| mwhudson | exarkun: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad-bazaar/+bug/260626 | 00:13 |
|---|---|---|
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 260626 in launchpad-bazaar "Cannot easily delete branches" [Undecided,Triaged] | 00:13 |
| === cjwatson_ is now known as cjwatson | ||
| === Ng_ is now known as Ng | ||
| tretle | hi, I was wondering if there was some api to launchpad that could be used in apps like anjuta for a start page | 01:32 |
| tretle | integration with gnome docs and some of launchpads features would be really cool for a webkit based start page | 01:33 |
| greg-g | Does launchpad know if more than one LP Bug has been linked to a single upstream bug? (ie: a way to make sure there aren't duplicate bugs both pointing to the upstream bug) | 01:52 |
| wgrant | greg-g: I've had it warn me if I add a link that already exists. | 01:56 |
| wgrant | I'm not sure that a page exists showing this duplication, however. | 01:56 |
| === _thumper_ is now known as thumper | ||
| greg-g | wgrant: good to know that it has warned you, at least. Thanks! | 02:08 |
| wgrant | How often is LP meant to pull down CVEs from Mitre? I think it's having issues. | 04:23 |
| === beuno-afk is now known as beuno | ||
| michelecs | Hi. How I ask my PPA to build a package on more than one ditribution? In my changelog I wrote "Hardy". Do I need to write "any" or a sort of list e.g. "gutsy, hardy, intrepid"? | 12:14 |
| Nafallo | upload separate sources I'd assume. | 12:15 |
| laga | you can also copy the packages | 12:15 |
| laga | but i dont think it will rebuild them | 12:15 |
| geser | no, it won't rebuild | 12:16 |
| geser | you need a seperate upload for each distribution (and update the package version a little) | 12:16 |
| laga | the copy packages thing could do that automagically. oh well | 12:17 |
| geser | laga: that would break the signature on the .dsc file | 12:17 |
| laga | does that matter? | 12:18 |
| geser | I guess the are people around who won't trust a source package with a broken .dsc signature (I myself wouldn't trust it) | 12:20 |
| laga | do you actually verify the signature of a source package before installing binary packages from a PPA? | 12:21 |
| geser | laga: I currently don't use any PPA | 12:23 |
| laga | so it's a moot point anyways. i doubt that people actually verify the signature on the source package | 12:24 |
| geser | and I know that at lease ScottK doesn't use any PPA until PPAs are signed | 12:24 |
| michelecs | Now I'm downloading the source for a package which has been build for hardy and intrepid... Let's have a look to its changelog | 12:24 |
| laga | i still wonder how signing will be implemented. if it's just LP auto-signing the packages then that's not a lot more secure... | 12:24 |
| laga | but to each their own | 12:25 |
| geser | I guess that's what will practically happen (not checking the signature) but it is still wrong to break it | 12:25 |
| laga | geser: so, it LP can sign packages, it might as well sign the source package when rebuilding ;) | 12:25 |
| laga | s/it/if/ | 12:26 |
| geser | sure | 12:27 |
| michelecs | I had a look at the changelog. Each package has intrepid or hardy (this or is xor). So I think I need to upload two sources. | 12:28 |
| geser | michelecs: yes | 12:29 |
| laga | if your package is already in the ppa, just do use dch to create a new changelog entry for the target distro and run debuild -S -sd | 12:29 |
| laga | to force exclusion of the orig.tar.gz | 12:29 |
| geser | but it should be sufficient to do only one full-source upload (incl. orig.tar.gz) and the second upload only be the other .diff.gz (and .dsc) | 12:29 |
| laga | i found some interesting behavior the other day | 12:30 |
| laga | i uploaded a package to intrepid main on accident because i omitted the dput target. it was reject, of course. then i uploaded to the PPA and that upload was rejected as well | 12:31 |
| michelecs | What about naming the binary package? Is there a way to append some extra info to the filename? (e.g. '-intrepid' or '-hardy') | 12:31 |
| laga | LP claimed the source package already was in the archives | 12:31 |
| geser | michelecs: why would you want do that? | 12:32 |
| michelecs | geser: To avoid they have the same filename... | 12:32 |
| geser | michelecs: the filename includes the package version | 12:33 |
| michelecs | geser: so they will differ by ppa1 (the first build, for example for hardy) and ppa2 (the second build, for example for intrepid)? | 12:34 |
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| geser | michelecs: yes | 12:36 |
| michelecs | Thanks guys... This is what I need to know. | 12:38 |
| geser | laga: please ask cprov or bigjools if it's a known bug | 12:38 |
| Hobbsee | laga: re: launchpad & autosigning, that's what i would have thought, too. I don't see why it's such a big priority | 12:39 |
| laga | Hobbsee: autosigning is a big priority? that's news to me ;) | 12:40 |
| Hobbsee | laga: well, they say it's one of the more important bugs they want to fix, and it's been "in progress" for a while, iirc. | 12:40 |
| Hobbsee | of course, that doesn't necessarily say a lot, but... | 12:40 |
| laga | yeah. PPAs have been around for a while. but i don't need it, so i'm not complaining | 12:41 |
| laga | or rather, there is other stuff that's bugging me a lot more ;) | 12:42 |
| === nebi is now known as nebi|away | ||
| === nebi|away is now known as nebi | ||
| tucuna | hello - have a Q about security key and launchpad PPA repos - is it essential? is it irresponsible to add a repo without a key? | 14:40 |
| nedko | packages are signed, not repos themself, AFAIK | 15:00 |
| === dehm^also is now known as dehm | ||
| NCommander | Is there anyone who can help me with my @ubuntu.com email? | 15:06 |
| nubae | hi there... I'm having an issue with launchpad I dont understand... I'm trying to login from bzr | 15:14 |
| nubae | like so: bzr launchpad-login Nubae | 15:14 |
| nubae | but get the following: bzr: ERROR: https://launchpad.net/%7ENubae/%2Bsshkeys is permanently redirected to https://launchpad.net/~nubae/+sshkeys | 15:14 |
| nubae | any ideas? | 15:14 |
| Hobbsee | NCommander: what about it? | 15:15 |
| NCommander | Hobbsee, its been two weeks and I still don't have it, or my kubuntu.org address | 15:15 |
| NCommander | (I was told it takes roughly a week for that to magicially pop up) | 15:15 |
| Hobbsee | NCommander: what's your launchpad ID? | 15:15 |
| NCommander | sonicmctails | 15:16 |
| Dominic | nubae: what happens if you use a lower-case 'N' instead? | 15:16 |
| nubae | username not recognised | 15:16 |
| Hobbsee | NCommander: ok, what address are you trying to use? | 15:17 |
| NCommander | sonicmctails@{k}ubuntu.org | 15:17 |
| NCommander | (well .com for ubuntu) | 15:17 |
| Hobbsee | and are you using gmail to test this? | 15:17 |
| NCommander | Hobbsee, yes. | 15:17 |
| Hobbsee | that'll be why. | 15:17 |
| Hobbsee | it's working, but gmail tends to mark mail sent to yourself as spam | 15:17 |
| NCommander | But shouldn't the addresses also show up on my Launchpad page? | 15:18 |
| Hobbsee | (this is a common problem) | 15:18 |
| Hobbsee | not unless you add it, and that can be a bad idea. | 15:18 |
| NCommander | I knew about the emails from yourself issue :-/ | 15:18 |
| Hobbsee | (possible infinite loop - I hear that at least a few people got bitten by it) | 15:18 |
| NCommander | Ouch | 15:18 |
| Hobbsee | you should have a mail from me. | 15:18 |
| Hobbsee | did you get it? :) | 15:18 |
| nubae | Dominic: should I change my username to all lowercase on launchapd? | 15:18 |
| NCommander | nope | 15:19 |
| Dominic | nubae: well I can't even see your page from my browser, nor can I search for your username. Sure that it's right? | 15:19 |
| Hobbsee | hmmm. did it hit spam? | 15:19 |
| === nebi is now known as nebi|away | ||
| NCommander | Hobbsee, nope | 15:19 |
| NCommander | Hobbsee, your too loved to be spam :-) | 15:20 |
| Hobbsee | strange. wonder if it got greylisted, or something. | 15:20 |
| nubae | ah wait, I changed my username today... is that why... it is here: https://launchpad.net/~dvanassche | 15:20 |
| Hobbsee | well, that's what i would have thought - but i haven't got a failed message from it. | 15:20 |
| Dominic | nubae: heh, then yeah, you're logging in with the wrong username | 15:20 |
| nubae | ok, so my username, even though changed on launchpad is still dvanassche | 15:21 |
| NCommander | Hobbsee, I am getting mail, I just got a post that was sent to debian-hurd | 15:21 |
| Dominic | nubae: are you sure you're not confused with your display name? Visit https://launchpad.net/~dvanassche/+edit - your display name is at the top, username is second | 15:22 |
| nubae | aaah... ok, doh... my bad... thanks Dominic | 15:22 |
| Hobbsee | NCommander: to your @ubuntu.com address? | 15:23 |
| NCommander | Hobbsee, no, to gmail, just saying I'm recieving general mail ;-) | 15:24 |
| Hobbsee | NCommander: ah, right :) | 15:25 |
| Hobbsee | NCommander: poke el*mo about it tomorrow, i guess, if you don't receive the mail late. | 15:25 |
| Nafallo | ehrm. file an RT rather. | 15:26 |
| Hobbsee | or that. or bug Nafallo directly :P | 15:26 |
| Nafallo | Hobbsee: yea. power cycle systems will probably help? ;-) | 15:27 |
| * Nafallo is not an admin :-) | 15:27 | |
| Hobbsee | Nafallo: i didn't know you supported windows? | 15:28 |
| Hobbsee | (and pity!) | 15:28 |
| Nafallo | Hobbsee: I like windows. they give me sunlight :-) | 15:28 |
| Nafallo | also, we're drifting off-topic. priv instead? :-) | 15:29 |
| NCommander | Hobbsee, finally got it | 15:30 |
| NCommander | That's some serious lag | 15:30 |
| Hobbsee | NCommander: \o/ | 15:30 |
| NCommander | at least now I can claim maintainership of my packages in Ubuntu | 15:30 |
| Nafallo | yay \o/ | 15:31 |
| NCommander | And my Kubuntu one works too :-) | 15:32 |
| === nebi|away is now known as nebi | ||
| infinito | does anyone know why lp is giving me this error while trying to upload a package to ppa? Unhandled exception processing upload: 'ascii' codec can't encode character u'\xe1' in position 73: ordinal not in range(128) | 15:48 |
| === nebi is now known as nebi|away | ||
| === nebi|away is now known as nebi | ||
| geser | infinito: it looks like you used a non-ascii char (0xe1 = รก if it's latin 1) where lp didn't like it | 16:09 |
| infinito | geser: hummmm should i remove accents from the control file? My name has accents.... | 16:10 |
| laga | i wonder if utf8 would work better | 16:10 |
| geser | yes, UTF-8 is better | 16:11 |
| geser | infinito: that should be a last effort, try using UTF-8 first | 16:12 |
| infinito | geser: i'm using utf-8 | 16:12 |
| geser | hmm | 16:13 |
| infinito | it's weird, because first time i tried to upload, it went ok, but failed to build because of dependencies | 16:15 |
| infinito | then i chenged the deps, tried again to upload, and it got rejected | 16:16 |
| geser | that's really weird | 16:16 |
| infinito | yeps, it is | 16:17 |
| geser | when was your first upload | 16:18 |
| Ampelbein | no, its not weird. you try uploading the same version-subversion with changed files. so the md5-sums do not match. try using -0ubuntu2 | 16:18 |
| geser | ? | 16:18 |
| === nebi is now known as nebi|away | ||
| === nebi|away is now known as nebi | ||
| geser | Ampelbein: wouldn't LP complain about md5 mismatch instead? and not about a non-ascii char | 16:19 |
| Ampelbein | hmm. could be. i shouldn't read only half of the text. nevermind. | 16:20 |
| infinito | Ampelbein: you were right | 16:26 |
| infinito | but maybe lp should give a more concise error | 16:26 |
| === nebi is now known as nebi|away | ||
| michelecs | Hi Guys. What if a package of mine needs some dependencies which are already in my PPA? Will Launchpad pick them automatically? | 17:27 |
| siretart | michelecs: yes | 17:34 |
| michelecs | Is there a way to use -i or -l and tell debchange "Please don't always append ubuntu1 to the version since I'm already using my suffix"? | 18:15 |
| === fdd is now known as ionutjula | ||
| zerwas | Hello | 21:10 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!