| fta | damn, %VERSION% is not understood in general.useragent.extra.firefox | 00:31 |
|---|---|---|
| fta | asac, i don't think setting general.useragent.extra.firefox in the branding branch was such a good idea | 00:32 |
| fta | !seen asac | 00:40 |
| ubottu | I have no seen command | 00:40 |
| asac | he? | 00:44 |
| asac | ;) | 00:44 |
| asac | fta: well. not sure. where do you want to put it? | 00:44 |
| asac | fta: why cant we make those js files sensible to VERSION? | 00:45 |
| fta | i used pref("general.useragent.extra.firefox", "Firefox/%VERSION%") hoping it will be resolved, it's not in the About UI | 00:45 |
| asac | yeah | 00:45 |
| asac | it doesnt happen automagically | 00:45 |
| fta | you hardcoded 3.0.1 in abrowser, so i inherited that in 3.1 too, i wanted to fix it but my 1st attempt didn't work | 00:46 |
| asac | fta: hmm. dont we use PREF_JS_EXPORTS in the branding Makefile.in ? | 00:47 |
| asac | wait ;) | 00:47 |
| asac | those %VERSOIN% things in the url are replaced at runtime | 00:48 |
| asac | so we would need to use template ;) | 00:48 |
| asac | anyway. i currently wonder why we have that useragent thing in there | 00:49 |
| fta | it was already in the 1st commit | 00:49 |
| fta | that sets Firefox instead of something else in the useragent | 00:50 |
| asac | try @APP_VERSION@ | 00:50 |
| asac | the original line is pref("general.useragent.extra.firefox", "@APP_UA_NAME@/@APP_VERSION@"); | 00:51 |
| asac | so Firefox/@APP_VERSION@ should be ok | 00:51 |
| fta | Sep 26 18:17:21 <mvo> asac: I got this nice "restart fixfox" box inside ff now, but when I press it, ff just died and did not restart - known issue? | 00:53 |
| fta | asac, ^^ in #ubuntu-desktop | 00:53 |
| asac | fta: yeah i aw that. but he most likely wasnt there when i saw it;) | 00:54 |
| asac | fta: well. i think i saw that too here | 00:54 |
| asac | but not really reproducible :/ | 00:54 |
| asac | i hope its a bug in the restart command guessing | 00:56 |
| fta | Firefox/@APP_VERSION@ doesn't work | 00:56 |
| fta | in my 3.1 build, it's already subst at build time | 00:56 |
| asac | fta: yes .. that should happen if you use that pattern actually | 00:57 |
| asac | with PREF_JS_EXPORT in Makefile.in | 00:57 |
| fta | trying | 00:58 |
| fta | I also have no logo in the about ui with firefox-3.1-branding while i have one with abrowser-3.1-branding | 00:59 |
| asac | fta: sounds like the "other" branding patch is wrong then | 01:01 |
| fta | still doesn't work | 01:05 |
| fta | PREF_JS_EXPORT is already there | 01:05 |
| fta | @APP_VERSION@ is not controlled by PREF_JS_EXPORT, it's a basic sed when it's needed | 01:09 |
| asac | oh ... then that ;) | 01:21 |
| fta | but imho, this line is not needed | 01:23 |
| fta | you should get Firefox anyway | 01:23 |
| fta | oh no, you'll get WebBrowser/versidon | 01:25 |
| fta | this is controlled by branding/awesome-browser/configure.sh | 01:25 |
| fta | MOZ_APP_DISPLAYNAME => APP_UA_NAME | 01:26 |
| fta | asac, what about moving this to /etc/firefox-3.0/pref/branding.js ? | 01:27 |
| fta | or /etc/firefox-3.0/pref/abrowser.js | 01:27 |
| fta | fta@voyager:~ $ abrowser-3.0 | 01:29 |
| fta | exec: 118: /usr/lib/firefox-3.0.3/abrowser-3.0: not found | 01:29 |
| fta | fta@voyager:~ $ dpkg -S abrowser-3.0 | 01:30 |
| fta | firefox-3.0: /usr/bin/abrowser-3.0 | 01:30 |
| fta | but i don't have abrowser-3.0-branding installed, why do I have the link ? | 01:31 |
| fta | this is confusing | 01:33 |
| fta | asac, the desktop file is confusing too | 01:54 |
| === asac_ is now known as asac | ||
| Hobbsee | hey guys, it looks like firefox-2 isn't installable. Do you guys plan to fix this? | 12:55 |
| Hobbsee | oh, the latest version got tried 18 days ago, but FTBFS. Please fix :) | 12:56 |
| fta | Hobbsee, firefox-2 will be removed from intrepid. btw, what is broken? | 15:35 |
| fta | asac, i changed a few things for abrowser, ie, desktop files and icons are in their respective branding packages, it is working fine now | 15:36 |
| fta | the only thing i don't like but that i haven't touched yet is the link in /usr/bin. is there a reason to install /usr/bin/abrowser(-3.0) when abrowser-3.0-branding is not installed/wanted? | 15:38 |
| fta | same question for the /usr/bin/firefox-3.0 link when abrowser-3.0-branding is installed (i understand that /usr/bin/firefox is wanted at all costs, but not the versioned one) | 15:40 |
| === asac_ is now known as asac | ||
| fta | asac, xpi.mk only works with xpi in the top level dir :( | 17:45 |
| fta | ok, i fixed it | 18:06 |
| fta | asac, please review my xpi.mk patch, i need it to build projects using xulapp.mk, such as prism | 18:25 |
| asac | fta: merge request? | 18:56 |
| asac | fta: i think the patch is OK... even though it has a non-related changelog hunk ;) | 19:05 |
| asac | (for minefield-packager) | 19:06 |
| asac | http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/mozilla-devscripts/mozilla-devscripts/revision/179 | 19:06 |
| asac | but i guess thats OK ;) | 19:06 |
| fta | well, just a carriage return | 19:07 |
| fta | asac, what about the new prism in intrepid, too late? | 19:08 |
| fta | (i hate the new background picture, i prefer the heron one) | 19:08 |
| asac | fta: you are a MOTU ;). try to follow the procedure and see what happens (prism) | 19:09 |
| asac | i am actually not even sure if universe is in a freeze or not | 19:10 |
| asac | it definitly isnt a the same freeze that the main archive is | 19:10 |
| asac | (because RMs will not review uploads, just push through if you say that) | 19:10 |
| fta | "Uploads to universe require a manual push through the queue, but are not subject to release management approval" | 19:10 |
| asac | fta: right. but that doesnt mean that there is nothing to do | 19:10 |
| asac | universe is goverend by motu-release | 19:11 |
| asac | i think its in a feature freeze | 19:11 |
| asac | so the normal procedure is to post a bug, subscribe them and explain the benefits as well the risks | 19:11 |
| asac | risks should be rather low | 19:11 |
| asac | but giving detailed information probably makes it easier ;) | 19:12 |
| asac | e.g. are there features or things that worked before and that are now not working and so on | 19:12 |
| asac | fta: did something happen with the 3.1 bug? | 19:12 |
| fta | asac, nothing, sistpoty is ok but wants motu-sru's feedback | 19:16 |
| fta | asac, so, what do you think about my ff3 change in .heads? | 19:17 |
| fta | -s | 19:17 |
| fta | changeS | 19:18 |
| asac | fta: commented | 19:35 |
| asac | ;) | 19:35 |
| asac | i actually didnt proof read | 19:36 |
| fta | asac, you didn't use mozclient for xul on hardy ??? | 19:36 |
| asac | so lets hope they get the point | 19:36 |
| fta | Get:207 http://ftpmaster.internal hardy-security/main xulrunner-1.9 1.9.0.3+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.8.04.1 [7764kB] | 19:36 |
| fta | tar zxf /usr/lib/xulrunner-devel-1.9.0.3/sdk/build-system.tar.gz | 19:36 |
| fta | tar: /usr/lib/xulrunner-devel-1.9.0.3/sdk/build-system.tar.gz: Cannot open: No such file or directory | 19:36 |
| fta | tar: Error is not recoverable: exiting now | 19:36 |
| asac | hardy? | 19:37 |
| fta | http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18004580/buildlog_ubuntu-hardy-i386.prism_0.9.1%2Bsvn20080918r18380-0ubuntu1~fta2~hardy_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz | 19:37 |
| asac | fta: i dont change the hardy package | 19:37 |
| asac | its in the same state that we released it | 19:37 |
| asac | thats the whole point of stable releases | 19:37 |
| asac | or am i getting something wrong? | 19:38 |
| fta | it's 1.9.0.3 | 19:38 |
| asac | and? | 19:38 |
| fta | so it's a new tarball, but it's missing build-system.tar.gz | 19:38 |
| asac | i dont have that build-system here in 1.9.0.2 | 19:38 |
| fta | -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 585582 2008-09-25 18:15 /usr/lib/xulrunner-devel-1.9.0.3/sdk/build-system.tar.gz | 19:39 |
| asac | fta: the build-system is most likely produced by the packaging right? or by a patch we ship in the packaging branch | 19:39 |
| asac | fta: yes. tahts intrepid | 19:39 |
| asac | fta: we have a patch to produce the build-system dont we? | 19:39 |
| fta | it's in m-d | 19:39 |
| asac | fta: yes. and hardy doesnt get any new m-d | 19:39 |
| asac | fta: so m-d patches xulrunner build system to produce such a tarball? | 19:40 |
| asac | how does ti get into the xulrunner-1.9-dev? | 19:40 |
| fta | i don't get it, you did a tarball for hardy and another for intrepid ?? | 19:40 |
| asac | how does the build-system.tar.gz get into that directory? | 19:41 |
| asac | thats not a source directory, but a binary dir | 19:41 |
| asac | /usr/lib/xulrunner-devel-1.9.0.3/sdk/build-system.tar.gz | 19:41 |
| fta | oh, it's not m-d, it's xul at build time | 19:42 |
| asac | right | 19:42 |
| fta | so i'm doomed | 19:42 |
| asac | thats also a new feature | 19:42 |
| asac | fta: well.... you do hardy in ppa ... push xul there too | 19:43 |
| asac | e.g. thats an intrepid backport you need technically | 19:43 |
| fta | i do, but it used your tarball | 19:43 |
| === wikz_ is now known as wikz | ||
| fta | asac, i can't request the new prism if the new m-d is not in first | 19:52 |
| fta | so i'm really doomed | 19:53 |
| fta | excellent, the prism extension is working just fine | 20:24 |
| fta | asac, http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=931586 | 22:10 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!