[00:13] exarkun: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad-bazaar/+bug/260626 [00:13] Launchpad bug 260626 in launchpad-bazaar "Cannot easily delete branches" [Undecided,Triaged] === cjwatson_ is now known as cjwatson === Ng_ is now known as Ng [01:32] hi, I was wondering if there was some api to launchpad that could be used in apps like anjuta for a start page [01:33] integration with gnome docs and some of launchpads features would be really cool for a webkit based start page [01:52] Does launchpad know if more than one LP Bug has been linked to a single upstream bug? (ie: a way to make sure there aren't duplicate bugs both pointing to the upstream bug) [01:56] greg-g: I've had it warn me if I add a link that already exists. [01:56] I'm not sure that a page exists showing this duplication, however. === _thumper_ is now known as thumper [02:08] wgrant: good to know that it has warned you, at least. Thanks! [04:23] How often is LP meant to pull down CVEs from Mitre? I think it's having issues. === beuno-afk is now known as beuno [12:14] Hi. How I ask my PPA to build a package on more than one ditribution? In my changelog I wrote "Hardy". Do I need to write "any" or a sort of list e.g. "gutsy, hardy, intrepid"? [12:15] upload separate sources I'd assume. [12:15] you can also copy the packages [12:15] but i dont think it will rebuild them [12:16] no, it won't rebuild [12:16] you need a seperate upload for each distribution (and update the package version a little) [12:17] the copy packages thing could do that automagically. oh well [12:17] laga: that would break the signature on the .dsc file [12:18] does that matter? [12:20] I guess the are people around who won't trust a source package with a broken .dsc signature (I myself wouldn't trust it) [12:21] do you actually verify the signature of a source package before installing binary packages from a PPA? [12:23] laga: I currently don't use any PPA [12:24] so it's a moot point anyways. i doubt that people actually verify the signature on the source package [12:24] and I know that at lease ScottK doesn't use any PPA until PPAs are signed [12:24] Now I'm downloading the source for a package which has been build for hardy and intrepid... Let's have a look to its changelog [12:24] i still wonder how signing will be implemented. if it's just LP auto-signing the packages then that's not a lot more secure... [12:25] but to each their own [12:25] I guess that's what will practically happen (not checking the signature) but it is still wrong to break it [12:25] geser: so, it LP can sign packages, it might as well sign the source package when rebuilding ;) [12:26] s/it/if/ [12:27] sure [12:28] I had a look at the changelog. Each package has intrepid or hardy (this or is xor). So I think I need to upload two sources. [12:29] michelecs: yes [12:29] if your package is already in the ppa, just do use dch to create a new changelog entry for the target distro and run debuild -S -sd [12:29] to force exclusion of the orig.tar.gz [12:29] but it should be sufficient to do only one full-source upload (incl. orig.tar.gz) and the second upload only be the other .diff.gz (and .dsc) [12:30] i found some interesting behavior the other day [12:31] i uploaded a package to intrepid main on accident because i omitted the dput target. it was reject, of course. then i uploaded to the PPA and that upload was rejected as well [12:31] What about naming the binary package? Is there a way to append some extra info to the filename? (e.g. '-intrepid' or '-hardy') [12:31] LP claimed the source package already was in the archives [12:32] michelecs: why would you want do that? [12:32] geser: To avoid they have the same filename... [12:33] michelecs: the filename includes the package version [12:34] geser: so they will differ by ppa1 (the first build, for example for hardy) and ppa2 (the second build, for example for intrepid)? === fta_ is now known as fta [12:36] michelecs: yes [12:38] Thanks guys... This is what I need to know. [12:38] laga: please ask cprov or bigjools if it's a known bug [12:39] laga: re: launchpad & autosigning, that's what i would have thought, too. I don't see why it's such a big priority [12:40] Hobbsee: autosigning is a big priority? that's news to me ;) [12:40] laga: well, they say it's one of the more important bugs they want to fix, and it's been "in progress" for a while, iirc. [12:40] of course, that doesn't necessarily say a lot, but... [12:41] yeah. PPAs have been around for a while. but i don't need it, so i'm not complaining [12:42] or rather, there is other stuff that's bugging me a lot more ;) === nebi is now known as nebi|away === nebi|away is now known as nebi [14:40] hello - have a Q about security key and launchpad PPA repos - is it essential? is it irresponsible to add a repo without a key? [15:00] packages are signed, not repos themself, AFAIK === dehm^also is now known as dehm [15:06] Is there anyone who can help me with my @ubuntu.com email? [15:14] hi there... I'm having an issue with launchpad I dont understand... I'm trying to login from bzr [15:14] like so: bzr launchpad-login Nubae [15:14] but get the following: bzr: ERROR: https://launchpad.net/%7ENubae/%2Bsshkeys is permanently redirected to https://launchpad.net/~nubae/+sshkeys [15:14] any ideas? [15:15] NCommander: what about it? [15:15] Hobbsee, its been two weeks and I still don't have it, or my kubuntu.org address [15:15] (I was told it takes roughly a week for that to magicially pop up) [15:15] NCommander: what's your launchpad ID? [15:16] sonicmctails [15:16] nubae: what happens if you use a lower-case 'N' instead? [15:16] username not recognised [15:17] NCommander: ok, what address are you trying to use? [15:17] sonicmctails@{k}ubuntu.org [15:17] (well .com for ubuntu) [15:17] and are you using gmail to test this? [15:17] Hobbsee, yes. [15:17] that'll be why. [15:17] it's working, but gmail tends to mark mail sent to yourself as spam [15:18] But shouldn't the addresses also show up on my Launchpad page? [15:18] (this is a common problem) [15:18] not unless you add it, and that can be a bad idea. [15:18] I knew about the emails from yourself issue :-/ [15:18] (possible infinite loop - I hear that at least a few people got bitten by it) [15:18] Ouch [15:18] you should have a mail from me. [15:18] did you get it? :) [15:18] Dominic: should I change my username to all lowercase on launchapd? [15:19] nope [15:19] nubae: well I can't even see your page from my browser, nor can I search for your username. Sure that it's right? [15:19] hmmm. did it hit spam? === nebi is now known as nebi|away [15:19] Hobbsee, nope [15:20] Hobbsee, your too loved to be spam :-) [15:20] strange. wonder if it got greylisted, or something. [15:20] ah wait, I changed my username today... is that why... it is here: https://launchpad.net/~dvanassche [15:20] well, that's what i would have thought - but i haven't got a failed message from it. [15:20] nubae: heh, then yeah, you're logging in with the wrong username [15:21] ok, so my username, even though changed on launchpad is still dvanassche [15:21] Hobbsee, I am getting mail, I just got a post that was sent to debian-hurd [15:22] nubae: are you sure you're not confused with your display name? Visit https://launchpad.net/~dvanassche/+edit - your display name is at the top, username is second [15:22] aaah... ok, doh... my bad... thanks Dominic [15:23] NCommander: to your @ubuntu.com address? [15:24] Hobbsee, no, to gmail, just saying I'm recieving general mail ;-) [15:25] NCommander: ah, right :) [15:25] NCommander: poke el*mo about it tomorrow, i guess, if you don't receive the mail late. [15:26] ehrm. file an RT rather. [15:26] or that. or bug Nafallo directly :P [15:27] Hobbsee: yea. power cycle systems will probably help? ;-) [15:27] * Nafallo is not an admin :-) [15:28] Nafallo: i didn't know you supported windows? [15:28] (and pity!) [15:28] Hobbsee: I like windows. they give me sunlight :-) [15:29] also, we're drifting off-topic. priv instead? :-) [15:30] Hobbsee, finally got it [15:30] That's some serious lag [15:30] NCommander: \o/ [15:30] at least now I can claim maintainership of my packages in Ubuntu [15:31] yay \o/ [15:32] And my Kubuntu one works too :-) === nebi|away is now known as nebi [15:48] does anyone know why lp is giving me this error while trying to upload a package to ppa? Unhandled exception processing upload: 'ascii' codec can't encode character u'\xe1' in position 73: ordinal not in range(128) === nebi is now known as nebi|away === nebi|away is now known as nebi [16:09] infinito: it looks like you used a non-ascii char (0xe1 = á if it's latin 1) where lp didn't like it [16:10] geser: hummmm should i remove accents from the control file? My name has accents.... [16:10] i wonder if utf8 would work better [16:11] yes, UTF-8 is better [16:12] infinito: that should be a last effort, try using UTF-8 first [16:12] geser: i'm using utf-8 [16:13] hmm [16:15] it's weird, because first time i tried to upload, it went ok, but failed to build because of dependencies [16:16] then i chenged the deps, tried again to upload, and it got rejected [16:16] that's really weird [16:17] yeps, it is [16:18] when was your first upload [16:18] no, its not weird. you try uploading the same version-subversion with changed files. so the md5-sums do not match. try using -0ubuntu2 [16:18] ? === nebi is now known as nebi|away === nebi|away is now known as nebi [16:19] Ampelbein: wouldn't LP complain about md5 mismatch instead? and not about a non-ascii char [16:20] hmm. could be. i shouldn't read only half of the text. nevermind. [16:26] Ampelbein: you were right [16:26] but maybe lp should give a more concise error === nebi is now known as nebi|away [17:27] Hi Guys. What if a package of mine needs some dependencies which are already in my PPA? Will Launchpad pick them automatically? [17:34] michelecs: yes [18:15] Is there a way to use -i or -l and tell debchange "Please don't always append ubuntu1 to the version since I'm already using my suffix"? === fdd is now known as ionutjula [21:10] Hello