/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2008/09/20/#ubuntu-devel.txt

kirklandcjwatson: and the UNRELEASED thing that you do... is that just an accounting mechanism you use to keep track of what's been pushed and what hasn't?00:00
mathiazkirkland: it's a way to notifies other devs that it hasnt' been uploaded yet.00:00
mathiazkirkland: but you still need a way to say that a new release of the package has started and is being worked on.00:01
brycesoren: could you comment on #237164 - these are the kvm xorg.conf bits we added a while back.  Are they still needed?  Sounds like maybe not.00:03
kirklandmathiaz: k00:04
kirklandmathiaz: i'll do that next time00:04
kirklandbryce: soren's basically on paternity leave00:04
brycegotcha00:04
kirklandbryce: i'm going to be backing him up on kvm'age00:04
brycekirkland: cool00:04
kirklandbryce: :-)  i guesss00:05
kirklandbryce: no really, i'm looking forward to it, just not sure where to begin.....00:05
brycekirkland: could you test with kvm if running with no /etc/X11/xorg.conf still allows X to work under kvm correctly?00:05
kirklandbryce: graphical desktop, i presume?00:05
brycekirkland: righto00:05
kirklandbryce: (that's a joke)00:05
kirklandbryce: i have an old intrepid desktop kvm... let me bring her up to date00:06
kirklandbryce: sweet, only 303 packages to upgrade :-)00:09
brycehehe00:10
mathiazkirkland: you haven't documented your VCS-* changes in the debian changelog00:13
mathiazkirkland: you should also add VCS-Browser to debian/control.00:13
kirklandmathiaz: what is the syntax of this VCS-Browser bit?00:14
cjwatsonplease don't add vcs-browser. it's a waste of effort. just add vcs-bzr with an http url00:14
cjwatsonfor example no installer package uses vcs-browser but practically all of them use vcs-bzr. It works fine.00:15
kirklandmathiaz: updated changelog in rev 14; didn't add vcs-browser per cjwatson's input00:16
cjwatsonvcs-browser is for vcsen like CVS (and to some extent Subversion) where the browseable URL cannot be mechanically guessed from the vcs url itself00:16
cjwatsonsee e.g. http://packages.qa.debian.org/b/base-passwd.html (search for VCS) for an example of how this is rendered by the only web UI I know of that parses Vcs-*00:20
mathiazkirkland: a debdiff between 1.6 and 1.7 shows that one of the changelog entry had its date changed.00:21
mathiazkirkland: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 17:16:4100:21
mathiazkirkland: http://paste.ubuntu.com/48433/00:21
kirklandmathiaz: relic of my semi-manual import of the deb changes into bzr00:23
kirklandmathiaz: wish i had know about the magic import plugin cjwatson mentioned00:23
mathiazkirkland: okay -  that's easy to change then. (I don't have commit access to the branch :p )00:24
kirklandcjwatson: Keybuk: patch posted to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cryptsetup/+bug/272301, tested, silences the error messages that bdmurray reported and i reproduced00:31
ubottuLaunchpad bug 272301 in cryptsetup "udevsettle and init-functions missing from initramfs" [Low,In progress]00:31
kirklandmathiaz: got the upload notice, thanks ;-)00:35
NCommanderlamont, hi00:36
kirklandbryce: geez, upgrades on the desktop take a lot longer than on the server :-P00:38
kirklandbryce: upgrading gnome + office = snooze for a while00:38
slangasekmathiaz: if it's a native package, surely the licensing on the packaging should match the licensing of the package as a whole?00:42
brycekirkland: heh yep00:43
sleepsterI would like to add a package to apt.. how do I go about doing that?00:43
kirklandslangasek: it certainly does in this case00:44
kirklandslangasek: misunderstanding on my part, as I was cloning the licensing information from other packages00:44
mathiazslangasek: sure - to be more precise, do you need to have an explicit note in debian/copyright about the packaging license ?00:46
kirklandDaviey: hiya00:46
kirklandDaviey: saw your ping the other day, sorry i missed you00:47
Davieykirkland: no worries00:50
Davieykirkland: you got a mention in the ubuntu uk podcast we recorded tonight.. only brief - but still :)00:50
kirklandDaviey: woohoo :-)00:50
cjwatsonmathiaz: personally, I take the line that if the packaging doesn't have an explicit licence then the intent is clearly for it to be under the same licence as the rest of it00:51
cjwatsonI have no idea whether this is legally sound ...00:52
kirklandDaviey: regarding?00:52
kirklandbryce: lesson learned....  install from scratch is probably faster than an upgrade00:58
kirklandwoohoo, 31st most popular blog of the day on WordPress (GregKH rant response) ...  http://botd.wordpress.com/2008/09/20/top-posts-876/01:11
Keybukgregkh had a rant? :)01:13
elmogreg who?01:14
slangasekkirkland: so I don't think there needs to be an explicit note about the packaging license, no01:23
kirklandslangasek: thanks, i removed it at mathiaz' request01:23
slangasekelmo: greg "kh", I think his last name is Tajik or something, yes?01:24
Keybukhe looks like lurch from the addams family ;)01:25
* slangasek snorts01:26
slangasekKeybuk: so I'm sure you'll be starting the we-love-gregkh team in LP soon01:27
Keybukactually I get along with him just fine ;)01:27
kirklandwatch it...  he might just turn off your usb without warning01:28
kirklandbryce: my desktop kvm is *now* upgraded and dist-upgraded :-)01:29
brycekirkland: cool01:30
kirklandand now, for my final performance of the evening, i will boot a kvm *without* an xorg.conf....01:30
brycekirkland: yay01:30
kirklandfollowed by partying into the night :-)01:30
_Zeus_:P01:30
kirklandbryce: gnome came up just fine, though in 800x600 rather than 1024x76801:32
kirklandfor a minor encore, i will attempt to switch resolutions via System->Preferences->Screen Resolution .....01:33
bryceok, so sounds like we still need the kvm bits in dexconf01:33
kirklandno love01:33
kirklandbryce: anything else you need at the moment?01:34
brycenope, that confirms it, thanks01:34
kirklandbryce: np.01:34
kirklandadios all01:34
* kirkland turns off his pirate filter01:35
brycekirkland: btw bug in question is 237164; I've bumped it over to kvm and closed the xorg task.01:38
Keybuk      read 2283 modules : new(0)  missing(93)01:44
KeybukEE: Missing modules (start begging for mercy)01:44
Keybuk*blink*01:44
Keybukto whom should I beg, and should I go fetch my collar?01:46
bryceheh01:57
NCommanderargh01:59
NCommanderSomeone please hit me01:59
NCommanderI'm considering writing a brainf?ck compiler01:59
ldp:|02:02
ldphehe02:02
=== superm1|away is now known as superm1
=== asac_ is now known as asac
=== superm1 is now known as superm1|away
YokoZarHmm, I'm not registered for ubuntu-users so my email to that list got in the moderator queue, even though I am an Ubuntu developer...09:31
=== asac_ is now known as asac
=== didrocks_ is now known as didrocks
alienhello, is it known yet what kernel version will be shipped with intrepid?12:56
Mez!info linux-image12:57
ubottulinux-image (source: linux-meta): Generic Linux kernel image.. In component main, is optional. Version 2.6.24.19.21 (hardy), package size 25 kB, installed size 52 kB12:57
alienthat's hardy12:57
Mezstupid thing doesnt pick up intrepid yet12:58
wgrant!info linux intrepid12:58
ubottulinux (source: linux-meta): Generic complete Linux kernel.. In component restricted, is optional. Version 2.6.27.3.3 (intrepid), package size 2 kB, installed size 32 kB12:58
alienokay, so 2.6.2712:58
wgrantYes.12:58
aliengreat12:58
Mezhttp://packages.ubuntu.com/intrepid/linux-image12:58
wgrantMez: It defaults to the latest stable.12:58
alienthanks12:59
alieni was interested if it's going to be greater 2.6.27.5, since my webcam is supported starting with that version13:00
wgrantErm.13:00
alienand i think we may get to 2.6.27.513:00
wgrant2.6.27 isn't out yet.13:00
terminatorI am trying to setup my Geforce FX5200 video card with the nvidia 173 drivers and I get nothing but low video mode.  What am I doing wrong?14:09
ogra-Q1terminator, #ubuntu is the place to ask such questions14:10
ogra-Q1(see topic)14:11
terminatorSorry new to this irc stuff and don't really know where to go14:11
=== elky is now known as elkbuntu
xfamousbabiiboy_hey14:50
=== superm1|away is now known as superm1
Adri2000slangasek or another member of the release-team: I know it's week-end, but it would be cool to review the vsftpd FFe asap, so that it gets as much testing as possible17:50
poningruok so sshfs is kinda broken right now in hardy and intrepid19:08
poningruI can automount sshfs using just fstab19:08
poningruerr cant*19:08
pittihi19:29
* sebner winks mighty pitti 19:29
* pitti hugs sebner19:29
sebner:)19:30
bryceheya pitti19:33
NCommanderHey pitti, got a moment to answer a packaging question19:38
* NCommander figures you should know19:38
pittiNCommander: sure19:39
NCommanderpitti, if I need to install something with special permissions (i.e. setuid, or something similar), how do I do it so upgrades don't clobber said permissions19:39
NCommanderpitti, I assume you do it in post/pre scripts, but I have that gut feeling there has to be a better way19:39
pittiNCommander: two ways really19:39
pittiNCommander: if the owner and group of the file are static (< 100), then you should just do it in debian/rules19:40
NCommanderafter getting base-files updated, right?19:40
pittiNCommander: i. e. chmod/chown them approprietly and dh_fixperms -X them19:40
pittiNCommander: but if you need to chgrp it to a dynamic system group, the postinst needs to chmod/chown them, after making sure that there is no dpkg-statoverride for the file already19:41
pittiNCommander: base-files?19:41
pittiNCommander: what are you trying to do exactly?19:41
NCommanderNo19:41
NCommanderQuestion on NM :-)19:41
NCommanderI'm not actively packaging anything19:41
NCommanderDebian policy manual says that if you need a static group assignment, you need to ask the maintainer of base-files to add it19:41
NCommanderer19:42
pittioh19:42
pittithat's usually not how it's done19:42
NCommanderyeah19:42
pittiadding static groups is a PITA19:42
NCommander(there is a big note saying it should be avoided if possible ;-))19:42
pittiso usually packages create their own system users/groups and chmod in postinst19:42
NCommanderRight, that's fine if its dymanic19:42
NCommander(you just need to clear it by the maintainer to make sure that name isn't used anywhere else in the system)19:42
NCommanderThanks :-)19:44
* NCommander is one small step closer to DD19:44
NCommander\o/!19:46
NCommanderand once I reach DD status, I shall apply to join Utunbtu19:46
* NCommander thinks he spelled that right19:46
LaneyNCommander: utnubu (read it backwards)19:55
NCommanderI know its utubu in reverse19:56
NCommanderEr19:56
NCommander...19:56
NCommander.....19:56
* Laney titters19:56
* NCommander takes a gun and shoots his brain19:56
LaneyWhat do Totem, Banshee and Rhythmbox have in common that they don't with adobe flash and VLC?19:57
Laney(broken sound in the former)19:57
=== LucidFox_ is now known as LucidFox
pittiLaney: gstreamer?20:00
pittiLaney: might be that the former use pulseaudio, while the latter don't20:01
LaneyVLC definitely does20:01
peciskPulseAudio provides ALSA and Esound support, so theoretically Flash and VLC shouldn't care. However Flash is very picky about this.20:02
LaneyI had to install vlc-plugin-pulse for it to output sound, but it works now20:02
pittiLaney: try "killall pulseaudio" and restart totem/rb20:03
pittiLaney: didn't you just say that sound worked in vlc, but not in rb?20:03
Laneypitti: Yes, that's right20:03
Laneypitti: Good call, works now20:04
NCommanderhey lamont20:17
=== njpatel_ is now known as jpatel
=== jpatel is now known as njpatel
calchello21:39
calcit looks like they aren't expecting to fully fix power in our zip code until after thu sept 25 (so sometime after 2 weeks with no power)21:40
xMassi1986xHi22:41
xMassi1986xThe next release is scheduled for 31 th October?22:42
xMassi1986xZzZzZzZz22:44
bigonhttps://wiki.ubuntu.com/IntrepidReleaseSchedule22:47
Yoghurt^xMassi1986x no23:00
xMassi1986xYoghurt^: wtf?23:00
xMassi1986xYoghurt^: wtf?23:00
Yoghurt^the next release will be a beta23:01
Yoghurt^2008-10-0223:01
Yoghurt^and ubuntu 8.10 will hit the internet 2008-10-3023:01
haker3come to #antynonsensopedia23:03

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!