| fta2 | crimsun, users are complaining that we still provide the old beta of nonfree flash, do you know why we don't push the last RC ? i've packaged it for myself and the user experience is much better, at least on i386. | 11:07 |
|---|---|---|
| asac | fta2: can you start midbrowser in intrepid? | 11:11 |
| fta2 | i'm at work (hardy) so it can't test right now | 11:12 |
| fta2 | btw, my hardy box crashed badly during the night | 11:13 |
| fta2 | so much for an lts and stable updates | 11:14 |
| asac | fta2: sure that its software and not hardware problems ;) | 11:16 |
| gnomefreak | what is mozillas IRC server? irc.mozilla.org isnt working | 12:21 |
| armin76 | Connecting to irc.mozilla.org (63.245.208.159) port 6667... | 12:21 |
| armin76 | * Connected. Now logging in... | 12:21 |
| armin76 | gnomefreak: ^ | 12:21 |
| gnomefreak | armin76: thanks. let me chekc that against settings | 12:22 |
| gnomefreak | armin76: thanks i used .net instead of org :( | 12:24 |
| armin76 | fail | 12:26 |
| gnomefreak | ;) all fixed | 12:36 |
| gnomefreak | be back | 12:36 |
| KB1OHY | anyone awake? | 13:30 |
| asac | fta_: http://paste.ubuntu.com/52463/ | 14:25 |
| asac | so we need more links ;) | 14:25 |
| gnomefreak | anyone know anything about claws-mail? | 14:57 |
| gnomefreak | KB1OHY: we are | 15:01 |
| gnomefreak | some of us anyway | 15:01 |
| gnomefreak | is it (zero)xKEYID? | 15:02 |
| gnomefreak | or the vowel o | 15:03 |
| asac | gnomefreak: ZERO | 15:58 |
| gnomefreak | asac: thanks | 16:00 |
| gnomefreak | i just intalled these packages not i get update for them? we are talking maybe 10 minutes have past | 16:02 |
| gnomefreak | :( 6 HUNKS failed to apply | 16:03 |
| gnomefreak | asac: you can ignore that email i sent you. its not fucking working | 16:14 |
| gnomefreak | '/win 3 | 16:16 |
| asac_ | gnomefreak: your mail wasnt signed | 16:46 |
| gnomefreak | i know i cant get claws-mail to work with gpg | 16:46 |
| gnomefreak | its starting to piss me off | 16:46 |
| gnomefreak | thanks for checking | 16:47 |
| asac_ | np | 16:49 |
| gnomefreak | not saying much since i cant get sunbird to apply a patch either but i didnt work hard enough on that yet | 16:50 |
| === asac_ is now known as asac | ||
| gnomefreak | ok its lunch time and ikm still drinking coffee ill be back after lunch | 17:13 |
| asac | k | 17:27 |
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| fta | asac, i have sm 1.1.12 for intrepid as a security update with 9 MFSA. i guess i'm on myself now? | 18:30 |
| asac | fta: yeah. if you need a helping hand let me know ;) | 18:48 |
| asac | fta: will you push to hardy-security too? jdstrand would be happy to see that happen i guess ;) | 18:48 |
| fta | sm is Maintainer: Ubuntu Mozilla Team, should i still ask for motu's approval? | 18:49 |
| asac | fta: for security updates? no i wouldnt say so | 18:50 |
| jdstrand | fta: for hardy-security, please follow https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityUpdateProcedures#Preparing%20an%20update and ping me for upload | 18:50 |
| asac | fta: at least as long as the packaging didnt receive a major polish ;) | 18:51 |
| fta | nope, just a bump | 18:51 |
| asac | fta: for -security the idea is to just use the diff.gz of latest hardy with the new orig ... e.g. zero packging changes | 18:52 |
| asac | fta: yeah that should work imo | 18:52 |
| fta | !info seamonkey hardy | 18:52 |
| ubottu | seamonkey (source: seamonkey): The Seamonkey Internet Suite. In component universe, is optional. Version 1.1.9+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 (hardy), package size 22 kB, installed size 88 kB | 18:52 |
| fta | woo, old | 18:52 |
| asac | fta: yeah. that nees thorough testing (not as bad as gutsy iceape though ;)) | 18:55 |
| asac | fta: maybe push to a ppa and let me know so i can run it a bit on my hardy system | 18:55 |
| fta | iceape is from debian, why isn't is merged like everything else? | 18:55 |
| fta | -is+it | 18:55 |
| asac | fta: security is never merged/synched ... main reason is that we dont have a stable target where to sync from (e.g. latest iceape might have changes that doesnt qualify for security updates) | 18:56 |
| asac | fta: but i think we can live with iceape being outdated in gutsy for now ;) | 18:56 |
| fta | for hardy: http://paste.ubuntu.com/52549/ | 18:57 |
| asac | fta: looks good. maybe also reference the USNs fixed in firefox/tbird as applicable | 18:59 |
| asac | e.g. | 18:59 |
| asac | New security upstream release: 1.1.12 | 18:59 |
| asac | fixes security issues also announced in USN-XXX-X (ffox) and USN-XXX-X (tbird) | 19:00 |
| asac | we wont have our own USNs for universe updates ... so its not that important | 19:00 |
| asac | but might give ubuntu folks that track -security a better idea how to look things up | 19:00 |
| * asac getting dinner | 19:03 | |
| fta | the USN are not public yet (reserved) | 19:05 |
| fta | i mean cve | 19:06 |
| jdstrand | fta: it doesn't matter. just use what's listed in the MFSAs | 19:07 |
| jdstrand | (and there will be a lot of them for the big jump for hardy) | 19:08 |
| fta | i just have the MSFAs and corresponding CVEs | 19:08 |
| jdstrand | fta: listing the MFSA in the changelog is up to you. listing the CVEs is a requirement for the -security updates. asac has a special case where he refers to the USN. this is acceptable, assuming the language is as he said above | 19:09 |
| jdstrand | fta: so you have a choice to list the CVEs that are referenced in the MFSAs, or to look through the USNs for firefox, et al and refer to those | 19:10 |
| jdstrand | fta: using CVEs is probably more accurate-- I don't know if there are any CVEs that are exclusively seamonkey or firefox/thunderbird | 19:11 |
| jdstrand | fta: if you want to run the changelog by me, feel free to ping me | 19:13 |
| fta | jdstrand, is that enough http://paste.ubuntu.com/52552/ ? | 19:14 |
| jdstrand | fta: while not conforming to what we use in SecurityUpdateProcedures, I think it's acceptable. However, there are probably a bunch of others for 1.1.9->1.1.10 and 1.1.10->1.1.11 | 19:16 |
| fta | well, this one is for intrepid, so just a small hop | 19:17 |
| jdstrand | fta: oh, I thought we were talking about hardy here | 19:17 |
| jdstrand | fta: for intrepid, that is totally fine | 19:17 |
| fta | jdstrand, for 1.1.10, i already have the 4 USNs | 19:18 |
| lucypher | fta : The last FF-3.1 in your ppa have some issues with tabs | 19:21 |
| fta | lucypher, really, i'm using it, i didn't notice anything wrong | 19:21 |
| fta | s/,/?/ | 19:22 |
| lucypher | I've also tried to remove .mozilla/firefox-3.1 folder... | 19:23 |
| sebner | lucypher: I also don't have problems O_o | 19:23 |
| fta | lucypher, what is the problem? | 19:24 |
| lucypher | Probably I've found what was wrong | 19:26 |
| fta | an addon? | 19:27 |
| lucypher | I had a new tab icon in my toolbar | 19:27 |
| fta | me too, it moved recently | 19:27 |
| lucypher | I had to restore to default toolbar set | 19:28 |
| fta | [reed], ^^ | 19:28 |
| lucypher | And now it works | 19:28 |
| fta | obviously not a packaging issue. maybe there's a bug upstream for that | 19:29 |
| lucypher | It seems that the toolbar icons thing is WIP... | 19:30 |
| lucypher | So I think isn't useful to file a bug about that at the moment. | 19:32 |
| lucypher | Thanks. | 19:32 |
| fta | i update my packages every few days so we'll see | 19:33 |
| lucypher | anyway FF-3.1 is great, first of all in memory usage | 19:37 |
| * asac reboots | 19:41 | |
| asac | gnome bug 554485 | 20:19 |
| ubottu | Gnome bug 554485 in Profiles "regression: open new tab using keyboard shortcut does not open new tab with profile of parent window" [Normal,Unconfirmed] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=554485 | 20:19 |
| asac | \o/ ;) | 20:19 |
| fta | damn, animated svg has been postponed to 3.2 | 20:21 |
| fta | asac, i'm still using xterm | 20:23 |
| asac | fta: lucky you ... this bug annoyed me for about 3 month now ;) | 20:24 |
| asac | nobody seems to care ... so either noone uses profiles or noone uses gnome-terminal ;) | 20:24 |
| fta | i like xterm because of the low footprint | 20:24 |
| asac | i gave up on low footprint when i committed to firefox ;) | 20:25 |
| fta | this is 5 times bigger, not good when you have 30+ like i do | 20:26 |
| asac | good side effect of fixing this is that i discovered that i can add new chars to the "select" word feature ... now i can select complete firefox package versions with double click again ;) | 20:26 |
| asac | fta: i have a bunch of tabs instead | 20:26 |
| asac | like two terminal windows with 6 tabs each | 20:26 |
| fta | I have 7 workspaces, each specialized to different tasks | 20:27 |
| asac | also multiple tabs and windows appear to live in the same process. | 20:27 |
| asac | fta: yeah. i think you have a much better memory ... or at least willingness to remember what you do where ;) | 20:28 |
| fta | i'd say more habits | 20:28 |
| asac | yeah ... but its kind of investment to become used to habits like that for me | 20:28 |
| asac | whenever i try, i forget about the idea at some point and then things become even messier | 20:29 |
| asac | e.g. when you think you should have something in some terminal/desktop, but then you dont find it ... and later you find it somewhere else :) | 20:29 |
| crimsun | fta: I also have RC2 merged locally, but I'm investigating an nspluginwrapper fix | 21:08 |
| crimsun | fta: I'd rather not have to kludge nspluginwrapper just to have the latest RC | 21:08 |
| crimsun | fta: in the meantime, I certainly wouldn't complain if you wanted to push RC2 into intrepid | 21:09 |
| crimsun | I find RC2 far too unstable to use daily; I use swfdec-mozilla (and libswfdec-0.7-1) | 21:10 |
| fta | i find the current one almost unusable, cpu wise, and ff crasher wise | 21:10 |
| fta | the rc i'm using now is far better for both | 21:11 |
| fta | 10.0.12.10ubuntu1~fta1 | 21:11 |
| sebner | fta: +1 | 21:11 |
| crimsun | fta: it's a complete crasher on amd64 due to nspluginwrapper and internal Flash changes. | 21:11 |
| crimsun | yeah, I've had flashplugin-nonfree_10.0.1.218+10.0.12.10ubuntu1.dsc for some time locally, but again, I don't use it. | 21:12 |
| crimsun | granted, my local versioning is pooched, but whatever :) | 21:12 |
| fta | 10.0.1.218+10.0.0.525ubuntu1 was evil on i386 | 21:12 |
| * sebner hopes that the final arrives soon :) | 21:13 | |
| fta | sebner, i wouldn't bet on it to be perfect, i expect no changes compared to the rc, unfortunately | 21:14 |
| sebner | bah | 21:14 |
| sebner | fta: anyhow. rc > beta what's in the archive | 21:14 |
| fta | i know | 21:14 |
| fta | that's why i packaged the rc | 21:15 |
| sebner | :) | 21:15 |
| fta | it's not in my ppa as i didn't want to break my 64bit users | 21:15 |
| sebner | fta: well, I asked asac and we'll have final or rc definately in the archive | 21:16 |
| crimsun | fta: again, if you'd like it in, by all means, please push u-u-s to sponsor an upload. Please remember to account for https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nspluginwrapper/+bug/272286 | 21:16 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 272286 in nspluginwrapper "nspluginwrapper 1.1.0 does not support wmode correctly with Flash 10 RC2" [Wishlist,Confirmed] | 21:16 |
| KB1OHY | anyone in here know anything about lightning calendar? | 21:26 |
| fta | jdstrand, is that suitable http://paste.ubuntu.com/52592/ ? with all the info in bug 276437 | 21:46 |
| ubottu | Bug 276437 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/276437 is private | 21:46 |
| fta | damn | 21:46 |
| fta | no reason to keep that bug private i guess | 21:46 |
| fta | bug 276437 | 21:47 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 276437 in seamonkey "security upgrade of seamonkey 1.1.12" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/276437 | 21:47 |
| KB1OHY | anyone in here know anything about lightning calendar? | 21:48 |
| asac | KB1OHY: only packaging wise ... and code wise, but not really feature wise | 21:49 |
| KB1OHY | mine updated from 0.8 to 0.9 and now it's completely unusable | 21:49 |
| asac | KB1OHY: thats not our package | 21:49 |
| asac | KB1OHY: go to irc.mozilla.org | 21:49 |
| asac | we only can support ubuntu packages | 21:50 |
| fta | hm, i should use 1.1.12+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.8.04.1, not 1.1.12+nobinonly-0ubuntu1.8.04.1 | 21:59 |
| fta | asac, ^^ ? | 22:04 |
| asac | fta: yes. hardy must be lower than intrepid. i assume intrepid gets ubuntu1 | 22:19 |
| fta | yep | 22:19 |
| jdstrand | fta: I think the changelog looks good, with a couple of questions: | 22:20 |
| fta | asac, pushed to my ppa, feel free to try the hardy one, once it's done | 22:20 |
| Volans | si | 22:20 |
| jdstrand | 1) you reference the CVEs in one part and USNs in another-- perhaps you could just reference USNs and not worry about the CVEs (unless there are CVEs not addressed in the USNs that are fixed/not fixed) | 22:21 |
| Volans | ops... wrong tab... sorry | 22:21 |
| jdstrand | 2) what does 'refresh diverged patch' mean in the context of hardy? | 22:21 |
| jdstrand | 3) the fontconfig patch is required to even build seamonkey on hardy correct? | 22:22 |
| fta | jdstrand, 1/ i got the CVE from mozilla, and the USNs are from my previous (1.1.11) security upload in intrepid. | 22:22 |
| jdstrand | 4) can you explain the gcc comments? did gcc used need to be changed to build in hardy? | 22:22 |
| fta | jdstrand, 2/ diverged compared to 1.1.9 in hardy | 22:22 |
| asac | jdstrand: diverged: the same patch didnt apply anymore | 22:23 |
| jdstrand | asac: oh- we carried patches for security fixes that have been applied upstream? | 22:23 |
| fta | jdstrand, 4/ we forced gcc 4.2 a long time ago, but in hardy, 4.2 is the default so we dropped it to prefer plain gcc | 22:24 |
| asac | jdstrand: sorry. i just explained diverged. dont know which patch this is about in particular | 22:24 |
| asac | fta: ^^ ? | 22:24 |
| fta | 3/ correct | 22:24 |
| jdstrand | I wasn't clear, as both of you answered a question I didn't mean to ask :) | 22:24 |
| jdstrand | fta: what changed in the security patch, and why? | 22:25 |
| fta | asac, debian/patches/80_security_build.patch | 22:25 |
| asac | fta: the GCC change is not necessary in hardy ... though shouldnt hurt | 22:25 |
| asac | fta: whats in that patch? | 22:25 |
| fta | jdstrand, just the context (we use a large one) | 22:25 |
| jdstrand | asac, fta: I highly prefer not to make the gcc change, as it does nothing and just introduces a chance for problems | 22:25 |
| asac | yeah. | 22:26 |
| jdstrand | we are *very* careful selective about -security updates | 22:26 |
| fta | jdstrand, the gcc change has been in the branch for a long while now | 22:26 |
| jdstrand | careful and selective... | 22:26 |
| asac | fta: the best way is just to start with the current hardy diff.gz on top of the orig | 22:26 |
| jdstrand | fta: I understand, but hardy is released | 22:26 |
| jdstrand | fta: if you want to get non-security fixes in, then it needs to go through SRU, and then -security can pull from -updates | 22:27 |
| fta | i can revert that, no problem | 22:27 |
| asac | fta: i fork the branches when the release is out and dont touch them except for updates | 22:27 |
| fta | asac, i have 2 branches | 22:27 |
| asac | fta: i think the .hardy branch is a backport branch and not a stable release update branch. | 22:27 |
| asac | fta: you could create a .8.04 for the stable release updates | 22:27 |
| asac | and .hardy for the backports | 22:27 |
| asac | fta: oh | 22:27 |
| asac | fta: so you already did that | 22:28 |
| fta | yes | 22:28 |
| jdstrand | fta: ok, so the entirety of the 80_security_build.patch | 22:28 |
| jdstrand | still is needed, but just needed to be reapplied to the new codebase | 22:28 |
| asac | fta: can you link that branch to the bug? | 22:28 |
| jdstrand | fta: is that accurate? | 22:28 |
| fta | asac, sure | 22:28 |
| asac | hmm only seamonkey-1.1.dev in ~mozillateam code | 22:29 |
| fta | jdstrand, it's an old security patch from debian/iceape | 22:29 |
| fta | asac, sure, as in i will | 22:29 |
| fta | i just have 2 hands | 22:29 |
| jdstrand | fta: I'm confused-- it's an old security update that fixes things not already in the new upstream version? | 22:30 |
| jdstrand | fta: perhaps it'll become apparent when I look at the debdiff | 22:30 |
| asac | jdstrand: is there nothing about it in changelog? | 22:31 |
| jdstrand | asac: the changelog says: | 22:31 |
| jdstrand | * Refresh diverged patch: | 22:31 |
| jdstrand | - update debian/patches/80_security_build.patch | 22:31 |
| jdstrand | that isn't chock-full of info ;) | 22:31 |
| asac | hmm | 22:31 |
| asac | let me look at the patch | 22:31 |
| asac | appears to be really old (from iceape/debian times) | 22:32 |
| asac | its introduction is not in changelog at least | 22:32 |
| fta | yes | 22:32 |
| fta | branch pushed | 22:32 |
| jdstrand | fta: lastly, I recommend rather than listing all those CVEs, that you just add usn-645-1 to your list of USNs | 22:32 |
| jdstrand | fta: to me, it's really an either/or thing | 22:33 |
| asac | jdstrand: yeah. thats a patch from debian | 22:33 |
| asac | jdstrand: its about linking the nss security libs shared instead of static | 22:33 |
| jdstrand | asac: ok, so it had to be massaged to apply/build | 22:34 |
| jdstrand | that's cool | 22:34 |
| asac | yeah | 22:34 |
| asac | jdstrand: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/%7Emozillateam/seamonkey/seamonkey-1.1.dev/annotate/154?file_id=svn-v2%3A1%40f4e3d8d1-d80b-0410-9133-bbc0d6b0e2e8-iceape%252ftags%252f1.0.6%252d1-debian%252fpatches%252f80_security_build.dpatch | 22:34 |
| asac | mozilla bug 302416 | 22:35 |
| ubottu | Mozilla bug 302416 in Build "NSS root cert module & fortezza should not be using NSPR static libraries" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=302416 | 22:35 |
| asac | fta: we can probably drop that patch in intrepid | 22:36 |
| asac | most likely its only for in-source nss/nspr | 22:36 |
| asac | but better keep it in the hardy update | 22:36 |
| fta | asac, well, i don't touch the branches for anything related to nspr&nss as long as your last soname changes are not either pushed or reverted. | 22:38 |
| asac | fta: yeah | 22:39 |
| asac | fta: anyway. the right procedure would have been just to bump changelog in .hardy branch and not merging (or only merging down essential issues) | 22:40 |
| asac | fta: nss i really have to decide soon | 22:41 |
| asac | fta: but in this case its ok. just backout the gcc changes and all should be fine ;) | 22:42 |
| fta | done | 22:42 |
| asac | jdstrand: is that kind of debdiff helpful? dont you need a new orig as well? | 22:44 |
| * asac just revealed his bad side of ignorance | 22:44 | |
| jdstrand | asac: I'd like the whole source package-- I can do the diffing in this case | 22:45 |
| jdstrand | asac: I can then upload when you guys ping me on testing | 22:46 |
| fta | the package is get-orig-source ready, it uses uscan from upstream and applies a nobin clean-up script, then repacks | 22:48 |
| fta | you can trust me and get the tarball from my ppa, or don't trust me and redo it yourself, i won't blame you | 22:49 |
| fta | (but it has to be same for hardy and intrepid) | 22:50 |
| asac | fta: upload the tarball to launchpad | 22:50 |
| fta | in the bug ? | 22:50 |
| asac | fta: yeah | 22:51 |
| fta | ok | 22:51 |
| asac | all pieces: orig. diff.gz + dsc | 22:51 |
| asac | fta: or if orig for intrepid is already in that should be good enough | 22:51 |
| asac | but then providing a link to the orig.tar.gz would be nice | 22:51 |
| asac | ppa link probably works as well. | 22:51 |
| fta | ppa expires after a while | 22:52 |
| asac | fta: does it do that still? | 22:56 |
| asac | thought we have endless dailies now ;) | 22:56 |
| fta | hm | 22:56 |
| asac | at lesat celso said to me that we can use it for dailies now | 22:56 |
| asac | not sure if he said that those expire after a year | 22:56 |
| fta | jdstrand, better ? http://paste.ubuntu.com/52609/ | 22:56 |
| asac | but you are right best is to put that in launchpad bug then i guess | 22:56 |
| asac | fta: there is one MFSA in the middle ;) | 22:57 |
| fta | nope | 22:57 |
| asac | is that because that doesnt have a CVE? | 22:57 |
| asac | - MFSA 2008-26: Buffer length checks in MIME processing | 22:57 |
| fta | yep | 22:57 |
| asac | fta: ok ... maybe use no-CVS (MFSA2008-25): .... | 22:57 |
| asac | just an idea | 22:57 |
| fta | http://www.mozilla.org/security/announce/2008/mfsa2008-26.html | 22:57 |
| fta | so it's a follow-up of CVE-2008-0304 | 22:58 |
| fta | - MFSA 2008-26 (follow-up of CVE-2008-0304): Buffer length checks in MIME processing | 22:59 |
| fta | that's an awful lot of security fixes | 22:59 |
| asac | jdstrand: how to document followups of CVEs that dont have a CVE on their own? | 23:01 |
| asac | just CVE-2008-0304(b) ? | 23:01 |
| jdstrand | fta: looks good to me (and yes, that *is* a lot of fixes) | 23:02 |
| asac | http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-629-1 has: | 23:03 |
| asac | "Mozilla developers audited the MIME handling code looking for similar vulnerabilities to the previously fixed CVE-2008-0304, and changed several function calls to use safer versions of string routines. " | 23:03 |
| asac | so probably fine to document i like that | 23:03 |
| asac | fta: is hardy built? | 23:03 |
| fta | asac, https://edge.launchpad.net/+builds | 23:03 |
| fta | just amd64 | 23:04 |
| fta | hop, i386 too | 23:04 |
| asac | ok i can pick amd64 | 23:04 |
| fta | but i reverted gcc since | 23:05 |
| asac | fta: in which ppa is it? fta? | 23:05 |
| fta | fta | 23:05 |
| fta | as 1.1.12+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.8.04.1~fta1 | 23:05 |
| asac | yeah. this reminds me that we need a security PPA soon ;) | 23:06 |
| asac | its hard to keep personal PPAs free from other depends | 23:07 |
| fta | i agree | 23:07 |
| asac | fta: is the nss in the the cluttered one? | 23:07 |
| fta | yes | 23:07 |
| asac | hehe | 23:08 |
| asac | ok | 23:08 |
| asac | fta: hmm cannot initialize security component | 23:09 |
| fta | ? | 23:09 |
| asac | fta: nss doesnt work :/ | 23:10 |
| asac | e.g. visiting launchpad | 23:10 |
| fta | no problem on intrepid | 23:10 |
| fta | i guess you just picked sm and not nss/nspr for my ppa, right? | 23:11 |
| fta | it's a mess | 23:11 |
| fta | ok, let me repush that to mt, is it nss/nspr free? | 23:12 |
| asac | fta: no ... new nss/nspr was forced in the upgrade (e.g. the proper lower bunds) | 23:12 |
| asac | fta: i will push to asac ... which i only use for security testing | 23:12 |
| fta | ok | 23:12 |
| asac | mozillateam might be cluttered too (we have to clean that up) | 23:12 |
| fta | wait, take the fta2 i just pushed, it's the final one | 23:12 |
| asac | fta: i used the latest branch | 23:13 |
| asac | 148 | 23:13 |
| asac | * Improve MFSA / CVE descriptions in changelog | 23:13 |
| asac | is that right? | 23:13 |
| fta | ok | 23:13 |
| asac | dum di dum (slow diff.gz) | 23:15 |
| fta | well, just dget and dput | 23:16 |
| fta | asac, plz decide quickly for nss, if you revert, i need to rebuild a lot of stuff now | 23:17 |
| asac | fta: yeah. would have been an option ;) | 23:18 |
| asac | fta: concerns me a bit that seamonkey had this issue now :/ | 23:18 |
| asac | it was a fresh respin on top | 23:18 |
| asac | (nss) | 23:19 |
| fta | strange that it's fine on intrepid | 23:19 |
| asac | indeed | 23:19 |
| asac | fta: oops nspr has a .a file ? | 23:23 |
| asac | -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 461752 Sep 25 19:18 /usr/lib/libnspr4.a | 23:23 |
| asac | -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 235920 Sep 25 19:18 /usr/lib/libnspr4.so | 23:23 |
| fta | -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 208848 2008-09-25 21:18 /usr/lib/libnspr4.so | 23:23 |
| fta | lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 2008-09-25 22:08 /usr/lib/libnspr4.so.0d -> libnspr4.so | 23:23 |
| fta | same on hardy: | 23:24 |
| fta | -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 202000 2008-09-25 21:18 /usr/lib/libnspr4.so | 23:24 |
| fta | lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 2008-09-29 11:46 /usr/lib/libnspr4.so.0d -> libnspr4.so | 23:24 |
| asac | (hardy1)asac@hector:~$ dpkg -S libnspr4.a | 23:24 |
| asac | libnspr4-dev: /usr/lib/libnspr4.a | 23:24 |
| fta | fta@cube:~ $ dpkg -S libnspr4.a | 23:24 |
| fta | dpkg: *libnspr4.a* not found. | 23:24 |
| asac | -dev package installed? | 23:24 |
| asac | upload finished :/ | 23:25 |
| fta | oh, right, in dev | 23:26 |
| fta | tarball in the bug too | 23:26 |
| asac | fta: | 23:26 |
| asac | for lib in ssl3 softokn3 smime3 nss3 nspr4 plc4 plds4; do \ | 23:26 |
| asac | dh_link -p$(DEB_MOZ_APPLICATION)-browser usr/lib/lib$$lib.so.0d /usr/lib/$(DEB_MOZ_APPLICATION)/lib$$lib.so ; \ | 23:26 |
| asac | done | 23:26 |
| asac | dont see why it would hurt, but probably would need to be updated after nss transition | 23:27 |
| fta | after, yes | 23:27 |
| fta | so please decide | 23:27 |
| asac | yeah. maybe that linking is the cause for the issues | 23:29 |
| asac | actually so.1d is wrong | 23:29 |
| asac | that means you need nss-0d installed ... which is outdated | 23:29 |
| asac | fta: yeah ... that was it ;) | 23:30 |
| asac | i had an old nss3-0d package installed | 23:30 |
| asac | so its a bug in seamonkey | 23:30 |
| fta | hm, ok. strange it didn't hurt before | 23:37 |
| fta | in fact no, the .0d was still there as a legacy links | 23:38 |
| fta | -s | 23:38 |
| fta | asac, why did you have that old nss3-0d? | 23:40 |
| fta | we have that 0d/1d since last december | 23:42 |
| asac | fta: because nss3-0d doesnt have any .so ... so it doesnt get a lower bound for shlibs | 23:42 |
| asac | fta: well ... i had an old one 3.12.0.3-0ubuntu0.8 | 23:42 |
| asac | and ~rc2 for the other libs | 23:42 |
| asac | the links didnt look that bad | 23:42 |
| asac | but there surealy was one missing or something | 23:42 |
| fta | so it's not a bug in sm/hardy. just a bad mix of nss on your side | 23:44 |
| asac | fta: its a bug: sm still shps links to 0d links | 23:47 |
| asac | that shouldnt be the case | 23:47 |
| asac | instead the .1d whould be used | 23:47 |
| asac | and then this bug wouldnt exist | 23:47 |
| asac | it was just revealed by a bad mix | 23:47 |
| fta | should i fix that in both branches ??? | 23:47 |
| asac | fta: i think in hardy its ok. in intrepid fixing makes sense. | 23:48 |
| asac | let me see if sm built in ppa | 23:49 |
| asac | still spinning | 23:49 |
| asac | at least its on CPU | 23:50 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!