[01:25] fta: your script fails when branch is ahead of archive [01:25] shouldnt be bad in that order [01:26] isn't what you wanted [01:26] i used !=, not >= [01:26] yeah [01:26] we want to allow branch version >= archive [01:27] but if its just one package then it doesnt need to be updated [01:27] i'm done for today, just comment that test for now [01:28] my karma is melting like ice [01:28] 2008/09/21 11315 [01:28] 2008/09/22 11280 [01:29] fta: hmm. btw, dpkg-buildpackage -S -si includes the .bzr directory in diff.gz? [01:30] not with bd for sure [01:30] ok [01:35] *sigh* [01:35] imagezoom diverged too [01:37] me replays what was uploaded [01:38] i'm all done with mine but mediatomb and zekr never appeared anywhere [01:39] both were debian syncs [01:39] did I miss something ? [01:43] fta: +Maintainer: Ubuntu MOTU Developers [01:44] fta: err [01:44] really? damn [01:44] fta: thats ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com [01:44] isnt it? [01:44] Ubuntu MOTU Developers [01:45] @ and perl... [01:45] my bad [01:45] not sure if i should reup with the same version or bump... [01:46] fta: he? [01:46] fta: the bogus email made those packages fail for me [01:47] so there shouldnt be anything gone up like that [01:47] it didn't fail here [01:47] fta: what didnt fail? [01:47] fta: thats bad [01:48] fta: you should really use debuild for sources [01:48] but well [01:48] how many are that? [01:50] hm, zekr is in multiverse [01:50] just 2 [01:51] fta: you sure htat the bugos maintainer things got into the archive? [01:51] if yes, we probably have to hunt down which launchpad user was created for them [01:52] at least i think lp does that automatically [01:52] i'm sure i dpushed something, i still have it, let me check [01:53] grep ubuntu-motu.ubuntu.com *.changes [01:53] yep, mediatomb had a bad maint [01:53] ok. damage is done, so no need to hurry [01:54] just those 2 [01:54] mediatomb an? [01:54] mediatomb and ? [01:54] zekr? [01:54] zekr [01:55] multiverse is like main or universe? [01:55] not sure about that [01:55] its usualyl universe [01:55] i know that motus can upload to flashplugin-nonfree :( [01:55] eheh [01:56] I think we can remove bookmarksftp from the archive [01:56] here is its homepage [01:56] https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/14?application=firefox&id=14 [01:57] though, current archive version has 1.0.2, last one on amo is 1.0.1 [01:57] the thing AMO needs is to include a field for license info [01:58] for example: - Version: 1.2 [01:58] - License: GPL (or MPL, BSD, proprietary, link to the author's license) [01:59] fta: so apparently mediatomb was rejected silently [01:59] thats good news [01:59] same for zekr [01:59] just use the same version with proper Maintainer and upload agina [01:59] just pushed zekr [02:01] should I file a bug for archive removal regarding bookmarksftp? [02:01] i've fixed the script [02:02] subject: [ubuntu/intrepid] zekr 0.5.1.dfsg-1ubuntu1 (Accepted) [02:02] fta: good luck ;) [02:03] Jazzva: so bookmarksftp is dead? and doesnt support ffox 3? [02:03] well, not according to the amo [02:03] and I wasn't able to test it when I installed it [02:05] subject: [ubuntu/intrepid] mediatomb 0.11.0-3ubuntu1 (Accepted) [02:06] good, 22 uploads for my 1st time [02:08] asac, anyway, I think its development is discontinued [02:09] fta: i get "speedial" is a native package [02:09] thats a bug i guess? [02:10] asac, fta: Just a question... Have you removed firefox-2 in those uploads to bug 272772? :) [02:10] asac, because: [02:10] fta@ix:~ $ apt-cache madison speedial [02:10] fta@ix:~ $ [02:11] Jazzva, nope [02:11] fta_: speedial is broken [02:11] ok... I'll work on that then :) [02:11] he? [02:11] fta_: speeddial [02:12] fta_: bzt vcs header pointed to wrong location [02:12] Jazzva: is there an upstream dump? [02:12] err [02:12] bump for speeddial? [02:12] apparently that extension hasnt been touched since initial upload ;) [02:13] (well i am uploading it now :)) [02:13] not sure... I haven't done anything with that extension [02:13] asac, you got all the bad ones ;) [02:14] hehe [02:14] did you reshuffle ;)? [02:14] I think this should be the full list of extensions that depend only on firefox when they shouldn't (I think that's only mozilla-bookmarksftp, which isn't even compat), on firefox and firefox-2, and just on firefox-2 [02:14] *or just on fx-2 [02:15] asac, nope, i didn't [02:15] doing it-menu [02:15] thats the last for today [02:16] please remove firefox-2 :) [02:16] asac, ^ [02:17] too late ;) [02:17] not that important ;) [02:17] sigh... oh, well :) [02:17] though we should have done it [02:17] i will try to remember for the last few [02:17] asac, should I report a global bug for that now then? [02:19] mozilla Bug 404857 [02:19] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=404857 [02:19] firefox reloads every font.cache for every page loaded [02:19] well, here's a start... https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/272959 [02:20] the bot is dead === fta_ is now known as fta [02:26] nice, in ff3.1, the new tab list :) [02:26] Jazzva: firefox-2 removal? yes. [02:27] fta, do we have 3.1 in the archives? [02:28] i'd like to [02:28] ppa? :) [02:28] yes === vk5foss is now known as kgoetz [02:30] lol, i'm in the top30, how is that possible [02:30] http://thc.emanuele-gentili.com/utu/utu_intrepid.php [02:32] kde is leading the pack [02:43] fta: top 15 shouldnt be that hard [02:43] from there on ... the steps get bigger ;) [02:44] indeed [02:45] i really need some sleep [02:46] yeah ... me 2 [02:46] cu [02:46] cu [09:35] asac: is there documents on how mbox works? [09:35] or atleast how to attach file to debians bug tracker [09:51] asac: what do you call the firefox addons dialog? ubufox? === asac_ is now known as asac [10:13] ok working on linkwidgets. asac can you please get to the 3 i got done hopefully before they are out of date. [10:18] [10:18] [10:18] {a463f10c-3994-11da-9945-000d60ca027b} [10:18] 0.5 [10:18] 0.7.1 [10:18] [10:18] [10:19] [10:19] [10:19] you would think they would tell you what app it is since it has different em:id [10:58] ok linkwdgets looks straight forward but waiting till after breakfast [10:59] why is the package firefox pulling so much gnome-dependicies, like gtksu en even synaptic? I am a kubuntu user [11:00] talking about intrebit [11:00] it will bring in gtk libs but i see no reason for the 2 you said [11:01] jeroen-: hardy or intrepid? [11:01] latter [11:01] one [11:02] metapackage firefox [11:02] even gnome-app-install [11:02] firefox-3.0 is bringing in the gtk deps [11:04] gnomefreak: are you using adept? [11:04] jeroen-: ask asac when hes around and show him the dep list http://pastebin.mozilla.org/540990 that way he has all info needed you might want to try abrowser [11:04] jeroen-: nope i just restoreed my intrepid box and havent had a chanve to install kde4 yet [11:04] ok off for breakfaast [11:05] same from command line and with abrowser [11:06] oh well I need it now [11:06] gnomefreak: abrowser, thats the same without the name? [11:07] mm to late [12:34] urr ... team report is due already :/ [12:34] [DONE sep] fta became MOTU [12:34] [DONE sep] mozillateam meeting [12:34] not sure ,) [12:40] [DONE sep] abrowser rdepends transition [12:40] [DONE sep] eula business ;) [12:41] [DONE sep] release of ffox 2.0.0.17/3.0.2 and xul 1.9.0.2 and seamonkey 1.1.12 and tbird 2.0.0.17 [12:44] so that thing is working? [12:49] oh no [13:12] fta: do you still have this 3d anmaytion? [13:12] Jazzva: which thing? [13:12] Jazzva: oh ... no. i just used it ;) [13:12] a-priori ;) [13:13] but i think it should have been [DONE sep08] [13:13] :) [13:13] i see :) [13:14] i'm finishing the file of that global bug for packages that depend on firefox-2 [13:14] s/the file/filing/ [13:14] Jazzva: cool. lets look at that bug after that then [13:14] (before getting archive admins attention) [13:14] maybe there is software that can still be fixed for ffox 3 [13:15] well, all of the reported is compat with ff-3 [13:15] (at least that's what the depends line says) [13:15] except bookmarksftp [13:15] Jazzva: oh. ok. lets file a separate bug for "archive" removal then [13:15] and one for "archive depend elimination" :) [13:16] mhm... that would include firefox-ubuntu-theme and stuff :) [13:16] Jazzva: archive removal? [13:16] im waiting on author to add license to foxmarks to replace bookmarksftp [13:16] I guess that would be in the archive removal [13:16] gnomefreak, great ;) [13:16] :) [13:16] gnomefreak: have you asked him to add a license file to the .xpi too? [13:16] the new one is nonfree license [13:16] that would be great [13:16] asac: yes [13:16] sent email yeterday [13:17] gnomefreak: err. if its nonfree then we dont need to bother i guess [13:17] nonfree license? how will that get in the archive? [13:17] asac: no the new bookmarksftp(new project dont remember name) foxmarks is free from what i can tell it used to be apache license [13:18] ah cool [13:18] * gnomefreak working with debian on the bookmarks extension [13:18] go ahead then ;) [13:18] gnomefreak: who is the debian guy? [13:18] hard name to spell give me a minute and ill get it [13:19] i asked yesterday if anyone knew him i got no answer [13:19] Yaroslav Halchenko [13:21] [reed]: the info about mozilla mailing lists (my emails not going through here is mail i got: [13:22] Messages from non-subscribers are automatically rejected. Please [13:22] subscribe to the list first before attempting to post, or ensure that [13:22] you are posting using the address you subscribed with. [13:22] if i wasnt subscribed than why the hell does it come to my email :( [13:23] fta: didnt we have a fennec branch somewhere? [13:24] asac, done. bug 272959 [13:24] Launchpad bug 272959 in webdeveloper "Packages that depend on firefox-2 or firefox should just depend on firefox" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/272959 [13:25] all of them (except bookmarksftp) depend on firefox | firefox-2, or firefox-3.0 | firefox-2 [13:27] jcastro: did you ever get an (n)ack from launchpad team on the "super"-project chromium-project? [13:27] asac: do you know the guy? [13:27] gnomefreak: no. whats his nick? [13:27] dont know [13:28] its been email and bug reports [13:39] gnomefreak: whats his solution then? [13:41] asac: nothing yet its in my hands he suggested foxmarks so i keep him informed but after i package it for us i will do debians and he said he would sponsor the upload [13:42] gnomefreak: not sure. but most likely we want to use our branches if we need to do something anyway [13:42] right [13:42] gnomefreak: have you asked him if we would be willing to work with our infrastructure? [13:42] using xpi.mk, med-xpi-unpack et al [13:42] no not until i find out if he is Ubuntu dev as well [13:42] benefits: we would get automatic process [13:42] gnomefreak: he doesnt need to be a ubuntu dev [13:44] i will talk to him about it next chance i get, but he pretty much doesnt want to work on it thats why i got it. he either emailed the Ml or me directly dont remember about this [13:44] please dont use bookmarksftp as a depend [13:45] i have asked that it gets removed i still need someone to ack that bug so we can continue with it [13:45] Hi asac, you and fta have done a very hard job tonight :) [13:45] (hoping my list was useful) [13:45] Volans: yeah [13:46] Volans: though adding all the bug tasks was most likely the longer task ;) [13:46] my fingers ached ;) [13:46] sure! [13:46] Volans: but was good for sure ;) [13:46] wtf is going on damnit [13:46] sorry if I don't have helped but I come back at home at 5 today morning ;) [13:46] Volans: are there still questions i forgot to answer for these extension scripts? [13:46] * gnomefreak getting so sick of this bullshiot [13:47] Volans: thats fine ;) [13:47] gnomefreak: which bullshit are you after? [13:47] i casnt fucking email dev-apps-calendar@lists.mozilla.org and i am subscribed to it or i would never get emails from it [13:47] s/cant [13:48] asac: no, but I will try to test a better newer searching algorithm without entering in the tricky version string comparison [13:48] dev-apps-calendar-bounces+gnomefreak=ubuntu.com@lists.mozilla.org [13:48] that tells me im subscribed [13:49] they keep sending it to gnomefreak but im sending it from the subscribed address [13:51] Volans: hmm. i think in the end we need a normalizer for mozilla versioing [13:52] or a script that does the tests for us [13:52] e.g. versioncmp version1 version2 [13:52] == -1 if smaller, 0 if equal, 1 if greater [13:52] I was thinking that the install.rdf file must be updated with a newer version [13:52] or something like that [13:52] why? [13:52] so if we see the last modification time of that fine inside the xpi [13:52] /fine/file/ [13:52] Volans: thats all doing assumptions that are likely to be inaccurate at some point [13:53] i really think that writing a proper compare funciton is worth the effort [13:53] but if thats too hard we can of course start with some heuristic [13:53] i just see us forgetting about this and at some point bumping into issues when everybody forgot about what exactly was done :-D [13:54] make a generic one can be hard, make a function that use a pattern can be very simple, if we save the pattern in the main config file among the name and AMOID... [13:54] likely the version synatax will not change for newer versions [13:55] Volans: there should be a script for version compare available somewhere in the mozilla tree [13:56] at least i hope ;) [13:57] ok, I can take a look [13:59] asac: does this name look familar giggzounet i cant tell if that is his nick or not [14:00] lo [14:01] no matter what address i send it from they seem to get it from gnomefreak address [14:03] im my outgoing settings i set up all emails but gnomefreak is the default so shouldnt it send from any address i use even though its not default? this is tbird 2.0.0* [14:20] urgh. major bustage of my adsl modem [14:24] asac, hi [14:24] asac, are you done with the uploads? [14:24] asac, was the script useful? i mean, was it worth it? [14:25] asac: no I didn't [14:25] fta2: i think so yes. unfortunately i was struck quite a few times by the updated bzr branch error [14:25] fta2: but definitly good script ;) [14:26] excellent [14:27] fta2: but i think i have 3 uploads left [14:27] fta2: feel free to take them ;) [14:27] fta2: or one or two ;) [14:27] i have to finish sec update now [14:28] fta2: sm will most likely be out tomorrow too :/ [14:31] i can do the one in intrepid, maybe hardy if it's just a matter of updating the sources (ie, not backporting the patches, i don't have much time for that) [14:33] fta2: no backporting needed. even if, i have the backports [14:33] maybe iceape in gutsy ... but well [14:33] ;) [14:36] we dont need to add /* ***** BEGIN LICENSE BLOCK ***** to the copyright file right? [14:41] gnomefreak: technically not [14:45] ok cool [14:48] fta2: ok. the idea would be to upload seamonkey security update to PPA ... then test and ask jdstrand to reup that to security [14:57] fta2: people complain about spam now in the bug ;) [14:57] bug 272772 [14:58] Launchpad bug 272772 in ubuntu-docs "packages that Depend/Recommend/Suggest firefox (meta-package) must alternatively Depend/Recommend/Suggest abrowser" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/272772 [14:58] "I *really* need to unsubscribe from this list. I don't want to be on it [14:58] anymore and no matter what I do I keep getting emails. I have tried here [14:58] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-doc and that's not working. [14:58] Help please." [14:58] asac: is the mozilla-team list not the ubuntu-doc [14:59] Volans: no [14:59] and I think is a one time high traffic ;) [14:59] yeah [14:59] ;) [14:59] Volans: problem is that because we added ubuntu-doc package all the mail went to that ml too ;) [15:00] ah ok [15:07] Jazzva: asac what is the last target and what em:id do i use since they are different? http://pastebin.mozilla.org/541023 [15:08] eh application target [15:10] gnomefreak: you use the em:id of the extension ... not the target [15:10] (if you are talking aobut the directory name) [15:11] gnomefreak, this should be the extension id linkwidget@clav.mozdev.org [15:11] eh... [15:11] linkwidget@clav.mozdev.org [15:12] gnomefreak, you should look for or that is not nested inside tag [15:12] that is the top or [15:15] thats what i was thinking about while smoking a minute ago [15:15] thanks [15:21] np === asac_ is now known as asac [15:35] i hate errors that you cant find. be back i need to step away before i lose it [15:43] ha found the problem ;) [15:51] hmmmmmmmm [16:03] im betting its the id that is wrong [16:06] either that or it cant be used in 3.0 final [16:07] well it says 3.0* but the install.rdf had 3.0b4 [16:09] Jazzva: this set up in rules builds fine fails to install, any changes made it fails to build. any ideas would be greatly apprecated rules file: http://pastebin.mozilla.org/541034 [16:09] it installs just doesnt show up in abrowser [16:10] since abrowser is firefox unbranded it should work in it as well [16:10] gnomefreak: MOZ_XPI_EMID := {linkwidget@clav.mozdev.org} [16:11] thats wrong [16:11] curly brackets? why? [16:11] the uuid based EMIDs have curly brackets in the id itself [16:11] just remove them [16:14] remove the {? [16:14] new round of packages for "EULA" bug;) [16:14] https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.0/+bug/269656/comments/500 [16:14] \o/ i made the 500th post [16:15] Ubuntu bug 269656 in firefox-3.0 "AN IRRELEVANT LICENSE IS PRESENTED TO YOU FREE-OF-CHARGE ON STARTUP" [High,In progress] [16:15] ;) [16:15] http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17836902/firstrun2.png [16:15] http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17836924/about_rights.png [16:15] http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17836931/about_rights_expanded.png [16:15] gnomefreak: yes. the EMID should exactly what is in install.rdf [16:15] they usually dont have {} there [16:15] unless they use the old uuid approach [16:16] ah i see [16:16] it is so just the bleh [16:16] asac, that looks good :) [16:17] asac: no need to uncomment the id line right? [16:17] * gnomefreak looks at png's [16:17] gnomefreak, moz_xpi_emid line? you should uncomment it [16:18] ok [16:18] that is, if xpi.mk fails to find em:id... [16:20] testing now [16:23] fuck this extension [16:24] it worked but its not compatible with 3.0.2 [16:24] so i guess ill see what happens when changed [16:28] every other one uses max version 3.0 and it works in 3.0.2 [16:28] this one doesnt [16:29] that worked [16:29] gnomefreak: no .the other use 3.0.* [16:29] ah the * [16:30] ill use that [16:30] 3.0.2 worked as well [16:30] but ill make it broad [16:32] bug 273170 [16:32] Launchpad bug 273170 in firefox-3.0 "abrowser and firefox-3.0 commands don't work" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/273170 [16:32] gnomefreak: we want 3.0.* in extensions [16:33] otherwise we need to update the maxversion on every update [16:33] which doesnt scale [16:33] im using it [16:46] ok fixed branches and all is working on my system but im rebuilding it for PPA [16:47] and no lintian warnings :) [16:49] ok pushed to PPA for review. ill be testing it today until i run out of things to test (very small amount of prefference settings [16:58] asac: thats 4 that can be reviewed and pushed ( except linkwidgets im testing today but shouldnt be too long) none of them have errors or warnings from lintian. if we can still push to Intrepid [17:16] im done for now. be back a bit later [17:22] gnomefreak: thanks [17:22] gnomefreak: can you provide me with the list fo 4 things that can be reviewed? [17:22] (sorry, but i lost track on which extensions you touched) [17:39] http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=926488 [17:44] yeah. good news [17:56] asac: https://edge.launchpad.net/~gnomefreak/+archive chatzilla- 0.9.83-0ubuntu1~jjv1 firegpg - 0.5.1-0ubuntu1~jjv1 linkwidgets - 1.6-0ubuntu1~jjv wizz-rss - 3.0.0.2-0ubuntu1~jjv1 [17:56] * gnomefreak goes to lunch [18:29] is it a known bug that firefox window is initially sized so that the window title bar (and control buttons) is under the gnome upper panel [18:29] i'm running intrepid aplha-6 [18:30] there were so many bugs in the bug tracker that I couldn't tell :/ [18:41] Wellark: what screen resolution are you running? [18:43] compiz [18:43] disable compiz it should work normal [18:43] Wellark: is it that the window size is exceeds your screen or is it just displaced? [18:44] gnomefreak: you can reproduce that? [18:44] its been compiz bug for a while [18:44] asac: dont use it [18:44] i dont [18:45]