| fta | well, looks fine to me | 00:01 |
|---|---|---|
| asac | fta: yeah. | 00:08 |
| * asac remove --purge libnspr4-0d from chroot | 00:09 | |
| fta | jdstrand, what else is needed in the bug? | 00:13 |
| jdstrand | fta: what's the bug number again? (backscroll has got me down...) | 00:14 |
| fta | bug 276437 | 00:14 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 276437 in seamonkey "security upgrade of seamonkey 1.1.12" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/276437 | 00:14 |
| jdstrand | looking... | 00:15 |
| asac | i guess the .diff.gz and .dsc | 00:15 |
| * asac off doing something else | 00:17 | |
| jdstrand | fta: yeah, I'll need the full source. the debdiff looks good (need to look at it more closely) | 00:18 |
| fta | jdstrand, full source is already there | 00:18 |
| jdstrand | fta: once I have the dsc and diff.gz, please just document in the bug your testing | 00:18 |
| jdstrand | fta: I'm sorry, I meant full source package | 00:19 |
| jdstrand | fta: once I have the complete source package, and the testing is documented, I'll upload | 00:21 |
| fta | jdstrand, hm, i've made the intrepid one complete (-sa), and the hardy one as -sd, so intrepid must be uploaded first | 00:22 |
| fta | unless you prefer the opposite | 00:22 |
| jdstrand | fta: well, I do for complicated reasons dealing with the security buildd... | 00:23 |
| jdstrand | fta: sorry about that | 00:23 |
| jdstrand | fta: currently, we have a different buildd for security | 00:23 |
| jdstrand | fta: and that buildd doesn't have intrepid yet, cause it's not released | 00:24 |
| fta | so, both could include the orig.tar.gz ? | 00:24 |
| jdstrand | fta: so I need to build hardy in the security buildd, push it to LP, then I should be able to build intrepid | 00:24 |
| asac | jdstrand: intrepid? | 00:24 |
| asac | why do you need to care for intrepid at all? | 00:24 |
| asac | ;) | 00:24 |
| jdstrand | asac: well, I don't, if you or someone else uploads it | 00:25 |
| fta | i thought i would push to intrepid myself | 00:25 |
| jdstrand | that's cool-- I'll need -sa for hardy though | 00:25 |
| asac | jdstrand: yeah. fta will upload that | 00:25 |
| asac | ppa publishing takes ages today :/ | 00:31 |
| fta | yep, often longer than the build | 00:31 |
| asac | in this case unfortunate ... everything is there except the binary-all packages :) | 00:32 |
| asac | which come from i386 | 00:32 |
| asac | and are not yet published | 00:32 |
| fta | take it from the lp +archive page | 00:32 |
| asac | fta: thats the problem ;) | 00:32 |
| asac | fta: as soon as the .deb is there it will be quite soon in the archive index | 00:32 |
| asac | but its not there yet :( | 00:32 |
| fta | oh, i thought librarian had it immediately | 00:33 |
| asac | i thought so too. most likely that has changed | 00:33 |
| asac | amd64 bits took 15 minutes to show up after build | 00:34 |
| asac | anyone interested in fixing ifupdown to honour a global nm setting that would make ifupdown stop from auto upping interfaces? | 00:35 |
| asac | i hate that source ;) | 00:35 |
| asac | its one file ... and its written in tex ;) | 00:35 |
| asac | last time i touched it i thought it was fun ... but now i think that one time is enough for a lifetime :/ | 00:36 |
| asac | http://people.ubuntu.com/~asac/ifupdown.nw ;) | 00:36 |
| fta | i should stop caring about that : http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/karma.png it's too volatile | 00:37 |
| asac | thats what i am saying ;) | 00:37 |
| asac | but still nice experiment to keep running ;) | 00:37 |
| asac | maybe also comparison of bug, bzr and whatever ;) | 00:38 |
| fta | i'd be curious to see yours | 00:38 |
| asac | i'd rather not ... when i do the whole night bug triaging and then see my karma not moving at all i would certainly get depressed :-P | 00:39 |
| fta | i am | 00:39 |
| asac | yeah. simple cure: dont look at it ;) | 00:40 |
| asac | fta: do you have the script? | 00:40 |
| asac | i can add that to my crontab ... or even you can run it on your own i guess :-D | 00:40 |
| asac | so ... anyone has a C snippet to parse keyfile formats? e.g. | 00:41 |
| asac | [group] | 00:41 |
| asac | key1=value | 00:41 |
| asac | key2=value2 | 00:41 |
| fta | and do what with it? | 00:42 |
| asac | fta: i need to add a code snippet to http://people.ubuntu.com/~asac/ifupdown.nw that parses /etc/NetworkManager/nm-system-settings.conf | 00:42 |
| asac | and stops auto upping interfaces when there is | 00:43 |
| asac | [ifupdown] | 00:43 |
| asac | managed=true | 00:43 |
| asac | ;) | 00:43 |
| pwnguin | asac: iniparser? | 00:43 |
| asac | pwnguin: yeah. but i guess i cannot use glib :) | 00:43 |
| pwnguin | ? | 00:44 |
| pwnguin | oh, gnome probably doesn't have such a thing in their libs | 00:44 |
| asac | pwnguin: libglib has | 00:44 |
| asac | pwnguin: but i cannot use it | 00:44 |
| pwnguin | http://ndevilla.free.fr/iniparser/ | 00:44 |
| asac | people would kill me to pull in libglib dependency on ifupdown | 00:44 |
| pwnguin | heh | 00:45 |
| fta | jdstrand, all the files are in the bug now | 00:45 |
| asac | pwnguin: is that packaged? | 00:45 |
| pwnguin | i think people would kill you for changing ifupdown file syntax just the same | 00:45 |
| asac | hehe yeah. thats not my plan - i hope | 00:45 |
| pwnguin | in gentoo | 00:46 |
| asac | quite a big thing for this tiny ifupdow tex thing | 00:47 |
| asac | pwnguin: unfortunate that the tarball doesnt have a license info | 00:48 |
| pwnguin | the bigger challenge is that it's probably not secure | 00:48 |
| pwnguin | asac: the website suggests MIT license | 00:49 |
| asac | pwnguin: yeah websites can tell a lot of things ;) | 00:49 |
| asac | tarballs too of course ;) | 00:49 |
| pwnguin | but the author seems to be alive at least | 00:50 |
| pwnguin | so you could mail him and ask for a better clarification | 00:50 |
| pwnguin | wait | 00:50 |
| pwnguin | what's LICENSE | 00:50 |
| asac | he? | 00:51 |
| pwnguin | in the tarball | 00:51 |
| asac | hehe | 00:51 |
| asac | my fault i guess | 00:51 |
| asac | i also found libini now ;) | 00:52 |
| asac | pwnguin: why isnt iniparser secure? | 00:53 |
| pwnguin | good question; i was thinking that sort of thing should be fuzzed | 00:53 |
| pwnguin | but i guess if it's a parser, those are normally built to reject invalid input | 00:53 |
| asac | pwnguin: no | 00:53 |
| asac | pwnguin: its only about a single key in one config file ;) | 00:54 |
| asac | pwnguin: yeah. and that file is only writable by root usually | 00:54 |
| fta | asac, only a few lines of C are needed for that | 00:55 |
| pwnguin | or perhaps a regex ;) | 00:56 |
| fta | in perl, it's piece of cake | 00:57 |
| pwnguin | in fact, i think ini is fairly regular; just sections and key pairs | 00:57 |
| asac | true. | 00:59 |
| asac | there are also comments though | 00:59 |
| pwnguin | touche | 00:59 |
| asac | not sure how the comment delimiter can be escaped | 00:59 |
| pwnguin | i dont think it can | 00:59 |
| asac | i think even if multiline values are possible, we probably dont need this for our use case | 01:00 |
| pwnguin | new line usually terminates comments | 01:00 |
| fta | asac, could I push sm to intrepid, or should i wait for someone to confirm the bug ? (motu-something?) | 01:00 |
| asac | pwnguin: no .. i mean if you want a value with a ; in it ;) | 01:00 |
| asac | e.g. | 01:00 |
| asac | value=my;thing | 01:00 |
| asac | fta: i doubt that anyone will complain ;) ... but you never know :-P | 01:01 |
| pwnguin | well, you've got the source code to a couple implementations ;) | 01:01 |
| asac | pwnguin: yeah | 01:01 |
| asac | I'll take the MIT one i think ;) | 01:02 |
| asac | at least its pure C | 01:02 |
| fta | asac, so? | 01:02 |
| asac | fta: upload :) | 01:04 |
| asac | fta: it will be stuck in upload queue until beta is released (or in case a release manager clears the queue) | 01:05 |
| asac | but thats ok | 01:05 |
| asac | in case RMs dont have time it will automatically go in after beta | 01:05 |
| fta | ok | 01:06 |
| asac | you can probably also kindly ask RMs after 24 hours or so | 01:06 |
| fta | Bug 246820 | 01:29 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 246820 in prism "Google Gears does not install on Prism" [Unknown,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/246820 | 01:29 |
| fta | [ubuntu/intrepid] seamonkey 1.1.12+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 (Waiting for approval) | 01:31 |
| fta2 | http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18102344/buildlog_ubuntu-intrepid-hppa.seamonkey_1.1.12%2Bnobinonly-0ubuntu1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz | 10:57 |
| asac | fta2: only hppa? | 11:17 |
| asac | thats fine then | 11:17 |
| asac | most likely imagemagick didnt built or is outdated | 11:17 |
| asac | you could retry in 24 hours (e.g. use launchpad "retry" button) | 11:17 |
| Kamping_Kaiser | hi all | 11:34 |
| asac | hi Kamping_Kaiser | 11:34 |
| Kamping_Kaiser | asac, evening | 11:35 |
| armin76 | asac: thats okay? die :P | 11:56 |
| asac | why do you have that much sympathy for hppa? | 12:03 |
| Kamping_Kaiser | hppa? isnt that just an alpha wannabe? | 12:06 |
| armin76 | i have sympathy for all arches :P | 12:06 |
| fta2 | asac, yep, only hppa | 12:28 |
| fta2 | asac, how come ff/tb are not listed in the CVE pages on lp ? | 12:29 |
| fta2 | asac, eg: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/cve/2008-4060 | 12:29 |
| fta2 | asac, you said you fixed ff3.0 yesterday, is it in yet? | 12:35 |
| fta2 | doesn't seems to be | 12:35 |
| fta2 | -s | 12:36 |
| asac | fta2: huh? | 12:53 |
| asac | fta2: firefox and thunderbird usually dominate the USN page ;) | 12:53 |
| asac | fta2: http://www.ubuntu.com/usn | 12:53 |
| fta2 | maybe but lp tracks CVEs and ff/tb are not listed, that's too bad | 12:54 |
| asac | fta2: not sure if the security team uses that feature seriously | 12:54 |
| asac | jdstrand: ^^ ? | 12:54 |
| fta2 | Bug 154749 | 12:58 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 154749 in seamonkey "seamonkey installer bin will not oper in ubuntu desktop ver 7.10" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/154749 | 12:58 |
| fta2 | doesn't seem to be the ubuntu package | 13:01 |
| fta2 | asac, where is your fix from yesterday? the ff-3.0 missing symlink | 13:11 |
| asac | fta2: isnt that in .head? | 13:12 |
| asac | *sigh* | 13:13 |
| asac | will do that after lunch | 13:13 |
| asac | fta2: feel free to fix it | 13:13 |
| asac | if you cant wait ;) | 13:13 |
| asac | or wait a sec ;) | 13:14 |
| fta2 | i wanted to do it yesterday, you said in #u-desktop that you already did it | 13:14 |
| asac | i know what i said | 13:15 |
| asac | its on my laptop ;) ... which is in my bag | 13:15 |
| fta2 | should i wait? or what? | 13:20 |
| asac | fta2: no ... go ahead ... its such a minimal change that i dont feel any loss :) | 13:21 |
| fta2 | did you do something smart for the 3.1 merge? | 13:26 |
| fta2 | or just a symlink | 13:26 |
| asac | fta2: 3.1 merge? | 13:29 |
| asac | fta2: we have the _VER variable. i used that | 13:29 |
| asac | i think i added | 13:30 |
| fta2 | nm, i'll manage | 13:31 |
| asac | k | 13:32 |
| asac | fta2: can you fix that in .head pleaes? | 13:32 |
| fta2 | sure | 13:33 |
| asac | 3.0.head i mean | 13:33 |
| asac | in theory there should be no difference in the code | 13:33 |
| asac | we have the _META ifdef for that | 13:33 |
| gnomefreak | wasnt 3.0.3 released a while ago? i just got email about release email date was 9/26/08 i thought we had it a while before than | 13:39 |
| asac | gnomefreak: we released a bit early yeah. | 13:43 |
| asac | (wasnt that a great idea ;)) | 13:43 |
| gnomefreak | i liked it ;) | 13:43 |
| jdstrand | fta, asac: the CVE database in LP leaves a lot to be desired-- it is in no way surprising that ff and tb aren't listed | 13:44 |
| jdstrand | basically, LP imports the CVEs | 13:44 |
| jdstrand | then you either have to file a bug, then 'Link to CVE' in the bug | 13:44 |
| jdstrand | if a comment has CVE-XXXX-YYYY in it, then LP will do the 'Link to CVE' step for you | 13:45 |
| jdstrand | (regardless of if you want it to or not) | 13:45 |
| asac | jdstrand: ok ... so a CVE: XXXX-xxx changelog parsing feature is missing ;) | 13:46 |
| fta2 | no, it worked for sm | 13:46 |
| jdstrand | asac: I think it'll see it when things are Fix Released and posted in the bug | 13:46 |
| jdstrand | (cause it shows up as a comment) | 13:47 |
| asac | james_w: do we have hardy backport packages for current bzr and bzr-builddeb? | 13:47 |
| fta2 | just plain CVE-XXXX-YYYY, not CVE-XXXX-YYYY..ZZZZ | 13:47 |
| jdstrand | fta: correct | 13:47 |
| james_w | asac: no, not yet | 13:47 |
| asac | james_w: my auto builder doesnt like the --result-dir option hardy chroot :( | 13:47 |
| james_w | asac: I'll bump it up my todo list | 13:48 |
| jdstrand | really, the usefulness of the CVE functionality is that *if* a CVE happens to be linked to the bug, you can click and get to the CVE description | 13:48 |
| jdstrand | we don't try to keep it in sync cause the API just isn't there yet. we use our own ubuntu-cve-tracker | 13:49 |
| asac | thanks for clarifying | 13:49 |
| jdstrand | np | 13:49 |
| asac | james_w: latest builddeb wont work with hardy bzr? | 13:49 |
| asac | james_w: or could i just checkout builddeb in .bazaar/plugins or something? | 13:50 |
| james_w | asac: what's the error? | 13:50 |
| james_w | or is it the depends? | 13:50 |
| asac | james_w: i havent tried ... i only saw that --result-dir isnt known | 13:50 |
| asac | in default hardy | 13:50 |
| james_w | that's nothing to do with the bzr version, the name of the option just changed | 13:51 |
| james_w | at your request I believe | 13:51 |
| james_w | --result will work in both | 13:51 |
| fta2 | --result doesn't work for me, i want the results in build-area as before, not above, but i get raise Error, "`%s` and `%s` are the same file" % (src, dst) | 13:54 |
| === thunderstruck is now known as gnomefreak | ||
| asac | james_w: result works? | 14:08 |
| asac | hmm | 14:08 |
| james_w | fta2: please upgrade to 2.0.1 | 14:08 |
| asac | ok giving that a spin | 14:09 |
| asac | lets see ;) | 14:09 |
| gnomefreak | 2.0.1 is in intrepid unless he missed updates he should be running it | 14:10 |
| fta2 | i'm using 2.0.1 | 14:14 |
| james_w | fta: file a bug with the backtrace then please | 14:16 |
| james_w | if there isn't a backtrace then add -Derror to the command line and run it again | 14:16 |
| asac | fta2: we also need a versioned simlink from _NAME_OTHER | 14:28 |
| asac | fta2: abrowser-3.0 wont work now i think | 14:28 |
| fta2 | james_w, that's what i get: http://paste.ubuntu.com/52846/ | 14:29 |
| fta2 | asac, i wanted to ask you if i can move all the abrowser stuff to the abrowser branding deb | 14:30 |
| asac | fta2: i think the links are fine in the -common package (which currently i firefox-3.0) | 14:31 |
| asac | fta2: in that way things that use the abrowser commands will still work with firefox and vv. | 14:31 |
| fta2 | well, in /usr/bin, i don't like to add stuff that are not needed, like /usr/bin/abrowser* for people using plain ff3 | 14:32 |
| asac | fta2: its a matter of compatibility. those scripts dont hurt | 14:33 |
| asac | fta2: same argument would be true for abrowser. whipping firefox links everywhere but abrowser links not will make "abrowser" more a second class citizen then it already is | 14:34 |
| asac | fta2: imo we should review how the branding split is packaged for jaunty | 14:38 |
| fta2 | it's now clean for the desktop file, and for icons. i just don't like all those links in usr/bin and usr/lib | 14:41 |
| fta2 | i don't expect that many users to switch to abrowser anyway, so 2nd class citizen is more than probable. | 14:42 |
| asac | fta2: well. its a political thing | 14:42 |
| asac | both need to be similar and all those links dont really hurt | 14:42 |
| asac | they only serve for compatibility | 14:42 |
| asac | users will only see the .desktop files | 14:42 |
| fta2 | http://paste.ubuntu.com/52853/ | 14:47 |
| fta2 | no idea how representative it is | 14:48 |
| asac | fta2: its not ... ffox is installed by default ;) | 14:49 |
| thunderstruck | 2nd class my ass i use it and like it ;) | 14:49 |
| asac | but as i said. its not a matter of popularity. | 14:49 |
| asac | the bidirectional links need to be in the -common package | 14:50 |
| thunderstruck | asac: and you are right abrowser-3.0 doesnt work | 14:50 |
| === thunderstruck is now known as gnomefreak | ||
| fta2 | we have 125 times more people using the ff branding just in intrepid | 14:51 |
| gnomefreak | ?? | 14:52 |
| asac | that doesnt change the fact that both packages should be 100% equivalent | 14:52 |
| asac | thats only achieved if abrowser links exist everywhere | 14:52 |
| * gnomefreak has no way of finding that percentage out | 14:52 | |
| gnomefreak | awesome-browser?? | 14:53 |
| gnomefreak | is that abrowser? | 14:53 |
| fta2 | 6941 firefox-3.0-branding 4263 1255 0 3006 2 (Unknown) | 14:53 |
| fta2 | 33650 abrowser-3.0-branding 34 9 0 25 0 (Unknown) | 14:53 |
| fta2 | 4263/34 | 14:53 |
| fta2 | ~125 | 14:53 |
| gnomefreak | where did you find that? | 14:53 |
| fta2 | popcon | 14:53 |
| gnomefreak | oh | 14:54 |
| asac | ok ... lunch and then coding NM | 14:54 |
| gnomefreak | fta2: abrowser still gives you firefox-3.0 | 14:54 |
| fta2 | 26018 firefox-3.1-branding 118 36 0 82 0 (Unknown) | 14:54 |
| fta2 | 44115 abrowser-3.1-branding 7 1 0 6 0 (Unknown) | 14:54 |
| fta2 | 22665 firefox-3.1 197 32 45 120 0 (Unknown) | 14:54 |
| gnomefreak | asac: care to tell the people on bug 87101 to back off. we fix it one way it pisses others off, cant win them all | 15:10 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 87101 in thunderbird "when opening an attachment, it should be written to tmp as a read-only file" [Wishlist,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/87101 | 15:10 |
| thunderstruck | this is starting to piss me off | 15:17 |
| === thunderstruck is now known as gnomefreak | ||
| james_w | fta2: thanks, should be fixed in the next upload | 15:17 |
| gnomefreak | !info libflashsupport intrepid | 15:29 |
| ubottu | libflashsupport (source: libflashsupport): Support library for sound output of Flash 9+ with PulseAudio. In component universe, is extra. Version 1.9-0ubuntu2 (intrepid), package size 8 kB, installed size 64 kB | 15:29 |
| gnomefreak | asac: do you plan pon removing libflashsupport from archives anymore? | 15:29 |
| gnomefreak | s/pon/on | 15:31 |
| asac | gnomefreak: i am waiting for feedback from ltsp on whether they still need that | 15:33 |
| gnomefreak | k | 15:34 |
| gnomefreak | people are making frigging wiki pages on how to fix the issue and i have strong feeling we are gonna get comments that that isnt the fix (because people dont know any better | 15:34 |
| gnomefreak | )* | 15:35 |
| gnomefreak | asac: i told guy on bug 255297 i would ping you | 15:38 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 255297 in xulrunner-1.9 "please include debian patch to enable old certificates UI" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/255297 | 15:38 |
| gnomefreak | !info flashplugin-nonfree hardy-backports | 15:41 |
| ubottu | flashplugin-nonfree (source: flashplugin-nonfree): Adobe Flash Player plugin installer. In component multiverse, is optional. Version 10.0.1.218+10.0.0.525ubuntu1~hardy1+really9.0.124.0ubuntu2 (hardy-backports), package size 18 kB, installed size 164 kB (Only available for i386 amd64 lpia) | 15:41 |
| asac | gnomefreak: when? | 15:41 |
| asac | gnomefreak: i mean i am always in chpe's epiphany channel ;) | 15:42 |
| asac | he could easily ping me there :) | 15:42 |
| gnomefreak | i dont really know him but i said it on bug. my mail might have not gotten there yet | 15:42 |
| asac | ah ok | 15:43 |
| thunderstruck | asac: did you get my last post about tbird notification? | 15:55 |
| asac | huh? | 15:56 |
| asac | i dont think so | 15:56 |
| asac | at least not here | 15:56 |
| thunders1ruck | fuck this | 16:01 |
| thunders1ruck | asac: in case you missed it | 16:02 |
| thunders1ruck | .:10:50:35:. < gnomefreak > do we have notification for tbird restart after update? if not we should really think about this | 16:02 |
| asac | thunders1ruck: yeah we dont have it yet | 16:04 |
| thunders1ruck | k | 16:05 |
| asac | but makes sense i agree | 16:05 |
| === thunders1ruck is now known as gnomefreak | ||
| thunderstruck | asac: do we have master bug on the the exec: 118: /usr/lib/firefox-3.0.3/..... people are trying it with all different browser links. like sendible-browser | 16:26 |
| thunderstruck | x-www-browser gets a different error | 16:27 |
| asac | thunderstruck: thanks | 16:38 |
| asac | thunderstruck: we should make a bug out of that | 16:38 |
| thunderstruck | i opened the one i filed and marked all as dup and explained in bug what links fail | 16:42 |
| thunderstruck | asac: bug 273907 | 16:42 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 273907 in firefox-3.0 "abrowser does not start: :$pkglibdir/abrowser link missing" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/273907 | 16:42 |
| thunderstruck | updated description | 16:43 |
| === thunderstruck is now known as gnomefreak | ||
| gnomefreak | ok i really have to work on connection now. its getting old fast | 16:44 |
| === asac_ is now known as asac | ||
| asac | jcastro: did you reping blizzard? | 17:05 |
| jcastro | asac: not yet, I will do so today | 17:06 |
| jcastro | sorry I've been running around like a chicken with my head cut off. | 17:06 |
| asac | jcastro: too points. ask him if he thinks that anyone would come. most likely those will come during UDS and not fosscamp (as its business day for them), right? | 17:08 |
| asac | jcastro: i am trying to sort out if i need to be at fosscamp :) | 17:08 |
| [reed] | asac: get mconnor to come? :) | 17:11 |
| asac | [reed]: i asked him and he said he planned to be in MV around that time and would then consider to come | 17:19 |
| [reed] | cool | 17:20 |
| bfiller | asac: where can I find a version of firefox-3.0 with debug symbols? | 18:02 |
| asac | bfiller: you can find debug symbols | 18:03 |
| asac | bfiller: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs#Crashes | 18:03 |
| asac | adapt apt lines for intrepid accordingly | 18:03 |
| bfiller | asac: thanks | 18:03 |
| asac | bfiller: if you need a real debug build you need to build on your own | 18:05 |
| asac | (e.g. with debug output and without optimization) | 18:05 |
| asac | so now i became a ~ubuntu-mir team member :/ | 18:12 |
| asac | james_w: http://paste.ubuntu.com/52925/ | 18:56 |
| asac | james_w: thats the error i referred to the other day | 18:56 |
| asac | building -sa complains about binary changes missing sometimes | 18:57 |
| fta | asac, i tried to make head or tail from the gnash package, it's really awful | 20:27 |
| fta | asac, http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=935231 | 20:52 |
| asac | fta: he? | 21:12 |
| asac | i updated gnash.ubuntu.head today | 21:12 |
| asac | should work | 21:12 |
| fta | nm, it was a few days ago, i gave up and updated nf-flash instead :( | 21:13 |
| fta | mozilla bug Bug 368428 | 21:58 |
| ubottu | Error: Launchpad bug 368428 could not be found | 21:58 |
| fta | mozilla bug 368428 | 21:58 |
| ubottu | Mozilla bug 368428 in Networking: JAR "XUL FastLoad cache corruption when application running while upgrading" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368428 | 21:58 |
| === `6og is now known as Kamping_Kaiser | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!
