/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2008/09/20/#ubuntu-mozillateam.txt

bdmurrayasac: okay, thanks00:01
Ampelbeinasac: in the stockresponses it says that apport-crashes which failed retrace should be closed. is this still true? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Responses#Firefox%20crash%20report%20that%20fails%20retrace00:08
asacAmpelbein: the responses probably need a face-lift00:11
asacAmpelbein: well. usually yes00:21
asacAmpelbein: _unless_ the reporter provided a good testcase00:21
asacAmpelbein: also one can try to manually retrace - i had a few that i could retrace here, but apport failed to do that00:21
Ampelbeinok, thanks.00:24
ftahttp://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/cool.gif00:47
asacfta: yay01:05
ftastill a bit slow but cool anyway01:06
ftaok, tb3 should be in a good enough shape, sending to ppa01:08
asacfta: ok. the feature looks much prettier01:10
asac;)01:10
asacon .head now01:10
asacwhen using the new xulrunner-1.901:11
ftawant me to send it to my ppa ?01:11
ftai have a bunch of users01:11
asacfta: xulrunner, yes. firefox. not yet i guess.01:15
ftahm, the eula thread has been closed at the #201 post01:15
asacfta: in forums?01:15
asacwhich is it?01:15
ftayes01:15
ftahttp://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=91944401:16
ftaoh, there's another one: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=581328601:16
fta" Firefox EULA was "giant error" -- Says Mozilla  "01:16
ftaasac, [reed], gasp.. http://paste.ubuntu.com/48442/01:19
asac"Iceweasel is as advanced, updated and secure as anything you get from Mozilla, or long before Ubuntu updates."01:20
asaclol01:20
asachttp://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=5786671&postcount=2401:20
[reed]fta: gasp, you need symbols!01:20
ftait's the kernel01:21
[reed]oh, firefox killed your kernel?01:21
ftano ff3.1 symbols01:21
[reed]hah01:21
ftanot01:21
ftano, it's not dead01:21
[reed]yes, but whose symbols are missing in order to track down where the problem is?01:21
ftaseems to be the scheduler01:22
ftakernel 2.6.2701:22
asacfta: maybe we should provide boring old -dbg packages again01:23
ftahere, it's not useful, this is not ff01:23
asacthis no dbgsym on ppa mess and dbgsym accidentially lost in archive things always come back to us01:24
ftawhat chan is about the kernel?01:24
asactoo frequently we are finding that we have no symbols for whatever some user experiencing a bug is running01:24
asacfta: which kernel?01:25
asac#ubuntu-kernel01:25
asacis the ubuntu channel01:25
asacsomeone please fix dpkg-genchanges :(01:28
asacit always include the full source for me01:28
ftareally?01:28
asacyes :(01:28
ftai use -sa or -sd, no problem01:29
asaci do bzr bd --merge --dont-purge --builder='debuild -S -si' ... and it includes the full source in changes01:29
asacbut dpkg-genchanges -S -si also does it01:29
ftappa = "bd --merge --build-dir=../ppa --builder='dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -S -sa -kB6EE20E8'"01:29
ftappa2 = "bd --merge --build-dir=../ppa --builder='dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -S -sd -kB6EE20E8'"01:29
ftappan = "bd --native --build-dir=../ppa --builder='dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -S -sa -kB6EE20E8'"01:29
asacsd?01:29
asacfta: ok. now i see the difference01:30
fta       -sd    Forces the exclusion of the original source and includes only the diff.01:30
asacand now i understand it01:30
asacwell01:30
asaci dont really understand01:30
asacthe manpage isnt accurate apparently for ubuntu01:30
fta-si is a debian magic option01:31
ftanot ubuntu01:31
asacyeah01:31
asacbut it worked until hardy01:31
asacit was like -sd01:31
fta-0/-1 vs -0ubuntu101:31
asacbecause we never have -0 -101:31
asacfta: yeah. but now even if i upload -0ubuntu1~asac201:32
asacit includes it01:32
asacbut well. thanks01:32
asaci will use -sd now ;)01:32
asacone step further away from debian01:32
ftai assume -sd is fine for debian too01:32
ftayou just have to think 1st01:32
asacyeah ;)01:33
asactoo much for me :)01:33
asacespecially when you consider that i always typed -si even though its the default ;)01:33
asacbut then in ubuntu it definitly had kind of force character here01:33
ftahttp://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=92431901:38
ftahttp://www.ubuntugeek.com/how-to-install-chromium-google-chrome-in-ubuntu-using-deb-package.html01:39
asacnice ... is the packaging available?01:40
asacor just the debs?01:40
ftadonno. codeweavers is a commercial/non-free wine01:41
asacoh01:44
asacfta: ok. i am uploading this firefox 3 thing to my security QA ppa. once that has some positive feedback we can spread this more widely i think.01:46
ftaok01:47
asacfta:  have you tried to pull that into 3.1?01:47
asacor is the patch completely diverged there?01:47
ftanot since firefox-3.0.head #32301:48
fta~2 days ago01:48
asacredhat bug 21707601:58
ubottuBug 217076 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/217076 is private01:58
asacubottu: no comprende :)01:58
ubottuSorry, I don't know anything about no comprende :)01:58
asacfedora bug 21707601:58
ubottuBug 217076 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/217076 is private01:58
asachttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=21707602:00
ubottubugzilla.redhat.com bug 217076 in ppp "ChapMS2 is broken in pppd-2.4.4" [Medium,Closed: rawhide]02:00
asacbugzilla.redhat.com bug 21707602:00
ubottuBug 217076 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/217076 is private02:00
asaci give up02:00
wikzfta: you there !02:10
ftayes02:11
wikzfta: cool02:11
wikzlisten,I forgot to add the file .desktop02:12
wikz:(02:12
wikzdh_install -pspicebird-0.702:12
wikzcp: cannot stat `./debian/spicebird-0.7.desktop': No such file or directory02:12
wikzDo I have to start from the beginning ?02:12
ftano02:12
wikzThis bloody thing takes 2 hiurs to build02:12
fta:)02:12
wikzIt's 7 in the morning and I just realized it :|02:13
asachehe02:13
ftago to your build dir, where you have the debian dir, fix your problem, then dpkg-buildpackage -nc02:14
asacwikz: no02:14
wikzso How do I resume from here? I have added the .desktop file02:14
wikzok ok02:14
asacwikz: yeah what fta said02:14
ftanc stands for no clean02:14
wikzcool02:14
asacwikz: are you working with bzr?02:14
wikzlaunchpad ppa ?02:14
asacwikz: no ... bzr branches02:15
asacour packages are maintained in bzr02:15
wikzYeah with fta's PPA TB3A102:15
asacyeah. but thats doomed to get painful02:15
ftawhat ?02:15
asacyou should work directly from his bzr branch i think02:15
asacbut not sure how much related those packages would be02:16
wikzI tested to see if it works with spice the mozilla way before doing the debian way02:16
wikzasac: I will once I get hold of this whole debian building stuff :D02:16
asacyou are using dpkg-buildpackage for "the mozilla way" ;)02:16
wikzasac: no no02:16
wikzI did it earlier just to check02:17
asacah ok02:17
wikzcoz we merged calendar into it02:17
wikzlightning is not an extension in spice02:18
asacwikz: how did you do that?02:18
asacwikz: i hope you didnt hack too much ;)02:18
asacunless you change the ui too i mean02:19
wikzlolz I can't help you on that.our prinicpal hacker does all that stuff02:19
asack02:19
wikzprasaad sunkari02:19
wikz#spicebird on irc.mozilla.org02:19
ftadamn, configure does not pass MOZ_OBJDIR recursively, it depends on .mozconfig for that :(02:24
asacfta: oh02:25
asacfta: you can have a mozconfig with just  MOZ_OBJDIR02:25
asacI think02:25
asacthere is a variable02:25
asacbut i'd say its a bug02:25
ftayep, but that's an hybrid thing.. i'd prefer to stay clean, if possible02:26
asacyeah02:26
asacfix the configure bug then02:26
ftaeven export MOZ_OBJDIR doesn't work02:26
asacwhy is in source building not supported anymore?02:27
asacbecause they dont want to care for a proper clean?02:27
ftadonno, kairo said so in the source02:37
ftathat whole comm-central thing is a mess, they should have focus on xul sdk instead02:38
asaci think tbird folks have in priincipal quite similar isues that lets say songbird have02:39
asacthey lack people that are wrestling with firefox core devs ot get things into xul02:39
asacbut thats just a guess out of my guts02:39
asacfta: i think the only thing they see is that they would slip another firefox cycle if they would focus on rewriting mailnews/ in xul sdk fashion02:40
asacfirst02:40
asacso they want to add the features the world is desparately waiting for first02:40
ftabut by doing so, they have to fight with an unbearable build system over and over again02:41
asacyeah02:41
ftare-damned, the recursion thing is in autoconf, not in moz02:42
asaci am not really into tbird development02:42
asacbut i think that rewriting all the old cruft in proper javascript would have given more flexibility afterwards02:43
asacso it would have paid off02:43
asacbut then, imap support and such are really performance critical02:43
wikzasac: I think the world is waiting for a porno mode in firefox :P02:43
asacwikz: why not in tbird?02:44
wikzasac: privacy mode in tbird would be helpful02:45
wikz?02:45
asacwikz: what is "privacy" mode?02:46
wikzthe one IE8 was bragging about.Where none of the user info is stored and stuff02:46
wikzand chrome02:46
asacstill dont understand how to do a privacy mode for a email application02:47
wikzthat's what I meant by a porno mode :P02:47
wikzin firefox.02:48
ftait's supposed to be in ff soon, probably 3.1 now that google put up the pressure02:49
wikzfta: Thanks for your support.That wtretched thing did get built but I did something silly which I'm not going to tell you :P02:50
ftaeheh02:51
wikzfta: You don't sleep on weekends either ?02:51
ftai do, but when i'm on something like today, nights get shorter :P02:52
ftadpkg-source is just a slow pig now in tb3.. ~500MB of source is too02:59
wikzasac: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44969103:11
wikzsuper cool to me :)03:11
ubottuMozilla bug 449691 in Mail Window Front End "improved message (view) reader pane" [Normal,New]03:11
=== asac_ is now known as asac
=== asac_ is now known as asac
gnomefreakwhy does every script for irssi use the status bar for info and crap. like its not cluttered enough :(11:50
gnomefreakhmm this looks strange13:00
ftaasac, i don't know why but my problem with tb3 is not really the .mozconfig but that the main configure wants to run build/autoconf/configure during the recursion, which does not exist. it's fine when using the standard client.mk15:05
asacok ... screens are in bug ;)15:10
asachttp://launchpadlibrarian.net/17779249/firstrun1.png15:10
asachttp://launchpadlibrarian.net/17779270/about_rights.png15:10
asachttp://launchpadlibrarian.net/17779313/about_rights_expanded.png15:10
asacfta: hmm15:11
asacfta: is there autoconf/configure somewhere? (e.g. not in build/ directory)?15:11
Nafallobug?15:12
asacNafallo: you know that bug, dont you?15:12
asacits _THE_ bug ;)15:12
Nafallopossibly. haven't seen it, but I should have heard about it.15:13
ftaasac, on the 1st screenshot, i'm having a hard time seeing the bar15:13
Nafallowhat was the verdict from Mozilla?15:13
asacNafallo: bug 1 has 840 comments ... _THE_ bug has 470 within a week ;)15:13
ubottuError: Could not parse data returned by Launchpad: The read operation timed out (https://launchpad.net/bugs/1/+text)15:13
asacNafallo: its fun reading ... bug 26965615:13
ubottuLaunchpad bug 269656 in firefox-3.0 "AN IRRELEVANT LICENSE IS PRESENTED TO YOU FREE-OF-CHARGE ON STARTUP" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/26965615:13
pwnguinmore like a nightmare15:13
pwnguin400 opinions15:14
asacwell15:14
Nafallo\o/15:14
asacyou can just ignore the trollish comments ;)15:14
pwnguinand accusations. and several replies from sabdfl15:14
asacfta: well. it sticks there until you close firefox or close that notification bar15:14
asacfta: the idea is that its doesnt get in your way15:15
ftai guess it's fine, and definitely better than before15:15
Nafalloasac: make it glow in red :-)15:16
asacNafallo: we can make it yellow15:16
Nafalloand the glow? :-)15:16
asacby giving it not a "info", but a warning priority15:16
pwnguini wonder why an anti phishing site has an eula15:16
asacpwnguin: it doesnt have one anymore15:17
asacpwnguin: there are webservices terms15:17
Nafalloasac: give it killing_is_easy_killing_is_fun prio :-)15:17
pwnguinok, i wonder why an antiphishing webservice has terms15:17
* Nafallo stops trolling a bit again ;-)15:17
asacpwnguin: why? because they want to put a disclaimer there that its not 100% accurate15:17
ftaasac, http://paste.ubuntu.com/48585/15:18
pwnguinheh15:18
pwnguini wonder how wikipedia survives without that ;)15:18
asacso people that go to a website and dont get a warning, but get their identity robbed cant sue them15:18
asacpwnguin: wikipedia doesnt offer a webservice that claims to prevent you from identity theft15:18
pwnguinneither does mozilla ;)15:18
asacpwnguin: they do through google15:19
asacpwnguin: consider this. when a browser puts gmail in your homepage15:19
asacyou would have to read terms before using gmail15:19
pwnguinwhich nobody does15:20
asacthis service just doesnt have an account for a user15:20
asacpwnguin: right. but its the webservice providers decision what they want to show the user15:20
asacand if they think its legally required to do so15:20
pwnguinits never required, just less risky15:21
asacright15:21
asacand it doesnt really hurt15:21
asacpwnguin: in worst case you saw those terms for nothing15:21
asacin best case you feel informed15:22
asacnormally you dont care15:22
asacpwnguin: have you looked at the screens?15:24
pwnguini saw some on planet mozilla15:24
asacpwnguin: look at the one i posted above15:24
asac16:10 < asac> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17779249/firstrun1.png15:25
asac16:10 < asac> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17779270/about_rights.png15:25
asac16:10 < asac> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17779313/about_rights_expanded.png15:25
pwnguinlemme fix some other problems on my intrepid box first15:25
pwnguin(i have a scrollback...)15:25
pwnguinasac: so the firefox brand requires the MPL?15:29
asacpwnguin: more or less yes.15:33
asacfor comparison: http://people.ubuntu.com/~asac/mozeula.html15:35
asacthat was the eula  before ;)15:35
asaci feel like nspluginwrapper could deserve a rewrite ;)15:48
asaci tried to debug this beast yesterday ... its interesting at best15:48
pwnguini wonder, can you use javascript to render on top of a video in firefox?15:50
asacpwnguin: afaict the not-windowless plugin will always be on top15:51
asaci somehow dont even understand how nspluginwrapper is doing this15:51
asaccan you paint to a Drawable in X from a different process?15:51
asacxembed is simple but that is not windowless :/15:52
pwnguini only learn stuff about x when it breaks15:52
asacyeah. here its broken ;) do you want to learn it?15:52
asac:)15:52
pwnguindepends15:53
pwnguini got an email from a moz recruiter the other day15:54
asacwho was it? Dan?15:54
pwnguinjulie?15:55
pwnguinits pretty strange to get an email because of "comments you wrote on a blog"15:56
asacpwnguin: hehe16:22
ftaasac, in hg, configure is/are no longer in the tree16:51
asacfta: you mean configure.in is gone?16:51
ftano, there's only the .in16:52
asacgood16:52
asaci like that ;)16:52
asacwe had to patch it anyway all the time16:52
asacthough now if you dont auto gen it during build you might not realize that configure.in has changed16:52
ftain cvs, there was a bot running autoconf each time there was a commit of configure.in, it's gone16:52
asaci dont mind16:53
asacfor me checking files that get generated are just clutter in the archive16:53
ftait is not important for us, we use DEB_AUTO_UPDATE_AUTOCONF16:54
asacfta: yeah. other packages (e.g. that wnt to ship a patch) should probably also generate .md5sums16:54
ftabut for tb3, we need to generate 2 configure files16:54
asacso they can abort build when patch isnt updated, but configure.in is16:54
ftacdbs can only do 116:54
asacfta: right16:55
asaci have the same impassee in NM16:55
asacwhere i currently rip the vpn plugins into separate source packages16:55
asacbut i would love to use multiple configures there16:55
asacmaybe worth improving cdbs16:55
asacbut certainly gettig it into main tree16:55
asacbut that would mean big changes to autotools.mk i guess16:56
asacall autotools should be able to handle multiple subtrees16:56
asacok... out running some errands. i have to get away from computer. did too much last week :(16:57
ftai just need to find the right hook16:58
wikzfta: Out of curiosity,does debian/rules pick up the config options I set in my .mozconfig ?16:58
ftacommon-configure-indep doesn't seem right16:58
ftawikz, no16:58
asacfta: using existing hooks to manually to the second run is a good intermediate solution16:58
asacbut i think we should invest some work at some point to improve cdbs16:59
ftawikz, i think it's in rules.mk16:59
wikzI will take a look16:59
asacfta: does the second configure depend on the first configure ... or even that first has already built?16:59
asacfta: common-configure-arch17:00
ftawikz, something triggers build/autoconf/mozconfig2configure17:00
asacfta: or even common-configure-impl::17:00
asacwikz: no it usually wont pick up .mozconfig17:01
asacthats only client.mk17:01
wikzasac: I need to pass a . ${topsrcdir}/collab/config/mozconfig17:01
asacfta: maybe we should consider to provide an alternative to cdbs CONFIGURE in mozilla-devscripts17:01
asaclike MOZCONFIGURE ...17:01
ftatrying with common-configure-arch instead of common-configure-indep17:01
asacwikz: we do that in the package directly17:02
asacwikz: err in the CONFIGURE FLAGS17:02
asacwikz: but it became better in the past because now you can more easily extend configure.in17:02
ftaasac, i'll think about it, i just want to quickly finish that tb3, it's getting on my nerves17:02
asacfta: sure17:02
asactry the -impl17:02
asachook17:02
asaci think thats the one that should be ok17:02
asacyou could try to use -impl:: $(DEB_BUILDDIR)/subdir/Makefile17:03
asacerr17:03
asacyou could try to use -impl:: $(DEB_BUILDDIR)/subdir/config.status ;)17:03
asacand implement your own config.status until we fix that in autotools.mk17:04
asacok ... off for real17:04
wikzasac: You mean DEB_CONFIGURE_USER_FLAGS= ? fta ^^17:05
wikzfta: were those last couple of lines by asac for me ?17:05
ftano, for me17:06
wikzok17:06
wikzso fta what do you suggest I do If I had to pass on that flag ?17:06
wikz. ${topsrcdir}/collab/config/mozconfig17:07
ftawhat do you have in that file ?17:07
wikzonly one line17:07
ftait's better to use DEB_CONFIGURE_USER_FLAGS for --flags and DEB_CONFIGURE_SCRIPT_ENV for env vars17:07
wikzhttp://pastebin.mozilla.org/54051817:08
wikzthis is the file at collab/config.moz17:08
wikzthis is the file at collab/config/mozconfig17:08
ftathe two MOZ_CO are not used for building, it's jsut for your tarball, the two options could go to DEB_CONFIGURE_USER_FLAGS17:10
wikzfta: will do that17:10
wikzfta: and for the other two ac_add options ?Should I add a section DEB_CONFIGURE_SCRIPT_ENV and put them there ?17:11
wikzin the debian/rules file ?17:11
ftaac_add_options should go to DEB_CONFIGURE_USER_FLAGS in debian/rules17:12
ftamk_add_options should go to DEB_CONFIGURE_SCRIPT_ENV in debian/rules but here, it's just MOZ_CO_xx so only useful to checkout sources, which should *not* dynamic, everything should already be in your tarball17:13
ftas/dynamic/be dynamic/17:13
wikzfta: done17:15
ftaasac, common-configure-arch and configure/$(DEB_MOZ_APPLICATION) are called too late (ie after configure is run) so i used post-patches, it means i create the sub-autoconf before the main one but it's ok.19:21
asacfta: post-patches should get the autoconf run, thats correct19:32
asacbut i would run the subconfigure in -impl/-arch or is that too late too19:32
asac?19:33
ftathe sub-configure is run by the main configure itself, not by our rules19:33
asacok. thought it was different19:38
asacfta: have you looked where the autoconf is hooked in (the cdbs mail autoconf)?19:39
asacis that in post-patches?19:39
ftacommon-configure-arch common-configure-indep:: debian/stamp-autotools-files19:39
ftadebian/stamp-autotools-files:19:39
ftait's in there19:39
asacyeah19:39
asacok19:39
ftathere's a missing hook in between, as common-configure-arch is used both to run autoconf and run configure19:40
asaci think that cdbs could deserve a separate common-autotools-files19:41
asacso we could hook in other things _before_ configure is run19:41
ftait may be possible to hook in between by inserting code between the include but it's ugly19:41
asacfta: right. should be split up like above i think19:41
asacfta: yeah. thats ugly19:41
asaccdbs should have a proper hook to make it usable for sub layouts ;)19:41
ftai agree19:42
asacbut then one could also look how to rpoperly do sub-layouts19:42
asacwithout the need to write once own stuff19:43
ftabtw, i dropped OBJDIR, there's no reason in-source build should not be supported19:43
asacso lets go for post-patches for now19:43
asacfta: ok. where did you read that OBJDIR isnt supported again?19:43
asaci forgot19:43
ftahttp://developer.mozilla.org/en/Comm-central_source_code_(Mercurial)#Building19:45
asacfta: actually i would love to be able to use OBJDIR by default19:47
asacone goal of the packaging should always be to also allow good upstream development in the packages ... and having the objects sorted to their own tree is helpful for that imo19:47
ftait's possible19:48
ftabut i find it weird19:48
asacfta: what was the problem again? that the subconfigure didnt use the env?19:48
ftayou edit the source, then you have to build it from somewhere else19:48
ftano, with tb3, i thought objdir wasn't passed in the recursion but in fact, after some troubleshooting, it's just that the sub configure does not exist19:49
asacfta: oh. yeah. but i am doing that all the time with my upstream tree ... its just so much better to have two terminals open: 1. for editing, 2. for building instead of having to deal with all the clutter in your source trree19:49
asacfta: ah ok19:50
asaccool19:50
asacif we could use that it would also remove all future unclean "clean" target issues19:50
asacat least from the package POV19:50
asacclean::19:50
asac   rm -rf objdir19:50
ftanot even needed, objdir is wiped out by default19:51
asacyeah. then thats good19:51
asaci just wanted to show the point ;)19:51
asacfta: so i also need comm-central?19:52
asac(i only have mozilla-central as an upstream tree)19:52
ftayes19:52
asacfta: do i need to checkout comm-centrel inside of moz-central?19:52
ftano, clone comm-central, then the client.mk script will checkout moz-central inside mozilla/ (hence the mozilla/mozilla dir) + some other stuff19:53
asacoh ... that way around19:54
asachmm19:54
sebnerasac: /me just discovered that installing libflashsupport fixes the no sound with youtube issue but I thought this was already fixed? O_o  ^^20:14
asacsebner: you need set-pulseaudio maybe20:25
asacsebner: the landing to make that the default option will happen soonish20:25
asacluke is working on a solution that doesnt break KDE ;)20:25
asac... which was the blocker to get that out20:25
sebnerasac: I thought I already did O_o )20:25
sebnerasac: bah, who needs kde :P20:25
asacsebner: actually this kind of diversity - even though it can be cumbersome - usually helps to keep quality up ... as we have to find a _real_ solution instead of implementing whatever dirty hack comes first ;)20:27
sebnerasac: I know, I know ^^20:27
sebnerasac: do you think it will be implemented before beta freeze/release?20:28
asacbefore beta20:29
sebnersounds great :D20:29
asacshould happen any day20:30
sebner\o/20:30
asacunless something more important came up, luke is working on it20:30
sebnerkk20:30
asacand knows a solution from what i heard20:30
sebnermaybe then I can satisfy my sister ^^20:30
asacyeah... painful thing indeed20:30
asachope we can find a way to backport this to hardy20:31
sebnerasac: already too late , most will upgrade intrepid. LTS or no LTS. doesn't matter20:32
asacwell... there are shipping a bunch of devices with hardy20:33
asacand more to come i think20:33
sebnerbah, mainstream :P20:34
asacyeah ... but all fanatics are already using linux ;)20:47
asacwe need more mainstream mindshare20:47
asacthats where the masses are waiting ;)20:47
asacor not waiting ;)20:48
sebnerasac: as long as we get better hardware support :)20:57
asacok ... i am off for some real-life fun ;)21:01
asaccu21:01
sebnerasac:  bye :)21:05
ftaasac, help!22:15
ftahttp://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/tb3-1.png22:15
ftahttp://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/tb3-2.png22:15
ftahttp://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/tb3-3.png22:15
ftasame from dist/bin22:42

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!