[00:00] how do I link a bug to an upstream one? [00:01] elmo: "Also affects project" [00:01] Find the project, and paste the bug URL into the appropriate box. [00:01] And hope it works. [00:02] Which it does in a lot of cases now, particularly since it started automatically creating bugtrackers. [00:02] I don't need this upstream link molarkey for the distro source package? [00:02] You don't need it, but it helps. [00:02] It sets the default for when you click "Also affects project" [00:03] Compare https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/soundconverter/+bug/260853/+choose-affected-product and https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/convertall/+bug/224049/+choose-affected-product [00:03] Launchpad bug 260853 in soundconverter "Write ID3 tags to converted files" [Wishlist,New] [00:04] Hmm, a product reference in the UI. [00:05] "" [00:05] \o/ [00:06] what a sweet pop up [00:06] Hah. [00:06] I keep away from those pages in general. [00:06] As they're rather unmaintained. [00:10] Would one file bugs against -foundations or soyuz for those pages? [00:12] not soyuz, I don't think [00:26] <_Zeus_> am i the only one annoyed by that long thing at the right on launchpad? [00:26] <_Zeus_> the thing that makes the page so much longer [00:28] On which page? [00:28] The only horrifyingly long one is the Ubuntu tag list. [00:30] (that I know of, that is) [00:31] And I know most parts of LP pretty well. [00:36] <_Zeus_> yeah, that one [00:46] * NCommander wonders whats in the PPA admin menu [00:49] NCommander: Hm? [00:49] wgrant, https://edge.launchpad.net/~xubuntu-dev/+archive/+admin [00:49] Or equivelent PPA admin URL [00:50] Making it private, probably. [00:50] I wonder if there is any other magic in that menu :-P [00:50] Like a switch to enable it to use real vs. virtual builders [00:51] wgrant, do any projects have private PPAs AFAIK? [00:51] IIRC that's implicit in being a P3A. [00:51] P3A? [00:52] PPPA. Private PPA. [00:53] Suspose the next question is how do you get a PPPA :-) [00:53] * NCommander runs [00:55] * NCommander also wonders how wgrant knows so much about launchpad's internals [00:55] As do I. [00:56] PPPA or your knowledge of the internals of LP? [00:56] The latter. [00:56] I think your really kiko, and the wgrant aspect is just a split personality [00:56] * NCommander runs [00:56] Private PPAs are still in development, but they're going to be used for security [00:56] as one example [00:56] Very handy [00:57] * NCommander figured the security usage [00:57] Would it be wrong to file two duplicates of bug #2088 in order to bring the list on https://edge.launchpad.net/launchpad-foundations/+filebug into order? [00:57] Launchpad bug 2088 in launchpad-foundations "psycopgda reconnection and conflict handling" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2088 [00:57] Er, hm. [00:58] It seems indecisive. [00:59] wgrant, er, what? [01:00] Ah, wrong tab. [01:00] Just noting that the list on one of the Launchpadish projectish was slightly out of order. [01:00] But not that one. [01:00] I have too many tabs open. [01:02] elmo, is it possible to have a PPA work on normal builders vs. the virtual ones? (I ask only because for some PPAs like xubuntu-dev, it would be nice to see powerpc binaries for those of us who use that architecture ;-)) [01:02] NCommander: Port Xen to PowerPC! [01:03] wgrant, http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenPPC/Build [01:03] already don e [01:04] Damn. m68k, then. [01:04] So first you want me to port Ubuntu to m68k? [01:04] k [01:05] NCommander: not being funny, but didn't we have this discussion already? [01:05] No, that discussion was using qemu [01:05] NCommander: because PPAs can install their own packages as build dependencies, it's a firm requirement that they use a strong virtual sandboxed enviroment [01:06] Right, I know that, for general usage [01:07] I was just noting that I actually use Xubuntu (server install, then xubuntu-desktop) on my PPC, and its kinda anonying I can't use the beta packages right out of the box on it [01:09] (btw, Xen/PowerPC has hardware requirements that we don't meet) [01:09] ah [01:09] THat explains that and ends that discussion ;-) [01:10] Man, I'd thought that PPC was totally dead, but there are 2962 active Ubuntu PPC machines [01:10] NCommander: sure, I appreciate it's unideal, and I'd love to be able to support !x86 arches for PPA someday, but honestly, I don't know when anyone's going to get the time to explore alternatives [01:10] elmo, I'll probably look into it once LP is open [01:11] * NCommander finds it amusing he has or has access to every Ubuntu port [01:16] * wgrant cries. [01:16] * _Zeus_ backs off... [01:16] I'm trying to file bugs on the DSSP<->Product linkage pages. [01:16] But I keep finding more. [01:16] Not more bugs, more pages. [01:18] I think all 6 that I've found so far can have a bug reported on pretty much every element. [01:21] So far I've found /+edit-packaging, /+packaging, /+packages, /+distributions, /+ubuntupkg, /+addpackage [01:21] So there are three instances of each of the two types of pages. [01:22] A couple of the pages expose information about the links that isn't visible on any of the other five, nor the SP page. [01:26] DSSP? [01:26] DistroSeriesSourcePackage [01:28] are you sure on addpackage [01:28] I don't get a Permission Denied on that one [01:29] Right, the permissions differ for ubuntupkg and addpackage. [01:29] For no good reason that I can see. [01:29] What's ubuntupkg? [01:29] (no, I get Lost Something page, not permission denied) [01:29] ProductSeries/+addpackage, not Product. [01:30] still getting lost something [01:30] https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/hardy/+addpackage [01:31] how badly do I fail ;-) [01:31] That's a distroseries. [01:32] oh [01:32] so then whats a ProductSeries vs. a DistroSeries [01:33] Product is the old name for project. Still used internally and in places they've forgotten it in the UI. [01:34] So a project series. [01:34] Oh I see [01:34] BTW, wgrant, they fixed having Releases for distributions [01:34] https://edge.launchpad.net/nexenta/hardy - i.e. [01:35] * NCommander wishes it was possible to run a publisher instance for Nexenta, but meh :-P [01:37] Yep, I noticed that. [01:40] I do hope LP gets the ability to seperate publisher from Soyuz so it would be possible for us to use LP's archive tools without having to run a seperate LP instance [01:40] (once LP is open) [01:40] Publisher is part of Soyuz... [01:42] right [01:42] Essentially, what I'm saying is having all archive functions controlled via launchpad.net, but hosting our own infrastructure [01:42] I'm told to do that, publisher would require work to seperate it from Soyuz, or Storm would require modification to work across the internet [01:43] ^securely [02:54] barry, hola [02:54] (and beuno-afk ping) [05:40] I've pushed a branch to launchpad under my username (ie, lp:~mhammond/...) when I really want it under one of the groups - can I move it? [05:41] markh: Sure, click on the edit button next to the branch's title. [05:44] wgrant: ahh, I see now - thanks [05:51] hello. I'm getting a trying to get to http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-virt/vmbuilder/trunk/revision/198 and get a "please try again error", normal? [05:55] nijaba: me too on a different branch [05:55] markh: ok, I feel better now . I know that I am not alone ;) [05:56] Works for me, now. [05:57] still not for me [06:07] are there any OOPS codes? [06:09] Loggerhead doesn't OOPS, does it? [06:10] working now! [06:10] jml: Can you please explain why I got the error that caused me to file bug #272304? [06:10] Launchpad bug 272304 in launchpad-bazaar ""User timeout caused connection failure." doesn't make sense" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/272304 [06:12] wgrant: nope, sorry, there's not enough info there. what were you doing? with which branch? time would also be good in case we have to check the logs. [06:13] jml: It's still there now: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~wgrant/ubuntu-cve-tracker/mainold [06:18] wgrant: ok. that means that the branch timed out when being mirrored to the public area. [06:18] jml: Ahh. Thanks. [06:18] wgrant: why it timed out is another interesting question. [06:18] It is an old knit branch. [06:18] With an awful lot of files. [06:19] well, the size per se doesn't matter [06:19] it's more a question of how granular bzr's progress reporting is. [06:19] Ah. [06:19] I find it awful for knits. [06:20] then, that's quite possibly the problem. [06:20] * wgrant might try his luck recreating that as a stacked branch. [06:20] you can trigger a re-mirror using launchpadlib (but I don't have the right incantation handy), or by doing a trivial write to the branch. [06:21] I need to upgrade it, and an upgrade will take forever. I'll just recreate it. [06:21] (particularly as I think it's all merged) [06:21] well, upgrading your local copy and pushing won't be so bad [06:21] oh, if it's merged... :) [06:21] * jml -> risotto [06:21] Mmm, risotto. [06:22] It's an ongoing branch, but I think it's all in master now. [06:22] Thanks for the help. [06:24] Hrmph. [06:24] It dereferenced my lp: URL. Not very nice of it. [06:24] Created new stacked branch referring to bzr+ssh://wgrant@bazaar.launchpad.net/%7Eubuntu-security/ubuntu-cve-tracker/master/. [06:39] And a pretty AssertionError because of that. Yay. [06:44] wgrant: is the assertion error on Launchpad or Bazaar? [06:45] jml: LP. Complaining that my hosted branch references a non-hosted branch. It dereferenced lp:ubuntu-cve-tracker, which I passed as --stacked-on. [06:46] I'm using the real HTTP URL for now, so it should be happier. [06:47] same branch as before? [06:47] lp:~wgrant/ubuntu-cve-tracker/main [06:48] (the one I pointed you to earlier had been main, but I renamed it because it was sooooo slooooow and needed to die) [06:48] *nod* [06:48] Is it a bug that it dereferences the lp: URL? [06:48] no. [06:48] well... [06:49] no. [06:50] How is one meant to do it, then? [06:51] you'd have to stack on the http url. It's possible that bzr makes it harder than it could be. [06:52] But I don't know that the HTTP URL exists. I am a poor ignorant lp: user [06:52] wgrant: oh, one of those. [06:52] wgrant: well, then we'll be rolling out something soon that does it all for you magically. [06:52] Wait. What. [06:52] https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~wgrant/ubuntu-cve-tracker/main [06:53] That makes a total of *no* sense. [06:53] ok. that's definitely a bug. [06:53] * jml files [06:53] Thanks. [06:54] What is a hosted branch if not something on bazaar.launchpad.net? [06:55] wgrant: it's an overzealous security check. [06:56] Apparently. [06:58] jml: Shall I use an unstacked pack branch for now, or is there a workaround? [06:58] no workaround I can think of, sorry. [06:58] hmm. [06:59] no. [06:59] it's a security check, the whole point is I can't think of a workaround ;) [07:01] A security check that always returns false? Bulletproof, I guess. [07:02] b = bzrlib.branch.Branch.open('bzr+ssh://bazaar.launchpad.net/~wgrant/ubuntu-cve-tracker/main') [07:02] b.set_stacked_on_url('/~ubuntu-security/ubuntu-cve-tracker/master') [07:03] might work [07:04] o/` or just another country o/` [07:05] mwhudson: Thanks. I'll try that. [07:05] * wgrant looks confused at jml. [07:05] (this is what the automagic stacking thing will do for you) [07:06] Does that not work yet? [07:08] wgrant: a phased rollout seemed sensible, in case of horrific bugs [07:09] mwhudson: Indeed, but having something that can't be used isn't an excellent method of testing. [07:09] wgrant: _we_ can use it [07:09] It seems to be complaining less now, but I might not have waited long enough... [07:09] mwhudson: Ah, right. [07:09] Yay, it worked. Thanks mwhudson, jml. [07:09] np [08:17] Hi. I'm trying to update the bug status/milestone/comment of a bug, but I get this error: "Application error. Unauthenticated user POSTing to page that requires authentication.". I've tried pressing back and trying again, but it refuses to let me comment. I'm using edge. [08:19] Hew: Try logging in. You may have been logged out by viewing a Launchpad feed. [08:21] wgrant: Thanks, I had indeed been logged out for some reason. [08:22] Viewing feeds seems to destroy your session at the moment; I believe it's being worked on. [08:25] wgrant: No worries, these things have to be expected when on launchpad-beta. What is a "feed" though? [08:25] Hew: An RSS or Atom (I forget which) feed. Does that make more sense? [08:27] wgrant: Yes, even though I don't view feeds (unless firefox is pulling it down in the background or something). [08:30] the fix for this has landed, btw [08:30] so it should be fixed on edge pretty soon [08:31] mwhudson: Sounds good :-) [08:32] hm, should be fixed on edge already, actually === _neversfelde is now known as neversfelde === didrocks_ is now known as didrocks [12:50] hi! so, launchpad is for opensource software... but what if i wanted to buy it as a service for a company? is there a chance i could get a cheap rent for a low-traffic service? [13:10] attila_lendvai: ask mrevell about that, during a european workday. [13:12] Hobbsee: thanks! [13:12] attila_lendvai: you're welcome! === nebi is now known as nebi|away === nebi|away is now known as nebi [17:40] are there any known issues currently w/ Launchpad source view? [17:41] (I'm getting repeated "Problem connecting to the Launchpad server.... ) [17:41] ...this is for better than the last 1/2 hour. [17:43] I just checked and am getting this on more than one project... [17:44] I believe there's a problem w/ the source server... [17:51] Is anyone else experiencing server problems w/ Launchpad? [17:51] <_steven_> I get an error when browsing source online [17:51] I just merged from one tree, and wound up with NO FILES (everything deleted) [17:51] I tried browsing, and got an error also [17:52] I tried browsing in another project - same thing, an online error [18:36] I seem to have problems to connect to the lp server and was told to drop a notification here [18:57] How long is it before bugs that were marked for expiration actually expire? [19:10] tgm4883_laptop: At least for Ubuntu, they don't actually expire. This was turned off as it annoyed too many people. [19:10] ah [19:11] which is interesting, since we have a lot of incomplete bugs that aren't expiring, which is annoying me ;) [19:11] is there another way to get rid of them? [19:24] hello. i accidentally dput something to regular ubuntu instead of to my PPA. of course, the upload was rejected. now i can't upload to the PPA because it claims the source is already in ubuntu/intrepid. but it's not, it was rejected. [19:32] barry, ping [20:12] Are there any dogfood administrators online? === trmanco_ is now known as trmanco === insomn1nja is now known as insomninja [20:55] I can not connect to Bazaar on LP via browser at the moment. Known problem? [21:23] hey guys. is it possible to get the HEAD revision of my project's trunk downloadable as a .tar.gz? [21:23] or, how do i put something in my new project's "downlaods" section? === Anders__ is now known as Spirit55555 === trmanco_ is now known as trmanco [21:57] ketilwaa: should be working now [22:02] spm: Thanks, I just noticed. [22:05] https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+faq/49 says to choose "Delete branch" in the actions menu [22:05] I can't recognize anything that might be an actions menu on https://code.launchpad.net/~exarkun/pyopenssl/thread-safety [22:06] How can I delete that branch? [22:19] exarkun, to the right of ~exarkun/pyopenssl/thread-safety, isn't there a pink dot with a - on it? [22:21] tgm4883_laptop: Indeed there is. [22:21] And hovering it, I see the title is "Delete branch", so I suppose that's it :) [22:21] that should be the delete button [22:21] yep, I had trouble finding it when lp changed looks too [22:22] I'm sure this isn't the ideal forum for usability feedback, but man, that's obscure :) [22:22] yea could be [22:22] * tgm4883_laptop is just a lp user [22:29] I have a project that uses translations in LP. Is there an easy way to get update po files than the 'request a download' button? Like, is there an rsync line I can run? === rick_h_ is now known as rick_h === rick_h is now known as rick_h_ === rick_h_ is now known as rick_h_mobile === rick_h_mobile is now known as rick_h === rick_h is now known as rick_h_