[00:06] <emma> Hi. Every time I start FireFox and then try to go to YouTube at http://youtube.com, the browser crashes. Is there a log or any other vital information I should include in an effective bug report for this? I am running 64 bit Ubuntu Intrepid.
[00:07] <bdmurray> emma: reinstall flashplugin nonfree
[00:07] <emma> Okay.
[00:07] <bdmurray> I forgot the bug number already
[00:09] <bdmurray> oh heh
[00:09] <bdmurray> bug 262693 I think
[00:09] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 262693 in nspluginwrapper "Flash not working: Intrepid, 2.6.27, FF3" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/262693
[00:10] <bdmurray> yep
[00:12] <emma> hey seems to be working now. Thank you although I was not here for the fix, that's great.
[00:12] <emma> I guess that the devs know about it anyhow.
[00:12] <bdmurray> yep
[00:25] <dupondje> fglrx doesn't work with newest kernel ...
[00:27] <bdmurray> that's correct
[00:27] <Spets> In alpha?
[00:30] <dupondje> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fglrx-installer/+bug/266956
[00:30] <ubottu> Ubuntu bug 266956 in fglrx-installer "fglrx fails to compile with 2.6.27-2 kernel" [Undecided,New]
[00:30] <dupondje> there wasn't a bug report yet it seems
[00:32] <bdmurray> I believe there were some discussions about it on ubuntu-devel or devel-discuss though
[00:34] <dupondje> its quite easy to fix tho
[00:36] <Spets> I'll wait with the a5 install then
[00:37] <dupondje> smp_call_function(func, info, wait)
[00:37] <dupondje> this is on 2.6.27
[00:37] <emma> I am seeing a lot of these errors from firefox -- *** NSPlugin Wrapper *** WARNING: unhandled variable 11 in NPP_GetValue()
[00:37] <dupondje> smp_call_function(func, info, retry, wait)
[00:37] <dupondje> this is on <=2.6.26
[00:37] <emma> *** NSPlugin Wrapper *** ERROR: NPP_HandleEvent() invoke: Connection closed
[00:37] <emma> *** NSPlugin Wrapper *** ERROR: NPP_GetValue() invoke: Connection closed
[00:37] <emma> *** NSPlugin Wrapper *** WARNING: unhandled variable 11 in NPP_GetValue()
[00:39] <CarlFK> bug #266959
[00:39] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 266959 in ubuntu "remove_conffile_commit(" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/266959
[00:39] <CarlFK> other than the lame title, is there anything else I should add to that?
[00:41] <bdmurray> CarlFK: a package would be good
[00:41] <CarlFK> x11-common ?
[00:41] <bdmurray> that's correct
[00:41] <hggdh> and something like "postinst error: ...
[00:42] <hggdh> as the title
[00:42] <CarlFK> yeah, notiec that lame title after I saved it.
[00:42] <hggdh> :-)
[00:42] <CarlFK> can I change it?
[00:43] <hggdh> yes. click on the yellow ! mark by the title
[00:44] <CarlFK> heh - always wondered what that was
[00:44] <CarlFK> "'x11-common' is a binary package. This bug has been assigned to its source package 'xorg' instead."
[00:45] <CarlFK> good?
[00:45] <bdmurray> yeah, launchpad knows how to deal with that
[00:47] <hggdh> although the package pretty much will force a Ubuntu version, it is usually good to state which one it is (Intrepid, in this case). But no big deal right now
[00:48] <hggdh> CarlFK, just for grins, I did not have this problem :-)
[00:49] <CarlFK> of course not :)
[01:16] <Ampelbein> hmm. what is the right package to assign to for a bug with the availability of live-cds? bug #257976
[01:16] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 257976 in ubuntu "daily live cds not available for powerpc" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/257976
[01:17] <bdmurray> that's a dup
[01:17] <bdmurray> not that I know which one is the master though
[01:17] <bdmurray> check ubuntu-meta though
[01:20] <bdmurray> bug 173474
[01:20] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 173474 in ubuntu "daily live cds not available for powerpc" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/173474
[01:20] <bdmurray> well, not that one
[01:29] <Ampelbein> 173474 looks good to me. and i cant find another.
[01:34] <Ampelbein> that one's funny: bug #256754
[01:34] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 256754 in ubuntu "Unsatable system" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/256754
[02:32] <hggdh> well, indeed different, to say the least
=== LucidFox is now known as Sikon
=== Sikon is now known as LucidFox
=== Initial_1 is now known as Initial_M
=== mcas is now known as mcas_away
=== stefanlsd_ is now known as stefanlsd
=== mcas_away is now known as mcas
=== asac_ is now known as asac
[14:36] <CarlFK> how do I downgrade a package?
[14:36] <CarlFK> bug 261977 says "please downgrade the other packages that were updated"
[14:36] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 261977 in xorg-server "nv is chosen even if it doesn't support the card" [Medium,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/261977
[15:09] <gnomefreak> CarlFK: sudo apt-get install package=versionyouwant if it is still in cache but you should really be asking this in a support channel
[15:09] <gnomefreak> and pin the package so its not upgraded until you release the pin
[15:10] <gnomefreak> see /msg ubottu pinning
[15:51] <Turl1> hello
[15:52] <Turl1> can you mark https://bugs.launchpad.net/language-selector/+bug/254316 as important?
[15:52] <ubottu> Ubuntu bug 254316 in language-selector "Language Support doesn't install Firefox Locales" [Undecided,New]
[15:52] <Turl1> and maybe confirm it?
[15:55] <gnomefreak> Turl1: try to install those packages
[15:55] <Turl1> what packages?
[15:55] <gnomefreak> mozilla-firefox-locale-es-es
[15:55] <gnomefreak> maybe mozilla-firefox-locale-es-ar but first one should do it
[15:56] <Turl1> I have es-ar installed
=== mcas is now known as mcas_away
[16:02] <Turl1> gnomefreak, installed es-ar & es-es and ff is still in english
[16:03] <gnomefreak> Turl1: did you change it to use es
[16:03] <Turl1> isn't it automatically handled by the package config? if not, how do I do?
[16:09] <gnomefreak> not real sure im thinking only if your whole system is in spanish from install (dont quote me on that) i use english maybe a bug in how its handled but the bug you have isnt a bug since you didnt have right packages installd
[16:12] <Turl1> but I am reporting the fact that language-manager didn't install the packages when it should have
[16:12] <Turl1> gnomefreak, even if the packages are outdated, they should have been installed
[16:13] <Turl1> can you mark it as Important?
[16:13] <Turl1> brb
[16:14] <gnomefreak> Turl1: that bug isnt a bug please restate the issue
[16:19] <Turl> gnomefreak, are you there?
[16:19] <gnomefreak> yes im hre
[16:19] <gnomefreak> working but here
[16:20] <Turl> gnomefreak, the thing is, if you install a language using language-selector, in this case spanish, firefox locales need to be installed
[16:21] <Turl> but they don't get installed, so I installed them manually, but they don't work as they are outdated
[16:21] <Turl> there are two different bugs there, I know
[16:21] <Turl> I'm reporting the first one, the fact that they don't get installed as they should
[16:22] <gnomefreak> what version of firefox?
[16:22] <Turl> the latest in intrepid
[16:22] <Turl> let me see
[16:23] <Turl>  3.0.1+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu2
[16:24] <gnomefreak> ok maybe asac didnt rebuidl them or set them to be updated. however the bug you have doesnt have correct info for bug report since the packages need to be installed please update bug with the info you gave me with versions of firefox and locales installed
[16:25] <Turl> ok
[16:27] <gnomefreak> Turl: asac would be the man to speak to but please update bug first assuming he is at pc or has time to look today
[16:27] <ApOgEE-> hi all
[16:30] <gnomefreak> ill be back a bit later
[16:35] <Turl> gnomefreak, updated the bug
[16:43] <gnomefreak> Turl: hold that thought
[16:44] <gnomefreak> there may be a different name for -3.0. are you on instrepid?
[16:46] <gnomefreak> Turl: yep they need to be updated for 3.0 is all it is. asac <<< is this still automaticly done or rebuild by hand?
[16:46] <gnomefreak> or we package them in a different locales package like in hardy but that was supposed to be changed in Intrepid
[16:48] <Turl> yes, I'm on intrepid
=== emma is now known as |riVen|
=== |riVen| is now known as emma
[18:43] <ZeetreX`> hi
[18:43] <ikt> hi
[18:44] <ZeetreX`> may i ask a question here?
[18:44] <ikt> don't see why not
[18:44] <ZeetreX`> :)
[18:44] <ikt> My problem isn't asking a question, it's finding someone who can answer it
[18:44] <ZeetreX`> dunno how to solve the apt-cdrom problem "E: Failed to mount the cdrom"
[18:45] <ikt> ah
[18:45] <ikt> that would probably be best asked in #ubuntu
[18:46] <ZeetreX`> ok
=== mcas_away is now known as mcas
=== eddie is now known as Guest72872
=== tuxmaniac is now known as Shilpa_
=== Shilpa_ is now known as tuxmaniac
[22:01] <CarlFK> /msg ubottu pinning
[22:02] <CarlFK> I never got this: (09:10:04 AM) gnomefreak: see /msg ubottu pinning
[22:02] <CarlFK> doh
[22:02] <CarlFK> got it.  stupid pidgin cut/paste
[22:14] <Savago> Hello friends.
[22:15] <Savago> I was wondering when newer bluetooth related package will be released to Hardy?
[22:16] <Savago> More specifically, I'm worried about bug 227429 and 211252.
[22:16] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 227429 in bluez-utils "[hardy] Bluetooth Serial Port undiscoverable (dup-of: 211252)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/227429
[22:16] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 211252 in obex-data-server "Cannot recieve files using bluetooth" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/211252
=== mcas is now known as mcas_away
=== hggdh is now known as hggdh|away
[23:10] <nellery_> any bugcontrol admins around?
[23:26] <bdmurray> nellery: what's up?
[23:31] <nellery> bdmurray, my membership is about to expire... would it be possible to extend it on?
[23:35] <bdmurray> nellery: checking
[23:36] <nellery> bdmurray, thanks
[23:38] <bdmurray> nellery: done!  Thanks for helping out.
[23:39] <nellery> bdmurray, thank you
[23:44] <bdmurray> bug 264105
[23:44] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 264105 in ubuntu "[needs-packaging]" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/264105