[01:07] LaserJock: so it seems broken to have two projects for matplotlib on launchpad [01:07] i guess one should be deactivated [01:07] mwhudson: well, if you want to import the code that actually goes into the released tarball I think python2.4-matplotlib has the right branch [01:07] python2.4-matplotlib seems a little older and a little more active [01:07] but it has a silly name [01:07] yeah [01:08] can you move that branch to matplotlib? [01:08] it looks like somebody named the project after the package, not the actual project name [01:08] or even the source package name, as that's matplotlib too [01:08] another option would be to kill off the current matplotlib project and rename the python2.4-matplotlib to something more sensible [01:10] can you rename python2.4-matplotlib to matplotlib after killing the current one? [01:10] i can't, but an admin can [01:10] ok, I just wondered if there was some issue with renaming to something that had previously existed [01:11] well, i guess the admin can rename matplotlib to matplotlib-dead or something [01:11] LaserJock: can you ask a question for this? [01:11] well, I'd rather not have confusing cruft if we can help it [01:12] and yeah, I'll ask a question [01:12] should the question be for launchpad and not codehosting? [01:12] LaserJock: rename it to matplotlib-dead, then kill it, i mean [01:12] t [01:12] ah [01:12] LaserJock: yes, launchpad, this isn't really to do with codehosting any more [01:12] right [01:12] thanks for the help === salgado is now known as salgado-afk [01:53] So when you fill a bug you click report and click the bug if there is a duplicate then thats it? [01:58] any one/ [01:58] timo: not sure i understand the question [01:59] if it suggests duplicates you can click the suggestion for more detail [01:59] ok, Say i file a bug [01:59] if that is in fact the bug you've encounterd, tick its checkbox and press ok [02:00] yes but i have reported many bugs but looking at my account says i have 3 bugs reported how? [02:01] can you give me the url of the page that says that? [02:01] i just reported this bug but nothing has change in the original bug report https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/totem/+bug/173878 [02:01] Launchpad bug 173878 in totem "totem-gstreamer crashed with SIGSEGV in malloc()" [Medium,Invalid] [02:02] Am i making sense ? [02:02] sure [02:03] what is it that you want to know? [02:03] How do i file bugs [02:03] are you 'neptune'? [02:04] in widows you just click on report , but in ubuntu you have to log on don't you? , then what [02:05] no im tim [02:05] are you experiencing the same problem described in 173878? [02:06] or do you want to report a different bug? [02:06] same problems [02:07] and do you have a launchpad account? [02:07] and reported it by clicking on the report icon and clicking send then loged on and selected the bug that i thin it is [02:07] ok i see [02:08] but the bug stays the same how do the debuggers know the bug has changes with new info. [02:08] and did you press 'ok' after choosing that bug? [02:08] um [02:08] maybe the 'choose a duplicate' page is confusing [02:08] It still has the 2007 dates [02:08] did you click the link, or press the radiobutton? [02:08] the link to the bug itself [02:09] ok [02:09] you need to back up in your browser history and pick the radio button [02:09] no radio here bud https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/totem/+filebug/x4KFeLG8WJmJBZsA1EUY32fpgql [02:11] oh that's really interesting [02:11] i think you've found a launchpad bug or at least misdesign [02:11] Hope im the only one [02:12] so, basically what i suggest you do is enter your own summary, even if it's similar to what's already there [02:12] been reporting some time now [02:12] like 'totem crashed trying to play avi file' or whatever [02:12] and place log files? [02:14] it should then automatically attach your files to that new bug [02:14] thing is the crash is a bit random. [02:15] i suggest you just report a new bug with the files attached then [02:15] and as much description as you can give [02:15] ok [02:17] do you know where the log would be place om my computer for totem [02:17] not off hand [02:18] i filed bug 267971, you can comment on that too [02:18] Launchpad bug 267971 in malone "user confusion about how what to do with 'most frequently reported bugs'" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/267971 [02:18] or subscribe to it [02:20] Its prob just me. and my computer nothing wrong with the bug system [02:22] subscribed [02:24] thanks for all the help [05:15] * Hobbsee wonders if there's any useful mail from launchpad she actually needs, apart from bugs. [05:16] everything launchpad has a X-launchpad-* header now, doesn't it? [05:18] Hobbsee: it should have [05:18] Hobbsee: if it doesn't, then you should file a bug :) [05:20] hmmm.... [05:20] which would hopefully get fixed relatively quickly, too [05:20] * Hobbsee looks at filters [08:51] Hmm, team approval messages don't have an X-Launchpad-* header, just "X-Generated-By: Launchpad (canonical.com)". === fta_ is now known as fta [10:12] Hrmph. [10:12] Is it deliberate that milestones don't have their own set of tabs? [10:13] It seems impossible to escape from from a milestone's +subscribe, and one can't easily get from the blueprint list to bug list or vice versa. [10:28] hi, i'm trying to use my new @ubuntu.com address but it doesn't work (yet). could anyone come to my rescue ? :) [10:28] hello [10:29] i've two active gpg keys at LP. is it possible to use 3rd email address and sign it with one of those 2 keys to submit bug-report to LP? [10:29] fta: You want #canonical-sysadmin. They shouldn't bounce you around any more. [10:30] But it won't happen immediately. [10:30] As there's a cron job that does it, IIRC. [10:30] gour: I think that the email address needs to match. [10:30] i see [10:30] Don't quote me on that, though. [10:30] :-) [10:31] well, let's make an experiment :-) [10:31] wgrant, how often is that cron runing? daily? weekly? any idea? [10:31] any test address where one can send testing bug report via email? [10:32] fta: #canonical-sysadmin would know. [10:35] wgrant, i thought it was a channel on a private server, apparently not ;) [10:36] fta: #is the one on a private server. [10:36] Er, "#is is the one" === hubuntu_ is now known as hubuntu [11:10] If I want to file a bug about a certain email not containing an X-Launchpad header, where should I do it? https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad ? [11:12] Peng_: What is the email? [11:13] Could someone look into https://code.launchpad.net/~vcs-imports/pyparsing/trunk ? It cannot be imported because something is broken, and before fixing that, it's useless to try to import every 5 hours. [11:14] wgrant: Just the "you've been accepted into a team" one. It may not be worth reporting. [11:14] Peng_: That's appropriate for launchpad-foundations. [11:15] Leonidas: done [11:15] wgrant: So I should file it? Alright. [11:17] mwhudson: thanks. Now, is there a way to get it running? I suspected that I use the wrong URL for the SVN-Repo, but I'm not sure. [11:17] Leonidas: not with a repo layout like that, i think [11:19] Leonidas: unless importing just https://pyparsing.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/pyparsing/src/ would be useful [11:20] mwhudson: thats enough since the other folders are empty anyway. [11:20] Leonidas: oh, ok :) [11:21] (no idea why the repo layout is so strange %-) [11:21] running the import system you encounter all sorts of strange things :) [11:22] (cvs is better at total wtf-ness than svn though) [11:24] mwhudson: thanks. I tried contacting folks via email, but never got an answer. [12:18] I was wondering, would having to be both the admin of a team and the owner of a project to be able to set the team as the bug superviser for the project a bug? If someone wants to set a team as the bug supervisor, and the team wants to receive the bugmail, but whoever owns the project isn't an admin in the bug-email team / doesn't want to be, wouldn't they be stuck? [12:43] fta: re: email: don't use your gmail account to test it, if it's forwarding to a gmail acccount. [12:44] Hobbsee, don't worry, i didn't. it's fine now, thanks to elmo [12:45] fta: ah, cool. various other people have, and have run into that problem. [12:49] fta: :( [12:49] Hobbsee, .. and thanks to jpds :) [12:49] :) [12:51] i'm all smile today.. great success with a project at work, and motu since yesterday :) [12:51] * fta is happy [12:52] * fta hugs everyone [12:53] * jpds hugs fta. === salgado-afk is now known as salgado === mrevell is now known as mrevell-lunch === _DasIch is now known as DasIch === mrevell-lunch is now known as mrevell [14:48] is it possible to set 'importance' and 'tag' for newly created bug via email interface? [14:48] yes [14:48] afaik, anyway. [14:48] assuming you have rights to do so normally [14:49] well, if i'm member of the team [14:49] gour, https://help.launchpad.net/Bugs/EmailInterface [14:49] beuno: not clear from that docs, or if you can point it out ? [14:50] gour: erm... [14:50] gour: try the headings marked 'importance' and 'tag' [14:50] :) [14:51] they're also in the contents thing, in case you missed htat. [14:51] importance - Change the importance of a bug. but it's not clear if it can be set for a new bug [14:51] AFAIK, those apply to new and existing bugs [14:52] * beuno pokes BjornT [14:52] you can change it all at any time. [14:52] i know i can change, but i want to set for new bugs which will be forwarded automatically [14:53] gour: yes, you can set them when filing new bugs [14:53] BjornT: thanks a lot. nice [14:53] thanks BjornT :) [14:55] * gour had to find workaround for creating bug tickets out of automatic bug-reports sent from within the application. all just for the sake to make project use LP and then move to bzr :-) [15:33] what are "private builds" ? [15:38] builds done in a private PPA === Qball is now known as [OldFart] === [OldFart] is now known as [Qball] [16:11] OOPS-983ED85 [16:46] * Ursinha looks at the oops [16:50] the link in PPA build failures still uses internal launchpad address [16:56] where? [17:06] cody-somerville, didn't we update the configs? [17:06] bigjools, ^^^ [17:06] Ursinha, in la e-mails [17:06] * bigjools looks [17:15] cody-somerville: can you file a bug and attach the email please [17:26] i'm having trouble branching the mplayer bzr - i keep getting "error not a branch" from bzr [17:26] other branches work [17:27] i have tried launchpad-login but still no luck [17:28] sam@wildthing:~/dev/mplayer/bzr/mplayer$ bzr launchpad-login sambrightman [17:28] sam@wildthing:~/dev/mplayer/bzr/mplayer$ bzr branch lp:~ubuntu-dev/mplayer/ubuntu dev [17:28] bzr: ERROR: Not a branch: "bzr+ssh://sambrightman@bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-dev/mplayer/ubuntu/". [17:28] could someone please help me figure out what's going on here? [17:32] let me check that out [17:33] abentley, what's going on in the above? [17:34] it doesn't work over http either [17:34] (and ubuntu-hardy branch is empty... maybe that's just the way it is?) [17:36] Launchpad's munging of changelog entries is very "not nice". Please do *not* represent data as something it's not [17:37] LaserJock: can you elaborate please? [17:37] it's a problem that's been known about for several releases and needs to be fixed now [17:38] attributing changelog entries to the wrong people [17:38] primarily for syncs I believe [17:38] can you give me a specific example of that, and I'll look [17:38] sure [17:38] thanks [17:38] compare https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/intrepid/+source/tuxpaint-stamps/2008.03.01-1 [17:38] and http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/main/t/tuxpaint-stamps/tuxpaint-stamps_2008.03.01-1/changelog [17:39] perfect, thanks [17:39] not only did Launchpad strip the attribution from the right person [17:39] it fakes somebody else's into it [17:39] a changelog is *very* easy to get, please use it [17:40] LaserJock: please file a bug if you haven't already and I'll push it through [17:40] lol [17:40] kiko: any ideas? [17:40] a bug has been around for probably a year on this [17:41] samtb, I need abentley to help me out here [17:41] unless rockstar knows what it could be? [17:41] before i used lp-login [17:41] * rockstar perks up [17:42] the error message was referring to http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-dev/mplayer/ubuntu/.bzr/branch/ [17:42] bigjools: see bug #55795 for instance, filed in *2006* [17:42] which colin suggested was old layout or something? [17:42] Launchpad bug 55795 in soyuz "+changelog includes misleading information related to package versions and authors" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/55795 [17:43] LaserJock: thanks [17:44] samtb, there seems to be a problem with that branch. [17:44] :( isn't it the main/current branch? [17:44] intrepid's ubuntu15 seems to be from that plus one change from nhandler [17:44] from what i can tell === kiko is now known as kiko-fud [17:45] but as i said, ubuntu-hardy is empty and ubuntu-intrepid doesn't exist [17:45] samtb, let me take a look at this. [17:45] bigjools: see also bug #139162 and bug #247456 for related [17:45] Launchpad bug 139162 in soyuz "Store the pristine debian/changelog for each SourcePackageRelease" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/139162 [17:45] Launchpad bug 247456 in soyuz "changelog listing are incomplete and/or undiscoverable" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/247456 [17:46] changelog entries are such an unbelievable simple thing for Launchpad to do utterly wrong [17:47] rockstar: i'm gonna have to leave for the night very shortly, can be back tomorrow [17:48] samtb, alright. [17:48] rockstar: what time zone/eta? [17:48] roughly [17:49] samtb, well, not sure an the ETA, but it's a high priority. [17:49] i mean when you'll be around here :) [17:50] hey about karma [17:50] or shall i just leave you to it and keep trying - anything i can do? [17:50] does karma take a while to update? === salgado is now known as salgado-lunch [17:51] emet, yes, it updates every 24hs [17:51] ish === matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch [18:01] <\sh> hmm... [18:01] <\sh> is it planed to have a check against "application name" inside lpapi for apps which are already approved under the same name? [18:03] Who help me? https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/mail-notification/+question/44261 [18:03] <\sh> or is it possible to "reserve" some consumer_key idents for "special" apps? [18:03] is about mailing lists [18:04] jcastro: https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/mail-notification/+question/44261 - Help us! Please.... [18:05] barry: help! [18:05] jcastro: hi [18:06] thx... [18:06] ok, I believe this list was declined initially, and then after that it was decided to have it on launchpad [18:06] but when they reapplied it came up with that error [18:07] initially.. yes.. [18:08] jcastro, ubuntuser question updated [18:08] barry: thanks! [18:08] jcastro, ubuntuser let me know if you need more info [18:08] I suspect that fixing it now would require mangle-age that isn't allowed. :p [18:10] the same problem: The application for this team's mailing list has been declined. Please contact a Launchpad administrator for further assistance. [18:10] ubuntuser: he meants subscribe to the bug, once it's fixed you'll apply again [18:11] Ahh.. ok! [18:11] ubuntuser: go here and click "subscribe" https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad-foundations/+bug/237210 [18:11] Launchpad bug 237210 in launchpad-foundations "should be a way to delete/disconnect a mailing list" [High,In progress] [18:11] thanks jcastro and barry [18:12] cheers! [18:12] np! === beuno_ is now known as beuno === matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara === kiko-fud is now known as kiko [19:16] hello [19:16] any admin available? [19:17] I'm in great need of this reassignation https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/44018 [19:17] is this possible? [19:20] kiko: Sorry, was on lunch. [19:20] abentley, no problemo [19:20] patpiiii, hangona [19:21] patpiiii, the right way to fix that problem would have been to merge the accounts! [19:21] kiko: Do you want me to look at this now? [19:21] patpiiii, I'll reassign to kamil fwiw [19:21] abentley, I'd like to understand how a hosted branch can fail bzr branching, yes [19:23] kiko: [19:23] kiko: There's no branch there, just a repository. [19:23] but the first Arvanil account was deleted [19:23] now it is Kamil Dziedzic [19:23] so merge is impossible [19:24] (i think) [19:24] so if you can pleas assign this to me, "patpi" [19:24] abentley, but visiting the page I see revisions [19:24] or to kamil [19:24] <\sh> kiko: is it planned to package launchpadlib for intrepid? [19:24] can kamil later add another admin to this project? [19:24] patpiiii, indeed it is impossible now. I can reassign to kamil as he requested it. [19:24] \sh, absolutely 100% yes [19:25] ok, but then he would be abble to add me also to admins [19:25] because i will setup those trabnslations [19:25] <\sh> kiko: ok..I'll have httplib2 0.4.0 handy...so UVE is on its way [19:26] \sh, ah, you are the man, thanks so much -- if you can help packaging that flacoste and leonardr have a much easier life [19:26] <\sh> kiko: har...I'm glad that I found the time to integrate lplib now into leonov (at least the approval stuff) [19:26] <\sh> I'm really busy regarding company life [19:27] <\sh> ok...off I been [19:28] \sh, thanks [19:28] kiko: My guess is that the mirrored copy is broken but the read-write copy is not. [19:28] abentley, except that.. well, using bzr+ssh didn't work either? it's weird weird weird. [19:29] kiko: I don't have write permissions on that project, so I always see the mirrored copy. [19:29] I see [19:29] kiko: Even over bzr+ssh. [19:29] abentley, thanks, at least now I know what the problem could be [19:30] kiko: Do your superpowers allow you to see the read-write copy? [19:31] abentley, probably not me either, but give me the branch URL and I'll find a writer to test for us [19:31] kiko: It's the same bzr+ssh URL. [19:31] weird [19:31] links *on* launchpad are pointing to the internal domain name [19:31] abentley, it scrolled off my screen :) [19:32] kiko: run "bzr info bzr+ssh://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-dev/mplayer/ubuntu/". It should not say "Unshared repository with trees" [19:32] so, kiko, can you assign it also to me? [19:33] Unshared repository with trees (format: unnamed) [19:33] kiko: Right, sorry. I meant for the writer to run that. [19:33] kiko: It's supposed to say "Standalone branch" [19:39] abentley, cody-somerville tells me it's Standalone branch (format: unnamed) [19:39] abentley, so something's broken in the mirrorring [19:40] kiko: Okay, I'll get someone to stomp on it. [19:40] thanks aaron [19:42] kiko: Is there a bug #, or someone to notify? [19:43] abentley, well, all I had was scrollback, so I don't really know -- don't think so. cody-somerville, did you submit a question for that? [19:46] for the links issue? no [19:47] thanks kiko, bye === salgado-lunch is now known as salgado [20:26] How can i remove a wrong Ubuntu package link? [20:28] DnaX, it depends. for some it works in the UI, for others, it requires a DB run. where's the wrong link? [20:28] https://edge.launchpad.net/ircp-tray [20:28] exits only Intrepid package [20:31] hi [20:32] kiko: so? [20:32] DnaX, it requires a DB patch. good grief [20:32] and... who can this? [20:33] can do this* [20:34] i use dput to upload a package on my PPA, the *source.upload says everything ok but nohing happens on the PPA builder ... that is still idle ... any tips ? thanks [20:37] psycose: were you notified by email about the upload acceptance/rejection ? [20:38] kiko: who can do this DB patch? [20:38] cprov-afk: no in fact i launch the dput this more than 12 hours ago ... [20:39] DnaX, i'm trying to find an OSA but they are not here, so I'd ask you to use answers.launchpad.net/launchpad [20:39] psycose: uhm, do another upload and I will trace it for you. [20:40] cprov-afk: woops i'm sorry ... i did not saw the mail saying it was rejected ... (hide by debian-release mailing list so hudge) [20:41] psycose: np, let me know if you need any help to sort out the rejection issue. [20:43] cprov-afk: ok thanks for your help [20:43] psycose: you're welcome. [21:01] kiko: ok, I ask there [21:03] DnaX, thanks man [21:03] bye === [Qball] is now known as Qball [21:49] kiko, samtb: ~/ubuntu-dev/mplayer/ubuntu is working now. [21:50] cody-somerville: Please consider upgrading ~ubuntu-dev/mplayer/ubuntu to packs. [21:51] abentley, it isn't my branch :P [21:51] cody-somerville: You have write access :-P [21:51] true === salgado is now known as salgado-afk === kiko is now known as kiko-fud === hubuntu is now known as huayra === hubuntu is now known as huayra