[00:00] I just 1) don't know anything about greasemonkey 2) don't know anything about javascript (which is what I'm guessing I'd need) [00:00] yeah, p-l-b would be pretty easy to hack up for it [00:01] it'd be nice if LP could have it though somewhere so the team could all view it [00:01] also, apis, sooner or later [00:02] * LaserJock imagines the mother of all PTSs ..... mmmmmm [00:02] multidistrotools+python-launchpad-bugs might about do the trick [00:03] I'd prefer multidistrotools + $SOME_WAY_TO_GET_ALL_OF_THE_DATA_OUT_OF_THE_BLACK_BOX [00:03] Rather than making 45000 requests. [00:03] Which might get the LOSAs to murder us. [00:04] actually, multidistrotools + p-l-b + Harvest might get me what I want [00:07] mwhudson: regarding matplotlib, what do you mean by using rsync? [00:07] LaserJock: you can get the repository files from sf using rsync [00:07] then do the import from a file:/// url on the code import machine [00:08] ah, I see [00:08] is it because the SVN repo is so large? [00:10] yeah, and because cscvs sucks so bad [00:10] (but it's being worked on now!) === kiko is now known as kiko-fud [00:35] oh clucking bells, the rsync to sf timed out [00:36] at least that restarts better than cscvs :) [00:36] Haha. [00:36] Don't they still have LP blocked? [00:36] And can't cscvs just pick up from the revision at which it died, or does it really all have to be in one hit? [00:36] (a) not really (b) not doing the rsync from an lp machine [00:37] cscvs is pretty terrible [00:37] some kind of restarting should be possible [00:37] So I've seen/heard. [00:50] launchpad does not like single number versions (like "6") when registering releases, can some admin please delete this "release", it has incorrect version "6.0": https://launchpad.net/jackmixer/trunk/6.0/ [00:52] nedko: ask a question at answers.launchpad.net/launchpad for this sort of thing [00:52] mwhudson: ok [01:36] mwhudson: can you please review this svn branch import: https://code.launchpad.net/~vcs-imports/laditools/trunk [03:17] mwhudson: thank you [03:26] hey I just tried uploading a package to my PPA but this is the error by email: PPA uploads must be for the RELEASE pocket. What does that mean? [03:30] andresj: it means your version it target to post-release pocket (hardy-{updates, security, proposed}). PPAs only have the release pocket ('hardy') [03:31] cprov-afk: oh... but my package i think needs hardy-backports dependencies. [03:33] andresj: right, currently PPAs cannot use the corresponding backported packages, see https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/soyuz/+bug/246685 [03:33] Ubuntu bug 246685 in soyuz "PPA dependency with backports" [Medium,Confirmed] [03:35] andresj: it will be possible soon, meanwhile you have to reproduce the backporting context in your PPA by uploading & rebuilding everything you need from -backports. [03:36] cprov-afk: oh... is it possible to use the Copy function? [03:37] andresj: only for other PPAs, not yet for packages in the primary archive. [03:39] oh ok, so I should `apt-source install `, then `dput ppa P_V_source.changes`, right? Do i have to sign it with my signature? [03:39] *, cprov-afk? :) [03:41] andresj: `apt-get source ` [03:41] cprov-afk: oh; what's the difference? [03:42] andresj: then for each of them `debuild -S` (which will build and sign the source packages) [03:43] andresj: you don't necessarily want to install the binary packages dependencies in your system, but instead download their corresponding sources and re-upload them to your PPA. [03:43] cprov-afk: (oh i see the diff :) mm... i see i see; should I add ~ppa1 to the changelog, too? [03:45] andresj: IMO, it's not necessary, since they would not be available otherwise [03:45] andresj: Yes, you should. [03:45] using the same versions might become a problem if you have both your PPA and -backports enabled in your system [03:45] which I do :) [03:45] In which case you want the real ones to supersede. [03:46] ok, so I will add ~ppa1 and stuff to the changelog, then, too :) [03:46] thanks for your help! :) oh btw, pbuild will tell me which are the dependencies not in hardy RELEASE, right? [03:46] * wgrant curses X, and reboots. [03:47] hahaha [03:48] Ctrl-Alt-Backspace? [03:54] andresj: yes, pbuilder will help locally, or if you prefer you can extract that information from the PPA build log (retrying the build a couple times) [03:54] mm... i think ill go with pbuilder, cuz it takes a while to upload to the PPA. I'll troubleshoot the actual compiling in the PPA build logs, since it would take a lot of time here :P [03:56] oh well, builders are dealing with another lang-pack tsunami right now :( [03:57] hahaha [03:57] andresj: but they are low-priority [03:57] so is mine haha [03:58] wow 22 mins building [03:58] andresj: anything else will be built immediately [03:58] oh i see what u mean [03:59] oh hey is it possible to make binary-only uploads? [04:00] cprov-afk? [04:00] wgrant? [04:00] andresj: no [04:00] No, that would be very bad. [04:01] oh really? because there is one package in backports that i think will take long to compile [04:01] by breaking the most valuable PPA characteristic, IMHO: binaries you see what really built from the associated sources [04:02] cprov-afk: That characteristic is already violated by them being unsigned, but yes. [04:02] wgrant: no, it's isn't [04:02] but what about uploading binary just for the sake of meeting the dependency; and then letting launchpad build it again from source [04:02] mm... [04:02] wgrant: i never was, since ppa.l.n was never poisoned. The problem is that we can't guarantee that. [04:02] this is wierd [04:03] cprov-afk: The binaries apt sees on ppa.launchpad.net could be those injected by Mallory's proxy. [04:03] boost is listed in the pbuild log as being the dependencies not met (actually, libboost-*-dev); but when I see the debian/changelog, it is in hardy. [04:03] wgrant: stop hitting the same thing again and again ;) what will you do when that bug gets fixed ? [04:04] cprov-afk: Have less to complain about :( [04:04] any help? :D [04:05] andresj: What's the exact error? [04:05] what if i complain too? the launchpad packages are not signed!! :@ [04:05] wgrant: yes, as life was supposed to be. [04:05] cprov-afk: Indeed! [04:05] well its long [04:05] the part i think is important is [04:05] (flood warning:) [04:05] The following packages have unmet dependencies: [04:05] pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy: Depends: libboost-filesystem-dev which is a virtual package. [04:05] Depends: libboost-iostreams-dev which is a virtual package. [04:05] Depends: libboost-regex-dev which is a virtual package. [04:05] Depends: libboost-signals-dev which is a virtual package. [04:06] Depends: libboost-test-dev which is a virtual package. [04:06] The following actions will resolve these dependencies: Remove the following packages: pbuilder-satisfydepends-dummy [04:08] * cprov-afk waves and really goes afk [04:08] hahaha [04:09] wgrant? :) [04:09] andresj: Hard to say. I use sbuild myself. [04:09] mm.. what does it do? [04:09] Nor do I use boost. [04:09] Try #ubuntu-motu. [04:10] mm... ill try using sbuild--however it is used :P [04:11] Don't. [04:11] oh why/ [04:12] Somewhat more invasive to set up. [04:14] oh i see i see [04:14] well im asking in #ubuntu-motu... although im not sure if im making myself clear :P [04:27] aw!! hey wgrant, do u know why they sent me this? "Rejected: Signer has no upload rights at all to this distribution.Not permitted to upload to the RELEASE pocket in a series in the 'CURRENT' state." [04:28] andresj: You uploaded to Ubuntu, not your PPA. [04:29] wgrant, my ppa is ~andresjriofrio/ubuntu/, no? it worked when I uploaded to intrepid. [04:29] andresj: It is. [04:29] You probably left the 'my-ppa' or similar out of 'dput my-ppa something_someversion_source.changes' [04:29] ooh!! [04:29] i htink i did [04:29] yep thats it [04:29] hahaha thanks :) [04:30] np [04:54] Time to ask again, now that my connection appears slightly stable: The package xserver-xgl has been removed from the archives. Is there a way to mass-close all the bugs against it? [04:57] RAOF: I've used a single email in the past. [04:57] ' status invalid\n\nxserver-xgl has been removed from Intrepid.' [04:57] CC that to all of your bugs, and you are done. [04:57] wgrant: As in: the email interface? I was hoping not to have to enumerate each of the open bugs; there's a couple of hundred of them. [04:58] Ah. [04:58] You might be able to use python-launchpad-bugs. [04:58] Or screenscrape the list of bugs and turn that into a list of Ccs. [04:58] Urgh. [04:59] There's no button in LP to do it. [05:01] hahaha [05:01] there's a new API; maybe u can use that [05:02] That unfortunately gives one no facility to enumerate bugtasks against a package. [05:03] um... that's not good, then. [05:04] Yet. [05:04] well its time for me to take a taste of my own medicine; adding my PPA to my sources.list [05:06] Is there any documentation for python-launchpad-bugs? [05:06] yep; ill need to upload boost too [05:07] or not? f! [06:59] Hi, how to upload releases of your project? === poolie__ is now known as poolie [09:16] Hmm, uploading large files seems to give an error at launchpad, saying that I should try again in 2 minutes, but I re-tried several times, not succeeding [09:16] isnt there a different way (e.g. using ssh) to upload stuff? [09:17] pro-rsoft: copy it over to a different place, then upload from there? [09:17] there's no ssh accessabile to non-employees, afaik. [09:18] uhm, launchpad does not support uploading via url [09:18] Hobbsee: employees can't upload over ssh either [09:18] I need to http upload it, that seems to be the only way [09:18] I want to upload a new release of a project, not succeeding. [09:18] lifeless: i thought you guys could ssh into chinstrap, then beyond.. [09:19] Hobbsee: launchpad downloads are just http POST'd [09:19] Hobbsee: for everyone [09:19] The only file that succeeded yet is 32.4 kb (the release notes) [09:19] pro-rsoft: well what error do you get? [09:19] lifeless: my mistake - but i thought this was an *upload*? [09:20] lifeless, I dont remember, let me try to reproduce [09:20] Hobbsee: yes [09:20] it first takes about 15 minutes then it aborts with that error [09:20] Hobbsee: to upload a file to launchpad, for the launchpad downloads facility, you have to HTTP POST it [09:20] pro-rsoft: you probably have a broken HTTP proxy [09:20] i dont [09:21] uploading smaller file works, but not files around 50mb [09:21] oh [09:21] I think there is a size limit [09:21] the limit is 60MiB [09:21] hmm [09:21] and my files are less than that [09:22] lifeless: um, OK :) [09:22] If it's Launchpad telling you to retry, it must be Launchpad's fault... [09:22] yeah [09:23] Hobbsee: https://edge.launchpad.net/bzr/+download for instance [09:23] I just tried a 22mb file which worked [09:24] lifeless: right [10:54] Hmm, I got the error again [10:55] will post screenshot [10:55] http://imgbin.org/images/160.png [10:56] it only happens when uploading the larger files (but still smaller than 60mib) === pro-rsoft is now known as pro-rsoft|lunch [11:30] * Hobbsee blinks [11:30] launchpad, why don't you be *useful* when searching? [11:32] if i've got an advanced search that I've run, and then i pick a different sort option, then i *probably* want the advanced search query to still apply, and for you to just reorder the results. What I *don't* want is for you to throw out the advanced search criteria, and give me back the whole lot of entries, whether they match the advanced search criteria or not - albeit, ordered the desired way. [11:33] Advanced search really needs a makeover. [11:33] that's true - but i think they have done some work, as it doesn't show all the old milestones now. [11:34] so it only shows 13, not 50+ [11:37] hi [11:38] how can I send translation import request to launchpad without browser? [12:04] Hobbsee: wait till they integrate more of google into LP to get a useable search :) [12:05] geser: oh, that'd be nice. i do often search launchpad via google. [12:05] if i don't know what i'm looking for, but only a general search term. === pro-rsoft|lunch is now known as pro-rsoft === fta_ is now known as fta === pro-rsoft is now known as pro-rsoft|bbl [13:16] how would one go about installing launchpad on its own server? i did not see any packaged download [13:22] epsy: you can't. [13:22] is it planned to have it possible one day? [13:23] yes, before oscon next year. === pro-rsoft|bbl is now known as pro-rsoft [13:25] would it also be possible to integrate the whole launchpad project into your own website layout? [13:25] uhm..when is oscon? [13:25] pro-rsoft, magic stick [13:25] ;) [13:26] magic stick? [13:26] pro-rsoft, you will have to do some work on your own [13:26] well, you would* [13:26] yeah, of course [13:27] but is it already possible or will it only be possible at 'oscon' ? [13:27] since it hasn't been released to the public.. [13:27] ah [14:36] hi, i'm using ubuntu and sent several hwtest reports, therefore i had to give the email i used for launchpad. where can i find those reports? [15:09] hi, does launchpad offer the functionality of sending emails to project members upon bzr commits? [15:41] theine: yes [15:45] theine: the subscription list for a particular bzr branch appears in the right hand side of the page. You can also add and remove subscriptions from there [15:48] mdke: ah, thanks, didn't notice that I wasn't actually subscribed. silly me... === kiko is now known as kiko-afk === barry-away is now known as barry === jordi_ is now known as jordi