[04:57] you know what would be neat? a totem pole from ubuntu animals [05:39] Why the heck do things keep getting OOM-killed? [05:39] er, wrong tab. [10:49] kwwii, ping [10:50] tell me when you'll be available this afternoon/evening, in CEST timezone [11:08] Cimi: pong [11:08] I am avaiable now (and later probably as well) [11:39] kwwii, maybe I'll change a bit the background of scrollbars and progressbars with the new contrast function, and maybe the highlight of the notebook [11:40] Cimi: cool, I was just working on getting a package ready...I can wait if you'd like and put in the newest stuff you have [11:40] also, I've seen one recent version of newhuman, and I have to admit I prefer the earlier versions, where the base color was saturated (not plain white) and where scrollbars were not colored [11:41] yeah, both of "my" themes need work...been busy doing other stuff unfortunately [11:41] kwwii, you can do a new package tonight or tomorrow, because if I will change something, it will be only notebook highlight and progressbar/scrollbar background [11:42] because with the new contrast function it changes color, and I don't want it [11:42] if you wait 10 minutes I do tat thing for the background [11:43] Cimi: cool, go right ahead :-) [11:43] I can wait until tonight, if that's enough time [11:55] kwwii, could you try rev 59? [11:56] btw I'm not sure of this [11:57] on low contrasts it could look odd [12:03] Cimi: sure, which svn are you using now? [12:04] mm [12:04] it is not looking odd at low contrasts [12:04] btw [12:04] rev 59 does not change the background of scrollbars and progressbars [12:05] 58 does [12:05] (when tou change the contrast) [12:05] please try both and tell me which behaviour you think is correct for a contrast function [12:14] Cimi: compiling now [12:17] http://img293.imageshack.us/img293/580/screenshot1pa4.png [12:20] let me restart my desktop [12:26] hrm, hard to tell the difference on a running system :p [13:30] kwwii: ping [13:50] Ziroday-temp: pong [13:50] bonjour! [13:51] servus === andreasn_ is now known as andreasn [18:37] oi, thorwil. :) [18:37] hi rsc_ [18:38] anything fresh? the mailing list has been quiet lately. [18:38] well, i'm still working on the countdown images [18:39] * _MMA_ will have some more Breathe icon set info this week. [18:39] ah, swell [18:39] i can't wait to see progress on the icon theme. [18:39] i'm somewhat disappointed that apparently no one cares about bg colors for breathe. not exactly surprised, though [18:40] re: bg colors for breathe, i didn't really bother making noise in that thread since I knew there was no way to do it anyway :/ [18:40] no way to do what? [18:40] but it really has been quite a problem that's plagued me whenever I make icons, and a solution for it would be wonderful IMHO. [18:41] having a different slightly-adjusted icon for different bg colors? [18:41] i was referring to the set of bg colors, not the post about automatic adjustment [18:42] <_MMA_> thorwil: I think most are like: "OK. Sounds good. Now give us new icons!" :) I hope to have the technicals done this week so I can get people submitting icons for a base set this weekend. [18:43] could be [18:43] ahh. [18:47] <_MMA_> thorwil: What would you consider a "base set"? folder, computer, home, hardrive, trash, CD and CD-ROM? [18:48] _MMA_: maybe the set used on gnome-look? [18:48] <_MMA_> No no. I'll have a call for replacements of Oxygen. A starting point. [18:48] _MMA_: your list sounds good, though [18:49] <_MMA_> Ok. [18:50] <_MMA_> thorwil: You might want to kill you perspective idea on the wiki if we're gonna follow Oxygen there. [18:51] _MMA_: i think it should be brought up at least [18:51] except if you are suddenly sure it's the right path [18:52] <_MMA_> I'm sure about following Oxygen and improving where we can. [18:57] _MMA_: i removed my note about trying gradation curves for adjusting to varying backgrounds. box and sphere make sense even just to pick up how oxygen does it [18:58] looks like "trivial change" means you will not get a notice [18:58] <_MMA_> thorwil: Sure. Could you look through them so you can make an image people can look at and understand? [18:59] hopefully [18:59] <_MMA_> thorwil: I tend to do that as I make alot of small mistakes. :) [18:59] <_MMA_> "trivial change" [19:20] _MMA_: Why not include some standard toolbar buttons too? (Back, forward, stop) [19:20] it's going to be visible a lot (ff/nautilus) on an average user's computer time. [19:24] <_MMA_> rsc_: Sure. I think that will go in the next round.