[00:12] <fta> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: couldn't find library libxul.so needed by debian/fennec/usr/lib/fennec-0.3/xulrunner/libxpcom.so (its RPATH is '').
[00:12] <fta> Note: libraries are not searched in other binary packages that do not have any shlibs or symbols file.
[00:12] <fta> To help dpkg-shlibdeps find private libraries, you might need to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
[00:12] <fta> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: /usr/lib/libplds4.so.0d has an unexpected SONAME (libplds4.so)
[00:12] <fta> dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: no dependency information found for /usr/lib/libplds4.so.0d (used by debian/fennec/usr/lib/fennec-0.3/xulrunner/libxpcom.so).
[00:12] <fta> dh_shlibdeps: command returned error code 512
[00:12] <fta> make: *** [binary-predeb-IMPL/fennec] Error 1
[00:12] <fta> asac, ^^
[00:33] <asac> fta: what kind of build is that?
[00:33] <fta> fennec
[00:33] <asac> fta: build with new nspr with old xulrunner?
[00:33] <fta> you wanted me to try nspr/nss, right?
[00:33] <asac> yeah i see that
[00:34] <asac> fta: so building fennec on top of old xulrunner (linked against old nspr/nss) but with new nspr/nss installed?
[00:35] <fta> it's /w xul 1.9
[00:35] <fta> the xul from intrepid
[00:35] <fta> so yes, new nspr/nss but old xul1.9
[00:36] <asac> ok. i currently cannot think about a way that could be fixed more gracefully
[00:36] <fta> i guess a rebuild of xul should fix this
[00:37] <asac> fta: right. but i hoped that we could go completely without problems (neither runtime nor build time)
[00:53] <fta> http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/5a9c08494f5871eda9a8ba0dab025b7612dbed46
[00:57] <asac> fta: yeah... makes sense
[01:20] <fta> damn, upstream cairo dropped the lcd filter from 1.8.0
[01:27] <asac> fta: use "best shapes" ;)
[01:27] <asac> the different i see from LCD to best shapes is really minimal
[01:27] <asac> and best shapes looks the same with or without that patch for me
[01:46] <fta> i have a 21" lcd screen, difference is huge
[01:47] <asac> mine is 24" :-P
[01:47] <fta> i guess i'll resurrect our patch, fortunately, i "maintain" cairo in bzr
[01:47] <asac> full source?
[01:48] <fta> no, i don't see the point of full source in bzr, expect when i'm upstream of course
[01:49] <asac> it has its benefits
[01:49] <asac> and negative sides too
[01:50] <asac> but for reasonable code size i think having full source doesnt hurt
[02:21] <mconnor> asac: you only have one? :)
[04:18] <newz2000> hey guys, back in the ff2.0 days when you right clicked and chose "page info" there was a tab that showed form details. It's gone with ff3, does anyone know how to get it back?
[04:19] <newz2000> I found this but can't make it work: http://mozilla.queze.net/#linksforms (and not sure if I trust it anyway)
[04:24] <newz2000> ah, got it figured out from https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/6939
[08:46] <asac> mconnor: huh?
[08:49] <asac> mconnor: ah ... no i have two :)
[10:05]  * armin76 kicks asac 
[10:06] <armin76> asac: wanna bet? does ff3.0.2 sigbus on sparc?
[10:06] <asac> armin76: yes it does sigbus ;)
[10:07] <asac_the_bumber> lets all bumb!
[10:09] <armin76> how much did it took to sigbus?
[10:09] <asac> armin76: not sure ;)
[10:09] <asac> armin76: its just by "bet" ;)
[10:11] <armin76> yeah, but i don't remember how much it took the last time
[10:11] <armin76> oh well, there it goes
[10:11] <armin76> asac_the_bumber: ping?
[10:13] <asac> armin76: i think the time before the last time it happened on startup
[10:13] <armin76> there
[10:13] <asac> armin76: then the least time it took a few minutes of browsing
[10:13] <armin76> yeah, 5 mins or so
[11:10] <gnomefreak> asac: im gonna guess you havent had time to review/look at the extensions yet?
[11:32] <XioNoX> hi
[11:34] <asac> gnomefreak: which extensions?
[11:34] <asac> hi XioNoX
[11:34] <XioNoX> hi asac
[11:34] <gnomefreak> asac: the 4 on my PPA
[11:35] <asac> gnomefreak: new extensions? or updates?
[11:35] <gnomefreak> new
[11:35] <asac> gnomefreak: nope :/
[11:36] <asac> gnomefreak: are there bugs?
[11:36] <gnomefreak> no
[11:36] <gnomefreak> no warnings nor errors
[11:37] <asac> gnomefreak: ok. we need at least one bug so we can provide a feaature freeze exception
[11:37] <gnomefreak> asac: yes bugs are filied
[11:37] <asac> at best one bug per package  (against the firefox-extensions) project
[11:37] <asac> gnomefreak: ah
[11:37] <gnomefreak> sorry i thought you meant bug in package
[11:38] <asac> yeah .. i will look at that in a few
[11:38] <gnomefreak> they are in changelogs but if you need them i can get them
[11:38] <gnomefreak> k
[11:38] <gnomefreak> Back on topic, thanks to Mark and everybody from Mozilla to coming to as
[11:38] <gnomefreak> reasonable a solution on this issue as you could.
[11:38] <gnomefreak> Mozilla didnt do anything yet :(
[11:40] <gnomefreak> asac: now they have problems with firefox contacting google what the fuck has this turned into a circus?
[11:40] <asac> they are working on the solution for whatever release comes next (
[11:41] <asac> gnomefreak: yeah. things could be easier imo
[11:42] <asac> but its not an easy topic
[11:43] <gnomefreak> someguy says it should be ok because debian doesnt allow you to make a tshirt with its logo and such :(
[11:45] <gnomefreak> ok really need a break. these people today are really hmmmm cant say the word i would like
[11:45] <gnomefreak> asac: be warned your email is full of non smart commetns
[11:46] <asac> gnomefreak: on what?
[11:46] <asac> your comments?
[11:52] <gnomefreak> not mine
[11:52] <gnomefreak> to fix firefox uninstall it and re-install it
[11:52] <gnomefreak> because he states he doesnt see the notifier to restart after upgrade
[11:53] <gnomefreak> see bug 270303
[11:54] <gnomefreak> i cant remember if firefox or ubufox controls that now. ff used to i know
[11:54] <asac> gnomefreak: yeah
[11:54] <asac> thats our restart notification
[11:56] <gnomefreak> yeah but my works so im not sure what hes doing wrong. I also had one person tell me since last update he doesnt get warning on closing tabs. Im beting its because he marked at to not show anymore
[12:13] <gnomefreak> wtf is wrong with video download helper (the placement on wiki) it should work but for some reason its not showing right
[12:13] <gnomefreak> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Extensions/List#preview
[12:17] <asac> gnomefreak: looking
[12:18] <asac> gnomefreak: same for flashgot
[12:18] <asac> can you fix those two?
[12:18] <gnomefreak> no ive been trying
[12:18] <gnomefreak> it look perfect in editer
[12:19] <gnomefreak> but final redraw it looks like crap
[12:21] <asac> gmok i think i have it
[12:22] <asac> gnomefreak: fixed (well sving)
[12:22] <gnomefreak> thanks
[12:22] <gnomefreak> asac: is Ubuntu Firefox Modifications 0.5 ubufox?
[12:23] <asac> yes
[12:23] <gnomefreak> oh fun
[12:24] <gnomefreak> asac: bug 274307 no need to look now but that is right up your ally ;)
[12:29] <gnomefreak> runnig firefox during upgrade fucks up users profile :( wth is wrong with people
[12:48] <gnomefreak> if make -f doesnt work with m-devscripts and we use get orig how does it know what to get without a debian dir.
[12:48] <gnomefreak> s/get orig/get orig now,
[13:03] <gnomefreak> ok never mind i found my  file i was looking for with some commands in it
[13:03]  * gnomefreak hopes its the right version
[13:06] <asac> gnomefreak: huh?
[13:06] <gnomefreak> asac: i used make -f with get-orig-*
[13:07]  * gnomefreak starting on sunbird-0.9 sometime this weekend so i figured i would grab source 
[13:07] <gnomefreak> assuming no changes needed in m-d for that
[13:12] <gnomefreak> it worked ;)
[13:25] <gnomefreak> ok breakfast time.
[13:41] <asac> hmm is sunbird really using m-d?
[15:19] <fta> asac, whatdo you think about 274187?
[15:28] <asac> fta: is there any feedback yet?
[15:30] <fta> asac, 2 + the one i just posted
[15:35] <asac> fta: urgh. i hope you dont feed trolls :)
[15:35] <asac> bug 274187
[15:35] <fta> what do you mean?
[15:40] <fta> asac, ^^
[15:41] <asac> fta: posted
[15:41] <asac> fta: well. i mean if someone starts to post unreasonable rants or flames, one shouldnt answer hiim
[15:41] <asac> ;)
[15:41] <asac> but this wasnt the case here
[15:41] <asac> just that motu-release now thinks to know that they know better about how we should name the package ;)
[15:43] <fta> asac, i usually recognize troll posts and i don't enter that game. for ex, i refrained myself from entering that eula tournament on purpose
[15:44] <asac> fta: yeah ;) ... wise man
[15:44] <asac> thanks for that
[15:44] <asac> even gnomefreak was wise enough :)
[15:44] <asac> so ... this team did quite well in this regards
[15:45] <fta> yep
[15:51] <asac>    
[17:07] <fta> asac, 1 more comment
[19:24] <fta> mozilla bug 421977
[19:25] <[reed]> what about it? :)
[19:25] <fta> [reed], nothing, just wanted the url
[19:25] <fta> solved, that explains why our patch diverged
[19:26] <[reed]> are you patching 3.0.x with it?
[19:26] <[reed]> or just 3.1?
[19:26] <fta> no
[19:26] <fta> hm, yes
[19:26] <fta> both
[19:26] <[reed]> can you request approval for the branch then?
[19:26] <[reed]> explain why you want it
[19:26] <[reed]> and that you're already taking it upstream
[19:26] <[reed]> er
[19:26] <[reed]> downstream
[19:26] <[reed]> could get it into 3.0.4 maybe
[19:27] <fta>   * fix LP: #206191 - Firefox 3 "set as Desktop background" does not work
[19:27] <fta>     properly; we cherry-pick latest upstream patch from bugzilla
[19:28] <[reed]> yeah, so request approval
[19:28] <[reed]> click "Details" next to the patch
[19:28] <[reed]> find the approval1.9.0.4 flag
[19:28] <[reed]> set it to ?
[19:29] <[reed]> and explain that you want it on the 1.9.0 branch
[19:29] <[reed]> why you want it
[19:29] <[reed]> etc.
[19:30] <fta> bug 206191
[19:32] <fta> [reed], should I link this bug ?
[19:32] <[reed]> fta: sure
[19:35] <fta> done
[19:52] <fta> http://www.journaldugeek.com/2008/09/26/ubuntu-mobile-se-devoile/
[19:52] <fta> (it's in french)
[19:53] <fta> with midbrowser instead of firefox
[19:55] <fta> [reed], $ lsof -np `pidof firefox-3.1` | grep -c /tmp/jemalloc
[19:55] <fta> 162
[19:55] <fta> all DEL
[19:56] <fta> looks like a munmap is missing somewhere in jemalloc
[19:56] <[reed]> dunno, file a bug
[19:57] <[reed]> I know very little about jemalloc :)
[19:57] <[reed]> Core :: jemalloc
[19:57] <fta> maybe there's one already
[20:00] <fta> mozilla bug 447710
[20:37] <fta> *** glibc detected *** /usr/lib/firefox-3.1b1pre/firefox-3.1: munmap_chunk(): invalid pointer: 0x9f5941c0 ***
[20:43] <fta> 100% reproducible
[20:46] <fta> http://www.panoramas.dk/photokina/2008/canon/index.html  click on the video, then click on fullscreen (the big button on the top/right) => crash
[20:46] <fta> [reed], ^^ could you try ?
[23:06] <Hammerhead> Hey all, d/l'd 3.0 and now none of my config files will open from the browser. The file is call....router.confg and I have about 200 of them. I would, in the ver2 click on the file and Firefox would display a text file. Now it wants me to save it locally then open it...anyone have an idea?
[23:07] <Hammerhead> I read about mime types, setting them in the OS but that does not seem to help.