/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2008/09/28/#launchpad.txt

=== RAOF_ is now known as RAOF
=== thumper_laptop is now known as thumper
=== jelmer is now known as Guest4379
=== Guest4379 is now known as jelmer
IntuitiveNippleI have a strange PPA build FTBFS issue. Uploaded a version of audacity with libsoundtouch enabled. to enable that to work, I also built a new soundtouch package from upstream 1.3.1 (to satisfy the audacity depends). soundtouch built successfully. audacity builds successfully for lpia and amd64 but fails for i386. In a local pbuilder the i386 succeeds.10:10
IntuitiveNippleThe failure is with a  #include of one of the soundtouch include headers in /usr/include/soundtouch - but all three arch's have it installed10:11
geserURL of the build log?10:16
IntuitiveNipplehttp://launchpadlibrarian.net/18012508/buildlog_ubuntu-hardy-i386.audacity_1.3.4-1.1ubuntu2~ppa1h_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz10:17
IntuitiveNippleand the amd64 for comparison:10:17
IntuitiveNipplehttp://launchpadlibrarian.net/18012525/buildlog_ubuntu-hardy-lpia.audacity_1.3.4-1.1ubuntu2~ppa1h_FULLYBUILT.txt.gz10:17
IntuitiveNipplesoory, lpia!10:17
IntuitiveNippleI checked the log to be sure the soundtouch 1.3.1 dev package was installed, and that the audacity configure script detects the system libraries as it should10:18
geserIntuitiveNipple: compare also the contents of libsoundtouch1-dev on amd64 and i38610:24
IntuitiveNipplegeser: of the .debs you mean?10:24
geserIntuitiveNipple: yes, the amd64 one has usr/include/soundtouch/st_assert.h, the i386 hasn't that file (I didn't check lpia yet)10:25
IntuitiveNipplegeser: really!? I checked them locally and they were okay, which would explain why it builds locally. How the heck did it manage to miss that I wonder?10:26
geserIntuitiveNipple: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18010432/buildlog_ubuntu-hardy-i386.soundtouch_1.3.1-0ubuntu1~ppa1h_FULLYBUILT.txt.gz and see the package contents at the end of the log10:28
IntuitiveNipplegeser: yeah I noticed that... now to work out *how* that happened!10:28
IntuitiveNipplesomehow a patch must have failed, just i38610:29
IntuitiveNipplewell this has me truly flummoxed!10:37
pro-rsoft|idleHi, where to request for a certain Series to be deleted, if it was accidentally created?10:59
spmpro-rsoft|idle: open a question against the launchpad project, specifying the project/series you wish removed.11:22
pro-rsoft|idleokay11:23
RainCTHi11:43
RainCTDoes/Will launchpadlib allow to download PO files from rosetta?11:44
=== pro-rsoft|idle is now known as pro-rsoft|lunch
=== nebi is now known as nebi|away
=== nebi|away is now known as nebi
=== nebi is now known as nebi|away
=== nebi|away is now known as nebi
salutisHello guys! I am still unable to build packages in PPA. There is an error (new one) in the log file. Please, can anyone help? Thanks! Log is located here - http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17982008/buildlog_ubuntu-intrepid-i386.thinkingrock_2.0.1-0ubuntu5_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz16:57
gesersalutis: don't use the build target (which is run as non-root) to install files, a better place is the binary target17:03
salutisgeser: aha17:04
salutisgeser: I will try!17:05
gesersalutis: can you point me to your PPA? so I can look at the package17:05
salutisgeser: deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/salutis/ubuntu hardy main17:06
salutisdeb-src http://ppa.launchpad.net/salutis/ubuntu hardy main17:06
gesersalutis: after checking your debian/rules, it would be a good idea if you looked again at the packaging guide (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Complete) escpecially the section about debian/rules (and the example there)17:12
geserit might save you several upload iterations before it finally builds17:13
salutisgeser: you're right. because there's no compilation I changed 'build' to 'binary'17:15
salutisgeser: I will try and check17:15
gesersalutis: if you don't have a build, you can have a empty build target, but everything which needs "root" like installing files, changing ownership, etc. needs to be run from the binary target17:18
salutisgeser: thank you for your help! it saved me lot of time. I am trying to fix my packages right now17:23
salutisI got error by e-mail from no_reply@lanuchpad.net: 'Rejected:  Unhandled exception processing upload: 'ascii' codec can't encode character u'\u010d' in position 75: ordinal not in range(128)' :(17:27
LarstiQdoes it also give a traceback?17:29
salutisLarstiQ: no, I received only e-mail17:31
salutisLarstiQ: I don't know about trackback17:32
Ursinhasalutis, what were you trying to upload?17:32
salutisUrsinha: salutis-connect (1.2.5)17:32
Ursinhaoh, your package17:33
Ursinhalet me see if there is an already reported bug17:33
salutisUrsinha: yes17:33
salutisUrsinha: FYI - the package is lintian checked, without errors or warnings17:35
Ursinhasalutis, i guess the error you got is unrelated to package problems17:36
LarstiQu'\u010d' is č17:37
LarstiQsalutis: which I guess may be in your name?17:38
LarstiQsalutis: do you have the .dsc file available somewhere?17:38
salutisLarstiQ: here - http://www.salutis.sk/salutis-connect_1.2.5.dsc17:42
LarstiQsalutis: okay, no problem there.17:45
LarstiQsalutis: could there be any other place in the package that uses a č, the changelog maybe?17:45
LarstiQsalutis: I see your user page features it17:46
LarstiQsalutis: did the reject email mention anything else?17:48
salutisLarstiQ: grep -R 'č' * gives me only 'salutis-connect.sh:  _AUTHOR_NAME_="Rudolf Adamkovič - Salutis"'. so, it's only in main script17:48
LarstiQsalutis: then I think it's a launchpad bug17:49
salutisLarstiQ: in the e-mail, there are is only 1 line with mentioned error and then some generic information like 'format', 'date', 'source', 'binary', 'architecture' etc...17:49
UrsinhaLarstiQ, it is indeed17:49
salutis:(17:50
LarstiQUrsinha: without the code or such, I suspect it's trying to use salutis' display name somewhere and not taking into account some unicode issues?17:50
UrsinhaLarstiQ, launchpad has known issues with some unicode chars17:51
UrsinhaLarstiQ, all on queue to be fixed17:51
LarstiQUrsinha: cool17:51
Ursinhaat least all we know :)17:51
salutisso, I can remove 'č' from my profile name and it should work? I want upload packages ASAP :-/17:52
LarstiQ:)17:52
LarstiQsalutis: that would be my recommended try at a workaround, yes17:52
Ursinhasalutis, you can try that17:52
salutisperfect guys, I am very happy from your help! and sorry for my buggy english :)17:52
LarstiQsalutis: thinkingrock looks interesting, just this week I've been reading David Allen's book, so I'll surely check it out17:54
Ursinhasalutis, no problem :) you can come here every time you need17:56
Ursinhasalutis, can you just tell me if changing the char on the script will be enough to workaround it?17:57
salutisUrsinha: yes, of course. wait a second17:57
Ursinhasalutis, thanks >:)17:57
Ursinhaoops17:57
Ursinhas/>//17:58
salutisUrsinha: it's working, package is accepted18:00
Ursinhasalutis, thanks for checking it for me18:02
Ursinhaand for reporting it18:02
salutisthanks guys!18:03
LarstiQsalutis: pleased to help :)18:04
Ursinhasalutis, no worries :)18:05
Ursinhasalutis, one more thing if possible :) can you send me one PM or email with the error mail you've received?18:08
salutisUrsinha: yes, of course. I will18:12
Ursinhasalutis, thanks! if you prefer email, you can send it to ursinha@canonical.com18:12
salutisUrsinha: It's in PM here at ICQ. it is O.K.?18:15
Ursinhait's ok, i'm receiving it18:16
UrsinhaICQ? how come?18:16
salutisUrsinha: no, no - I mean IRC, of course :)18:17
Ursinhaoh :D18:17
Ursinhasalutis, may i attach that info to the bug i'm filing?18:19
salutisUrsinha: of course18:21
Ursinhasalutis, thanks18:22
salutisguys, how long it take to delete packages from PPA? I deleted my packages 5 mins ago and I still can't upload new ones (Rejected: File <...> already exists in PPA for Rudolf Adamkovic, but uploaded version has different contents)18:27
IntuitiveNippleThis morning I had a package build on PPA for gutsy, hardy, and intrepid (i386, amd64, lpia). The hardy i386 package somehow missed out installed *one* (development header) file into the -dev package. The i386 builds for gutsy and intrepid included the file, as did local pbuilder hardy i386 test builds. I've just bumped the changelog version and re-uploaded the package and now the file is included. Because I can't explain the issue based o20:12
IntuitiveNipplen the packaging itself I'm wondering if it *might* be some kind of random glitch on the buildds. I thought it might be a good idea to at least put the issue on the radar in case similar things happen again for others.20:12
IntuitiveNippleThe package in my PPA is soundtouch (1.3.1-0ubuntu1~ppa1h) hardy - note, it successfully built but another package that Build-Depends on it FTBFS the i386 hardy version only20:13
IntuitiveNipple(the file is "usr/include/soundtouch/st_assert.h" and it is created by debian/patches/00_assert.patch)20:15
salutishow long it takes to delete packages from PPA? I deleted my packages aprox. 1 hour ago and I still can't upload new ones (Rejected: File <...> already exists in PPA for Rudolf Adamkovic, but uploaded version has different contents). please help!20:23
salutissorry, there was a network error. if there was any answers to my question, please post it again. thanks!20:28
=== mwhudson_ is now known as mwhudson
ftais it possible to add a new bug tracker for a project when it's not in the registered tracker list?21:50
beunofta, I think you have to request for it to get added21:50
ftabeuno, how? a bug?21:51
beunoyou can file a question in https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad21:51
ftaok, thanks21:51
Stavroshello22:56
Stavroshow can i create a new release to add files to? launchpad is so confusing :(22:56
beunoStavros, you have to create a release from a series22:56
beuno(it is confusing, we're working on it)22:56
beunoso, go to a series (or create a new one)22:56
beunoand you can create a release from it22:57
Stavrosah, "register a release"? thanks22:57
beunothat's it!22:57
beunonp22:57
Stavroshow long until the non-confusing version arrives? :/22:57
beunoI wish I knew. But it's on the top of the list, so it can't be too long22:57
Stavrosah, great22:57
Stavrosi hate how i try to find something and keep going round and round in cycles22:59
beunoyeah, we all do22:59
beunowe're working on making the UI much easier to use23:00
Stavrosthat's great, because now the functions are all over the place23:00
Stavrosfor example, i wanted to add a new download, there should be an "add file" in the downloads page23:00
beunoso you will see many improvements land23:00
Stavroswhere i can select from the series or add a new one23:00
Stavrosi hope so, because i love the service23:00
Stavrosit's really useful (when i can use it) :P23:00
beunoStavros, when you find something confusing, please, file a bug for it, or add a comment to an existing one23:00
beunoit helps a lot to know what we should be focusing on23:01
Stavrosah, great, i'll do that now23:01
beunoanyway, I'm off to do sunday stuff23:01
Stavrosoh, it's sunday23:02
Stavrosokay, thanks again23:02

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!