[00:00] persia: hey, i see you uploaded qemu last... i'm trying to fix a bug there, but i can even build the current package from source [00:00] http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17939088/buildlog_ubuntu-intrepid-amd64.qemu_0.9.1-5ubuntu3_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz [00:00] persia: curious if you're familiar? === emma_ is now known as emma === funkyHat is now known as funkyHat|off [01:00] is a ~motu-release online at this hour? We need a 2nd vote on bug 207404 [01:00] Launchpad bug 207404 in gnome-panel "Blutooth Stopped Working" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/207404 [01:00] err what the heck? bug 270404 [01:00] Launchpad bug 270404 in vlc "Please update VLC to 0.9.2" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/270404 [01:01] * jdong could care less about 2.4GHz transmitters ;-) === tudenbart is now known as dothebart [01:08] kirkland: Sorry. No idea. I only added lpia as a build target architecture. I'd suggest soren or IntuitiveNipple as people who might know. [01:09] jdong: I heard j-d was preparing 0.9.3 to fix a couple last-minute bugs. [01:09] persia: j-g but correct; though I'd hope to get 0.9.2 in by betafreeze for testing [01:09] 0.9.3 should be simpler to approve on top of 0.9.2 [01:10] err j-b actually [01:10] Oh. I thought I heard that 0.9.3 was coming out in the next day or two. [01:10] that is true [01:10] (some voiced consonant, anyway) [01:10] isn't betafreeze right at the corner though? [01:11] Ah. Indeed it is. [01:13] jdong: persia: I have some shitty windows bug to fix before tagging it [01:13] j-b: those are always fun :) [01:13] but there will not be any modification for *nix versions [01:14] jdong: I hate windows [01:14] j-b: There are *nix changes between 0.9.2 and 0.9.3 though, right? [01:14] persia: yes, minor ones [01:14] persia: many crashes fix, some subtitles, some interface improvements [01:14] jdong: Perhaps a 0.9.2+vcs... branch, pulling in those? [01:15] s/branch/version/ [01:15] persia: I am tagging 0.9.3 in less than 10hours hopefully [01:15] j-b: if that's the case then let's wait for it to come out :) [01:15] Oh. Then it oughtn't matter much. It's already past midnight UTC on the 25th. [01:15] persia: thax [01:15] that could potentially mean I actually get some homework done [01:15] jdong: I tagged 0.9.3-rc1 [01:16] j-b: cool; let's wait for final though because you and I know we'll start getting those "ZOMGZ BUT ITZ RC1!!!" bugs if we don't :D [01:16] jdong: agreed [01:16] i want to help! omg! [01:17] jdong: biggest bugs where windows and OSX, though in 0.9.2, as expected [01:17] understandable [01:18] help me help you! [01:31] davismj: What do you want to do? [01:37] * Hobbsee advises people about the upcoming closure of UDS sponsorship requests. [01:53] UDS? [01:58] davismj: Ubuntu Developer Summit for Jaunty === emma_ is now known as emma [02:32] ok, I have a bug [02:32] I don [02:33] *do not maintain the package and don't know the status [02:33] but how come libmudflap0 is outdated? [02:34] huh, nvm, it seems to be working now :/ [02:37] oh wait, I see the issue now [02:37] * coppro files bug [02:43] finally internet again \o/ [02:47] coppro: bug #? [02:48] haven't made it yet; trying to decide how to proceed [02:48] I don't suppose anyone else has got around to filing rebuild bugs against packages depending on libopenal0a? [02:48] specifically, what to file against [02:48] coppro: what's the bug? [02:48] since I'm pretty sure libmudflap0-dev is redundant [02:48] and outdated [02:50] it is in universe, and libmudflap0 is in main and appears to fulfill all the required functionality [02:50] I'm just verifying that it does [02:51] libmudflap0-4.3-dev, is the package to replace it, perhaps [02:52] both are built from gcc [02:53] ah, could be, if gcc is still installing 4.1 in intrepid [02:54] no, gcc is at 4.3, but I'm building find without libmudflap0-dev, so I'm not quite sure what it's required for [02:54] s/find/fine/ [02:56] RAOF: Probably not. We should rebuild them, as openal-soft fixes *lots* of bugs in openal [02:56] Whoa, ajmitch speaketh :) [02:57] persia: Right. Also because it renders them uninstallable, because libopenal0a isn't in the archives anymore. [02:58] * ajmitch shuts up [02:58] Hrm? That shouldn't have happened unless everything was rebuilt, unless someone's not been following NBS guidelines. [02:58] Plus, the source for libopenal0a is available [03:00] So in the worst case, we could reinstate it, but rebuilding is better. [03:00] "(From Debian) Ro Release Team; superceded by openal-soft " [03:01] (that's from the binary) [03:01] RAOF: What do you see that depends on libopenal0a? My apt-cache says nothing. [03:01] * wgrant agrees with persia. === superm1|away is now known as superm1 [03:01] wgrant: "Removed from Debian" is now also used for *binary* removals? That's very dangerous, if true. [03:01] persia: It might have just inherited it from the source... I hope. [03:02] https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/intrepid/i386/libopenal0a [03:02] (hooray for being able to see the whole deletion comment now!) [03:02] persia: I see python-pyglet, libhugs-openal-bundled, libcoin40c2, and boson as rdepends of libopenal0a [03:03] RAOF: which arch? [03:03] * persia checks other arches [03:03] amd64 [03:03] Ah. [03:03] libopenal0a is a Suggests. [03:03] That's the one I checked first. [03:03] Er, on libcoin40c2 [03:04] libhugs-openal-bundled is a Depends, which means something is buggy. [03:04] As is boson [03:04] This is bad. [03:04] RAOF: What does apt-cache rdepends tell you? [03:04] "I see python-pyglet, libhugs-openal-bundled, libcoin40c2, and boson as rdepends of libopenal0a" [03:05] I'm confused. apt-cache rdepends tells me *nothing* for libopenal0a on amd64 [03:05] You didn't say that was through apt-cache [03:05] persia: Same on i386. [03:05] ok, yeah, I see no purpose for libmudflap0{,-4.3}-dev [03:05] In both my normal installation and a chroot. [03:05] Oh, and libopenal1, but that's because it Replaces libopenal0a apparently. [03:05] apt-cache is buggy somehow. [03:06] Maybe the Replaces is interacting badly with something. [03:06] boson 0.13-4build1 FTBFS, which probably explains that one. [03:06] Hmm. [03:06] Maybe it's because libopenal0a doesn't exist any more. [03:07] But RAOF has it installed. [03:07] So his apt knows about it, but ours don't... [03:07] Seems a bit odd, but would explain it. [03:08] Could be it. [03:09] wgrant: Oh, while you're here... you've been doing the synaptics xinput work, right? What info is useful if my System->Preferences->Mouse doesn't include a touchpad tab? [03:10] RAOF: Yay! I was hoping for someone like you. [03:10] A dev on IRC that has that problem is good news indeed, because no hardware I can find exhibits it. [03:10] RAOF: xinput list-props "SynPS/2 Synaptics TouchPad" [03:11] I need to know if it gives you an error, or a big list of properties. [03:14] wgrant: BadDevice [03:14] (That'd be the error, obviously) [03:15] But it appears under "xinput list" [03:15] RAOF: Can you pastebin the error and your Xorg log? [03:16] Yeah, why not. [03:17] \sh: do you have a git/bzr/.. tree for your current ia32-libs work? I'm trying to preempt a Flash 10 debacle. [03:18] wgrant: There'll be a brief haitus while I fix the corruption on my usb stick by reformatting ext3 [03:18] RAOF: Sure, I'll be here for 10 hours yet... [03:19] Hm. gparted fails at text escaping. [03:47] wgrant: Oops, seems my usb stick is toast. Anyway, have Xorg.0.log http://pastebin.com/f7c7474bd and error http://paste2.org/p/78426 [03:47] Also, gnome-do + "selected text" + pastebin + "copy to clipboard" = love. [03:48] RAOF: Does gnome-do have a pastebin plugin? :-) [03:48] StevenK: Totally. [03:49] Do is pretty much made of awesome. [03:51] yay, awesomeness! [03:51] what is gnome-do? [03:51] wgrant: Oh, and http://pastebin.com/f1067f136 is the boring xorg.conf. [03:52] coppro: A quicksilver-inspired graphical text interface. [03:53] RAOF: Have you tried it with an Alpha 6 live CD to check that it's no config issue? There's nothing obviously wrong... [03:55] wgrant: I haven't, no. It was working previously at some point, though. I'll give A6 a whirl later. [03:59] RAOF: Right, thanks. [03:59] RAOF: It probably only worked before I ported g-c-c and g-s-d to use XI properties. [04:00] Quite possibly. [04:28] jdong: when are you going to action http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/13674/ ? [04:29] no, not that. [04:29] https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vlc/+bug/270404 [04:29] Launchpad bug 270404 in vlc "Please update VLC to 0.9.2" [Wishlist,New] [04:29] Hobbsee: well I do like to keep our old devs, but we need a 2nd ACK from -release to do so :) [04:29] jdong: you got it, i think. [04:30] Hobbsee: are we reading norsetto's comment as an ACK given superm1's response? [04:30] jdong: ah, siretart didn't give an ack. i'd say that's close enough. [04:31] Hobbsee: siretart is on the release team? [04:31] * Hobbsee waits for LP === fabrice_sp|away is now known as fabrice_sp [04:31] oh, apparently not. [04:31] Hobbsee: last time I talked to him he was waiting on a 2nd ack, so... :) [04:32] jdong: i'd consider norsetto's an ack, as the condition he wanted to not-ack with was proved false. [04:33] Hobbsee: okay :) [04:33] siretart: ^^ green light to upload VLC [04:42] hey jdong [04:45] asac? === nxvl_ is now known as nxvl [05:52] jdong: Hobbsee: In case I get problems with that upload, I'll blame you! :P [05:53] \o/ [05:53] siretart: well, i can ack it too, if you want... [05:53] siretart: u-r is still a part of m-r [05:53] good morning [05:53] dholbach: good morning [05:53] siretart: besides, i get blamed for all sorts of stuff anyway, so, meh :) [05:53] hi nxvl [05:54] Hobbsee: ah, I think that counts pretty well. great, I'm on it [05:54] hey dholbach! good morning! awake that early? [05:55] hiya siretart - yeah Mimi has to get up early a lot, so I'm supportive and get up myself... and I got used to it anyway now :) [06:44] jdong: Hobbsee: vlc uploaded, will need binary NEW though [06:44] siretart: What does it build that will force binary NEW? [06:46] StevenK: libvlc2 [06:46] instead of libvlc0 [06:46] no reverse depends though [06:59] Good morning. [07:08] dholbach, you around? [07:08] NCommander: yes [07:09] siretart, the issue with kdebase-runtime was with xine :-) === fabrice_sp is now known as fabrice_sp|away [07:15] Damnit! Why are the nouveau drivers _more_ stable than nvidia's blob? [07:16] RAOF: because the nvidia blobs are trying to get you to switch back to windows, subliminally? [07:17] dholbach: sorry. I was surely tired (let's say that, I fixed the bug #273579) [07:17] Launchpad bug 273579 in gnome-system-tools "Please sponsor gnome-system-tools 2.22.1 into intrepid" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/273579 [07:17] didrocks: will take a look at it in a sec [07:18] dholbach: thx. I am going now for the second day of "Paris Capitale du Libre" with nijaba and huats. I will be away surely for most of the day (no IRC or ssh connexion from there) [07:18] dholbach: and sorry again :) [07:18] didrocks: enjoy the show :) [07:18] dholbach: thanks! [07:20] NCommander: yes, sort-of, but agreed [07:20] siretart, so no issues with my fix? [07:23] didrocks: there's a 98_automake.patch.new in there - is that needed? [07:24] who's responsible for loading packages from lenny? [07:24] dothebart: can you elaborate? I'm not sure I understand [07:25] http://packages.ubuntu.com/intrepid/citadel-server [07:25] that one ;) [07:26] dothebart: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SyncRequestProcess (if you want a newer version in Ubuntu for some reason) and because we're near beta freeze: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess [07:27] dothebart: so basically: everybody who cares can get it done, there's just a bit of paperwork involved because we're getting near release [07:27] the actual version is a good step behind, and there are a good number of bugfixes in there... [07:27] if it's a bugfix only release that makes things even more likely to get it done [07:28] lenny actualy has .37 with many patches. [07:28] upstream has .38, which is a maintainance release. [07:29] just check out the wiki pages I mentioned, they tell you how to file bug reports on which the teams will act [07:29] btw, i'm the first real person on the upstream maintainr list. === superm1 is now known as superm1|away [07:38] ok, bugreport filed. [07:38] tnx... [07:38] Would someone like to have a look at bug 274276 please? [07:38] Launchpad bug 274276 in salasaga "Please sync salasaga 0.8.0~alpha4-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)." [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/274276 [07:39] I didn't write an exception because I think that changing the build system is not considered a feature. [07:40] Or should I file one just because it's a new upstream release? [07:41] Any KDE people around who might be able to chase the boson FTBFS? [07:42] Boson build-deps on libkdegames-dev, which depends on kdelibs5-dev, which isn't getting installed. [07:46] kirkland: Ah. QEmu fails to build because linux/dirent.h got removed. http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=cf6ae8b50e0ee3f764392dadd1970e3f03c40773 [07:46] soren: yeah, that was poo [07:46] kirkland: You might be able to just use instead, but what I'd do is look at what kvm did to overcome this change. [07:47] soren: i just did the former for my upload [07:47] soren: my qemu upload [07:48] soren: btw, slangasek sponsored the kvm on [07:48] soren: and i pushed the same patch to the qemu package [07:48] soren: and posted it on the qemu-devel list [07:48] Awesome! [07:49] soren: you might just sanity check all of that, please [07:49] soren: i tested all of my keys on my thinkpad [07:50] soren: probably would help to spread that out a bit [07:50] soren: probably safe since that patch has been riding in gtk-vnc for a few days now [07:51] kirkland: At a glance, it looks great. [07:51] soren: rockin' [07:52] Very :) === Hobbsee` is now known as Guest34533 === Guest34533 is now known as Hobbsee === dholbach_ is now known as dholbach === BugMaN1 is now known as BugMaN === quadrispro1 is now known as quadrispro [10:26] dholbach: hi, bug 274299 [10:26] Launchpad bug 274299 in tk8.5 "Please sync tk8.5 8.5.3-3 (main) from Debian unstable (main)." [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/274299 [10:26] quadrispro: I'm subscribed to it - I'll take a look at it in a bit [10:26] dholbach: i didn't want request a sync with the upstream version, but with sid version [10:26] ok thank you :) [10:26] tk8.5 (8.5.4-1) experimental; urgency=low [10:26] * New upstream release. [10:26] -- Sergei Golovan Sat, 23 Aug 2008 16:40:42 +0400 [10:26] it says in the bug report [10:27] it also says "Changelog since current intrepid version 8.5.3-1:" [10:27] dholbach: that changelog has been created by requestsync [10:28] ok [10:28] so it should be 8.5.3-3 everywhere? [10:28] could you update it? [10:28] it's a mistake, yes, 8.5.3-3 [10:28] thanks [10:28] sure [10:29] done [10:29] ROCK [10:29] :D [10:32] fabrice_sp|away: ping me when you are back [11:19] http://blogs.computerworld.com/where_windows_is_2_to_linux [12:34] Would it be ok to mark Bug #70887 as invalid? See my last comment. [12:34] Launchpad bug 70887 in wxwidgets2.6 "Crash when closing a simple program" [Medium,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/70887 [12:34] pochu: ^? === TheMuso_ is now known as TheMuso [12:35] hi stani [12:35] looking [12:36] stani: yes, it makes sense [12:36] stani: there's the option to convert bugs to questions too, see in the top right corner [12:36] the "Convert to a question" link [12:37] hmmm... but normally there won't be wxpython gurus answering questions there [12:38] if he asks this on the mailing list he will be answered in no time [12:38] so you can do both :) [12:39] convert it to a question closing it as invalid, and tell him he may be answered quite fast in that list [12:39] that's what I would do [12:39] ok [12:39] I'll do that [12:40] do I first have to make the bug invalid, as converting into a question does not work directly? [12:42] doesn't it close it as invalid automatically? [12:42] Yes it does pochu [12:43] hey nhandler [12:43] bah [12:43] The only thing you need to do before converting a bug to a question is verify that the bug is for the correct package [12:43] Hello pochu [12:43] http://paste.ubuntu.com/50459/ [12:43] I can't type "^" with my keyboard anymore :-/ [12:44] I have to copy&paste it... [12:45] the bug is invalid already [12:46] ^ that was the problem [12:46] now it seems to work [13:42] hi, anyone familiar with GQ? [13:42] sorry, wrong channel. === thekorn_ is now known as thekorn === Czessi_ is now known as Czessi [14:26] Hi, has anyone checked this? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tor/+bug/261693 [14:26] Launchpad bug 261693 in tor "version bump to 0.2.X" [Undecided,New] [14:27] Debian has already updated to that version.. [15:10] dholbach: I think that now, it may be ok for bugs #273579. Thx for your patience :) [15:10] Launchpad bug 273579 in gnome-system-tools "Please sponsor gnome-system-tools 2.22.1 into intrepid" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/273579 [15:19] didrocks: I'll take care of it later, need to rush out to a Bug Jam now :-) [15:20] dholbach: have a good bug jam event :) [15:20] thanks :) === asac_ is now known as asac === superm1|away is now known as superm1 === smarter_ is now known as smarter === Zic_ is now known as Zic [17:17] Can someone have a look at bug 189406? It seems to be getting ignored, even though it's a clear regression and an easy fix. I set this issue to medium importance a while ago, and it's just been changed to wishlist and had the milestone removed. Why? [17:17] Launchpad bug 189406 in update-manager "Update Manager doesn't display package versions anymore" [Wishlist,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/189406 [17:19] jdong: no need to involve motu-release if its a bug fix only [17:19] Hew: please ask Keybuk in #ubuntu-devel as he made this status changes [17:19] geser: Will do, thanks. [17:21] * iulian is looking for a motu to ack bug 274276 [17:21] Launchpad bug 274276 in salasaga "Please sync salasaga 0.8.0~alpha4-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)." [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/274276 [17:23] geser: Do you think you can sponsor a small debdiff for libdvdread. The install-css.sh script is modified to use medibuntu packages and some other improvements to the script. [17:23] jdong: vlc 0.9.3 would most probably need a new exception. read a new bug, new report, new list of fixed bugs and so on === cr3_ is now known as cr3 [17:32] slytherin: probably. Is beta freeze already? [17:33] geser: Will it need freeze exception? The bug in question is bug #105963 [17:33] Launchpad bug 105963 in libdvdread "libdvdread3 on 7.04 64bit requires build-essential. " [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/105963 [17:34] slytherin: that would be a question I'd need to figure out myself first [17:34] It doesn't add any new feature. Only fixes a problem. [17:35] slytherin: the question would be if every upload after beta freeze needs a exception from ~motu-release [17:38] Oh. I didn't know that. I thought such rule would apply to to RC. [17:40] slytherin: might be, that's what I don't remember exactly [17:41] I remember that after some point every upload needs an exception but not anymore when the point is [18:03] great, nomore sound on my laptop running intrepid [18:04] dholbach: Thought you might be interested in this - the latest Ubuntu UK podcast has a big segment on 5-a-day [18:04] word of advice: Avoid trying to explain Little's Law and queuing theory to Subway's workers. [18:27] bobbo: re bug 274174 and debian bug 500090: do you know which desktop file the ubuntu package of fityk uses? [18:27] Launchpad bug 274174 in fityk "Please merge fityk 0.8.6-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/274174 [18:27] Debian bug 500090 in fityk "Desktop file does not validate" [Minor,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/500090 [18:49] geser: sorry, still around? [18:50] DktrKranz: mi lovely sponsor [18:50] DktrKranz: need a favor [18:50] DktrKranz: Bug #274173 [18:50] Launchpad bug 274173 in terminator "[FFe] Please sync terminator 0.11 from debian sid" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/274173 [18:52] geser: I am not sure and dont have an intrepid installation to hand to test it out, but it looks like a sync of the next fityk upload should solve any problems === fabrice_sp|away is now known as fabrice_sp [18:53] nxvl, I used to be your lovely sponsor, now I need to figure out to love from now on... :) [18:54] :D [18:54] DktrKranz: you can still love me :D [18:54] bobbo: I'm just asking if we perhaps patch an unused file and could sync right now [18:55] geser: ah yeah, makes sense, i'll try a testbuild with the file removed and see if anything breaks and get back to you [18:55] nxvl, I can grant you a love exception but I guess it's not the exception you want, isn't it? [18:56] bobbo: thanks [18:57] heh [18:57] :D [18:57] DktrKranz: or you can grant me a lovely FFe [18:57] DktrKranz: :D [18:58] nice combo ;) [18:58] bobbo: I've just tested the desktop file from the fityk deb from Debian and desktop-file-validate doesn't complain [18:58] \o/ [18:58] lunch time [18:58] bbl [18:58] give me a sec to discover why my favourite program crashes and I'm all yours [18:58] (well... FFe related only) [19:02] geser: just checked debian/rules and it installs the upstream .desktop file (in the source package root) and doesnt touch the one in /debian [19:02] DktrKranz: you beloved sponsor you :P [19:03] sebner, shut up or send that mail, your choice [19:03] ;) [19:03] geser: looks like I can file a sync request now? [19:03] DktrKranz: Silence! I. K. Y. :P [19:04] sebner, one of those days I'll send you Jeff, so you'll meet achmed [19:05] \o/ [19:05] * sebner hides xD [19:12] bobbo: yes, just give a good description why the ubuntu changes can be dropped [19:20] geser: Bug #274509. Thanks for pointing that out :) [19:20] Launchpad bug 274509 in fityk "Please sync fityk 0.8.6-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)." [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/274509 [19:27] bobbo: ACKed [19:27] geser: thanks alot :) === chuck_ is now known as zul [19:56] wgrant, ping [19:59] NCommander: according to my clock it's 5 am there [19:59] darn, wgrant must require sleep, I forget het's human [19:59] * NCommander runs [19:59] * NCommander was simply looking towards reverse enginneering landscape-server [20:08] norsetto: ngircd's sru should be fixed now (if you have time to test) [20:17] Adri2000: sure [20:18] * sebner waves to norsetto :) [20:18] * norsetto feels the air on his face [20:18] xD [20:18] hi sebner [20:18] :) [20:19] norsetto: Everything fine so far in italy? :) [20:19] sebner: as fine as things can go around here [20:19] good to here :) [20:19] *hear [20:36] 161 packages upgraded, 5 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. [20:36] * pochu prays for his desktop not to explode [20:36] err [20:36] 158 packages upgraded, 5 newly installed, 2 downgraded, 3 to remove and 3 not upgraded. [20:37] puchu: you beat me: 116 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 4 not upgraded. [20:37] puchu? [20:37] oh well ... [20:37] heh [20:37] * pochu waves at norsetto [20:37] * norsetto is gratefull for some more fresh air :-) [20:38] pochu: hey, this is cool: xserver-xorg-core: Conflicts: xserver-xorg-video-2 E: Broken packages [20:39] i upgraded to intrepid without problems [20:39] well, almost [20:40] 1) aptitude safe-upgrade -> Xorg crash, not even able to stop it and go to the terminal, system hanged [20:40] 2) edit grub, single mode -> apt-get dist-upgrade -> w00t \o/ [20:40] nxvl: stop using terminator, see what happens ... [20:40] nooo [20:40] * nxvl runs screaming and holding his terminator [21:23] is there any known pidgin 2.5.1 ppa package that was approved to be good? [21:24] compengi: uh? it's in intrepid, what's the problem? [21:26] compengi: Why not build+test a backport with prevu and comment on bug #271453 as to whether it works? (assuming you're on Hardy) [21:26] Launchpad bug 271453 in hardy-backports "Please backport Pidgin 2.5.1-0ubuntu2" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/271453 [21:26] Adri2000, oh, already in intrepid. i checked the package site week ago it wasn't. thanks :) [21:26] Laney, yeah i'm on hardy [21:28] Laney, is that bug found in 0ubuntu1 too? [21:29] * NCommander tries it [21:31] compengi, I'm test building the backport [21:32] I would do it but I don't have a Hardy install [21:32] Laney, pbuilder is your friend [21:32] for building [21:32] but not for testing [21:33] nothing beats a proper install ;) [21:33] Laney, pbuilder login, install the package, and run it [21:34] That's how I do every backport ack [21:34] I prefer to do test runs in a VM [21:36] Laney, you seriously feel that a VM is needed? [21:36] * NCommander considers that overkill [21:36] It's really no trouble tbh [21:39] emgent: ping [21:39] Laney, well, I'll ack pidgin if it builds and works [21:40] NCommander: Be sure to test the rdepends [21:40] * Laney did the last pidgin backport [21:40] Oh *fun* [21:40] * NCommander loves rdepends [21:40] I'm going to haphazardly guess that all the plugins need a binary rebuild or backport? [21:41] They didn't last time [21:42] ok [21:43] * NCommander waits for this to build [21:47] Laney, well, pidgin builds fine [21:47] As it should ;) [21:47] 'snot that different from 2.5.0 [21:48] ok, pidgin installed [21:48] ;-) [21:48] so its installable [21:50] (pidgin:12292): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_display_get_name: assertion `GDK_IS_DISPLAY (display)' failed [21:50] That's an issue [21:50] * NCommander hates figuring out the required black magic to get X11 to work [22:08] Well, firefox now has an ad it seems that Mozilla is "free software" [22:10] i'm having dbconfig-common issues.. [22:11] if someone has the time to install a ( non-intrusive ) package from my ppa and try it out? :$ [22:11] i cannot remove the package because it fails in the uninstall phase [22:13] Why does it fail to uninstall? [22:15] let me give you access to my server so you can see for yourself :) [22:22] verwilst: pastebin the error, rather [22:23] verwilst, makes life easier to pastebin it [22:24] http://pastebin.ca/1210917 [22:34] any ideas? [22:36] verwilst, well what's in the prerm script? [22:36] http://pastebin.ca/1210927 for some more info [22:36] oh i pasted the wrong script [22:37] # [22:37] No /usr/sbin/zabbix_server found running; none killed. [22:37] # [22:37] dpkg: error processing zabbix-server-mysql (--remove): [22:37] # subprocess pre-removal script returned error exit status 10 [22:37] well, buggy [22:37] http://pastebin.ca/1210928 [22:37] omg [22:38] just because it can't shut down zabbix-server? [22:38] looks like the init script can't handle that [22:38] * verwilst wonders why he didnt see this himself :| [22:38] you mean the init script should exit 0 when it wasnt running? [22:38] that seems to make the most sense to me [22:39] check policy, but yeah, I believe so [22:39] it exits 0.. [22:39] just tried it manually [22:39] No /usr/sbin/zabbix_server found running; none killed. root@test002:~# echo $? 0 [22:41] the only step below that is dbc_go zabbix-proxy-mysql $@ [22:45] verwilst, i'd recommend putting in set -x [22:45] in your prerm to debug it [22:46] superm1: ah, nice that you can just do it on the fly [22:47] No /usr/sbin/zabbix_server found running; none killed. [22:47] + dbc_go zabbix-proxy-mysql remove [22:47] wtf? [22:47] proxy? [22:48] the actual error is from + RET=10 zabbix-proxy-mysql/dbconfig-remove doesn't exist [22:49] well there you go [22:49] how will it have gotten in there? [22:49] where does it fetch the pkgname? [22:50] hm [22:50] my zabbix-proxy-mysql.prerm has server, and vice versa [22:54] rebuilding :) [23:02] works! [23:02] jaj1 [23:02] thanks a lot guys for your help :) [23:02] it's a lot easier when there are some people thinking along :) === superm1 is now known as superm1|away [23:27] bobbo: re your mpd merge - I think it's unlikely that an init.d change fixes the segfault bug