not there or am I just not looking correctly? [19:25] eg where should they be if they did exist :) [19:26] eean, have you tried: bzr tags lp:mysql-server [19:26] nope [19:26] I'll do so [19:26] wait [19:26] that doesn't work [19:27] you have to have the branch locally for that [19:27] hm [19:27] do you have the branch locally? [19:27] no [19:27] actually I don't have bzr yet [19:27] installing now [19:27] was wanting to see if the tag existed or not [19:27] you'll have to get the branch in order to do so [19:27] (I want 5.1-rc without all the autogenerated stuff they include in the tarball) [19:28] we will show tags in Loggerhead (code view) eventually, so you can see it online [19:28] ah ok [19:28] was about to ask if I should make a feature request or not [19:28] sure you can [19:29] um, but if its already planned? [19:29] well you have launchpad in your cloak [19:29] I'll take your word for it :) [19:29] haha [19:29] there's a bug for it [19:29] let me find it so you can subscribe [19:30] ah [19:30] eean, https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/loggerhead/+bug/246739 [19:30] Ubuntu bug 246739 in loggerhead "tags are not available" [Wishlist,Confirmed] [19:30] pssh I don't care aobut it personall :) [19:38] suppose I shouldn't be surprised that cloning mysql is taking a long time [19:38] it's a big tree [19:39] what version of bzr are you using? [19:39] long history is the problem I'd assume [19:39] its not that big of a tree [19:39] yeah, very long history [19:39] 1.6 [19:39] 1.6.1 has a big speed improvement for initial branching [19:41] it makes the tubes faster? ;) [19:41] yes, it comes lubricated [19:41] much less friction === dressed_in_black is now known as AndrewB [21:39] Hi there. Launchpad's source hasn't been released yet, right? [21:48] xif: correct. [21:49] LarstiQ: but it would be released sometime in the coming year, right? [21:49] it's Python, I guess? [21:50] xif: that is my understanding, and yes, it's python [21:51] LarstiQ: awesome. what's the advantage of Launchpad over other services, particularly Savannah? [21:51] It's the only one that supports the Bazaar vcs. what else? [21:52] xif: ehm, I'm not sure what you mean with "support", but that's hardly true. [21:52] xif: note I don't work on Launchpad nor am I employed by Canonical. [21:53] LarstiQ: you can host bzr branches on Launchpad. I don't know that you can do that on any other service. [21:53] xif: anywhere you can upload files you can do that, and I'm rather sure Savannah supports bzr in at least that sense. [21:53] xif: but yes, for me, Launchpad is nice with the ease of use with bzr [21:53] yeah, but you can't push to it then [21:54] xif: I also like the bugtracker more than sourceforget based solutions [21:54] you can host read-only branches, but it's not the same. [21:54] xif: eh? [21:54] LarstiQ: if I can only upload files through, say, a web (browser) interface, then I can't push revisions directly to the server... [21:54] (from bzr) [21:54] xif: pushing works just fine if you have {a,s,}ftp/ssh/etc access [21:55] xif: ah, like so. [21:55] xif: right, that is _not_ what I had in mind :) [21:55] :) [21:55] OK, how about compared to Savannah, which is my main alternative atm? [21:55] xif: I haven't used Savannah in earnest, you probably will get better answers from an lp person [21:56] Rinchen: awake? [21:57] xif: I can point you to some information, or I can answer specific questions I have experience with :) [21:57] xif: seen https://launchpad.net/+tour ? [21:58] LarstiQ: thanks, I'll take a look at that [21:58] not too many specific question [21:59] mostly need support for AGPL, which I guess is supported? [22:02] xif: Affero GPL? yeah [22:02] xif: you can play around on staging.launchpad.net if you want [22:02] LarstiQ: cool, guess I will. [22:02] thanks for your advice. [22:04] xif: np [22:04] * LarstiQ heads to bed, ciao === barry is now known as barry-away === salgado is now known as salgado-afk [23:56] is there any good way to "tweak" +packagebugs pages? I'd like to be able to sort for starters. For bonus points I'd like to see columns for New and Triaged [23:57] LaserJock: Greasemonkey ftw. [23:57] hmm, I wonder how hard that would be [23:59] I guess an advanced search allows me to at least get individual bugs sorted, I'd like to get the numbers per package though :/ [23:59] there's a package of launchpad greasemonkey hacks somewhere isn't there? [23:59] yeah [23:59] You could scrape the list of packages and use python-launchpad-bugs or launchpadlib directly to get the stats. [23:59] mwhudson: Nothing like that, AFAIK. [23:59] But there is a set of them around.