[00:13] <mwhudson> exarkun: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad-bazaar/+bug/260626
[01:32] <tretle> hi, I was wondering if there was some api to launchpad that could be used in apps like anjuta for a start page
[01:33] <tretle> integration with gnome docs and some of launchpads features would be really cool for a webkit based start page
[01:52] <greg-g> Does launchpad know if more than one LP Bug has been linked to a single upstream bug? (ie: a way to make sure there aren't duplicate bugs both pointing to the upstream bug)
[01:56] <wgrant> greg-g: I've had it warn me if I add a link that already exists.
[01:56] <wgrant> I'm not sure that a page exists showing this duplication, however.
[02:08] <greg-g> wgrant: good to know that it has warned you, at least.  Thanks!
[04:23] <wgrant> How often is LP meant to pull down CVEs from Mitre? I think it's having issues.
[12:14] <michelecs> Hi. How I ask my PPA to build a package on more than one ditribution? In my changelog I wrote "Hardy". Do I need to write "any" or a sort of list e.g. "gutsy, hardy, intrepid"?
[12:15] <Nafallo> upload separate sources I'd assume.
[12:15] <laga> you can also copy the packages
[12:15] <laga> but i dont think it will rebuild them
[12:16] <geser> no, it won't rebuild
[12:16] <geser> you need a seperate upload for each distribution (and update the package version a little)
[12:17] <laga> the copy packages thing could do that automagically. oh well
[12:17] <geser> laga: that would break the signature on the .dsc file
[12:18] <laga> does that matter?
[12:20] <geser> I guess the are people around who won't trust a source package with a broken .dsc signature (I myself wouldn't trust it)
[12:21] <laga> do you actually verify the signature of a source package before installing binary packages from a PPA?
[12:23] <geser> laga: I currently don't use any PPA
[12:24] <laga> so it's a moot point anyways. i doubt that people actually verify the signature on the source package
[12:24] <geser> and I know that at lease ScottK doesn't use any PPA until PPAs are signed
[12:24] <michelecs> Now I'm downloading the source for a package which has been build for hardy and intrepid... Let's have a look to its changelog
[12:24] <laga> i still wonder how signing will be implemented. if it's just LP auto-signing the packages then that's not a lot more secure...
[12:25] <laga> but to each their own
[12:25] <geser> I guess that's what will practically happen (not checking the signature) but it is still wrong to break it
[12:25] <laga> geser: so, it LP can sign packages, it might as well sign the source package when rebuilding ;)
[12:26] <laga> s/it/if/
[12:27] <geser> sure
[12:28] <michelecs> I had a look at the changelog. Each package has intrepid or hardy (this or is xor). So I think I need to upload two sources.
[12:29] <geser> michelecs: yes
[12:29] <laga> if your package is already in the ppa, just do use dch to create a new changelog entry for the target distro and run debuild -S -sd
[12:29] <laga> to force exclusion of the orig.tar.gz
[12:29] <geser> but it should be sufficient to do only one full-source upload (incl. orig.tar.gz) and the second upload only be the other .diff.gz (and .dsc)
[12:30] <laga> i found some interesting behavior the other day
[12:31] <laga> i uploaded a package to intrepid main on accident because i omitted the dput target. it was reject, of course. then i uploaded to the PPA and that upload was rejected as well
[12:31] <michelecs> What about naming the binary package? Is there a way to append some extra info to the filename? (e.g. '-intrepid' or '-hardy')
[12:31] <laga> LP claimed the source package already was in the archives
[12:32] <geser> michelecs: why would you want do that?
[12:32] <michelecs> geser: To avoid they have the same filename...
[12:33] <geser> michelecs: the filename includes the package version
[12:34] <michelecs> geser: so they will differ by ppa1 (the first build, for example for hardy) and ppa2 (the second build, for example for intrepid)?
[12:36] <geser> michelecs: yes
[12:38] <michelecs> Thanks guys... This is what I need to know.
[12:38] <geser> laga: please ask cprov or bigjools if it's a known bug
[12:39] <Hobbsee> laga: re: launchpad & autosigning, that's what i would have thought, too.  I don't see why it's such a big priority
[12:40] <laga> Hobbsee: autosigning is a big priority? that's news to me ;)
[12:40] <Hobbsee> laga: well, they say it's one of the more important bugs they want to fix, and it's been "in progress" for a while, iirc.
[12:40] <Hobbsee> of course, that doesn't necessarily say a lot, but...
[12:41] <laga> yeah. PPAs have been around for a while. but i don't need it, so i'm not complaining
[12:42] <laga> or rather, there is other stuff that's bugging me a lot more ;)
[14:40] <tucuna> hello - have a Q about security key and launchpad PPA repos - is it essential? is it irresponsible to add a repo without a key?
[15:00] <nedko> packages are signed, not repos themself, AFAIK
[15:06] <NCommander> Is there anyone who can help me with my @ubuntu.com email?
[15:14] <nubae> hi there... I'm having an issue with launchpad I dont understand... I'm trying to login from bzr
[15:14] <nubae> like so: bzr launchpad-login Nubae
[15:14] <nubae> but get the following: bzr: ERROR: https://launchpad.net/%7ENubae/%2Bsshkeys is permanently redirected to https://launchpad.net/~nubae/+sshkeys
[15:14] <nubae> any ideas?
[15:15] <Hobbsee> NCommander: what about it?
[15:15] <NCommander> Hobbsee, its been two weeks and I still don't have it, or my kubuntu.org address
[15:15] <NCommander> (I was told it takes roughly a week for that to magicially pop up)
[15:15] <Hobbsee> NCommander: what's your launchpad ID?
[15:16] <NCommander> sonicmctails
[15:16] <Dominic> nubae: what happens if you use a lower-case 'N' instead?
[15:16] <nubae> username not recognised
[15:17] <Hobbsee> NCommander: ok, what address are you trying to use?
[15:17] <NCommander> sonicmctails@{k}ubuntu.org
[15:17] <NCommander> (well .com for ubuntu)
[15:17] <Hobbsee> and are you using gmail to test this?
[15:17] <NCommander> Hobbsee, yes.
[15:17] <Hobbsee> that'll be why.
[15:17] <Hobbsee> it's working, but gmail tends to mark mail sent to yourself as spam
[15:18] <NCommander> But shouldn't the addresses also show up on my Launchpad page?
[15:18] <Hobbsee> (this is a common problem)
[15:18] <Hobbsee> not unless you add it, and that can be a bad idea.
[15:18] <NCommander> I knew about the emails from yourself issue :-/
[15:18] <Hobbsee> (possible infinite loop - I hear that at least a few people got bitten by it)
[15:18] <NCommander> Ouch
[15:18] <Hobbsee> you should have a mail from me.
[15:18] <Hobbsee> did you get it? :)
[15:18] <nubae> Dominic: should I change my username to all lowercase on launchapd?
[15:19] <NCommander> nope
[15:19] <Dominic> nubae: well I can't even see your page from my browser, nor can I search for your username.  Sure that it's right?
[15:19] <Hobbsee> hmmm.  did it hit spam?
[15:19] <NCommander> Hobbsee, nope
[15:20] <NCommander> Hobbsee, your too loved to be spam :-)
[15:20] <Hobbsee> strange.  wonder if it got greylisted, or something.
[15:20] <nubae> ah wait, I changed my username today... is that why... it is here: https://launchpad.net/~dvanassche
[15:20] <Hobbsee> well, that's what i would have thought - but i haven't got a failed message from it.
[15:20] <Dominic> nubae: heh, then yeah, you're logging in with the wrong username
[15:21] <nubae> ok, so my username, even though changed on launchpad is still dvanassche
[15:21] <NCommander> Hobbsee, I am getting mail, I just got a post that was sent to debian-hurd
[15:22] <Dominic> nubae: are you sure you're not confused with your display name?  Visit https://launchpad.net/~dvanassche/+edit - your display name is at the top, username is second
[15:22] <nubae> aaah... ok, doh... my bad... thanks Dominic
[15:23] <Hobbsee> NCommander: to your @ubuntu.com address?
[15:24] <NCommander> Hobbsee, no, to gmail, just saying I'm recieving general mail ;-)
[15:25] <Hobbsee> NCommander: ah, right :)
[15:25] <Hobbsee> NCommander: poke el*mo about it tomorrow, i guess, if you don't receive the mail late.
[15:26] <Nafallo> ehrm. file an RT rather.
[15:26] <Hobbsee> or that.  or bug Nafallo directly :P
[15:27] <Nafallo> Hobbsee: yea. power cycle systems will probably help? ;-)
[15:27]  * Nafallo is not an admin :-)
[15:28] <Hobbsee> Nafallo: i didn't know you supported windows?
[15:28] <Hobbsee> (and pity!)
[15:28] <Nafallo> Hobbsee: I like windows. they give me sunlight :-)
[15:29] <Nafallo> also, we're drifting off-topic. priv instead? :-)
[15:30] <NCommander> Hobbsee, finally got it
[15:30] <NCommander> That's some serious lag
[15:30] <Hobbsee> NCommander: \o/
[15:30] <NCommander> at least now I can claim maintainership of my packages in Ubuntu
[15:31] <Nafallo> yay \o/
[15:32] <NCommander> And my Kubuntu one works too :-)
[15:48] <infinito> does anyone know why lp is giving me this error while trying to upload a package to ppa? Unhandled exception processing upload: 'ascii' codec can't encode character u'\xe1' in position 73: ordinal not in range(128)
[16:09] <geser> infinito: it looks like you used a non-ascii char (0xe1 = á if it's latin 1) where lp didn't like it
[16:10] <infinito> geser: hummmm should i remove accents from the control file? My name has accents....
[16:10] <laga> i wonder if utf8 would work better
[16:11] <geser> yes, UTF-8 is better
[16:12] <geser> infinito: that should be a last effort, try using UTF-8 first
[16:12] <infinito> geser: i'm using utf-8
[16:13] <geser> hmm
[16:15] <infinito> it's weird, because first time i tried to upload, it went ok, but failed to build because of dependencies
[16:16] <infinito> then i chenged the deps, tried again to upload, and it got rejected
[16:16] <geser> that's really weird
[16:17] <infinito> yeps, it is
[16:18] <geser> when was your first upload
[16:18] <Ampelbein> no, its not weird. you try uploading the same version-subversion with changed files. so the md5-sums do not match. try using -0ubuntu2
[16:18] <geser> ?
[16:19] <geser> Ampelbein: wouldn't LP complain about md5 mismatch instead? and not about a non-ascii char
[16:20] <Ampelbein> hmm. could be. i shouldn't read only half of the text. nevermind.
[16:26] <infinito> Ampelbein: you were right
[16:26] <infinito> but maybe lp should give a more concise error
[17:27] <michelecs> Hi Guys. What if a package of mine needs some dependencies which are already in my PPA? Will Launchpad pick them automatically?
[17:34] <siretart> michelecs: yes
[18:15] <michelecs> Is there a way to use -i or -l and tell debchange "Please don't always append ubuntu1 to the version since I'm already using my suffix"?
[21:10] <zerwas> Hello