[02:44] <geeter> is puiparts being executed consistently as part of a universe harness?
[09:21] <AnAnt_> Hello, I am making a new package for sl-modem , but it does not build in intrepid, can someone help ?
[09:22] <AnAnt_> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17788419/buildlog_ubuntu-intrepid-i386.sl-modem_2.9.11%7E20080817-1%7Eintrepid1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
[09:29] <geser> AnAnt_: that's a common one, see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/CompilerFlags#-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
[09:31] <AnAnt_> geser: thanks
[09:36] <AnAnt_> geser: is D_FORTIFY_SOURCE being used in Debian too ?
[09:43] <geser> AnAnt_: afaik no
[09:57] <AnAnt_> geser: 'S_IRUSR' undeclared (first use in this function)
[09:57] <AnAnt_> that's what I get now
[10:06] <AnAnt_> geser: nevermind, added a header file
[10:20] <AnAnt_> thanks again
[11:38] <iulian> In which directory do I have to install .ui files?
[11:38] <iulian> /usr/share/<pkg>/?
[11:48] <RainCT> How can I mark a bug as affecting Hardy? :/
[11:50] <RainCT> iulian: .ui as in the replacement for .glade?
[11:51] <geser> RainCT: "Nominate for release"
[11:51] <RainCT> geser: ah, the "nominate" was confusing me :) thanks
[11:52] <laga> well, release managers can decline the nomination, right?
[12:05] <iulian> RainCT: No, I don't think so, .ui files uses an XML format.
[12:07] <iulian> laga: I think that everyone from the -drivers team can decline nominations.
[12:10] <pochu> it's motu for universe and core-dev for main who approve/decline nominations
[12:12] <iulian> Oh, thanks for clarifying, pochu.
[12:14] <geser> superm1: Hi, can you please look at bug 251330 and tell me if it's ok to sponsor it? It's sitting in the u-u-s queue for some time now.
[12:16] <iulian> pochu: So, how come Brian Murray can decline nominations?
[12:16] <iulian> "The Ubuntu release manager  is Ubuntu Drivers."
[12:17] <iulian> He is a member of the ubuntu-drivers team. So, everyone from that team can approve/decline nominations.
[12:17] <iulian> Not only motus or core developers.
[12:26] <Light-> hello, can anyone tell me how to include a .desktop file in a package?
[12:28] <RainCT> Light-: add the file to the debian/ directory and install it into usr/share/pixmaps (with dh_install or whatever)
[12:30] <Light-> /usr/share/pixmaps? most of my other applications have .desktop files in /usr/share/applications
[12:30] <RainCT> Light-: err, I mean applications :)
[12:30]  * Light- thought pixmaps was for icons
[12:30] <RainCT> yea.. lapsus
[12:30] <pochu> iulian: so I guess ubuntu-drivers can approve/decline for all the distro, and core-dev for main and motu for universe
[12:30] <Light-> ah ok :P
[12:31] <RainCT> iulian: Yes, .glade's are XML too. Anyway, does it define a GTK interface? If so, then yes, /usr/share/<packagename>/ is right (but you'll have to check if the application looks there or someone else for it)
[12:31] <Light-> RainCT: so, the .desktop file is in the debian/ directory... what do I need to do to get it to the final .deb puts it in /usr/share/applications?
[12:32] <Light-> s/to/so
[12:32] <RainCT> Light-: does the package have a debian/install (or debian/<pkgname>.install) file?
[12:32] <Light-> yep
[12:32] <RainCT> Light-: then add this line to it:      debian/<pkgname>.desktop usr/share/applications
[12:33] <RainCT> Light-: and basically that's it :). Note that you can validate the .desktop file with desktop-file-validate, and that the comment should start with a verb
[12:33] <Light-> actually... now that I check it only has debian/control debian/files and debian/rules
[12:33] <Light-> (also the changelog, copyright etc)
[12:34] <RainCT> Light-: can you paste the debian/rules somewhere?
[12:35] <Light-> http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/48859/
[12:35] <Light-> the debian/rules has an install: section
[12:35] <iulian> RainCT: It's a python application, no idea where to look at.
[12:38] <RainCT> iulian: well, just run it after installing from the package and see if it works :P. or run "egrep -r \.ui *" in the source
[12:38] <RainCT> Light-: #	dh_install
[12:38] <RainCT> Light-: uncomment that line and then add a debian/install file containing the line I told you
[12:39] <Light-> ok, thanks i'll give that a go
[12:39] <RainCT> Light-: (or just replace the "#    dh_install" line with  "dh_install debian/<pkgname>.desktop usr/share/applications" and then you won't need a new file)
[12:43] <geser> pochu: do you know if bug 272231 needs a FFe or does if fall into the general gnome FFe?
[12:43] <Light-> ok, final question: in a .desktop file, eg for brasero I see "Icon=brasero", where is that defined?
[12:44] <geser> as far as I know it check your icon theme for a matching icon and falls back to /usr/share/pixmaps
[12:45] <Light-> ohk, thanks
[12:49] <pochu> geser: I think it needs one, as it doesn't follow the GNOME release schedule (so it has no freezes upstream)
[12:50] <pochu> geser: but seb128 would know for sure
[12:52] <pochu> geser: OTOH motu-release delegated on Seb for GNOME packages
[12:52] <pochu> so he can decide whether it fits or not for an exception
[12:55] <geser> pochu: thanks, will ask seb128
[13:01] <slytherin> persia: there?
[13:02] <persia> slytherin: Yes.
[13:03] <slytherin> persia: Can you please take care of bug #268914 before the confusion multiplies?
[13:06] <persia> slytherin: Added to my list.  People should read debdiffs :)
[13:06] <slytherin> :-)
[13:13] <Adri2000> Hobbsee: you can ack main FFe, can't you?
[16:31] <superm1> geser, isn't kirkland MOTU?
[16:32] <superm1> geser, oh nvm, it looks like someone luca already mentioned that :)
[16:33] <geser> superm1: now yes, but not as the bug was filed
[17:14] <siretart> devfil_: around?
[17:15] <siretart> devfil_: re bug #255837, could you please improve the comments on your patches?
[17:15] <siretart> devfil_: that way they are unlikely to get accepted upstream, because they are not self explanatory at all
[17:16] <sebner> siretart: ah, good to see you. Just wanted to tell you that I really have to time to do this mlt thing (damn summer job). At least for the next 2 weeks and as it needs a FFe ..
[17:18] <siretart> sebner: you mean no time?
[17:18] <sebner> siretart: ah yes
[17:33] <devfil_> siretart: ok, I will np
[20:27] <directhex> which package managers in ubuntu don't install recommends by default?
[20:32] <iulian> apt-get install --no-install-recommends
[20:35] <asac> emgent: hey
[20:35] <asac> you uploaded all-in-one-sidebar ... ignoring that its maintained in bzr
[20:36] <asac> emgent: i will now just upload without your changes ;) ... feel free to submit those changes as a bzr branch ;)
[20:38] <directhex> iulian, i don't think that counts as "by default"
[20:39] <asac> emgent: ok i integrated your standard-versions bump
[20:40] <asac> so all should be there now
[20:42] <iulian> directhex: Ahh, sorry, misread
[20:44] <asac> emgent: ok all fine again i think ;) ... maybe remember to "not" ignore the warning apt-get source spits out when there is a Vcs-Bzr header in control :)
[20:45] <nxvl> asac: hi! i file a bug against network-manager-openvpn, that as i understand you touched last
[20:45] <nxvl> asac: Bug 272689
[20:45] <asac> nxvl: i am more or less the one to talk to yes
[20:45] <asac> buzt i am out for 10 minutes ;)
[20:45] <asac> nxvl: thats a known bug i am quite sure
[20:45] <asac> problem is that someone needs to implement the migration code from what i understand
[20:46] <asac> and the import code might be broken
[20:46] <nxvl> asac: did you have any reference on that? (as in a link to read and implement)
[20:53] <asac> nxvl: not in my head ... and searching in launchpad is painful ;)
[20:54] <asac> nxvl: i think it was on the networkmanager mailing list
[20:54] <asac> not long ago
[20:54] <asac> most likely in sep ... maybe aug
[21:03] <jrib> user in #ubuntu was using hardy-proposed main and now needs to downgrade.  Flannel pointed out to me that he could pin hardy-proposed packages to 1001.  However, I'm not sure how to match only hardy-proposed in the "Pin:" line
[21:06] <crimsun> Pin: release a=hardy-proposed
[21:06] <Flannel> He wants to downgrade from -proposed
[21:07] <jrib> erm, I tried that I swear crimsun :) (it works)
[21:07] <jrib> thanks
[21:07] <crimsun> np
[21:08] <directhex> i need to find a core dev to beat with the "upload this package, you!" stick.
[21:12] <\sh> siretart: when you read this, please give me a ring tomorrow morning I need someone who can provide some bandwidth for testing a new 4gbit/s line
[21:15] <\sh> siretart: and don't forget the "kinderschnitzel" this week .. planed is to stay in nbg until wednesday ,)
[21:16] <\sh> good night until tomorrow
[22:26] <azeem> asac: were those dozen+ mails due to #272772 necessary?
[22:27] <asac> azeem: yeah. ignore
[22:27] <azeem> I'll just remove myself from the respective team I think
[22:47] <asac> azeem: which team is that?
[22:49] <azeem> asac: apparently the debichem team through gnome-chemistry-utils
[23:00] <asac> azeem: yeah. wont take long ... then the mail wont happen anymore :)
[23:01] <RainCT> good night
[23:31] <crimsun> tcsh debdiff (#86683) pushed.