=== RAOF_ is now known as RAOF | ||
=== thumper_laptop is now known as thumper | ||
=== jelmer is now known as Guest4379 | ||
=== Guest4379 is now known as jelmer | ||
IntuitiveNipple | I have a strange PPA build FTBFS issue. Uploaded a version of audacity with libsoundtouch enabled. to enable that to work, I also built a new soundtouch package from upstream 1.3.1 (to satisfy the audacity depends). soundtouch built successfully. audacity builds successfully for lpia and amd64 but fails for i386. In a local pbuilder the i386 succeeds. | 10:10 |
---|---|---|
IntuitiveNipple | The failure is with a #include of one of the soundtouch include headers in /usr/include/soundtouch - but all three arch's have it installed | 10:11 |
geser | URL of the build log? | 10:16 |
IntuitiveNipple | http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18012508/buildlog_ubuntu-hardy-i386.audacity_1.3.4-1.1ubuntu2~ppa1h_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz | 10:17 |
IntuitiveNipple | and the amd64 for comparison: | 10:17 |
IntuitiveNipple | http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18012525/buildlog_ubuntu-hardy-lpia.audacity_1.3.4-1.1ubuntu2~ppa1h_FULLYBUILT.txt.gz | 10:17 |
IntuitiveNipple | soory, lpia! | 10:17 |
IntuitiveNipple | I checked the log to be sure the soundtouch 1.3.1 dev package was installed, and that the audacity configure script detects the system libraries as it should | 10:18 |
geser | IntuitiveNipple: compare also the contents of libsoundtouch1-dev on amd64 and i386 | 10:24 |
IntuitiveNipple | geser: of the .debs you mean? | 10:24 |
geser | IntuitiveNipple: yes, the amd64 one has usr/include/soundtouch/st_assert.h, the i386 hasn't that file (I didn't check lpia yet) | 10:25 |
IntuitiveNipple | geser: really!? I checked them locally and they were okay, which would explain why it builds locally. How the heck did it manage to miss that I wonder? | 10:26 |
geser | IntuitiveNipple: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18010432/buildlog_ubuntu-hardy-i386.soundtouch_1.3.1-0ubuntu1~ppa1h_FULLYBUILT.txt.gz and see the package contents at the end of the log | 10:28 |
IntuitiveNipple | geser: yeah I noticed that... now to work out *how* that happened! | 10:28 |
IntuitiveNipple | somehow a patch must have failed, just i386 | 10:29 |
IntuitiveNipple | well this has me truly flummoxed! | 10:37 |
pro-rsoft|idle | Hi, where to request for a certain Series to be deleted, if it was accidentally created? | 10:59 |
spm | pro-rsoft|idle: open a question against the launchpad project, specifying the project/series you wish removed. | 11:22 |
pro-rsoft|idle | okay | 11:23 |
RainCT | Hi | 11:43 |
RainCT | Does/Will launchpadlib allow to download PO files from rosetta? | 11:44 |
=== pro-rsoft|idle is now known as pro-rsoft|lunch | ||
=== nebi is now known as nebi|away | ||
=== nebi|away is now known as nebi | ||
=== nebi is now known as nebi|away | ||
=== nebi|away is now known as nebi | ||
salutis | Hello guys! I am still unable to build packages in PPA. There is an error (new one) in the log file. Please, can anyone help? Thanks! Log is located here - http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17982008/buildlog_ubuntu-intrepid-i386.thinkingrock_2.0.1-0ubuntu5_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz | 16:57 |
geser | salutis: don't use the build target (which is run as non-root) to install files, a better place is the binary target | 17:03 |
salutis | geser: aha | 17:04 |
salutis | geser: I will try! | 17:05 |
geser | salutis: can you point me to your PPA? so I can look at the package | 17:05 |
salutis | geser: deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/salutis/ubuntu hardy main | 17:06 |
salutis | deb-src http://ppa.launchpad.net/salutis/ubuntu hardy main | 17:06 |
geser | salutis: after checking your debian/rules, it would be a good idea if you looked again at the packaging guide (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Complete) escpecially the section about debian/rules (and the example there) | 17:12 |
geser | it might save you several upload iterations before it finally builds | 17:13 |
salutis | geser: you're right. because there's no compilation I changed 'build' to 'binary' | 17:15 |
salutis | geser: I will try and check | 17:15 |
geser | salutis: if you don't have a build, you can have a empty build target, but everything which needs "root" like installing files, changing ownership, etc. needs to be run from the binary target | 17:18 |
salutis | geser: thank you for your help! it saved me lot of time. I am trying to fix my packages right now | 17:23 |
salutis | I got error by e-mail from no_reply@lanuchpad.net: 'Rejected: Unhandled exception processing upload: 'ascii' codec can't encode character u'\u010d' in position 75: ordinal not in range(128)' :( | 17:27 |
LarstiQ | does it also give a traceback? | 17:29 |
salutis | LarstiQ: no, I received only e-mail | 17:31 |
salutis | LarstiQ: I don't know about trackback | 17:32 |
Ursinha | salutis, what were you trying to upload? | 17:32 |
salutis | Ursinha: salutis-connect (1.2.5) | 17:32 |
Ursinha | oh, your package | 17:33 |
Ursinha | let me see if there is an already reported bug | 17:33 |
salutis | Ursinha: yes | 17:33 |
salutis | Ursinha: FYI - the package is lintian checked, without errors or warnings | 17:35 |
Ursinha | salutis, i guess the error you got is unrelated to package problems | 17:36 |
LarstiQ | u'\u010d' is č | 17:37 |
LarstiQ | salutis: which I guess may be in your name? | 17:38 |
LarstiQ | salutis: do you have the .dsc file available somewhere? | 17:38 |
salutis | LarstiQ: here - http://www.salutis.sk/salutis-connect_1.2.5.dsc | 17:42 |
LarstiQ | salutis: okay, no problem there. | 17:45 |
LarstiQ | salutis: could there be any other place in the package that uses a č, the changelog maybe? | 17:45 |
LarstiQ | salutis: I see your user page features it | 17:46 |
LarstiQ | salutis: did the reject email mention anything else? | 17:48 |
salutis | LarstiQ: grep -R 'č' * gives me only 'salutis-connect.sh: _AUTHOR_NAME_="Rudolf Adamkovič - Salutis"'. so, it's only in main script | 17:48 |
LarstiQ | salutis: then I think it's a launchpad bug | 17:49 |
salutis | LarstiQ: in the e-mail, there are is only 1 line with mentioned error and then some generic information like 'format', 'date', 'source', 'binary', 'architecture' etc... | 17:49 |
Ursinha | LarstiQ, it is indeed | 17:49 |
salutis | :( | 17:50 |
LarstiQ | Ursinha: without the code or such, I suspect it's trying to use salutis' display name somewhere and not taking into account some unicode issues? | 17:50 |
Ursinha | LarstiQ, launchpad has known issues with some unicode chars | 17:51 |
Ursinha | LarstiQ, all on queue to be fixed | 17:51 |
LarstiQ | Ursinha: cool | 17:51 |
Ursinha | at least all we know :) | 17:51 |
salutis | so, I can remove 'č' from my profile name and it should work? I want upload packages ASAP :-/ | 17:52 |
LarstiQ | :) | 17:52 |
LarstiQ | salutis: that would be my recommended try at a workaround, yes | 17:52 |
Ursinha | salutis, you can try that | 17:52 |
salutis | perfect guys, I am very happy from your help! and sorry for my buggy english :) | 17:52 |
LarstiQ | salutis: thinkingrock looks interesting, just this week I've been reading David Allen's book, so I'll surely check it out | 17:54 |
Ursinha | salutis, no problem :) you can come here every time you need | 17:56 |
Ursinha | salutis, can you just tell me if changing the char on the script will be enough to workaround it? | 17:57 |
salutis | Ursinha: yes, of course. wait a second | 17:57 |
Ursinha | salutis, thanks >:) | 17:57 |
Ursinha | oops | 17:57 |
Ursinha | s/>// | 17:58 |
salutis | Ursinha: it's working, package is accepted | 18:00 |
Ursinha | salutis, thanks for checking it for me | 18:02 |
Ursinha | and for reporting it | 18:02 |
salutis | thanks guys! | 18:03 |
LarstiQ | salutis: pleased to help :) | 18:04 |
Ursinha | salutis, no worries :) | 18:05 |
Ursinha | salutis, one more thing if possible :) can you send me one PM or email with the error mail you've received? | 18:08 |
salutis | Ursinha: yes, of course. I will | 18:12 |
Ursinha | salutis, thanks! if you prefer email, you can send it to ursinha@canonical.com | 18:12 |
salutis | Ursinha: It's in PM here at ICQ. it is O.K.? | 18:15 |
Ursinha | it's ok, i'm receiving it | 18:16 |
Ursinha | ICQ? how come? | 18:16 |
salutis | Ursinha: no, no - I mean IRC, of course :) | 18:17 |
Ursinha | oh :D | 18:17 |
Ursinha | salutis, may i attach that info to the bug i'm filing? | 18:19 |
salutis | Ursinha: of course | 18:21 |
Ursinha | salutis, thanks | 18:22 |
salutis | guys, how long it take to delete packages from PPA? I deleted my packages 5 mins ago and I still can't upload new ones (Rejected: File <...> already exists in PPA for Rudolf Adamkovic, but uploaded version has different contents) | 18:27 |
IntuitiveNipple | This morning I had a package build on PPA for gutsy, hardy, and intrepid (i386, amd64, lpia). The hardy i386 package somehow missed out installed *one* (development header) file into the -dev package. The i386 builds for gutsy and intrepid included the file, as did local pbuilder hardy i386 test builds. I've just bumped the changelog version and re-uploaded the package and now the file is included. Because I can't explain the issue based o | 20:12 |
IntuitiveNipple | n the packaging itself I'm wondering if it *might* be some kind of random glitch on the buildds. I thought it might be a good idea to at least put the issue on the radar in case similar things happen again for others. | 20:12 |
IntuitiveNipple | The package in my PPA is soundtouch (1.3.1-0ubuntu1~ppa1h) hardy - note, it successfully built but another package that Build-Depends on it FTBFS the i386 hardy version only | 20:13 |
IntuitiveNipple | (the file is "usr/include/soundtouch/st_assert.h" and it is created by debian/patches/00_assert.patch) | 20:15 |
salutis | how long it takes to delete packages from PPA? I deleted my packages aprox. 1 hour ago and I still can't upload new ones (Rejected: File <...> already exists in PPA for Rudolf Adamkovic, but uploaded version has different contents). please help! | 20:23 |
salutis | sorry, there was a network error. if there was any answers to my question, please post it again. thanks! | 20:28 |
=== mwhudson_ is now known as mwhudson | ||
fta | is it possible to add a new bug tracker for a project when it's not in the registered tracker list? | 21:50 |
beuno | fta, I think you have to request for it to get added | 21:50 |
fta | beuno, how? a bug? | 21:51 |
beuno | you can file a question in https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad | 21:51 |
fta | ok, thanks | 21:51 |
Stavros | hello | 22:56 |
Stavros | how can i create a new release to add files to? launchpad is so confusing :( | 22:56 |
beuno | Stavros, you have to create a release from a series | 22:56 |
beuno | (it is confusing, we're working on it) | 22:56 |
beuno | so, go to a series (or create a new one) | 22:56 |
beuno | and you can create a release from it | 22:57 |
Stavros | ah, "register a release"? thanks | 22:57 |
beuno | that's it! | 22:57 |
beuno | np | 22:57 |
Stavros | how long until the non-confusing version arrives? :/ | 22:57 |
beuno | I wish I knew. But it's on the top of the list, so it can't be too long | 22:57 |
Stavros | ah, great | 22:57 |
Stavros | i hate how i try to find something and keep going round and round in cycles | 22:59 |
beuno | yeah, we all do | 22:59 |
beuno | we're working on making the UI much easier to use | 23:00 |
Stavros | that's great, because now the functions are all over the place | 23:00 |
Stavros | for example, i wanted to add a new download, there should be an "add file" in the downloads page | 23:00 |
beuno | so you will see many improvements land | 23:00 |
Stavros | where i can select from the series or add a new one | 23:00 |
Stavros | i hope so, because i love the service | 23:00 |
Stavros | it's really useful (when i can use it) :P | 23:00 |
beuno | Stavros, when you find something confusing, please, file a bug for it, or add a comment to an existing one | 23:00 |
beuno | it helps a lot to know what we should be focusing on | 23:01 |
Stavros | ah, great, i'll do that now | 23:01 |
beuno | anyway, I'm off to do sunday stuff | 23:01 |
Stavros | oh, it's sunday | 23:02 |
Stavros | okay, thanks again | 23:02 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!