=== matsubara is now known as matsubara-dinner | ||
=== matsubara-dinner is now known as matsubara | ||
Verterok | intellectronica: the searchTasks feature in launchpadlib looks gooood :), nice job! | 00:51 |
---|---|---|
intellectronica | thanks, Verterok! | 01:05 |
wgrant | intellectronica: Good to see that issue was fixed so quickly. Thanks. | 01:09 |
* intellectronica wonders if the compliments always start that late | 01:09 | |
intellectronica | i obviously go to sleep too early most nights :D | 01:09 |
wgrant | Heh. | 01:09 |
intellectronica | wgrant: thanks for the help testing it, b.t.w | 01:10 |
wgrant | intellectronica: Um, sure. | 01:10 |
intellectronica | and now ... | 01:11 |
* intellectronica --> zzz | 01:11 | |
wgrant | Night. | 01:11 |
Peng_ | jml: Ping? | 03:40 |
jml | Peng_: howdy | 03:40 |
Peng_ | jml: Hi. :D | 03:41 |
jml | ('Peng: pong' would have been simply too much fun.) | 03:41 |
Peng_ | :) | 03:41 |
Peng_ | Hm | 03:42 |
Peng_ | jml: So...I have a knit branch, lp:~mnordhoff/pytz/pytz-2008f. LP was finally able to mirror it over bzr+http, and then... it complains about a missing revision. Any idea? | 03:43 |
Peng_ | "bzr check" reports a ghost and "1 revisions missing parents in ancestry", but the revision in question is present. | 03:44 |
jml | Peng_: well, the idea that's bouncing around in my head like a pinball is that it's a bzr bug. | 03:44 |
jml | Peng_: also, I've seen other cases where that error shows up when it shouldn't. | 03:45 |
Peng_ | Huh. | 03:45 |
Peng_ | Hmm, when did "AssertionError: <bzrlib.bzrdir.BzrDirMeta1 object at 0x95c4a0c> is not a RemoteBzrDir" happen? That's on one of my older branches that hasn't been mirrored in ages. | 03:46 |
Peng_ | Oh, 2008-08-01. | 03:46 |
jml | yay logs :) | 03:46 |
jml | Peng_: can you request another mirror? | 03:47 |
Peng_ | Yeah, I am. | 03:47 |
Peng_ | Wait, another mirror of which branch? | 03:47 |
jml | the one with the AssertionError. | 03:48 |
Peng_ | OK. Yeah, I am then. | 03:48 |
Peng_ | It's going now. | 03:48 |
Peng_ | Ooh, done. | 03:51 |
Peng_ | It's complaining about the missing revision now too. (It's lp:~mnordhoff/pytz/pytz-2008e, the parent of the other branch.) | 03:51 |
Peng_ | Hey, it was able to mirror one of my pack branches from another project. At least something works. :P | 03:57 |
Peng_ | LP has no problem mirroring a pack copy of the branch that has the revision error. | 04:09 |
tgm4883_laptop | Is there something special I need to do to get the launchpad janitor to auto expire bugs in my project? | 04:10 |
beuno | tgm4883_laptop, you have to specify it in your project's details | 04:12 |
beuno | so, go to your projects overview page | 04:12 |
beuno | and click on "Change details" | 04:12 |
wgrant | Is that under bugs.lp.net yet? | 04:12 |
beuno | nope | 04:12 |
* wgrant imagines "X bugs can expire (!)" | 04:13 | |
wgrant | With the (!) being the edit icon. | 04:13 |
beuno | sure, unless you really don't want them to | 04:13 |
beuno | you keep on seeing that anyway | 04:13 |
wgrant | Hm? | 04:13 |
beuno | if you don't want bugs to expire | 04:14 |
beuno | you would see that message all the time | 04:14 |
wgrant | You do already, don't you? | 04:14 |
beuno | do you? | 04:14 |
* beuno looks | 04:14 | |
beuno | you do! | 04:15 |
Peng_ | Heh, "This branch may be out of date, as Launchpad has not been able to access between 2008-06-30 and 2008-07-04." | 04:15 |
beuno | edit icon would be nice then :) | 04:15 |
wgrant | beuno: Good, so I wasn't going crazy. | 04:15 |
beuno | wgrant, no, I am | 04:15 |
tgm4883_laptop | beuno, it is | 04:16 |
wgrant | Heh. | 04:16 |
tgm4883_laptop | beuno, that is set, yet some bugs are way old | 04:17 |
wgrant | tgm4883_laptop: Which is a bug that you think should have been expired? | 04:17 |
tgm4883_laptop | sec | 04:17 |
tgm4883_laptop | bug 151612 | 04:18 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 151612 in mythbuntu "Remote not supported" [Wishlist,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/151612 | 04:18 |
tgm4883_laptop | for instance, that one | 04:18 |
tgm4883_laptop | we had one that was 262 days old that was marked for expiration, but someone marked it invalid | 04:19 |
Ursinha | hey danilo[home]__, you there? | 04:19 |
tgm4883_laptop | lp also lists 32 bugs that can expire | 04:19 |
wgrant | beuno: Hmm, I guess that wouldn't actually work. | 04:21 |
wgrant | It's not shown when there are no expirable bugs. | 04:22 |
wgrant | Which happens both when there are no incomplete bugs untouched for 60 days, or if expiry is turned on. | 04:22 |
wgrant | But it seems that expiry doesn't work too well. | 04:22 |
beuno | BjornT, ping? ^ | 04:22 |
Peng_ | How many branches are mirrored at once? | 04:31 |
thumper | Peng_: up to 10 | 04:38 |
* thumper thinks | 04:38 | |
thumper | maybe 4 | 04:38 |
thumper | can't remember | 04:38 |
mwhudson | 4 | 04:40 |
jml | you know what would be good? | 04:42 |
jml | metrics. | 04:42 |
jml | lots of metrics. | 04:43 |
Peng_ | I just got it t ouse 8.72 Mbit of bandwidth. :) | 04:43 |
Peng_ | to use* | 04:43 |
Peng_ | Is it supposed to be able to mirror rich-root-pack branches? | 04:44 |
mwhudson | yes | 04:46 |
Peng_ | Well it can't. | 04:47 |
Peng_ | "KnitPackRepository('lp-mirrored:///~mnordhoff/bzr-svn/new-style-classes/.bzr/repository') is not compatible with ..." | 04:47 |
=== beuno_ is now known as beuno | ||
=== thekorn_ is now known as thekorn | ||
=== Hobbsee` is now known as Guest34533 | ||
=== Guest34533 is now known as Hobbsee | ||
krokosjablik | Hello, I cannot change the project name myself, is it right? I have asked for this in Launchpad answers just now, is it the right place for such requests? Thanks. | 09:28 |
wgrant | krokosjablik: That's the right place. | 09:28 |
krokosjablik | wgrant: Many thanks! | 09:29 |
=== mdz_ is now known as mdz | ||
=== mrevell is now known as mrevell-lunch | ||
=== salgado-afk is now known as salgado | ||
=== mrevell-lunch is now known as mrevell | ||
jjesse | good morning, i'm sure you all know about it already, but logging into launchpad this morning w/ konqueror on intrepid i get a message about the google map api key being rejected? | 13:41 |
mars | salgado, ^ | 13:41 |
jjesse | salgado: i get the error message on both edge and launchpad | 13:42 |
salgado | jjesse, bug 271613 | 13:43 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 271613 in launchpad-foundations "Google Maps API Key Error" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/271613 | 13:43 |
jjesse | ah ok, i wanted to make sure someone hadn't already reported it before i filed something | 13:43 |
=== bac_afk is now known as bac | ||
pro-rsoft | Hey, when I click Propose as goal it immediately gets marked as "Accepted for x.x.x" instead of "Proposed". How to mark something as Proposed but not Accepted? | 13:57 |
pro-rsoft | or isnt that possible? | 14:08 |
Hobbsee | pro-rsoft: it's not possible, as far as I know - but should you be able to set those anyway? | 14:10 |
pro-rsoft | should I register an account that is not admin and propose it there? is that the only way? | 14:10 |
Hobbsee | i'd sya so | 14:11 |
pro-rsoft | hmm. | 14:11 |
=== thekorn_ is now known as thekorn | ||
jmota | can anyone tell me why the icons in the top pannel(date, end session, sound...) sometimes get out of the place when i iniciate ubuntu? | 15:06 |
=== salgado is now known as salgado-brb | ||
=== salgado-brb is now known as salgado | ||
=== mdz_ is now known as mdz | ||
=== henninge_ is now known as henninge | ||
andrea-bs | Hello! https://launchpad.net/launchpad says "See https://edge.launchpad.net/launchpad-project for details..." | 16:36 |
andrea-bs | the problem is that the url includes "edge" | 16:36 |
tgm4883_laptop | andrea-bs, that would be for launchpad beta testers | 16:38 |
andrea-bs | tgm4883_laptop: I don't think so: I see non-edge links on https://launchpad.net/launchpad-project | 16:39 |
tgm4883_laptop | andrea-bs, go to https://launchpad.net/ and turn off redirection | 16:39 |
andrea-bs | tgm4883_laptop: the "edge" still be there | 16:40 |
tgm4883_laptop | andrea-bs, if you turn off redirection, then go to https://launchpad.net/launchpad-project it should be fine | 16:41 |
tgm4883_laptop | that will only last for 2 hours though, but this is just to prove that it's fine anyway | 16:42 |
tgm4883_laptop | you could also log out and go to https://launchpad.net/launchpad-project | 16:42 |
andrea-bs | tgm4883_laptop: sorry, I mean: the link in the page https://launchpad.net/launchpad include the "edge"; this is OK for betatesters, but not for other people | 16:44 |
andrea-bs | -See https://edge.launchpad.net/launchpad-project for details on the other components that make up the project. | 16:44 |
andrea-bs | +See https://launchpad.net/launchpad-project for details on the other components that make up the project. | 16:44 |
rockstar | andrea-bs, why is not good for other people? | 16:44 |
tgm4883_laptop | andrea-bs, the edge site only shows up for betatesters | 16:45 |
tgm4883_laptop | regular users don't get the redirection | 16:45 |
andrea-bs | rockstar: for example if they go to edge.lp.net/launchpad-project and click on "report a bug" they need to login an another time | 16:45 |
rockstar | I mean, I see what you're saying, but it's not a huge issue. | 16:45 |
andrea-bs | rockstar: sure | 16:45 |
tgm4883_laptop | i'm not sure I understand | 16:46 |
tgm4883_laptop | non beta testers never see the edge link | 16:48 |
andrea-bs | it's just a small typo in the url: launchpad.net should be "standard", not "edge.lp.net" | 16:48 |
tgm4883_laptop | it is | 16:48 |
tgm4883_laptop | unless you are a beta tester | 16:48 |
tgm4883_laptop | which I thought was what you were trying to say | 16:48 |
andrea-bs | I'm talking about the project summary of lp.net/launchpad | 16:48 |
rockstar | andrea-bs, are you on the beta testers team? | 16:48 |
andrea-bs | rockstar: yes, I am | 16:48 |
tgm4883_laptop | and you are worried that non beta testers will see the edge link? | 16:49 |
rockstar | That's why then. It would show the link differently if you weren't. | 16:49 |
andrea-bs | tgm4883_laptop: no, of course | 16:49 |
tgm4883_laptop | then......i'm confused | 16:49 |
andrea-bs | rockstar: but if I log out I still see "edge" in the summary | 16:50 |
andrea-bs | the link has been set in https://launchpad.net/launchpad/+edit | 16:50 |
tgm4883_laptop | ah I get it now | 16:50 |
andrea-bs | that's why it includes edge for everyone | 16:50 |
rockstar | andrea-bs, ah, I see the link you're talking about. | 16:50 |
tgm4883_laptop | so edit it and remove the edge part | 16:50 |
mpt | hm | 16:52 |
mpt | I've forgotten what "focus of development" means | 16:52 |
mpt | Anyone know? | 16:52 |
tgm4883_laptop | mpt, that would be where all of the development is focused? | 16:53 |
mpt | Yes, what does that mean? | 16:53 |
tgm4883_laptop | it's were most of the projects development is taking place | 16:53 |
tgm4883_laptop | ie, trunk | 16:53 |
tgm4883_laptop | or for ubuntu, it's intrepid | 16:54 |
mpt | It can't just mean trunk, because projects have a "trunk" series by default | 16:54 |
mpt | and yet it's still possible to change "development focus" to a different series | 16:54 |
mpt | salgado, do you know? | 16:55 |
tgm4883_laptop | I assume thats because you don't have to call it trunk | 16:55 |
tgm4883_laptop | you could call it intrepid | 16:55 |
tgm4883_laptop | and when you release intrepid, you could then change it to jackalope | 16:56 |
salgado | mpt, isn't that just a way to define what lp:project-name will point to? | 16:57 |
salgado | or does lp:project-name always point to trunk? | 16:57 |
mpt | salgado, does that mean it's useful only if you use Launchpad for code hosting? | 16:57 |
=== matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch | ||
salgado | mpt, not sure. I have no idea what I'm talking about here. rockstar should know, for sure | 16:58 |
mpt | hm, looks like it's also used in Bugs somehow | 17:01 |
rockstar | mpt, the trunk is usually considered "focus of development" | 17:04 |
mpt | rockstar, in what cases would it not be? | 17:05 |
rockstar | Basically, it indicates where all the development is going on, so you know where to branch from to get the most up-to-date code. | 17:05 |
rockstar | mpt, in cases where the development is shifted to another branch with a LARGE feature that requires many developer's focus. | 17:06 |
mpt | rockstar, so does changing the development focus change what bzr branch lp:project-name does? | 17:07 |
tgm4883_laptop | i'd also think that trunk wasn't the development of focus leading up to a major release, where all development would be happening on that release | 17:07 |
rockstar | Yes. | 17:08 |
rockstar | Branching from lp:foo will pull the current development focus for foo | 17:09 |
mpt | ok | 17:09 |
mpt | rockstar, can you tell how it affects Bugs, or should I ask a Bugs person? | 17:09 |
rockstar | mpt, best to ask bugs. I didn't even know it affected them. | 17:09 |
mpt | ok, thanks rockstar | 17:10 |
mpt | gmb, can you unpuzzle me? :-) | 17:10 |
gmb | wsfg? | 17:11 |
mpt | gmb, a project's development focus affects how bugs work in some way but I can't tell what it is | 17:11 |
gmb | Oh, okay. | 17:12 |
* gmb looks. | 17:12 | |
mpt | (I'm in the middle of reporting a bug that this should be explained better) | 17:12 |
=== salgado is now known as salgado-lunch | ||
gmb | mpt: Good luck with that. It's horribly arcane in a lot of ways and is hell to describe, even in a code review. | 17:13 |
gmb | mpt: Basically, though, if the project has a development focus then the bug task which is filed against that development focus is the master bug task for that bug. | 17:14 |
gmb | (So you'll see things like "Tracked in foo-bar 0.2" in the slave bug tasks) | 17:14 |
rockstar | gmb, wtf? | 17:15 |
rockstar | I didn't understand very much of that. | 17:15 |
gmb | rockstar: Heh; I work with it and I don't get it every time. | 17:15 |
gmb | Erm, let me think about this. | 17:15 |
rockstar | gmb, :) | 17:16 |
gmb | rockstar: So, say you file a bug against the fronobulator project. | 17:16 |
gmb | Someone then targets that bug to a release (not the current development focus). | 17:16 |
gmb | Then someone else *also* targets it to the development focus release (well, series is the correct nomenclature here). | 17:17 |
gmb | There are then two bug tasks. | 17:17 |
gmb | One for fronobulator not-dev-focus | 17:17 |
gmb | and one for fronobulator dev-focus. | 17:17 |
rockstar | Okay, so the conjoined master is what results. | 17:17 |
gmb | Correct. | 17:17 |
rockstar | Ah, okay, that makes more sense. | 17:17 |
mpt | So the line for "Fronobulator" will say "Tracked in <whatever the development focus is>" | 17:18 |
gmb | mpt: Right. | 17:18 |
mpt | gmb, what does it say before someone targets it to the development focus? | 17:20 |
mpt | "Tracked in <old release>"? Or something else? | 17:20 |
gmb | mpt: Let me check... | 17:25 |
gmb | mpt: You just see two bug tasks. One for <Project>, one for <Series/Release> | 17:26 |
gmb | mpt: https://bugs.staging.launchpad.net/bugzilla-launchpad/+bug/274186 | 17:26 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 274186 in consolekit "console-kit-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV in fclose@@GLIBC_2.2.5() (dup-of: 263245)" [Undecided,New] | 17:26 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 263245 in consolekit "console-kit-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV in fclose()" [Medium,Confirmed] | 17:26 |
gmb | Hush, ubuntoid, you don't know what you're on about. | 17:27 |
gmb | Oh, it's ubuntoid's dumber brother, ubottu | 17:27 |
mpt | gmb, ok, thank you for your investigations | 17:28 |
gmb | np | 17:28 |
mpt | and explanations | 17:28 |
=== matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara | ||
=== salgado-lunch is now known as salgado | ||
cr3 | when I enqueued a branch for merging, will it be done automatically? | 18:23 |
cr3 | it's been enqueued for 2 hours, I'm wondering if I still need to merge manually and then LP will automatically detect the merge | 18:23 |
rockstar | cr3, no, it wan't merge automatically. | 18:36 |
cr3 | rockstar: cheers dude, I would've waited a long time :) | 18:36 |
rockstar | If you want to merge automatically, you'll need to set up a PQM instance. | 18:36 |
rockstar | We'd like to make it so that enqueing it will allow an external PQM instance to see that queue and merge automatically, but we haven't gotten that far. | 18:37 |
pmatulis | what is the difference between 'subscribers' and 'also notified' ? | 19:11 |
siretart | the latter are implicit subscribers | 19:32 |
BjornT | pmatulis: what siretart said. 'also notified' are people like assignee and people subscribed to the whole project/package. 'subscribers' are people that has explicitly subscribed to the specific bug | 19:36 |
pmatulis | BjornT: thank you | 19:39 |
=== thumper_laptop is now known as thumper | ||
=== salgado is now known as salgado-afk |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!