[01:22] <chx> thanks mwhudson for unbreaking the drupal bzr mirror. much appreciated quick work.
[01:29] <mwhudson> chx: np
[01:29] <mwhudson> chx: it actually affected all mirrors, that kind of made it a priority :)
[01:29] <chx> oh :)
[01:29] <chx> i thought it's just us, as the git mirror is also broken
[03:15] <winferno> Hi, does anyone have time to help me with getting my source package on to my PPA? I'm a new to launchpad.
[03:16] <winferno> First off, my PPA URL, as listed on my launchpad page is http://ppa.launchpad.net/winferno/ubuntu
[03:17] <winferno> I get a 404 when I go there, which is a little disconcerting. I don't know if that's normal in my situation.
[03:20] <winferno> Next, I have built a source package per the Ubuntu package tutorial (the source builds fine on my box), and uploaded it using dput. I got a message about an unknown distroseries in an automated e-mail shortly after, but after modifying my changelog reflect the 'intrepid' distro (I'm using the Intrepid beta) I didn't receive the same automated mail.
[03:23] <winferno> Finally, I added the two lines for my /etc/apt/sources.list as shows on my launchpad page to my system. I'm under the impression that at this point I should be able to do a 'sudo apt-get install packagename' and the package will be installed. Is this true? Do I have to wait for launchpad to build my packages? Is there a way to get confirmation that I did my part ok? dput didn't give me much indication and I don't see anyt
[03:41] <ajmitch> winferno: http://launchpad.net/~winferno/+archive doesn't appear to show any uploaded source packages, at least
[03:52] <winferno> ajmitch: Where did you get that URL from?
[03:53] <ajmitch> by clicking on the 'personal package archive' link on your LP page
[03:54] <winferno> Ok, I see there: http://ppa.launchpad.net/winferno/ubuntu
[03:54] <winferno> ajmitch: Oh right, I see it's the URL of the page when you click 'personal package archive', sorry.
[03:55] <winferno> Does this page become populated the moment you use dput successfully, or only after launchpad builds the source package in to binary packages?
[03:55] <Hobbsee> the latter
[03:57] <winferno> Is there any indication of success in the dput stage? And how long will the build take for a 'hello world' test?
[04:01] <arjenAU> anyone.... what's the usual process/timeline for getting a mailing list on a team approved? (I do realise it's still wkend in many places, so no worries really)
[04:01] <winferno> Ok, I've received an automated message saying section 'unknown' isn't valid. Should I change my package's debian/control file to say something besides 'unknown'? 'optional' maybe?
[04:06] <Hobbsee> winferno: yes
[04:07] <Hobbsee> there are a list of valid sections
[04:08] <winferno> I changed it to 'main' =/
[04:08] <Hobbsee> winferno: http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-subsections
[04:08] <Hobbsee> main probably won't work
[04:09] <winferno> I see.. I'll try graphics (appropriate sounding for what I'm working on).
[04:11] <winferno> Does 'login = anonymous' sound right in my ~/.dput.cf file? That's from the launchpad site, I'd just expect it to me my launchpad username.
[04:11] <rockstar> winferno, that's correct.
[04:12] <Hobbsee> yes
[04:13] <Hobbsee> the dput instructions, at least from intrepid onwards, should be more than clear
[04:15] <winferno> dput doesn't seem to be complaining, I think it's that I'm new to Ubuntu packaging (and Debian packaging), and so those details are what I'm struggling with.
[04:16] <Hobbsee> winferno: dput has no idea if it was accepted by the server or not
[04:16] <Hobbsee> winferno: it just knows if it's sent the files somewhere.
[04:16] <Hobbsee> (dput also isn't a package checker - it's only an uploader)
[04:17] <winferno> Understood, so in troubleshooting something that's new to me, I was trying to get all the feedback possible (I don't mean IRC). All I had to work with were the automated messages in e-mail.
[04:17] <Hobbsee> :)
[04:18] <Hobbsee> yeah - it's not overly clear
[04:18] <winferno> Say that again. =) Okay, got it! changing section to 'graphics' fixed the problem.
[04:19] <Hobbsee> woot!
[04:19] <Hobbsee> you'll often find that packaging guide (or the ubuntu one) to be useful
[04:19] <winferno> Thanks Hobbsee, I think I can classify that as a 'I didn't know enough about Ubuntu packaging' problem.
[04:19] <winferno> Word.
[04:19] <Hobbsee> winferno: yeah, i think so :)  You're welcome
[04:24] <winferno> Hmm, my package failed to build the amd64 target with an error about configure: error: cannot find install-sh or install.sh in "." "./.." "./../.."
[04:24] <winferno> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18477041/buildlog_ubuntu-intrepid-amd64.motzy_1.0-1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
[12:35] <Hobbsee> so, how do i search a whole lot of bzr branches, belonging to a specific team?
[12:35] <Hobbsee> there seems to be no search
[12:36] <wgrant> Hobbsee: You click next lots of times, then file a bug.
[12:36] <Hobbsee> wgrant: ah
[15:21] <mrevell> New episode of the Launchpad podcast: http://news.launchpad.net/podcast/launchpod-episode-11-launchpad-teams-and-openid-future-of-lp-ui-and-community-help
[15:56] <_Andrew> Hi
[15:57] <_Andrew> I'm getting an error in windows when using bazaar to create a branch from lp:hardwar... ERROR: Unable to ask for a password without real terminal
[15:58] <al-maisan_> _Andrew: hello there.
[15:59] <al-maisan_> do you use a CMD prompt to issue the bzr commands?
[15:59] <_Andrew> ah, I was using tortoise..
[15:59] <_Andrew> I can use cmd
[15:59] <al-maisan_> _Andrew: what bzr version do you use?
[16:00] <_Andrew> oh nm I see the problemnow
[16:00] <_Andrew> It's asking for my ssh password.. thanks
[16:00] <al-maisan_> no problem
[16:07] <_Andrew> oh, another question about bzr
[16:08] <al-maisan_> _Andrew: yes..?
[16:08] <_Andrew> It keeps nagging me to upgrade my bazaar with bzr upgrade, but when I do it and commit it still nags me to do it when I create another branch
[16:09] <al-maisan_> _Andrew:
[16:09] <al-maisan_> Purpose: Upgrade branch storage to current format.
[16:09] <al-maisan_> Usage:   bzr upgrade [URL]
[16:09] <_Andrew> oh I have to do it online? I didn't realise
[16:09] <al-maisan_> it nags you to upgrade the storage format for a branch
[16:09] <_Andrew> so.. bzr upgrade lp:hardwar?
[16:10] <al-maisan_> what bzr version are you running
[16:10] <al-maisan_> I suspect that it's not up to date ..
[16:10] <_Andrew> 1.3.1
[16:10] <al-maisan_> .. and that that's the root cause of this
[16:10] <al-maisan_> bzr is at 1.7 already
[16:11] <al-maisan_> 1.7.1
[16:11] <Odd_Bloke> (1.8rc1 was released last week)
[16:11] <_Andrew> I'm just using the one default in ubuntu
[16:11] <al-maisan_> _Andrew: you can keep up to date by adding the following line to your /etc/apt/sources.list
[16:12] <al-maisan_> deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/bzr/ubuntu hardy main
[16:13] <al-maisan_> that will point to the archive with the current bzr production releases
[16:16] <_Andrew> Is it backwards compatible?
[16:17] <al-maisan_> _Andrew: yes, please see also: https://launchpad.net/~bzr/+archive
[16:17] <_Andrew> ok thanks
[17:10] <_Andrew> another question.. I can't do bzr pull because it says I locked it 23 hours ago?
[17:12] <kiko> _Andrew, bzr break-lock
[17:14] <_Andrew> thanks
[17:26] <leonel_> hello ..  I'm backporting a package  but it needs  2 more packages  will there  be errors with my ppa  for those 2 packages missing ?  or  do I  upload those 2 packages to??
[17:26] <kiko> leonel_, are those packages in ubuntu itself?
[17:27] <leonel_> kiko:  yes in intrepid
[17:27] <kiko> leonel_, should work fine there -- it fetches dependencies from ubuntu by default.
[17:27] <leonel_> the 3 packages are  in intrepid and I'd like to backport them to  hardy
[17:28] <leonel_> thank you  kiko
[17:48] <leonel_> kiko:  the source package got published but theres no .deb package and theres a red mark on the package built seccion  means no deb ..
[17:49] <leonel_> kiko:  there's a status message :   Denendency wait ..
[17:49] <leonel_> ok i'll  wait :)
[17:52] <leonel_> or  that  dependency wait  means that is waiting for me to upload the 2 missing packages ??
[17:53] <rockstar> leonel_, you'll need to backport those other packages from intrepid to hardy.
[17:54] <leonel_> rockstar:   thanks ..
[17:55] <rockstar> leonel_, no problem.
[19:37] <leonel_> How can delete a package from my ppa   the help says about  a  Deletion Page ..
[19:37] <cprov> leonel_: there is a link in you PPA page.
[19:39] <cprov> leonel_: 'Delete packages' (upper-right corner of the package list).
[19:41] <leonel_> sorry !!!  I guess  I must be logged on  ...
[19:41]  * leonel_ slaps leonel_ ...
[19:41] <leonel_> sorry ..
[19:41] <leonel_> I was looking on other machine that I was not logged on  ..
[19:41] <cprov> leonel_: no worries, I should have mentioned that ;)
[21:02] <kfogel> kiko: ping
[21:54] <kiko_> kfogel, lines were temporarily busy ;)
[21:54] <kfogel> kiko: oh, my ping is from when we got cut off before, no worries
[21:55] <kiko> kfogel, I know, was joking
[21:56] <kfogel> ah :-)
[22:42] <mwhudson> mdke: can you mark https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad-bazaar/+question/44071 as solved, if indeed it is?
[23:11] <winferno> Hi, I have a (hopefully) easy question about the Launchpad interface. On my project page (https://launchpad.net/motzy) I'd like to know what I have to do to have the 'downloads' tab link to my PPA build of the project source. I can't seem to figure it out.
[23:15] <beuno> winferno, unfortunetly, that tab is only for uploaded files, not packages
[23:15] <winferno> beuno: Ok, thanks. I was getting frustrated!
[23:15] <beuno> it sure sounds like something we'd want to fix, so feel free to file a bug on Launchpad for it
[23:16] <winferno> Ok, I think I'll wait for now, I'm still learning launchpad so I feel swamped at the moment.
[23:17] <beuno> fair enough  :)
[23:18] <winferno> I have another question. I'd like to release 'dev' builds in to my PPA. I tried to use dput to upload a package with the same version and got a 'rejected' message saying 'you cannot upload the same version within the same distribution'. Is there a way I can keep updating a 'dev' package?
[23:19] <cprov> winferno: by using a new source name, 'foo' & 'foo-dev'
[23:20] <winferno> cprov: can you be more specific about 'source name'?