/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2008/09/06/#ubuntu-bugs.txt

emmaHi. Every time I start FireFox and then try to go to YouTube at http://youtube.com, the browser crashes. Is there a log or any other vital information I should include in an effective bug report for this? I am running 64 bit Ubuntu Intrepid.00:06
bdmurrayemma: reinstall flashplugin nonfree00:07
emmaOkay.00:07
bdmurrayI forgot the bug number already00:07
bdmurrayoh heh00:09
bdmurraybug 262693 I think00:09
ubottuLaunchpad bug 262693 in nspluginwrapper "Flash not working: Intrepid, 2.6.27, FF3" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/26269300:09
bdmurrayyep00:10
emmahey seems to be working now. Thank you although I was not here for the fix, that's great.00:12
emmaI guess that the devs know about it anyhow.00:12
bdmurrayyep00:12
dupondjefglrx doesn't work with newest kernel ...00:25
bdmurraythat's correct00:27
SpetsIn alpha?00:27
dupondjehttps://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fglrx-installer/+bug/26695600:30
ubottuUbuntu bug 266956 in fglrx-installer "fglrx fails to compile with 2.6.27-2 kernel" [Undecided,New]00:30
dupondjethere wasn't a bug report yet it seems00:30
bdmurrayI believe there were some discussions about it on ubuntu-devel or devel-discuss though00:32
dupondjeits quite easy to fix tho00:34
SpetsI'll wait with the a5 install then00:36
dupondjesmp_call_function(func, info, wait)00:37
dupondjethis is on 2.6.2700:37
emmaI am seeing a lot of these errors from firefox -- *** NSPlugin Wrapper *** WARNING: unhandled variable 11 in NPP_GetValue()00:37
dupondjesmp_call_function(func, info, retry, wait)00:37
dupondjethis is on <=2.6.2600:37
emma*** NSPlugin Wrapper *** ERROR: NPP_HandleEvent() invoke: Connection closed00:37
emma*** NSPlugin Wrapper *** ERROR: NPP_GetValue() invoke: Connection closed00:37
emma*** NSPlugin Wrapper *** WARNING: unhandled variable 11 in NPP_GetValue()00:37
CarlFKbug #26695900:39
ubottuLaunchpad bug 266959 in ubuntu "remove_conffile_commit(" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/26695900:39
CarlFKother than the lame title, is there anything else I should add to that?00:39
bdmurrayCarlFK: a package would be good00:41
CarlFKx11-common ?00:41
bdmurraythat's correct00:41
hggdhand something like "postinst error: ...00:41
hggdhas the title00:42
CarlFKyeah, notiec that lame title after I saved it.00:42
hggdh:-)00:42
CarlFKcan I change it?00:42
hggdhyes. click on the yellow ! mark by the title00:43
CarlFKheh - always wondered what that was00:44
CarlFK"'x11-common' is a binary package. This bug has been assigned to its source package 'xorg' instead."00:44
CarlFKgood?00:45
bdmurrayyeah, launchpad knows how to deal with that00:45
hggdhalthough the package pretty much will force a Ubuntu version, it is usually good to state which one it is (Intrepid, in this case). But no big deal right now00:47
hggdhCarlFK, just for grins, I did not have this problem :-)00:48
CarlFKof course not :)00:49
Ampelbeinhmm. what is the right package to assign to for a bug with the availability of live-cds? bug #25797601:16
ubottuLaunchpad bug 257976 in ubuntu "daily live cds not available for powerpc" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/25797601:16
bdmurraythat's a dup01:17
bdmurraynot that I know which one is the master though01:17
bdmurraycheck ubuntu-meta though01:17
bdmurraybug 17347401:20
ubottuLaunchpad bug 173474 in ubuntu "daily live cds not available for powerpc" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/17347401:20
bdmurraywell, not that one01:20
Ampelbein173474 looks good to me. and i cant find another.01:29
Ampelbeinthat one's funny: bug #25675401:34
ubottuLaunchpad bug 256754 in ubuntu "Unsatable system" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/25675401:34
hggdhwell, indeed different, to say the least02:32
=== LucidFox is now known as Sikon
=== Sikon is now known as LucidFox
=== Initial_1 is now known as Initial_M
=== mcas is now known as mcas_away
=== stefanlsd_ is now known as stefanlsd
=== mcas_away is now known as mcas
=== asac_ is now known as asac
CarlFKhow do I downgrade a package?14:36
CarlFKbug 261977 says "please downgrade the other packages that were updated"14:36
ubottuLaunchpad bug 261977 in xorg-server "nv is chosen even if it doesn't support the card" [Medium,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/26197714:36
gnomefreakCarlFK: sudo apt-get install package=versionyouwant if it is still in cache but you should really be asking this in a support channel15:09
gnomefreakand pin the package so its not upgraded until you release the pin15:09
gnomefreaksee /msg ubottu pinning15:10
Turl1hello15:51
Turl1can you mark https://bugs.launchpad.net/language-selector/+bug/254316 as important?15:52
ubottuUbuntu bug 254316 in language-selector "Language Support doesn't install Firefox Locales" [Undecided,New]15:52
Turl1and maybe confirm it?15:52
gnomefreakTurl1: try to install those packages15:55
Turl1what packages?15:55
gnomefreakmozilla-firefox-locale-es-es15:55
gnomefreakmaybe mozilla-firefox-locale-es-ar but first one should do it15:55
Turl1I have es-ar installed15:56
=== mcas is now known as mcas_away
Turl1gnomefreak, installed es-ar & es-es and ff is still in english16:02
gnomefreakTurl1: did you change it to use es16:03
Turl1isn't it automatically handled by the package config? if not, how do I do?16:03
gnomefreaknot real sure im thinking only if your whole system is in spanish from install (dont quote me on that) i use english maybe a bug in how its handled but the bug you have isnt a bug since you didnt have right packages installd16:09
Turl1but I am reporting the fact that language-manager didn't install the packages when it should have16:12
Turl1gnomefreak, even if the packages are outdated, they should have been installed16:12
Turl1can you mark it as Important?16:13
Turl1brb16:13
gnomefreakTurl1: that bug isnt a bug please restate the issue16:14
Turlgnomefreak, are you there?16:19
gnomefreakyes im hre16:19
gnomefreakworking but here16:19
Turlgnomefreak, the thing is, if you install a language using language-selector, in this case spanish, firefox locales need to be installed16:20
Turlbut they don't get installed, so I installed them manually, but they don't work as they are outdated16:21
Turlthere are two different bugs there, I know16:21
TurlI'm reporting the first one, the fact that they don't get installed as they should16:21
gnomefreakwhat version of firefox?16:22
Turlthe latest in intrepid16:22
Turllet me see16:22
Turl 3.0.1+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu216:23
gnomefreakok maybe asac didnt rebuidl them or set them to be updated. however the bug you have doesnt have correct info for bug report since the packages need to be installed please update bug with the info you gave me with versions of firefox and locales installed16:24
Turlok16:25
gnomefreakTurl: asac would be the man to speak to but please update bug first assuming he is at pc or has time to look today16:27
ApOgEE-hi all16:27
gnomefreakill be back a bit later16:30
Turlgnomefreak, updated the bug16:35
gnomefreakTurl: hold that thought16:43
gnomefreakthere may be a different name for -3.0. are you on instrepid?16:44
gnomefreakTurl: yep they need to be updated for 3.0 is all it is. asac <<< is this still automaticly done or rebuild by hand?16:46
gnomefreakor we package them in a different locales package like in hardy but that was supposed to be changed in Intrepid16:46
Turlyes, I'm on intrepid16:48
=== emma is now known as |riVen|
=== |riVen| is now known as emma
ZeetreX`hi18:43
ikthi18:43
ZeetreX`may i ask a question here?18:44
iktdon't see why not18:44
ZeetreX`:)18:44
iktMy problem isn't asking a question, it's finding someone who can answer it18:44
ZeetreX`dunno how to solve the apt-cdrom problem "E: Failed to mount the cdrom"18:44
iktah18:45
iktthat would probably be best asked in #ubuntu18:45
ZeetreX`ok18:46
=== mcas_away is now known as mcas
=== eddie is now known as Guest72872
=== tuxmaniac is now known as Shilpa_
=== Shilpa_ is now known as tuxmaniac
CarlFK/msg ubottu pinning22:01
CarlFKI never got this: (09:10:04 AM) gnomefreak: see /msg ubottu pinning22:02
CarlFKdoh22:02
CarlFKgot it.  stupid pidgin cut/paste22:02
SavagoHello friends.22:14
SavagoI was wondering when newer bluetooth related package will be released to Hardy?22:15
SavagoMore specifically, I'm worried about bug 227429 and 211252.22:16
ubottuLaunchpad bug 227429 in bluez-utils "[hardy] Bluetooth Serial Port undiscoverable (dup-of: 211252)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/22742922:16
ubottuLaunchpad bug 211252 in obex-data-server "Cannot recieve files using bluetooth" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/21125222:16
=== mcas is now known as mcas_away
=== hggdh is now known as hggdh|away
nellery_any bugcontrol admins around?23:10
bdmurraynellery: what's up?23:26
nellerybdmurray, my membership is about to expire... would it be possible to extend it on?23:31
bdmurraynellery: checking23:35
nellerybdmurray, thanks23:36
bdmurraynellery: done!  Thanks for helping out.23:38
nellerybdmurray, thank you23:39
bdmurraybug 26410523:44
ubottuLaunchpad bug 264105 in ubuntu "[needs-packaging]" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/26410523:44

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!