[15:08] <hyperair_> where can i get 2.6.27 kernel images for testing in hardy?
[15:08] <hyperair_> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/234738/comments/2
[17:38] <munckfish> BenC: did have a chance to look at my linux-ports pull request yet?
[17:39] <BenC> munckfish: still settling back in after vacation...got some high priority stuff to handle first
[17:40] <munckfish> BenC: ok understood - any idea when you may have time to look at it? Quite keen to get it onto a daily build so I can start weeding the install/upgrade process.
[17:41] <munckfish> Or ... is there someone else who could evaluate it, who's less on-the-critical-path than yourself?
[17:42] <munckfish> BenC: also, I'm quite concerned to know how best to get the changes regression tested/validated for the other architectures
[17:42] <munckfish> BenC: is that something you would take care of or should I rally some testers on the kernel team list?
[17:43] <laga_> BenC: aufs? ;)
[17:43] <munckfish> BenC: whatever the simplest path to inclusion is, that doesn't burden you time wise
[17:59] <BenC> laga_: I believe amitk was looking at that
[18:05] <amitk> laga_: I'll get to aufs ASAP. I've been side-tracked by some bugs.
[18:06] <amitk> laga_: but we'll accept a patch too :)
[18:12] <BenC> amitk: laga_ sent one to kernel-team@ not too long ago, IIRC
[18:15] <amitk> BenC: that version is too old. It still contains deadlock bug in the rename() syscall
[18:15] <amitk> laga_: ^
[18:18] <laga_> amitk: well, it was whatever version was in the kernel AFAIK 
[18:18] <laga_> the version in the kernel probably was not a regular "monday" release but a CVS checkout 
[18:19] <laga_> i'm afraid i dont have time right now to prepare & test yet another patch. maybe i'll get to it on the weekend
[18:25] <amitk> laga_: what do you mean by "in the kernel"? aufs isn't upstreamed yet, AFAIK
[19:10] <laga_> amitk: "in the kernel" -> the version in the intrepid kernel as committed by benc.