[10:10] <IntuitiveNipple> I have a strange PPA build FTBFS issue. Uploaded a version of audacity with libsoundtouch enabled. to enable that to work, I also built a new soundtouch package from upstream 1.3.1 (to satisfy the audacity depends). soundtouch built successfully. audacity builds successfully for lpia and amd64 but fails for i386. In a local pbuilder the i386 succeeds.
[10:11] <IntuitiveNipple> The failure is with a  #include of one of the soundtouch include headers in /usr/include/soundtouch - but all three arch's have it installed
[10:16] <geser> URL of the build log?
[10:17] <IntuitiveNipple> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18012508/buildlog_ubuntu-hardy-i386.audacity_1.3.4-1.1ubuntu2~ppa1h_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
[10:17] <IntuitiveNipple> and the amd64 for comparison:
[10:17] <IntuitiveNipple> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18012525/buildlog_ubuntu-hardy-lpia.audacity_1.3.4-1.1ubuntu2~ppa1h_FULLYBUILT.txt.gz
[10:17] <IntuitiveNipple> soory, lpia!
[10:18] <IntuitiveNipple> I checked the log to be sure the soundtouch 1.3.1 dev package was installed, and that the audacity configure script detects the system libraries as it should
[10:24] <geser> IntuitiveNipple: compare also the contents of libsoundtouch1-dev on amd64 and i386
[10:24] <IntuitiveNipple> geser: of the .debs you mean?
[10:25] <geser> IntuitiveNipple: yes, the amd64 one has usr/include/soundtouch/st_assert.h, the i386 hasn't that file (I didn't check lpia yet)
[10:26] <IntuitiveNipple> geser: really!? I checked them locally and they were okay, which would explain why it builds locally. How the heck did it manage to miss that I wonder?
[10:28] <geser> IntuitiveNipple: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18010432/buildlog_ubuntu-hardy-i386.soundtouch_1.3.1-0ubuntu1~ppa1h_FULLYBUILT.txt.gz and see the package contents at the end of the log
[10:28] <IntuitiveNipple> geser: yeah I noticed that... now to work out *how* that happened!
[10:29] <IntuitiveNipple> somehow a patch must have failed, just i386
[10:37] <IntuitiveNipple> well this has me truly flummoxed!
[10:59] <pro-rsoft|idle> Hi, where to request for a certain Series to be deleted, if it was accidentally created?
[11:22] <spm> pro-rsoft|idle: open a question against the launchpad project, specifying the project/series you wish removed.
[11:23] <pro-rsoft|idle> okay
[11:43] <RainCT> Hi
[11:44] <RainCT> Does/Will launchpadlib allow to download PO files from rosetta?
[16:57] <salutis> Hello guys! I am still unable to build packages in PPA. There is an error (new one) in the log file. Please, can anyone help? Thanks! Log is located here - http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17982008/buildlog_ubuntu-intrepid-i386.thinkingrock_2.0.1-0ubuntu5_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
[17:03] <geser> salutis: don't use the build target (which is run as non-root) to install files, a better place is the binary target
[17:04] <salutis> geser: aha
[17:05] <salutis> geser: I will try!
[17:05] <geser> salutis: can you point me to your PPA? so I can look at the package
[17:06] <salutis> geser: deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/salutis/ubuntu hardy main
[17:06] <salutis> deb-src http://ppa.launchpad.net/salutis/ubuntu hardy main
[17:12] <geser> salutis: after checking your debian/rules, it would be a good idea if you looked again at the packaging guide (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Complete) escpecially the section about debian/rules (and the example there)
[17:13] <geser> it might save you several upload iterations before it finally builds
[17:15] <salutis> geser: you're right. because there's no compilation I changed 'build' to 'binary'
[17:15] <salutis> geser: I will try and check
[17:18] <geser> salutis: if you don't have a build, you can have a empty build target, but everything which needs "root" like installing files, changing ownership, etc. needs to be run from the binary target
[17:23] <salutis> geser: thank you for your help! it saved me lot of time. I am trying to fix my packages right now
[17:27] <salutis> I got error by e-mail from no_reply@lanuchpad.net: 'Rejected:  Unhandled exception processing upload: 'ascii' codec can't encode character u'\u010d' in position 75: ordinal not in range(128)' :(
[17:29] <LarstiQ> does it also give a traceback?
[17:31] <salutis> ﻿LarstiQ: no, I received only e-mail
[17:32] <salutis> LarstiQ: I don't know about trackback
[17:32] <Ursinha> salutis, what were you trying to upload?
[17:32] <salutis> Ursinha: salutis-connect (1.2.5)
[17:33] <Ursinha> oh, your package
[17:33] <Ursinha> let me see if there is an already reported bug
[17:33] <salutis> Ursinha: yes
[17:35] <salutis> Ursinha: FYI - the package is lintian checked, without errors or warnings
[17:36] <Ursinha> salutis, i guess the error you got is unrelated to package problems
[17:37] <LarstiQ> u'\u010d' is č
[17:38] <LarstiQ> salutis: which I guess may be in your name?
[17:38] <LarstiQ> salutis: do you have the .dsc file available somewhere?
[17:42] <salutis> LarstiQ: here - http://www.salutis.sk/salutis-connect_1.2.5.dsc
[17:45] <LarstiQ> salutis: okay, no problem there.
[17:45] <LarstiQ> salutis: could there be any other place in the package that uses a č, the changelog maybe?
[17:46] <LarstiQ> salutis: I see your user page features it
[17:48] <LarstiQ> salutis: did the reject email mention anything else?
[17:48] <salutis> LarstiQ: grep -R 'č' * gives me only 'salutis-connect.sh:  _AUTHOR_NAME_="Rudolf Adamkovič - Salutis"'. so, it's only in main script
[17:49] <LarstiQ> salutis: then I think it's a launchpad bug
[17:49] <salutis> LarstiQ: in the e-mail, there are is only 1 line with mentioned error and then some generic information like 'format', 'date', 'source', 'binary', 'architecture' etc...
[17:49] <Ursinha> LarstiQ, it is indeed
[17:50] <salutis> :(
[17:50] <LarstiQ> Ursinha: without the code or such, I suspect it's trying to use salutis' display name somewhere and not taking into account some unicode issues?
[17:51] <Ursinha> LarstiQ, launchpad has known issues with some unicode chars
[17:51] <Ursinha> LarstiQ, all on queue to be fixed
[17:51] <LarstiQ> Ursinha: cool
[17:51] <Ursinha> at least all we know :)
[17:52] <salutis> so, I can remove 'č' from my profile name and it should work? I want upload packages ASAP :-/
[17:52] <LarstiQ> :)
[17:52] <LarstiQ> salutis: that would be my recommended try at a workaround, yes
[17:52] <Ursinha> salutis, you can try that
[17:52] <salutis> perfect guys, I am very happy from your help! and sorry for my buggy english :)
[17:54] <LarstiQ> salutis: thinkingrock looks interesting, just this week I've been reading David Allen's book, so I'll surely check it out
[17:56] <Ursinha> salutis, no problem :) you can come here every time you need
[17:57] <Ursinha> salutis, can you just tell me if changing the char on the script will be enough to workaround it?
[17:57] <salutis> Ursinha: yes, of course. wait a second
[17:57] <Ursinha> salutis, thanks >:)
[17:57] <Ursinha> oops
[17:58] <Ursinha> s/>//
[18:00] <salutis> Ursinha: it's working, package is accepted
[18:02] <Ursinha> salutis, thanks for checking it for me
[18:02] <Ursinha> and for reporting it
[18:03] <salutis> thanks guys!
[18:04] <LarstiQ> salutis: pleased to help :)
[18:05] <Ursinha> salutis, no worries :)
[18:08] <Ursinha> salutis, one more thing if possible :) can you send me one PM or email with the error mail you've received?
[18:12] <salutis> Ursinha: yes, of course. I will
[18:12] <Ursinha> salutis, thanks! if you prefer email, you can send it to ursinha@canonical.com
[18:15] <salutis> Ursinha: It's in PM here at ICQ. it is O.K.?
[18:16] <Ursinha> it's ok, i'm receiving it
[18:16] <Ursinha> ICQ? how come?
[18:17] <salutis> Ursinha: no, no - I mean IRC, of course :)
[18:17] <Ursinha> oh :D
[18:19] <Ursinha> salutis, may i attach that info to the bug i'm filing?
[18:21] <salutis> Ursinha: of course
[18:22] <Ursinha> salutis, thanks
[18:27] <salutis> guys, how long it take to delete packages from PPA? I deleted my packages 5 mins ago and I still can't upload new ones (Rejected: File <...> already exists in PPA for Rudolf Adamkovic, but uploaded version has different contents)
[20:12] <IntuitiveNipple> This morning I had a package build on PPA for gutsy, hardy, and intrepid (i386, amd64, lpia). The hardy i386 package somehow missed out installed *one* (development header) file into the -dev package. The i386 builds for gutsy and intrepid included the file, as did local pbuilder hardy i386 test builds. I've just bumped the changelog version and re-uploaded the package and now the file is included. Because I can't explain the issue based o
[20:12] <IntuitiveNipple> n the packaging itself I'm wondering if it *might* be some kind of random glitch on the buildds. I thought it might be a good idea to at least put the issue on the radar in case similar things happen again for others.
[20:13] <IntuitiveNipple> The package in my PPA is soundtouch (1.3.1-0ubuntu1~ppa1h) hardy - note, it successfully built but another package that Build-Depends on it FTBFS the i386 hardy version only
[20:15] <IntuitiveNipple> (the file is "usr/include/soundtouch/st_assert.h" and it is created by debian/patches/00_assert.patch)
[20:23] <salutis> ﻿how long it takes to delete packages from PPA? I deleted my packages aprox. 1 hour ago and I still can't upload new ones (Rejected: File <...> already exists in PPA for Rudolf Adamkovic, but uploaded version has different contents). please help!
[20:28] <salutis> sorry, there was a network error. if there was any answers to my question, please post it again. thanks!
[21:50] <fta> is it possible to add a new bug tracker for a project when it's not in the registered tracker list?
[21:50] <beuno> fta, I think you have to request for it to get added
[21:51] <fta> beuno, how? a bug?
[21:51] <beuno> you can file a question in https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad
[21:51] <fta> ok, thanks
[22:56] <Stavros> hello
[22:56] <Stavros> how can i create a new release to add files to? launchpad is so confusing :(
[22:56] <beuno> Stavros, you have to create a release from a series
[22:56] <beuno> (it is confusing, we're working on it)
[22:56] <beuno> so, go to a series (or create a new one)
[22:57] <beuno> and you can create a release from it
[22:57] <Stavros> ah, "register a release"? thanks
[22:57] <beuno> that's it!
[22:57] <beuno> np
[22:57] <Stavros> how long until the non-confusing version arrives? :/
[22:57] <beuno> I wish I knew. But it's on the top of the list, so it can't be too long
[22:57] <Stavros> ah, great
[22:59] <Stavros> i hate how i try to find something and keep going round and round in cycles
[22:59] <beuno> yeah, we all do
[23:00] <beuno> we're working on making the UI much easier to use
[23:00] <Stavros> that's great, because now the functions are all over the place
[23:00] <Stavros> for example, i wanted to add a new download, there should be an "add file" in the downloads page
[23:00] <beuno> so you will see many improvements land
[23:00] <Stavros> where i can select from the series or add a new one
[23:00] <Stavros> i hope so, because i love the service
[23:00] <Stavros> it's really useful (when i can use it) :P
[23:00] <beuno> Stavros, when you find something confusing, please, file a bug for it, or add a comment to an existing one
[23:01] <beuno> it helps a lot to know what we should be focusing on
[23:01] <Stavros> ah, great, i'll do that now
[23:01] <beuno> anyway, I'm off to do sunday stuff
[23:02] <Stavros> oh, it's sunday
[23:02] <Stavros> okay, thanks again