[01:25] <asac> fta: your script fails when branch is ahead of archive
[01:25] <asac> shouldnt be bad in that order
[01:26] <fta> isn't what you wanted
[01:26] <fta> i used !=, not >=
[01:26] <asac> yeah
[01:26] <asac> we want to allow branch version >= archive
[01:27] <asac> but if its just one package then it doesnt need to be updated
[01:27] <fta> i'm done for today, just comment that test for now
[01:28] <fta> my karma is melting like ice
[01:28] <fta> 2008/09/21 11315
[01:28] <fta> 2008/09/22 11280
[01:29] <asac> fta: hmm. btw, dpkg-buildpackage -S -si includes the .bzr directory in diff.gz?
[01:30] <fta> not with bd for sure
[01:30] <asac> ok
[01:35] <asac> *sigh*
[01:35] <asac> imagezoom diverged too
[01:37] <asac> me replays what was uploaded
[01:38] <fta> i'm all done with mine but mediatomb and zekr never appeared anywhere
[01:39] <fta> both were debian syncs
[01:39] <fta> did I miss something ?
[01:43] <asac> fta: +Maintainer: Ubuntu MOTU Developers <ubuntu-motu.ubuntu.com>
[01:44] <asac> fta: err
[01:44] <fta> really? damn
[01:44] <asac> fta: thats ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
[01:44] <asac> isnt it?
[01:44] <asac> Ubuntu MOTU Developers <ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com>
[01:45] <fta> @ and perl...
[01:45] <fta> my bad
[01:45] <fta> not sure if i should reup with the same version or bump...
[01:46] <asac> fta: he?
[01:46] <asac> fta: the bogus email made those packages fail for me
[01:47] <asac> so there shouldnt be anything gone up like that
[01:47] <fta> it didn't fail here
[01:47] <asac> fta: what didnt fail?
[01:47] <asac> fta: thats bad
[01:48] <asac> fta: you should really use debuild for sources
[01:48] <asac> but well
[01:48] <asac> how many are that?
[01:50] <fta> hm, zekr is in multiverse
[01:50] <fta> just 2
[01:51] <asac> fta: you sure htat the bugos maintainer things got into the archive?
[01:51] <asac> if yes, we probably have to hunt down which launchpad user was created for them
[01:52] <asac> at least i think lp does that automatically
[01:52] <fta> i'm sure i dpushed something, i still have it, let me check
[01:53] <asac> grep ubuntu-motu.ubuntu.com *.changes
[01:53] <fta> yep, mediatomb had a bad maint
[01:53] <asac> ok. damage is done, so no need to hurry
[01:54] <fta> just those 2
[01:54] <asac> mediatomb an?
[01:54] <asac> mediatomb and ?
[01:54] <asac> zekr?
[01:54] <fta> zekr
[01:55] <fta> multiverse is like main or universe?
[01:55] <asac> not sure about that
[01:55] <asac> its usualyl universe
[01:55] <asac> i know that motus can upload to flashplugin-nonfree :(
[01:55] <fta> eheh
[01:56] <Jazzva> I think we can remove bookmarksftp from the archive
[01:56] <Jazzva> here is its homepage
[01:56] <Jazzva> https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/14?application=firefox&id=14
[01:57] <Jazzva> though, current archive version has 1.0.2, last one on amo is 1.0.1
[01:57] <Jazzva> the thing AMO needs is to include a field for license info
[01:58] <Jazzva> for example: - Version: 1.2
[01:58] <Jazzva>  - License: GPL (or MPL, BSD, proprietary, link to the author's license)
[01:59] <asac> fta: so apparently mediatomb was rejected silently
[01:59] <asac> thats good news
[01:59] <asac> same for zekr
[01:59] <asac> just use the same version with proper Maintainer and upload agina
[01:59] <fta> just pushed zekr
[02:01] <Jazzva> should I file a bug for archive removal regarding bookmarksftp?
[02:01] <fta> i've fixed the script
[02:02] <fta> subject: [ubuntu/intrepid] zekr 0.5.1.dfsg-1ubuntu1 (Accepted)
[02:02] <asac> fta: good luck ;)
[02:03] <asac> Jazzva: so bookmarksftp is dead? and doesnt support ffox 3?
[02:03] <Jazzva> well, not according to the amo
[02:03] <Jazzva> and I wasn't able to test it when I installed it
[02:05] <fta_> subject: [ubuntu/intrepid] mediatomb 0.11.0-3ubuntu1 (Accepted)
[02:06] <fta_> good, 22 uploads for my 1st time
[02:08] <Jazzva> asac, anyway, I think its development is discontinued
[02:09] <asac> fta: i get "speedial" is a native package
[02:09] <asac> thats a bug i guess?
[02:10] <Jazzva> asac, fta: Just a question... Have you removed firefox-2 in those uploads to bug 272772? :)
[02:10] <fta_> asac, because:
[02:10] <fta_> fta@ix:~ $ apt-cache madison speedial
[02:10] <fta_> fta@ix:~ $
[02:11] <fta_> Jazzva, nope
[02:11] <asac> fta_: speedial is broken
[02:11] <Jazzva> ok... I'll work on that then :)
[02:11] <asac> he?
[02:11] <asac> fta_: speeddial
[02:12] <asac> fta_: bzt vcs header pointed to wrong location
[02:12] <asac> Jazzva: is there an upstream dump?
[02:12] <asac> err
[02:12] <asac> bump for speeddial?
[02:12] <asac> apparently that extension hasnt been touched since initial upload ;)
[02:13] <asac> (well i am uploading it now :))
[02:13] <Jazzva> not sure... I haven't done anything with that extension
[02:13] <fta_> asac, you got all the bad ones ;)
[02:14] <asac> hehe
[02:14] <asac> did you reshuffle ;)?
[02:14] <Jazzva> I think this should be the full list of extensions that depend only on firefox when they shouldn't (I think that's only mozilla-bookmarksftp, which isn't even compat), on firefox and firefox-2, and just on firefox-2
[02:14] <Jazzva> *or just on fx-2
[02:15] <fta_> asac, nope, i didn't
[02:15] <asac> doing it-menu
[02:15] <asac> thats the last for today
[02:16] <Jazzva> please remove firefox-2 :)
[02:16] <Jazzva> asac, ^
[02:17] <asac> too late ;)
[02:17] <asac> not that important ;)
[02:17] <Jazzva> sigh... oh, well :)
[02:17] <asac> though we should have done it
[02:17] <asac> i will try to remember for the last few
[02:17] <Jazzva> asac, should I report a global bug for that now then?
[02:19] <fta_> mozilla Bug 404857
[02:19] <fta_> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=404857
[02:19] <fta_>  firefox reloads every font.cache for every page loaded
[02:19] <Jazzva> well, here's a start... https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/272959
[02:20] <fta_> the bot is dead
[02:26] <fta> nice, in ff3.1, the new tab list :)
[02:26] <asac> Jazzva: firefox-2 removal? yes.
[02:27] <Jazzva> fta, do we have 3.1 in the archives?
[02:28] <fta> i'd like to
[02:28] <Jazzva> ppa? :)
[02:28] <fta> yes
[02:30] <fta> lol, i'm in the top30, how is that possible
[02:30] <fta> http://thc.emanuele-gentili.com/utu/utu_intrepid.php
[02:32] <fta> kde is leading the pack
[02:43] <asac> fta: top 15 shouldnt be that hard
[02:43] <asac> from there on ... the steps get bigger ;)
[02:44] <fta> indeed
[02:45] <fta> i really need some sleep
[02:46] <asac> yeah ... me 2
[02:46] <asac> cu
[02:46] <fta> cu
[09:35] <gnomefreak> asac: is there documents on how mbox works?
[09:35] <gnomefreak> or atleast how to attach file to debians bug tracker
[09:51] <gnomefreak> asac: what do you call the firefox addons dialog? ubufox?
[10:13] <gnomefreak> ok working on linkwidgets. asac can you please get to the 3 i got done hopefully before they are out of date.

[10:18] <gnomefreak>   <r:Description>
[10:18] <gnomefreak>     <id>{a463f10c-3994-11da-9945-000d60ca027b}</id>
[10:18] <gnomefreak>     <minVersion>0.5</minVersion>
[10:18] <gnomefreak>     <maxVersion>0.7.1</maxVersion>
[10:18] <gnomefreak>   </r:Description>



[10:19] <gnomefreak> you would think they would tell you what app it is since it has different em:id
[10:58] <gnomefreak> ok linkwdgets looks straight forward but waiting till after breakfast
[10:59] <jeroen-> why is the package firefox pulling so much gnome-dependicies, like gtksu en even synaptic? I am a kubuntu user
[11:00] <jeroen-> talking about intrebit
[11:00] <gnomefreak> it will bring in gtk libs but i see no reason for the 2 you said
[11:01] <gnomefreak> jeroen-: hardy or intrepid?
[11:01] <jeroen-> latter
[11:01] <jeroen-> one
[11:02] <jeroen-> metapackage firefox
[11:02] <jeroen-> even gnome-app-install
[11:02] <gnomefreak> firefox-3.0 is bringing in the gtk deps
[11:04] <jeroen-> gnomefreak: are you using adept?
[11:04] <gnomefreak> jeroen-: ask asac when hes around and show him the dep list http://pastebin.mozilla.org/540990 that way he has all info needed you might want to try abrowser
[11:04] <gnomefreak> jeroen-: nope i just restoreed my intrepid box and havent had a chanve to install kde4 yet
[11:04] <gnomefreak> ok off for breakfaast
[11:05] <jeroen-> same from command line and with abrowser
[11:06] <jeroen-> oh well I need it now
[11:06] <jeroen-> gnomefreak: abrowser, thats the same without the name?
[11:07] <jeroen-> mm to late
[12:34] <asac> urr ... team report is due already :/
[12:34] <asac> [DONE sep] fta became MOTU
[12:34] <asac> [DONE sep] mozillateam meeting
[12:34] <asac> not sure ,)
[12:40] <asac> [DONE sep] abrowser rdepends transition
[12:40] <asac> [DONE sep] eula business ;)
[12:41] <asac> [DONE sep] release of ffox 2.0.0.17/3.0.2 and xul 1.9.0.2 and seamonkey 1.1.12 and tbird 2.0.0.17
[12:44] <Jazzva> so that thing is working?
[12:49] <asac> oh no
[13:12] <asac> fta: do you still have this 3d anmaytion?
[13:12] <asac> Jazzva: which thing?
[13:12] <asac> Jazzva: oh ... no. i just used it ;)
[13:12] <asac> a-priori ;)
[13:13] <asac> but i think it should have been [DONE sep08]
[13:13] <asac> :)
[13:13] <Jazzva> i see :)
[13:14] <Jazzva> i'm finishing the file of that global bug for packages that depend on firefox-2
[13:14] <Jazzva> s/the file/filing/
[13:14] <asac> Jazzva: cool. lets look at that bug after that then
[13:14] <asac> (before getting archive admins attention)
[13:14] <asac> maybe there is software that can still be fixed for ffox 3
[13:15] <Jazzva> well, all of the reported is compat with ff-3
[13:15] <Jazzva> (at least that's what the depends line says)
[13:15] <Jazzva> except bookmarksftp
[13:15] <asac> Jazzva: oh. ok. lets file a separate bug for "archive" removal then
[13:15] <asac> and one for "archive depend elimination" :)
[13:16] <Jazzva> mhm... that would include firefox-ubuntu-theme and stuff :)
[13:16] <asac> Jazzva: archive removal?
[13:16] <gnomefreak> im waiting on author to add license to foxmarks to replace bookmarksftp
[13:16] <Jazzva> I guess that would be in the archive removal
[13:16] <Jazzva> gnomefreak, great ;)
[13:16] <Jazzva> :)
[13:16] <asac> gnomefreak: have you asked him to add a license file to the .xpi too?
[13:16] <gnomefreak> the new one is nonfree license
[13:16] <asac> that would be great
[13:16] <gnomefreak> asac: yes
[13:16] <gnomefreak> sent email yeterday
[13:17] <asac> gnomefreak: err. if its nonfree then we dont need to bother i guess
[13:17] <Jazzva> nonfree license? how will that get in the archive?
[13:17] <gnomefreak> asac: no the new bookmarksftp(new project dont remember name) foxmarks is free from what i can tell it used to be apache license
[13:18] <asac> ah cool
[13:18]  * gnomefreak working with debian on the bookmarks extension
[13:18] <asac> go ahead then ;)
[13:18] <asac> gnomefreak: who is the debian guy?
[13:18] <gnomefreak> hard name to spell give me a minute and ill get it
[13:19] <gnomefreak> i asked yesterday if anyone knew him i got no answer
[13:19] <gnomefreak> Yaroslav Halchenko
[13:21] <gnomefreak> [reed]: the info about mozilla mailing lists (my emails not going through here is mail i got:
[13:22] <gnomefreak> Messages from non-subscribers are automatically rejected. Please
[13:22] <gnomefreak> subscribe to the list first before attempting to post, or ensure that
[13:22] <gnomefreak> you are posting using the address you subscribed with.
[13:22] <gnomefreak> if i wasnt subscribed than why the hell does it come to my email :(
[13:23] <asac> fta: didnt we have a fennec branch somewhere?
[13:24] <Jazzva> asac, done. bug 272959
[13:25] <Jazzva> all of them (except bookmarksftp) depend on firefox | firefox-2, or firefox-3.0 | firefox-2
[13:27] <asac> jcastro: did you ever get an (n)ack from launchpad team on the "super"-project chromium-project?
[13:27] <gnomefreak> asac: do you know the guy?
[13:27] <asac> gnomefreak: no. whats his nick?
[13:27] <gnomefreak> dont know
[13:28] <gnomefreak> its been email and bug reports
[13:39] <asac> gnomefreak: whats his solution then?
[13:41] <gnomefreak> asac: nothing yet its in my hands he suggested foxmarks so i keep him informed but after i package it for us i will do debians and he said he would sponsor the upload
[13:42] <asac> gnomefreak: not sure. but most likely we want to use our branches if we need to do something anyway
[13:42] <gnomefreak> right
[13:42] <asac> gnomefreak: have you asked him if we would be willing to work with our infrastructure?
[13:42] <asac> using xpi.mk, med-xpi-unpack et al
[13:42] <gnomefreak> no not until i find out if he is Ubuntu dev as well
[13:42] <asac> benefits: we would get automatic process
[13:42] <asac> gnomefreak: he doesnt need to be a ubuntu dev
[13:44] <gnomefreak> i will talk to him about it next chance i get, but he pretty much doesnt want to work on it thats why i got it. he either emailed the Ml or me directly dont remember about this
[13:44] <gnomefreak> please dont use bookmarksftp as a depend
[13:45] <gnomefreak> i have asked that it gets removed i still need someone to ack that bug so we can continue with it
[13:45] <Volans> Hi asac, you and fta have done a very hard job tonight :)
[13:45] <Volans> (hoping my list was useful)
[13:45] <asac> Volans: yeah
[13:46] <asac> Volans: though adding all the bug tasks was most likely the longer task ;)
[13:46] <asac> my fingers ached ;)
[13:46] <Volans> sure!
[13:46] <asac> Volans: but was good for sure ;)
[13:46] <gnomefreak> wtf is going on damnit
[13:46] <Volans> sorry if I don't have helped but I come back at home at 5 today morning ;)
[13:46] <asac> Volans: are there still questions i forgot to answer for these extension scripts?
[13:46]  * gnomefreak getting so sick of this bullshiot
[13:47] <asac> Volans: thats fine ;)
[13:47] <asac> gnomefreak: which bullshit are you after?
[13:47] <gnomefreak> i casnt fucking email dev-apps-calendar@lists.mozilla.org and i am subscribed to it or i would never get emails from it
[13:47] <gnomefreak> s/cant
[13:48] <Volans> asac: no, but I will try to test a better newer searching algorithm without entering in the tricky version string comparison
[13:48] <gnomefreak> dev-apps-calendar-bounces+gnomefreak=ubuntu.com@lists.mozilla.org
[13:48] <gnomefreak> that tells me im subscribed
[13:49] <gnomefreak> they keep sending it to gnomefreak but im sending it from the subscribed address
[13:51] <asac> Volans: hmm. i think in the end we need a normalizer for mozilla versioing
[13:52] <asac> or a script that does the tests for us
[13:52] <asac> e.g. versioncmp version1 version2
[13:52] <asac> == -1 if smaller, 0 if equal, 1 if greater
[13:52] <Volans> I was thinking that the install.rdf file must be updated with a newer version
[13:52] <asac> or something like that
[13:52] <asac> why?
[13:52] <Volans> so if we see the last modification time of that fine inside the xpi
[13:52] <Volans> /fine/file/
[13:52] <asac> Volans: thats all doing assumptions that are likely to be inaccurate at some point
[13:53] <asac> i really think that writing a proper compare funciton is worth the effort
[13:53] <asac> but if thats too hard we can of course start with some heuristic
[13:53] <asac> i just see us forgetting about this and at some point bumping into issues when everybody forgot about what exactly was done :-D
[13:54] <Volans> make a generic one can be hard, make a function that use a pattern can be very simple, if we save the pattern in the main config file among the name and AMOID...
[13:54] <Volans> likely the version synatax will not change for newer versions
[13:55] <asac> Volans: there should be a script for version compare available somewhere in the mozilla tree
[13:56] <asac> at least i hope ;)
[13:57] <Volans> ok, I can take a look
[13:59] <gnomefreak> asac: does this name look familar giggzounet i cant tell if that is his nick or not
[14:00] <fta2> lo
[14:01] <gnomefreak> no matter what address i send it from they seem to get it from gnomefreak address
[14:03] <gnomefreak> im my outgoing settings i set up all emails but gnomefreak is the default so shouldnt it send from any address i use even though its not default? this is tbird 2.0.0*
[14:20] <asac> urgh. major bustage of my adsl modem
[14:24] <fta2> asac, hi
[14:24] <fta2> asac, are you done with the uploads?
[14:24] <fta2> asac, was the script useful? i mean, was it worth it?
[14:25] <jcastro> asac: no I didn't
[14:25] <asac> fta2: i think so yes. unfortunately i was struck quite a few times by the updated bzr branch error
[14:25] <asac> fta2: but definitly good script ;)
[14:26] <fta2> excellent
[14:27] <asac> fta2: but i think i have 3 uploads left
[14:27] <asac> fta2: feel free to take them ;)
[14:27] <asac> fta2: or one or two ;)
[14:27] <asac> i have to finish sec update now
[14:28] <asac> fta2: sm will most likely be out tomorrow too :/
[14:31] <fta2> i can do the one in intrepid, maybe hardy if it's just a matter of updating the sources (ie, not backporting the patches, i don't have much time for that)
[14:33] <asac> fta2: no backporting needed. even if, i have the backports
[14:33] <asac> maybe iceape in gutsy ... but well
[14:33] <asac> ;)
[14:36] <gnomefreak> we dont need to add /* ***** BEGIN LICENSE BLOCK ***** to the copyright file right?
[14:41] <asac> gnomefreak: technically not
[14:45] <gnomefreak> ok cool
[14:48] <asac> fta2: ok. the idea would be to upload seamonkey security update to PPA ... then test and ask jdstrand to reup that to security
[14:57] <asac> fta2: people complain about spam now in the bug ;)
[14:57] <asac> bug 272772
[14:58] <asac> "I *really* need to unsubscribe from this list. I don't want to be on it
[14:58] <asac> anymore and no matter what I do I keep getting emails. I have tried here
[14:58] <asac> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-doc and that's not working.
[14:58] <asac> Help please."
[14:58] <Volans> asac: is the mozilla-team list not the ubuntu-doc
[14:59] <asac> Volans: no
[14:59] <Volans> and I think is a one time high traffic ;)
[14:59] <asac> yeah
[14:59] <asac> ;)
[14:59] <asac> Volans: problem is that because we added ubuntu-doc package all the mail went to that ml too ;)
[15:00] <Volans> ah ok
[15:07] <gnomefreak> Jazzva: asac what is the last target and what em:id do i use since they are different? http://pastebin.mozilla.org/541023
[15:08] <gnomefreak> eh application target
[15:10] <asac> gnomefreak: you use the em:id of the extension ... not the target
[15:10] <asac> (if you are talking aobut the directory name)
[15:11] <Jazzva> gnomefreak, this should be the extension id <id>linkwidget@clav.mozdev.org</id>
[15:11] <Jazzva> eh...
[15:11] <Jazzva> linkwidget@clav.mozdev.org
[15:12] <Jazzva> gnomefreak, you should look for <id> or <em:id> that is not nested inside <targetApplicatio> tag
[15:12] <Jazzva> that is the top <id> or <em:id>
[15:15] <gnomefreak> thats what i was thinking about while smoking a minute ago
[15:15] <gnomefreak> thanks
[15:21] <Jazzva> np
[15:35] <gnomefreak> i hate errors that you cant find. be back i need to step away before i lose it
[15:43] <gnomefreak> ha found the problem ;)
[15:51] <gnomefreak> hmmmmmmmm
[16:03] <gnomefreak> im betting its the id that is wrong
[16:06] <gnomefreak> either that or it cant be used in 3.0 final
[16:07] <gnomefreak> well it says 3.0* but the install.rdf had 3.0b4
[16:09] <gnomefreak> Jazzva: this set up in rules builds fine fails to install, any changes made it fails to build. any ideas would be greatly apprecated rules file: http://pastebin.mozilla.org/541034
[16:09] <gnomefreak> it installs just doesnt show up in abrowser
[16:10] <gnomefreak> since abrowser is firefox unbranded it should work in it as well
[16:10] <asac> gnomefreak: MOZ_XPI_EMID := {linkwidget@clav.mozdev.org}
[16:11] <asac> thats wrong
[16:11] <asac> curly brackets? why?
[16:11] <asac> the uuid based EMIDs have curly brackets in the id itself
[16:11] <asac> just remove them
[16:14] <gnomefreak> remove the {?
[16:14] <asac> new round of packages for "EULA" bug;)
[16:14] <asac> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.0/+bug/269656/comments/500
[16:14] <asac>  \o/ i made the 500th post
[16:15] <gnomefreak> ;)
[16:15] <asac> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17836902/firstrun2.png
[16:15] <asac> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17836924/about_rights.png
[16:15] <asac> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17836931/about_rights_expanded.png
[16:15] <asac> gnomefreak: yes. the EMID should exactly what is in install.rdf
[16:15] <asac> they usually dont have {} there
[16:15] <asac> unless they use the old uuid approach
[16:16] <gnomefreak> ah i see
[16:16] <gnomefreak> it is <id/bleh
[16:16] <gnomefreak> so just the bleh
[16:16] <Jazzva> asac, that looks good :)
[16:17] <gnomefreak> asac: no need to uncomment the id line right?
[16:17]  * gnomefreak looks at png's
[16:17] <Jazzva> gnomefreak, moz_xpi_emid line? you should uncomment it
[16:18] <gnomefreak> ok
[16:18] <Jazzva> that is, if xpi.mk fails to find em:id...
[16:20] <gnomefreak> testing now
[16:23] <gnomefreak> fuck this extension
[16:24] <gnomefreak> it worked but its not compatible with 3.0.2
[16:24] <gnomefreak> so i guess ill see what happens when changed
[16:28] <gnomefreak> every other one uses max version 3.0 and it works in 3.0.2
[16:28] <gnomefreak> this one doesnt
[16:29] <gnomefreak> that worked
[16:29] <asac> gnomefreak: no .the other use 3.0.*
[16:29] <gnomefreak> ah the *
[16:30] <gnomefreak> ill use that
[16:30] <gnomefreak> 3.0.2 worked as well
[16:30] <gnomefreak> but ill make it broad
[16:32] <asac> bug 273170
[16:32] <asac> gnomefreak: we want 3.0.* in extensions
[16:33] <asac> otherwise we need to update the maxversion on every update
[16:33] <asac> which doesnt scale
[16:33] <gnomefreak> im using it
[16:46] <gnomefreak> ok fixed branches and all is working on my system but im rebuilding it for PPA
[16:47] <gnomefreak> and no lintian warnings :)
[16:49] <gnomefreak> ok pushed to PPA for review. ill be testing it today until i run out of things to test (very small amount of prefference settings
[16:58] <gnomefreak> asac: thats 4 that can be reviewed and pushed ( except linkwidgets im testing today but shouldnt be too long) none of them have errors or warnings from lintian. if we can still push to Intrepid
[17:16] <gnomefreak> im done for now. be back a bit later
[17:22] <asac> gnomefreak: thanks
[17:22] <asac> gnomefreak: can you provide me with the list fo 4 things that can be reviewed?
[17:22] <asac> (sorry, but i lost track  on which extensions you touched)
[17:39] <fta2> http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=926488
[17:44] <asac> yeah. good news
[17:56] <gnomefreak> asac: https://edge.launchpad.net/~gnomefreak/+archive  chatzilla- 0.9.83-0ubuntu1~jjv1 firegpg - 0.5.1-0ubuntu1~jjv1 linkwidgets - 1.6-0ubuntu1~jjv  wizz-rss - 3.0.0.2-0ubuntu1~jjv1
[17:56]  * gnomefreak goes to lunch 
[18:29] <Wellark> is it a known bug that firefox window is initially sized so that the window title bar (and control buttons) is under the gnome upper panel
[18:29] <Wellark> i'm running intrepid aplha-6
[18:30] <Wellark> there were so many bugs in the bug tracker that I couldn't tell :/
[18:41] <asac> Wellark: what screen resolution are you running?
[18:43] <gnomefreak> compiz
[18:43] <gnomefreak> disable compiz it should work normal
[18:43] <asac> Wellark: is it that the window size is exceeds your screen or is it just displaced?
[18:44] <asac> gnomefreak: you can reproduce that?
[18:44] <gnomefreak> its been compiz bug for a while
[18:44] <gnomefreak> asac: dont use it
[18:44] <gnomefreak> i dont
[18:45] <gnomefreak> problem was any window you opened would hide under menu
[18:45] <gnomefreak> try disabling it and see if it works
[18:46] <newz2000> have anyone noticed that flashblock stopped working the other day? (i.e. it doesn't block any flash movies)
[18:46]  * newz2000 should have checked bugs first... does it now
[18:46] <gnomefreak> i still havent had time to get lunch
[18:47] <gnomefreak> newz2000: from repos or from addond site?
[18:47] <gnomefreak> addons
[18:47] <newz2000> gnomefreak: I've tried both
[18:47] <gnomefreak> ours was working AFAIK
[18:47] <newz2000> I noticed it because my version of flash has a tendancy to crash pulseaudio
[18:48] <gnomefreak> newz2000: remoev libflashsupport
[18:48] <gnomefreak> newz2000: try flashblock with a new firefox profile
[18:48] <newz2000> gnomefreak: I'm happy to try, how do I do that?
[18:49] <newz2000> (libflashsupport not installed btw)
[18:49] <gnomefreak> i can test it tomorrow. i am doing lunch and than finishing a spreadsheet
[18:49] <newz2000> oh, found the profile thingy
[18:50] <gnomefreak> newz2000: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs
[18:50] <Wellark> gnomefreak: i don't want to disable compiz now that I finally have a machine capable of running it :P
[18:50] <newz2000> yep, still shows flash movies even though flashblock is enabled
[18:50] <gnomefreak> Wellark: just to test it
[18:50] <newz2000> thanks gnomefreak, I'll check that out and file a bug if appropriate
[18:50] <gnomefreak> newz2000: on all sites?
[18:51] <newz2000> I only tested one with the clean profile (youtube)
[18:51] <gnomefreak> try a few
[18:51] <Wellark> gnomefreak: sure, of course I can do that :)
[18:51] <Wellark> but not today
[18:51] <Wellark> i put my laptop away already
[18:51] <gnomefreak> Wellark: if it fixes it file a bug on compiz if it doesnt fix it file bug on ff or abrowser whatever you use
[18:52] <newz2000> ok, testd with three so far and no blocking is happening
[18:52] <gnomefreak> ok im going to lunch i hope. need to find a way of dumping memory without restarting if i find a way i might get rich
[18:53] <gnomefreak> newz2000: what version do you have installed? apt-cache policy flashblock
[18:54] <newz2000> Installed: 1.3.10a~snapshot20080611-0ubuntu2
[18:54] <Wellark> gnomefreak: will do, thanks!
[18:54] <gnomefreak> newz2000: hardy?
[18:54] <newz2000> gnomefreak: intrepid
[18:54] <gnomefreak> what browser?
[18:54] <newz2000> firefox 3
[18:55] <newz2000> 3.0.2
[18:55] <gnomefreak> ok file bug on flashblock and subscribe me so i can test tomorrow
[18:56] <gnomefreak> asac: ill be back a bit later while working on spreadsheet
[18:56] <newz2000> gnomefreak: ok, are you gnomefreak on launchpad?
[18:56] <gnomefreak> yes
[18:56] <newz2000> ok, will do
[18:56] <gnomefreak> gnomefreak: or john vivirito
[18:56] <gnomefreak> -:
[20:19] <fta> back
[20:53] <fta> asac, lol, i just read comments on the transition bug
[21:00] <fta> SUNBIRD_0_9_RELEASE
[21:55] <armin76> fta: link for the bug? :)
[21:55] <fta> bug 272772
[22:00] <fta> http://www.crunchgear.com/2008/09/22/boob-powered-mouse-and-mouse-pad/
[22:31] <wikz> fta: why does fix_unix_installer.patch remove the line -$(error you need a "--enable-static --disable-shared" build to create an installer) in the installer makefile.in ?
[22:32] <wikz> Can't we add it in the DEB_CONFIGURE_USER_FLAGS= ?
[22:32] <fta> we don't want static
[22:32] <wikz> Ohh k
[22:34] <fta> btw, this patch has been rejected by upstream
[22:35] <fta> but they didn't propose anything useful to replace it, so i keep it until someone proposes something better
[22:37] <fta> wikz, ^^, if you do, let me know :)
[22:37] <wikz> Right now I'm immitating a lot of changes that you did
[22:38] <wikz> fta: FOr e.g adding the /installer/unnix/pack...
[22:38] <fta> is that patch needed for you too ?
[22:39] <fta> if you can fix that in your tree, it's better than adding a patch in the debian packaging
[22:39] <wikz> The thing is our trunk is changing so much that I don't feel like bothering my other devs
[22:39] <wikz> we have a delivery ate this october mid
[22:40] <wikz> and packaging is not a priority now
[22:40] <wikz> I also diabled NSS for libpurple
[22:40] <fta> can't you just open a bug and add your patch so someone could have a look later?
[22:40] <wikz> I will
[22:40] <wikz> I will
[22:40] <fta> would be nice :)
[22:40] <wikz> As I said I also have a prob with NSS for libpurple
[22:40] <fta> what kind of problem?
[22:41] <wikz> when I build the moz way it build fine.but when I build it the debain way it complains of the nss base header files missing
[22:42] <fta> do you have libnss3-dev installed ?
[22:42] <wikz> I have NSS and NSPR libs installed
[22:42] <fta> you need the -dev packages
[22:42] <wikz> yes
[22:43] <wikz> I even installed the one in your PPA
[22:43] <wikz> There is a config file for libpurple I need to go through it
[22:45] <wikz> fta: listen I forgot to patch the /installer/makefile.in for that line .The whole thing built but failed because of that one.Can I now reume from there somehow ?the -nc flag doesn't work !
[22:49] <fta> sure, move to build-area where the debian dir is, with quilt, pop until you are on the right patch, fix it, refresh, push -a, then go back to the root of the tree (where the debian dir is - still in build-area), and run dpkg-buildpackage -nc
[22:49] <fta> it should work
[22:50] <fta> (assuming you don't mess up your patches stack)
[22:50] <fta> (and you run the commands in the right directory)
[22:51] <wikz> ok
[22:55] <fta> don't forget to copy the fixed patch to your bzr branch afterwards
[22:56] <fta> i hope you are committing your changes on a regular base :)
[23:43] <wikz> fta: At one point it complains of this dh_install: spicebird-0.7 missing files (debian/tmp/usr/lib/spicebird-0.7*/thunderbird*), aborting ,why is that ?Wher is it picking up from ?
[23:44] <wikz> I don't have thunderbird in any of my files in debian dir
[23:45] <fta> are you sure ? dh_install uses the *.install files
[23:45] <fta> look in your build-area
[23:46] <wikz> it is picking up from the .install files because I had the MOZ_APP name differently set in autoconf.mk and it complained
[23:48] <wikz> alright
[23:48] <wikz> got it
[23:48] <wikz> sorry