[07:37] <ara> good morning fellow testers!
[08:20] <davmor2> Morning Everybody
[08:22] <ara> morning davmor2 :-)
[08:42] <davmor2> ara: did you like the line further down about you now have 2 install cd's to give away?
[08:42] <ara> davmor2: definitely!
[08:47] <davmor2> ara: this afternoon I'm going to finish off my screenshots of Kubuntu and start uploading them to pages need to smoke test first though :)
[08:47] <ara> davmor2: cool :-)
[08:58] <davmor2> Oh Lovely Bubbly :)  New backdrop
[09:36] <davmor2> anyone running a gnome based intrepid?
[09:42] <persia> Kinda.  What do you need checked?
[09:43] <davmor2> persia: when you open up FF does it go past the top panel?
[09:44] <persia> Oh.  I'm not close enough to Ubuntu Desktop to have firefox.  Sorry.
[09:45] <davmor2> persia: no worries
[09:47] <ara> davmor2: i am running gnome ubuntu
[09:48] <davmor2> ara: when you open up FF does it go past the top panel?
[09:48] <ara> davmor2: not it does not, but i remember experiencing something similar when I had the visual effects (compiz) on
[09:48] <ara> davmor2: are you running compiz?
[09:49] <davmor2> compiz by default yeap
[09:54] <ara> davmor2: try to disable that and try again
[09:55] <ara> davmor2: this is the known bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/99740
[09:55] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 99740 in compiz "Firefox problems with desktop-effects" [Medium,Triaged]
[09:56]  * ara has to reboot
[10:26] <davmor2> heno: morning
[10:26] <heno> morning davmor2
[10:27] <davmor2> heno: found a couple of bug smoke testing ubuntu this morning :(
[10:30]  * heno tries to launch his browser while doing an upgrade
[10:31] <heno> davmor2: are they on the smoke wiki page?
[10:31] <davmor2> will be as soon as I finish the test :)
[10:32] <heno> ok, I may have my browser working too by then :)
[10:33] <davmor2> heno: That doesn't sound good :(
[11:01] <heno> works now :)
[11:02]  * heno reboots
[11:30] <davmor2> heno: Welcome back smoke test results with bugs for ubuntu are up even though I'm still testing it :)
[11:33] <heno> davmor2: saw your firefox/compiz bugs, thanks
[11:54] <persia> Has anyone tested/used usb-creator?  It fails to start for me when called without arguments.
[11:55] <davmor2> persia: not touched it.
[11:56] <persia> Hmm.  I hate burning CDs for dailies, and want to test stuffwith HW != KVM.
[12:01] <davmor2> persia: who is listed as the author have a word with them :)
[12:02]  * persia is delayed by the failure of the flat earth society to have successfully convinced all local governing bodies to use UTC.
[12:07] <heno> persia: have you tried unetbootin? (see: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Installation/FromUSBStick) WFM
[12:08] <persia> heno: Thanks.  I'll try that.  usb-creator is supposed to be the officially supported means of doing it, and just passed it's MIR, so I thought I'd give it a try.
[12:30] <davmor2> ara: are you running compiz on your gnome system?  if so can you stop using it until the screensaver kicks in please?
[12:31] <ara> davmor2: I don't use compiz
[12:31] <davmor2> Np's
[12:38]  * ara -> lunch
[15:11] <cr3> ara: sorry, I haven't had time to look into the desktop integration into checkbox but I'm hoping to look into it today
[15:12] <ara> cr3: ok, thanks
[16:08] <davmor2> testing keyboard on remote desktop viewer
[16:11] <persia> Seems to work.
[16:13] <ara> cr3: could you subscribe to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/Automation/Checkbox. I will be editing it in the next few days, you could help checking all the mistakes I might do
[16:15] <cr3> ara: sure, you could already substitute "hwtest" for "checkbox" in the page
[16:15] <ara> cr3: sure, but nowadays it is still hwtest in intrepid :-)
[16:16] <ara> cr3: is checkbox as checkbox reaching intrepid?
[16:19] <cr3> ara: what's the question?
[16:19] <ara> cr3: the package is still called hwtest, and the version in intrepid has binaries hwtest*
[16:20] <ara> cr3: i remember that you were fixing the checkbox package
[16:21] <cr3> ara: I fixed the problems reported in my [needs-packaging] request on Launchpad but then asked another question: What is the proper way of handling old configuration files when creating a transitional package?
[16:21] <cr3> ara: this was never answered so I guess I'm on my own
[16:21] <ara> cr3: :(
[16:23] <cr3> ara: that's alright, I'll find a way to sort things out. it's just sometimes easier "with a little help from my friends" -- The Beatles
[16:28] <davmor2> cr3: but "you drive me crazy" -- FYC
[16:28] <davmor2> :)
[16:35] <cr3> davmor2: I know I do :)
[16:35] <davmor2> Sorry weren't we playing the song title per sentence game ;)
[16:38] <ara> Rainy days and Mondays always get me down -- The Carpenters :-P
[16:39] <davmor2> ara: "Tell Me Why I Don't Like Mondays" -- Boom Town Rats
=== asac_ is now known as asac
=== davmor2 is now known as davmor2_away
[17:19] <ara> cr3: next Monday we are having our second testing day. Would you like to give the ~1h session about the autoinstaller?
[17:19] <ara> cr3: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/UbuntuTestingDay/20081006 ^
[17:21] <liw> sbeattie, I get a lot of 'rsync: link_stat "/hardy/dvd/current/MD5SUMS" (in cdimage) failed: No such file or directory (2)' with the current dl-ubuntu-test-iso
[17:22] <liw> sbeattie, also, QUIET=true doesn't actually make things quiet, some rsync output still leaks
[17:22] <sbeattie> liw: hrm.
[17:22] <sbeattie> Thought I fixed the latter.
[17:23] <liw> sbeattie, i have revision 23 from bzr, md5sum cf29e542e37f3a58b6f3f51ce9a561a0  bin/dl-ubuntu-test-iso
[17:23] <liw> (just so we speak of the same version)
[17:23] <sbeattie> Is it just the MD5SUMs file that's reporting no such file, or is the iso missing as well?
[17:24] <liw> just the MD5SUMS
[17:37] <liw> sbeattie, some day I'll want to have a progress bar for the downloads :)
[17:37] <liw> but at that point it's going to be better to stop maintaining the script in shell
=== davmor2_away is now known as davmor2
[17:55] <heno> davmor2: how are you finding cdimage today? (slow here)
[17:56] <davmor2> heno: pass I use my server to cron the images down now first thing
[17:58] <davmor2> heno: yes it's crawling
[17:58] <heno> davmor2: ok, looking into it with the sysadmins
[17:59] <davmor2> heno: might just be demand :)
[17:59] <liw> dl-ubuntu-test-iso seems to be using chromium, and I'm getting just over 2 MB/s
[18:01] <heno> I'm getting 200kb/s
[18:01] <heno> (with dl-ubuntu-test-iso also)
[18:01] <liw> (i.e., I'm more or less saturating my downlink)
[18:02] <davmor2> heno: might be high demand for internet in you local area slowing it down
[18:02] <davmor2> try first thing in the morning :)
[18:03] <heno> I'm just worried about the download speed generally as we approach release
[18:04] <heno> when we may need to refresh quickly
=== erle64- is now known as erle-
[18:36] <stgraber> heno: yeah, it was quite slow lately. I usually try chromium directly as they turned off the DNS load balancing (everything goes to beryllium)
[19:27] <davmor2> heno: the bug list increases :(
[19:36] <davmor2> heno: Probably real testing tomorrow is that correct?
[19:37] <heno> davmor2: that's my best guess, yes
[19:37] <davmor2> heno: cool a bit longer to test :)
[19:44] <davmor2> Oh well I'm going
[19:48]  * stgraber gets 900KB/s from chromium, not that bad