[01:27] <fta> fyi, i'm having a whole bunch of those with the latest kernel on intrepid: http://paste.ubuntu.com/48442/ Should i file a bug?
[02:28] <wgrant> fta: There's a bug on that... it's at the top of the 2.6.27 regression list linked to in the 2.6.27 status email sent yesterday, I believe.
[02:30] <Nafallo> wgrant: you're not online
[02:32] <wgrant> Nafallo: You are "service unavailable"
[02:32] <wgrant> I'll check logs in a sec.
[02:32] <Nafallo> :-/
[09:48]  * laga waves
[09:48] <laga> i'll prepare a new aufs patch.
[09:49] <laga> with a current aufs release, unless someone objects. amitk complained that the patch i posted earlier still has some issues resolved in current aufs versions
[10:00] <wgrant> laga: Any chance of having CONFIG_AUFS_HINOTIFY enabled?
[10:04] <laga> wgrant: i'll look into it
[10:05] <wgrant> laga: Thanks. It's a bit annoying having to maintain a local patch for just that on production servers.
[10:23] <laga> hum. i think we could just apply the patch that fixes the deadlock issue to my patch. that'd save me some work :)
[10:57] <laga> how can i use ccache or distcc with the kernel build system? simply export CC?
[11:04] <alex_joni> yup
[11:05]  * alex_joni uses ccache usually
[11:06] <laga> great. i guess i wont need distcc then..
[14:49] <laga> hum
[14:50] <laga> aufs was added as a big monolothic patch cobbled together from an upstream checkout and several patches
[14:50] <laga> this is a huge PITA to work with