[00:07] I'm attempting to upgrade mouseemu from 0.15 to 0.16, but a build error tells me that applying one of the patch's fails [00:08] and it looks like it's because the pathname hasn't been updated [00:08] http://paste.ubuntu.com/47017/ [00:08] but simply changing line 10 to 'mouseemu-0.16' doesn't work out [00:08] any ideas? [00:08] That's not going to be the problem; dpatch will apply that patch with -p1, stripping out the first component. [00:09] I'd check out the rejects of the patch; chances are, that patch no longer applies because 0.16 has the same change in it. [00:10] RAOF, so should deleting it be sufficient? [00:11] I don't know. You'll need to see why it doesn't apply, and make a decision. [00:11] could anyone help me packaging pidgin from source to .deb package? [00:11] RAOF, ah, ok thanks [00:11] If it doesn't apply because the fix has been applied upstream, drop the patch. [00:11] If it doesn't apply, but the bug it fixes is still there, you'll need to rework the patch. [00:11] RAOF, ok, thanks a lot! [00:15] i first ran dh_make -m -c gpl then edited changelog, control, copyright and checked rules. anything else needs to be done? [00:16] compengi, generally, if a package already exists for something, use that source package as a basis for updates - don't reinvent the wheel [00:16] compengi, "uupdate" is a script which tries to update an existing debianised package against a new orig.tar.gz [00:18] directhex, erm.. i'm trying to build it from scratch. because i want to learn how to. that's why i was trying to ask for someone that did it before :) [00:20] compengi, well in theory you've done enough. in practice, pidgin is a difficult package, and diff.gz is over 200k when uncompressed [00:21] split libs/executables, lots of preinst & postinst cleanup, and so on [00:22] anyway, bedtime [00:24] directhex, okay directhex good night. and btw have you done pidgin packaging before? [01:11] when upgrading packages, do you just submit a debdiff of the old and new version .dsc files? [01:13] nellery: hi, submit the new .diff.gz along with a pointer to how to get the new upstream tarball [01:14] james_w, thanks, so inside that .diff.gz should be the .diff? [01:15] nellery: the .diff.gz is one part of the source package [01:15] a source package consists of the .dsc, the .diff.gz and the .orig.tar.gz [01:15] nellery: use revu [01:15] the last is the upstream code, the second is the diff that adds debian/* and any other changes, and the first ties it all together [01:16] nellery: revu.ubuntuwire.com [01:16] revu is used for upgrading a package? [01:16] nellery: so you can upload the whole source package [01:16] nellery: i used to use it [01:17] nellery: and then put the link of the revu package in the LP bug [01:17] nxvl, ok thanks a lot [01:21] http://lmedinas.livejournal.com/9117.html ---I'd like to see the packaging status of this and maybe observe the process closely [01:22] ...It would be cool to be able to package stuff a bit i think-- there's another package in repos that has a bad dependency [01:22] --checkinstall seems to be broken on my machine, i'm wondering what you guys usually use [01:23] ethana2: checkinstall, the eternal foe :) [01:23] that doesn't sound encouraging [01:23] i think it's unethical to go from source -> installed code, generally speaking ;) [01:24] We tend to just update the source package. [01:24] if everyone made packages instead, the world would be a better place [01:24] RAOF: how do you mean that? [01:25] ethana2: Well, the source package is basically upstream tarball + debian metadata (possibly including patches). Mostly it's easy to update the metadata and stick it on the new upstream tarball. [01:25] ..then an automated system compiles and pushes out the update? [01:25] ethana2: Is there a bug filed about that new release? It looks like it could be worth a FFe, or may even not require one. [01:25] i figure it's a shoe in [01:26] bugfix only [01:26] ...and those are some bugs /i/ wouldn't want to run into, and with what i do, it's likely that i would [01:26] ..maybe i have; in any case, i'd feel a lot better with 0.82 [01:27] I'd file an upgrade bug on launchpad. Bonus marks if you can list the launchpad bugs which are associated with each of the bugs fixed in the new version. [01:27] oh, so they're automatically closed? [01:27] * ethana2 begins [01:28] That, and so it's obvious that there's a real need to do the update. [01:30] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/brasero/+bug/270315 [01:30] Launchpad bug 270315 in brasero "upgrade to new upstream 0.8.2 bugfix only release" [Undecided,New] [01:31] oh wait, those bug numbers are from their trac or whatever [01:32] So those closed bugs aren't good enough, you have to see them reported /by ubuntu users/? [01:32] Ideally, yes. [01:33] hrm [01:33] You'd want to browse through https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/brasero/+bugs and work out which ones are fixed by this version. [01:33] yeah i am [01:34] seeing a lot of 'fix committed' ones [01:34] It looks like all the ones marked 'fix committed' will be fixed, yeah. [01:34] ....sounds like those should all warrant the upgrade [01:34] I'd therefore guess that the desktop team will be all over the new release. [01:34] ..should I just leave it to them then? [01:35] I think so, yes. You might want to keep an eye on it, but I'd be confident the desktop team will get to it quickly. [01:35] well, i filed the upgrade bug, so... [01:35] maybe i helped something [01:37] I think we're in alpha 6 freeze, so it'll probably be after that, though. [01:40] four days.... [01:40] RAOF: Is intrepid going to use the Dust theme? [01:41] * RAOF has exactly as much information on that front as you. [01:43] I see [01:45] by the way, ubuntu netbook is amazing [01:45] i'm using everything but ume-loader on my ubuntu desktop install === vorian is now known as mad-mule === mad-mule is now known as vorian [02:58] I'm trying to make my first package, and I'm having difficulty. The details are here: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=5790152#post5790152 What am I doing wrong? Or is this question off-topic here? [03:01] mssever: looks like the package built fine [03:02] But all it installs are directories, not files [03:03] you may need to add a sysres.install file in your debian dir [03:05] vorian: Where can I find documentation on that? My trouble is that there's lots of documentation, but I can't seem to be able to figure out how to use it effectively, or know what's relevant to my situation [03:05] hmmm [03:07] vorian: Debian packaging seems overcomplicated for handling simple Python programs. But that probably means I'm missing something. I just need to drop files in directories. That's all. [03:07] oh [03:07] you may want to check this out first if it's python http://wiki.debian.org/DebianPython/NewPolicy [03:08] vorian: Thanks. I'll check that out. That link didn't show up in my Google searches [03:09] no problem [03:09] as for the .install file, you can see some good examples in kdebase (intrepid) [03:09] just pull the source and look at the .intall files [03:10] it's a complex package, but it has many .install files to view [03:10] vorian: Thanks. Also, are there some good simple examples in Python (or some other interpreted language that doesn't need to be built)? [03:11] sure :) [03:11] chm2pdf is one of my favorites [03:11] although i didn't put an install file in it [03:11] it didn't need one [03:12] vorian: OK. I'll take a look at it. [03:12] cool [03:12] you can email/msg me with any questions you have [03:12] or ask any of these fine folks [03:14] Great. I'm busy reading now... :) [03:19] vorian: apt-get source chm2pdf says it can't find a source package for chm2pdf. What's the source package called (or how can I find that myself)? [03:20] are you in hardy or intrepid? [03:20] either should pull it [03:20] hardy [03:20] weird [03:20] http://packages.ubuntu.com/hardy/chm2pdf [03:21] I can see the binary package, but not the source package [03:21] Thanks [03:21] click on the dsc link, and copy the url [03:21] then you can use 'dget url' to get the source [03:22] which would be http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/c/chm2pdf/chm2pdf_0.9-0ubuntu1.dsc [03:23] what's the command to uncompress it like apt-get source does? [03:23] dpkg-source -x [03:23] dget -x [03:24] Thanks [03:24] dget will download it and relevant files, dpkg-source is if the source is local. [03:25] OK, I have it extracted now, and I'm looking it over. Thanks for all the help [03:27] doh, -x === asac_ is now known as asac [04:06] anyone have an idea as to why I get this error when attempting to build this package? [04:06] http://paste.ubuntu.com/47064/ [04:08] nellery: You need to add packages that your package build depends on to the Build-Depends field in debian/control. [04:09] So by the looks of it, there are several packages that the configure script didn't find when attempting to build your package. [04:09] TheMuso, I see, so it's just the ones that appear there? [04:09] nellery: Without knowing what you are trying to build, I can't really help much more than that. [04:09] that's fine, I'll try and figure it out myself [04:09] nellery: There maybe more, you should check the package documentation to find out what is needed to build the package. [04:09] thanks! [04:09] ok [04:09] nellery: You're welcome. [07:51] <\sh> james_w: when are you planning to update launchpadlib package to 0.2 from bzr? so we get the httplib2 UVE done, too...(bug #239734) [07:51] Launchpad bug 239734 in python-httplib2 "[Freeze Exception] python-httplib2 should be upgraded to 0.4.0" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/239734 [08:31] \sh: I hadn't decided if I was going to push it. Thanks for working on httplib2 though [08:35] <\sh> james_w: I think we should talk to barry it would be good to have lplib in intrepid in its bzr version now [08:44] Good morning. === dholbach_ is now known as dholbach [09:10] morningh everyone [09:11] 'ey === asac_ is now known as asac [10:33] q. i would like to get vlc 0.9.2 on 8.04. vlc teams doesnt support 8.04 only 8.10. is there a chance to get it backported to 8.04 ? [10:40] does it build on 8.04 unmodified? [10:55] directhex: it did not so long ago. vlc was doing a 8.04 build every night on nighly.videolan.org like 1months ago [10:55] directhex: they dropped support on 8.04 for unknown reason but very unlikely to be incompatible [10:55] have you tried it? [10:56] directhex: nope. i dont have time [10:56] directhex: they got 8.10 in nighly support tho [10:56] Hello. I'm trying to follow the fixingbugs1 meeting at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs/devweek0809/FixingBugs1 . I want to test the latest package to see if the bug is still there. I tried to use pbuilder build to build a package to install but i couldn't find the package file it made. How do I build and test a dsc file? [10:56] http://nightlies.videolan.org/build/ <- directhex [10:57] well that's nice & all, but if it's on THEIR server, you need to ask THEM why they're not building it [10:57] directhex: "8.04 is for losers" is the official reason [10:58] hence i wondered if ubuntu motu was planning to do the backport [11:00] they won't backport someone else's packages, not officially. if there's a newer version IN UBUNTU, then it can be looked at [11:02] hmm it is fair to say that vlc 0.9.2 will not reach 8.04 for at least 6months then ? [11:03] directhex: i got my servers on 8.04 so i look for solutions [11:03] servers which need videolan client? O_o [11:03] yes. [11:04] directhex: my only current alternative is to run VMs with 8.10 on those boxes and install vlc in the VM. do you see a better one ? [11:05] jimqode: if you build using pbuilder then I think the built packages end up in /var/cache/pbuilder [11:07] james_w, hmmm. thank you [11:08] zorglu_, you could have tried debuild in the time you've been asking, you know [11:09] directhex: nope. im not a packager. so i would have to learn how to do it in the process [11:09] directhex: in anycase i dont wanna fight. i just want to see if i can get vlc on 8.04. the 8.10 VM is possibility [11:10] zorglu_, that's the thing. some apps "just work" if you take the 8.10 source package and build it on 8.04. no changes. that's the kind of thing that can easily be added to ubuntu-backports [11:11] hmm ok [11:11] so no plan to backport [11:11] if the package cannot "just" build, then there's a problem - it means added developer effort to keep several versions going [11:12] directhex: is there a way for me to stay uptodate on this matter ? [11:12] you could file a wishlist bug on launchpad [11:12] directhex: doing a script which check backport repo ? [11:12] or subscribe to the source package [11:12] directhex: ok thanks [11:12] i will do the 8.10 VM stuff meanwhile [11:13] infact, someone already did. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vlc/+bug/270404 [11:13] Launchpad bug 270404 in vlc "Please update VLC to 0.9.2" [Undecided,New] [11:15] cool :) [11:16] zorglu_: sorry i just logged in in the middle of the conversation, where is the 8.10 package you're talking about? [11:17] ma10: videolan nightly. let me find the link [11:17] ma10, he wants backports. since the videolan team make intrepid nightly debs. [11:17] http://nightlies.videolan.org/ and http://nightlies.videolan.org/build/intrepid-i386/ [11:19] zorglu_, but please remember, as i said, those are NOT ubuntu debs. they're not in, made by, or supported by, anyone at ubuntu. the packages may be of suspect quality or vintage. that's why updating in ubuntu isn't trivial - we can't just take their packages [11:19] zorglu_: thanks [11:20] directhex: i understand. on the other hand, the fact videolan team makes them shows that it is not that hard to make :) [11:20] no diff.gz? s/may be/are/ [11:20] zorglu_, any idiot can run "alien" on an rpm. doesn't make it a reliable package [11:20] directhex: ok [11:21] ma10: if you are doing the package, you can ask j-b on #videolan he is handling the release [11:23] zorglu_: i don't know, if i do there's nowhere to upload it until the jaunty repositories are created. btw, when is that going to happen? [11:25] ma10: several people will be interested in this i think. where to upload it ? what about ppa ? meanwhile people could get it there and thus people considering putting it into backport or not could use user feedback. how does it sound ? [11:26] ma10: 8 [11:26] ma10: 8.04 is a LTS after all :) [11:30] zorglu_: yes that's probably what's going to happen. :) i think several ppa versions will pop up. i'll start working on mine. [11:30] ma10: cool :) [11:35] Could somebody please check https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/editline/+bug/256179 for anything I might have done wrong? I just uploaded a debdiff and applied for sponsorship. This is my first time. [11:35] Launchpad bug 256179 in editline "libeditline does not support home/end/delete keys" [Undecided,In progress] [11:43] does anyone have a Debian testing system around? [11:43] a chroot would work. [11:44] I'd like someone to test something in that environment, as it is claimed a bug is fixed, but I'm not sure [11:48] jimqode: i just gave it a quick look. the thing i noticed is that you forgot to update the Maintainer field in debian/control. [11:52] james_w, I have a kvm instance, but I need to boot it up... what do you need? [11:53] liw: a little bit of ruby please [11:53] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=487204 [11:53] Debian bug 487204 in ruby1.8 "ruby1.8: object allocation during garbage collection phase" [Important,Closed] [11:54] I'd like to know if the script in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=487204#25 still fails with libcairo-ruby 1.5.1-1+lenny1 [11:54] rebuilding on Intrepid and testing suggests that it doesn't fix it [11:55] james_w, ok, I'll get back to you in a few minutes after my kvm machine is up [11:55] liw: thanks a lot [12:11] james_w, ok, ysabel is up -- I don't know Ruby at all, which packages should I install? [12:13] just libcairo-ruby I think [12:14] changing the hashbang to say ruby1.8 instead of just ruby [12:14] running now, got to 153500 [12:15] ok, I think it's fixed then, thanks [12:15] it seems we can't just sync that [12:16] can I kill it? [12:16] sure [12:17] interestingly, it got slower once it got to about 100 to 150 thousand... the first second or two got that far, now it's only gotten to 181800 [12:17] hmm, did you have to fix up the script before you ran it? [12:18] no, I'm doing something wrong [12:18] hm, I killed it with control-c, and it's still dying, and now it said Segmentation fault [12:18] ***************** 181800 ********* [12:18] ^C./test.rb:8: Interrupt [12:18] ./test.rb:8: [BUG] Segmentation fault [12:18] ruby 1.8.7 (2008-08-11 patchlevel 72) [x86_64-linux] [12:21] ma10, what should I update it to? My name? This was an ubuntu package to start with. [12:23] * james_w smacks his forehead [12:23] make sure you install all the binary packages for the thing you are testing. [12:23] morning james_w [12:23] hey NCommander [12:24] how goes it? [12:24] pretty good thanks, you? [12:29] james_w: trying to fix my laptop [12:30] FIrefox likes to freeze every ten seconds [12:32] NCommander: Maybe it's Firefox Genuine Advantage kicking in its irritants. [12:33] but i already entered my firefox license key! [12:33] NCommander, i eagerly await a chromium-based browser for linux, given the 1-process-per-page thing should kill browser slowdown dead [12:36] wgrant: :-) [12:38] Yeah. (: [12:38] And browser hangs. <3 [12:39] First time I saw 'flash' having it's own process in Chrome's process explorer, and I could just "kill" it and all the flash on the page went away, I almost cried in joy. [13:13] jimqode: it was a debian package, you're releasing the first ubuntu version. control should look like: [13:13] jimqode: Maintainer: Ubuntu MOTU Developers [13:13] jimqode: XSBC-Original-Maintainer: Captain Packager [13:14] jimqode: (with the name of the debian maintainer of course) [13:16] yay, ubuntu packages. because pushing changes to debian is poopy! [13:17] * wgrant shoots directhex. [13:18] jimqode: also, update Standards-Version while you're at it, or lintian might complain. [13:29] anyone a fan of ruby? [13:32] ma10: we don't need to update Standards-Version in packages that we inherit from Debian, it's a string-change that gains us nothing and we need to merge again, also it's something the package maintainer in debian should do (after consulting the debian policy and see if the package really complies with the specified version of d-p) [13:32] I think that cjwatson wrote something about it recently [13:33] dholbach: didn't know, thanks [13:33] james_w: apachelogger is a fan of Ruby, I believe. [13:34] james_w: You might want to try #debian-ruby on oftc. [13:34] iulian: I'd love to, but they've already fixed it [13:34] + * Recommend that Standards-Version not be adjusted for Ubuntu revisions of [13:34] + this manual, and in general that Standards-Version should not be changed [13:34] + in Ubuntu for packages originating in Debian. [13:34] http://people.ubuntu.com/~cjwatson/ubuntu-policy/ubuntu.diff [13:35] ma10: anytime [13:36] we need a fix for http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=487204, and I can't find the targeted patch, and I'm not sure whether updating to the new upstream is the right thing to do [13:36] Debian bug 487204 in ruby1.8 "ruby1.8: object allocation during garbage collection phase" [Important,Closed] [13:36] ma10, dholbach, thanks for your help. I'll update it now === azeem_ is now known as azem [13:36] james_w: lucas filed a sync bug for ruby 1.8 [13:37] dholbach: hmm, odd, the bug isn't against ruby [13:37] ah, my fault: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=485738 [13:37] Debian bug 485738 in ruby1.8 "ruby1.8: object allocation during garbage collection phase" [Important,Closed] [13:37] ma10: don't worry - I did the mistake myself when I got started (I looked at my first uploads on hoary-changes a few weeks ago) :-) [13:37] hmm [13:38] bug 270389 [13:38] Launchpad bug 270389 in ruby1.8 "Please sync ruby1.8 1.8.7.72-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)." [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/270389 [13:38] ubottu: you are wrong! [13:38] Sorry, I don't know anything about you are wrong! [13:38] well, you are === azem is now known as azeem [13:48] hi sorry if i ask here , but i have made a simple video analyzer with ffmpeg and awk can someone build a package ?--------->http://www.cli-apps.org/content/show.php?content=89259 [13:50] james_w: dholbach: FWIW, I could convince the debian release team to let the new upstream release migrate to lenny last week [13:50] james_w: dholbach: and ruby-defaults just contains dummy packages that point to ruby1.8's binary packages at the moment. since we also have ruby1.9, all security bugs are usually duplicated for ruby1.8 and ruby1.9. [13:50] * apachelogger notes that james_w is quite hard on teh poor bot :S [13:51] Off the top of my head, if it got into Lenny I'd be really suprised we don't want it for Intrepid. [13:52] lucas: yeah, it doesn't look too bad, the mention of perhaps having to update dependent code due to libxml->xml namespace change is a bit worrying [13:52] ScottK-laptop: I think we definitely want the bug fixed [13:54] james_w: which namespace change is that? (link?) [13:54] == 0.8.2 / 2008-07-21 Charlie Savage [13:54] * To use LibXML you can either require 'xml' or require 'libxml'. [13:54] The differences is that require 'xml' mixes the LibXML module into [13:54] the global namespace, thereby allowing you to write code such [13:54] as document = XML::Document.new. Note that this is different [13:54] from 0.8.0 and 0.8.1 and may require updating your code. [13:55] devfil: hi [13:55] hi sbucat [13:56] sbucat: what are you doing here? :) [13:56] devfil: heheh i need of some motu for this :D hahahhttp://www.cli-apps.org/content/show.php?content=89259 [13:56] james_w: err, that's not a ruby1.8 change, right? I don't think that we are talking about the same thing here [13:57] sbucat: actually Ubuntu is on feature freeze, so for new packages a FFe is needed [13:57] lucas: no, I'm talking about the fix for http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=485738 [13:57] Debian bug 485738 in ruby1.8 "ruby1.8: object allocation during garbage collection phase" [Important,Closed] [13:57] lucas: which was fixed in Debian with the update to the new upstream release [13:58] sbucat: for more inf: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess#FeatureFreeze%20for%20new%20packages [13:58] 24 [14:00] james_w: I don't have an opinion on that one. note that libxml-ruby is a relatively unimportant lib. (most ruby users use rexml) [14:01] yeah, I just saw that there are no rdepends [14:01] except libxslt-ruby, which has none [14:25] Heya gang [14:26] hi bddebian [14:26] Hi james_w [14:27] Hello bddebian [14:31] Hi iulian [14:42] http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ looks a bit out of date, is this normal? [14:45] http://daniel.holba.ch/temp/no_attention is linked on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/TODO/Bugs but it does not work. It spits out the python source for the server side code [14:58] lucas: right... if that's the case the ubuntu-release team should ACK it pretty quickly [14:59] jimqode: hi, I don't see that, are you on hardy? [15:00] james_w, yes I'm on hardy. What difference does it make? [15:03] jimqode: my guess is that python-launchpad-bugs is broken on hardy [15:04] james_w, oops was it meant to run at my computer. *blushes* [15:04] it thought it was server side code that failed to run [15:04] ah :-) [15:05] sorry, sorry, sorry :) [15:26] soren, nixternal, geser: just in case you're wondering: NCommander has the nexenta-ACCEPTED-mails situation under control now :-) [15:27] * NCommander whisles === superm1 is now known as superm1|away [15:28] dholbach: I never got those accept emails in my inbox, were they filtered out by the mailserver? [15:28] NCommander: they were in the ubuntu-motu moderation queue [15:28] dholbach: again, sorry about that :-/ [15:29] NCommander: don't worry - it's been just 4 mails right now :) [15:29] we get much more spam every day that lands in the queue [15:29] Its probably going to be a few more, the dak server had a pretty large backlog :-P [15:29] NCommander: np, I'll send you the bill [15:29] ;-) [15:30] * NCommander will add a redirect of dholbach@ubuntu.com -> *somewhere* [15:38] have people started screaming for VLC yet? [15:38] yup bug 270404 [15:38] Launchpad bug 270404 in vlc "Please update VLC to 0.9.2" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/270404 [15:41] wgrant: you last-touched; any thoughts on this big scary update? I'm afraid if we don't do it we won't hear the end of it. [15:45] dholbach: can i congratulate NCommander now? [15:45] on what? [15:45] NCommander: uuc [15:47] nxvl: I think you can - I'll process the application in a sec [15:47] \o/ [15:47] NCommander: congrats [15:48] nxvl: hold your horses - just a (few) minute(s) :-) [15:48] \o/! [15:48] d'oh [15:50] :( [15:51] * NCommander looks forward to the day he can get MOTU [15:51] I apply at the end of September :-) [15:52] \o/ [15:55] NCommander: congratulations :-) [15:55] nxvl: now you can :) [15:55] ahaha [15:56] WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO [15:56] it just took a bit to get all the references to the application from the mailing list, the mail written etc [15:56] ANother icon for Bragging rights [15:56] At the rate I'm going, I'm going to need a linebreak :-/ [15:56] so that's what it's all about [15:56] NCommander: welcome to the team [15:56] * NCommander was already an Ubuntu member, UUC wasn't a huge upgrade [15:56] At least my posts to -devel are no longer moderated I think [15:57] dholbach: there were a LOT of references to catch on that mail [15:57] 16 I think [15:57] nxvl: exactement [15:58] dholbach: I'm told thats an unusually high number [15:59] dholbach: don't worry, you get the fun of doing it again for MOTU soon :-) [16:02] dholbach: i was checking the 5-a-day code the other day and i started wondering, now it works using only the LP login? [16:02] nxvl: bzr launchpad-login [16:03] nxvl: to me it didn't seem to make sense to write your lp login to yet another file :) [16:09] dholbach: re the last mc minutes: I didn't know that nixternal and you count double :) [16:09] geser: it was 11:18 here and it seems I still didn't have enough coffee [16:10] sorry i unpluged my laptop and forget i took the battery out [16:10] :D [16:11] ogra ping [16:11] dholbach: agreed on that, just making sure i catch it correctly === nxvl_ is now known as nxvl [16:17] mok0, [16:17] pong === superm1|away is now known as superm1 [16:26] NCommander: then nexenta ACCEPTED mail went to all maintainers, not just MOTU? [16:27] james_w: unfortantely [16:27] The problem was our mailserver was not sending emails [16:27] And I didn't realize dak was misconfigured [16:27] The mail admin just fixed the former and ran the queue -_-; [16:27] perhaps a mail to debian-devel explaining the situation would help? [16:28] yeah [16:28] guessing that it was more than just a couple of mails [16:28] MOTU got just 4 up until now [16:29] Well, the flame mail from DDs is pouring in now [16:29] :-) [16:29] NCommander, really? :P [16:29] lol [16:29] Man, when I screw up, I screw up big [16:30] NCommander: you now know which DDs read there mails timely :) [16:30] * dholbach bears that in mind for NCommander's MOTU application :-) [16:30] THanks dholbach :-P [16:31] NCommander: which DDs mail? [16:32] nxvl: not sure, its going to the changes mailing list which I haven't been subscribed to [16:32] NCommander: ubuntu changes or debian changes? [16:33] nexenta-changes [16:35] :D [16:38] hi, when will the next revu-day will be? (just asking) [16:50] handschuh: in November maybe [16:50] handschuh: archive are closed for new packages until jaunty [16:51] nxvl: ok thanks === bobbo_ is now known as bobbo [17:01] NCommander: You've definitely been hitting DDs. :) [17:02] **** [17:12] dholbach: today in the new release of the PC World there are 2 packages about me and motuship, i hope it helps to get more people involved :D [17:12] (the peruvian version of PC World btw) [17:12] nxvl: NICE - do you have an online version of it somewhere? [17:13] dholbach: mmm, not sure, let me check, but it's in spanish [17:13] nxvl: nevermind it's in spanish :) [17:13] heh [17:13] :D [17:13] i though so [17:16] dholbach: there were some minimal inaccuracies from the reporter, but still get my bits saying that it's easy and that people are invited to participate :D [17:16] NCommander, Isn't there a big fat warning in dak about this? :P [17:16] Apparently neither big, nor fat, enough. [17:17] dholbach: (sry for interruption) thanks for the motu-videos [17:17] With current versions of dak you explicitly need to configure it to mail people. [17:17] handschuh: I'm glad you find them useful. :-) [17:18]