| [reed] | pwnguin: beta 1 comes out Tuesday | 00:08 |
|---|---|---|
| [reed] | I think ETA on final is late Q1 | 00:08 |
| asac | fta: whats the problem with that branding? | 00:40 |
| asac | fta: what does the midbrowser thing do? | 00:41 |
| asac | fta: just wonder, because its as of now a native package | 00:41 |
| fta | asac, bug 210314 | 00:44 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 210314 in mozilla-devscripts "please add midbrowser and xulmidbrowser targets" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/210314 | 00:44 |
| fta | asac, bug 279083 | 00:45 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 279083 in firefox-3.0 "firefox 3.0.3 on intrepid reports 3.0.1 as user agent on amd64" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/279083 | 00:45 |
| asac | fta: did i add that useragent thing there? | 01:12 |
| asac | oh right | 01:12 |
| asac | fta: what about the other diffs? | 01:13 |
| asac | are the new urls bogus? | 01:13 |
| asac | or does that just happen to be in that pasted diff? | 01:13 |
| === mconnor_ is now known as mconnor | ||
| fta | asac, the pasted diff shows that /usr/lib/firefox-3.0.3/defaults/preferences/firefox-branding.js is not the same file on i386 and amd64. The 1st one is right, the 2nd one seems to be the abrowser one | 08:39 |
| asac | fta: but its both from the firefox package? (e.g. the 2nd isnt the firefox one?) | 08:51 |
| fta | asac, both are from firefox-3.0 | 08:54 |
| asac | hmm | 08:54 |
| didrocks | hi everyone :) | 09:02 |
| didrocks | I am updating swfdec to 0.8 (to make swfdec-gnome build). What about swfdec-mozilla? Do you want me to update it to make it build with swfdec0.8 (it is an independant package) | 09:04 |
| XioNoX | Hi ! | 09:21 |
| asac | hi | 09:42 |
| asac | didrocks: yes | 09:42 |
| asac | didrocks: do you have upload rights? | 09:43 |
| asac | didrocks: you you please do the following: | 09:43 |
| asac | 1. swfdec-mozilla should suggest ubufox | 09:43 |
| asac | 2. swfdec-mozilla should link its plugin .so also in /usr/share/ubufox/plugins/ | 09:43 |
| asac | 3. in postinst, you should for i in `ls /usr/lib/firefox-3*/.autoreg`; do touch $i; done | 09:44 |
| asac | 3. in postinst, you should for i in `ls /usr/lib/firefox-3*/.autoreg || true`; do touch $i; done | 09:45 |
| asac | didrocks: ^^ | 09:45 |
| asac | thanks | 09:45 |
| didrocks | asac: no, I haven't, but I can prepare a debdiff for this evening :) | 09:45 |
| didrocks | and do also what you say in the same time :) | 09:45 |
| asac | didrocks: there are a few more | 09:45 |
| asac | wait a second | 09:45 |
| didrocks | (ok, I open my tomboy :D) | 09:46 |
| asac | 4. Xb-Npp-Name: Swfdec player for Adobe/Macromedia Flash | 09:46 |
| asac | -> Xb-Npp-Name: Swfdec SWF player | 09:46 |
| asac | 5. add Xb-Npp-Description: gnome SWF player (http://swfdec.freedesktop.org/) | 09:47 |
| didrocks | (ok, I see that this is for the "search for plugin" function) | 09:48 |
| asac | (6 is coming ... wait asec) | 09:48 |
| didrocks | (no pb :)) | 09:49 |
| asac | 6. add Xb-Npp-File: libswfdecmozilla.so | 09:49 |
| asac | didrocks: actually 5. should be: | 09:49 |
| asac | 5. add Xb-Npp-Description: Gnome SWF player (http://swfdec.freedesktop.org/) | 09:49 |
| asac | didrocks: thats it from what i can tell ;) | 09:50 |
| didrocks | ok, corrected (Gnome and not GNOME) :) | 09:50 |
| asac | didrocks: yeah | 09:50 |
| asac | not sure | 09:50 |
| asac | if official is GNOME then use that | 09:50 |
| asac | maybe GNOME Swf Player (http://swfdec.freedesktop.org/) | 09:50 |
| didrocks | I think this is GNOME... | 09:50 |
| asac | or GNOME SWF Player ... | 09:50 |
| asac | but thats to much capitalized | 09:51 |
| asac | but its your choice | 09:51 |
| didrocks | ok, will see what is the best :) | 09:51 |
| didrocks | just a question: | 09:51 |
| asac | important thing is that -Name and Description dont name "Flash, Macromedia nor Adobe" | 09:51 |
| didrocks | why touching .autoreg files? | 09:51 |
| asac | didrocks: otherwise the ubufox hook ont work | 09:51 |
| asac | at least thats what my tests showed | 09:51 |
| asac | so better safe | 09:51 |
| didrocks | ok, it makes a stat or some stuff like that to see if there is new updates... | 09:52 |
| asac | didrocks: if possible please test that postinst doesnt fail if there isnt any firefox-3.0 installed | 09:52 |
| asac | didrocks: yes. firefox will reregister chrome and reintrospect system extensions when .autoreg was touched | 09:52 |
| didrocks | asac: ok, I will remove my FF from my VM for that | 09:52 |
| asac | didrocks: good | 09:52 |
| didrocks | ok, noted :) will keep you in touch | 09:53 |
| asac | didrocks: its important to do the for loop. as some users might have left over files or something or even multiple firefox version installed | 09:53 |
| asac | didrocks: actually we also would need to change the flash installer in a similar way | 09:53 |
| didrocks | yes, that was what i reckoned :) | 09:53 |
| asac | but thats a bit trickier. | 09:53 |
| asac | if you wantt o work on that too let me know | 09:53 |
| asac | i will take over gnash for sure | 09:53 |
| didrocks | hum ? can I give an hand on that ? | 09:53 |
| didrocks | ok, so, later :) | 09:54 |
| didrocks | (first, I finish that and then, see if I can be helpful) | 09:54 |
| asac | didrocks: sure. i gnash is pretty much prepared. i just have to do the upload i think | 09:54 |
| asac | didrocks: but you can test the package if you want | 09:55 |
| asac | didrocks: e.g. from bzr | 09:55 |
| asac | didrocks: but please do the other things first ;) | 09:55 |
| didrocks | ok, you use bzr from gnash, and for swfdec? | 09:55 |
| asac | didrocks: nothing for swfdec yet | 09:56 |
| asac | didrocks: gnash upstream uses bzr, so maintaining the package is a joy :) | 09:57 |
| didrocks | asac: yes, for sure :) | 09:57 |
| didrocks | so, I will keep you in touch when the debdiff will be ready (this evening, hopefully) | 09:58 |
| asac | didrocks: yeah. please do | 09:58 |
| * asac hopes for jazzva returning soon | 10:21 | |
| fta2 | [reed], isn't mozilla bug 456578 the same as mine ? | 10:49 |
| ubottu | Mozilla bug 456578 in GFX: Thebes "Font rendering regression (hinting)" [Normal,Unconfirmed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=456578 | 10:49 |
| fta2 | [reed], mine is mozilla bug 458612 | 10:50 |
| ubottu | Mozilla bug 458612 in GFX: Thebes "Font regression using system cairo" [Normal,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458612 | 10:50 |
| [reed] | fta2: that's what I think | 10:53 |
| [reed] | that's why I cc'd you | 10:53 |
| [reed] | :) | 10:53 |
| fta2 | so mine is a dupe ? gasp | 10:54 |
| fta2 | mine seems to have more info in it | 10:54 |
| fta2 | armin76, http://justimho.blogspot.com/2008/10/re-gentoo-destroying-earth.html | 10:55 |
| [reed] | ask in the other bug about duping it... forward duping is uncommon, but it is done | 10:55 |
| === asac_ is now known as asac | ||
| armin76 | fta2: bumb | 11:11 |
| asac | armin76: thanks. finally you dont ask me to bumb ;) | 11:22 |
| armin76 | lol | 11:22 |
| asac | armin76: fta2 is MOTU now ;) ... so at least half of the bumbs justifiable should go to him :) | 11:22 |
| armin76 | asac: bumb! | 11:23 |
| asac | no | 11:23 |
| * asac *kicks* armin76 | 11:23 | |
| asac | :) | 11:23 |
| armin76 | asac: triple bumb! | 11:23 |
| asac | damn gnomefreak isnt here ... i dont know how i can become OP :( | 11:23 |
| asac | :-P | 11:24 |
| armin76 | msg chanserv #ubuntu-mozillateam op | 11:24 |
| asac | and deop? | 11:24 |
| Nafallo | /deop asac | 11:24 |
| asac | ;) | 11:24 |
| armin76 | or /kick asac | 11:24 |
| asac | fta2: can we please in future just keep +buildX in upstream versions? | 15:09 |
| asac | and use the latest tag | 15:09 |
| asac | fta2: point is that we prepare the stable updates with latest tag and then dont reupload if thats the final release | 15:10 |
| asac | and having development release doing it different would cause confusion | 15:10 |
| fta2 | for which? ff3 ? i bumped only 3.0.3+build to 3.0.3 as it's released | 15:10 |
| asac | fta2: yes. lets please not do that | 15:11 |
| asac | (in future) | 15:11 |
| asac | i upload the latest head now | 15:11 |
| asac | just saw that we have a nochange upload now in xulrunner | 15:11 |
| fta2 | why ? those build tags are not the latest, release tags are | 15:11 |
| asac | which reminded me that we should sync that procedure | 15:11 |
| asac | fta2: latest build tag is latest | 15:11 |
| fta2 | it's ugly | 15:12 |
| asac | fta2: if not, something is wrong | 15:12 |
| fta2 | our versions are already ugly enough | 15:12 |
| asac | fta2: its a functional mean. version doesnt need to be beautiful and we need those for the security updates. | 15:12 |
| asac | as i said. its more ugly/confusing if we have different versions in development release vs stable/security | 15:12 |
| asac | ok uploading stuff and then forking the stable branches | 15:14 |
| asac | .head/.dev is then targetting .jaunty | 15:15 |
| asac | unless you say there is anything else we should fix on .head first | 15:15 |
| asac | fta2: ^^ | 15:15 |
| asac | fta2: is the branding issue just a ffox 3.1 one (e.g. the paste you showed?) | 15:16 |
| fta2 | i'm fine with xul, afair | 15:17 |
| asac | debian bug 499946 | 15:22 |
| ubottu | Debian bug 499946 in iceowl-extension "iceowl-extension: Please package 0.9" [Wishlist,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/499946 | 15:22 |
| asac | too bad that someone NMUed icedove ;) | 15:23 |
| asac | now i have to fish the changes and replay them in bzr | 15:23 |
| asac | fta2: so are we using embedded tarball for everything now? | 15:31 |
| asac | given that mozilla-central is a mess :) | 15:32 |
| asac | comm-central+... | 15:32 |
| asac | fta2: http://paste.ubuntu.com/57031/ | 15:36 |
| asac | is comm-central forked off from mozilla-central? | 15:36 |
| asac | oh sorry | 15:36 |
| asac | my fault :) | 15:36 |
| fta2 | asac, no | 15:36 |
| asac | opf course i cloned moz-central in it | 15:36 |
| asac | :) | 15:36 |
| * asac desparately waits for the xulrunner diff.gz to finish :( | 15:37 | |
| fta2 | comm-central is just tb3/sm3/lightning/.. but it needs a full mozilla-central | 15:37 |
| * asac whines about his slow hard drivers | 15:37 | |
| asac | but in fact only diff.gz is that slow. takes about the same time to diff than to build :) | 15:38 |
| * fta2 nods. xul 1.9 is clearly slow | 15:38 | |
| asac | so embedded everywhere right? | 15:38 |
| asac | with dquilt being a source-recommends ;) | 15:38 |
| asac | err mozilla-devtools | 15:38 |
| asac | actually. if we call it dquilt we should try to get it in devtools | 15:39 |
| asac | otherwise use mquilt or mozquilt i guess | 15:39 |
| asac | mtquilt ;) | 15:39 |
| fta2 | for embedded yes, unless you think it's a problem | 15:39 |
| asac | fta2: no i would want it, but people complained to me that its "hard to understand" | 15:39 |
| asac | thats why i am after getting better tool support | 15:39 |
| asac | like the dquilt now | 15:39 |
| asac | fta2: we could also investigate in using lzma/7z for in-source-tarball | 15:40 |
| asac | if support is missing in cdbs we should add that i guess | 15:40 |
| fta2 | the mozilla-devtools branch is not meant to be a package. it's just a script repository. | 15:40 |
| asac | fta2: yeah. then lets see if we can make something "general" useful of dquilt and get it in the great devtools package | 15:41 |
| fta2 | i remember a discussion on debian-devel a while ago about 7z | 15:41 |
| asac | or ubuntu-devscripts | 15:41 |
| asac | not sure whats better here | 15:41 |
| asac | for cdbs? | 15:41 |
| asac | or archive? | 15:41 |
| asac | our archive supports it afaict | 15:41 |
| asac | for .debs | 15:41 |
| asac | but we cannot use it for sources i think and we also cannot use it for anything that goes on cd | 15:41 |
| asac | wait | 15:42 |
| fta2 | i could move it to m-d for now and once it's mature enough, move it someplace else | 15:42 |
| asac | not "cannot use", but "doesnt help" :)( | 15:42 |
| fta2 | eh? | 15:42 |
| asac | fta2: we have to decide whether mozilla-devscripts is a package for general tools that can also be useful to the developer | 15:42 |
| asac | (instead of what is needed to fulfil things that are hooked into the package build scripts) | 15:43 |
| asac | fta2: well. we can make lzma packages in soyuz | 15:43 |
| asac | that works well with dpkg | 15:43 |
| asac | but on CD there are no packages, but unpacked stuff | 15:43 |
| asac | so lzma wouldnt help us to get more on the CD | 15:43 |
| asac | (we constantly have a hard time to not oversize) | 15:43 |
| asac | we would need lzma kernal support | 15:43 |
| asac | but thats not flying upstream according to kernel team | 15:44 |
| asac | i we dont want to put such a patch in our kernel without upstream having it | 15:44 |
| fta2 | i don't understand. i was talking about embedded 7z, recognized by cdbs, not about compressing the cd | 15:45 |
| asac | oh ok | 15:46 |
| asac | yeah that was my initial question ;) | 15:46 |
| asac | 16:41 < asac> for cdbs? | 15:46 |
| asac | 16:41 < asac> or archive? | 15:46 |
| asac | 16:41 < asac> our archive supports it afaict | 15:46 |
| asac | ... and then i forked off in that thread ;) | 15:46 |
| fta2 | asac, http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18500998/buildlog_ubuntu-intrepid-hppa.xulrunner-1.9_1.9.0.3%2Bnobinonly-0ubuntu1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz | 16:35 |
| asac | yeah hppa is broken | 16:39 |
| fta2 | talking with seb on -desktop | 16:40 |
| asac | fta2: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/xulrunner/xulrunner-1.9.intrepid | 16:41 |
| asac | fta2: ok i will keep the firefox-3.0.dev for another day or two | 17:00 |
| asac | to see if we get any regressions or last minute issues to fix | 17:00 |
| fta2 | i pushed ff3 to my ppa yesterday | 17:02 |
| asac | hmm finally bluekuja@ubuntu.com bounces | 17:07 |
| fta2 | he's gone ? | 17:10 |
| asac | fta2: yeah | 17:21 |
| asac | fta2: or his mail is broken | 17:21 |
| asac | mozillateam mailinglist mail bounces | 17:21 |
| asac | hmm ... most ubuntu mailing list mail went into spam folder for a while | 17:30 |
| asac | hmm | 17:30 |
| asac | blacklisted somewhere | 17:30 |
| bdmurray | asac: fwiw I have metrics for routes now with 20081008t224042-0ubuntu2 | 19:20 |
| asac | bdmurray: good ;) | 20:10 |
| asac | better late than never ;) | 20:10 |
| bdmurray | I guess that's true. | 20:12 |
| fta | asac, what do you mean ? <= <asac> fta2: could you also talk to vlad about performance with xul + cairo 1.8.0? | 21:40 |
| fta | 1.8.0 is very close to 1.7.6, which is in trunk | 21:40 |
| asac | fta: nevermind | 21:59 |
| fta | ? | 21:59 |
| asac | lets hope this NM ppa build now succeeds ;) | 21:59 |
| * sebner asks himself if mighty asac has a timemachine or no RL (like me ^^) | 22:00 | |
| asac | timemachine :) | 22:00 |
| sebner | asac: did I ever ask you what job do you have? | 22:01 |
| fta | asac, seen Bug 274187 ? | 22:06 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 274187 in ubuntu "FFe - firefox 3.1 and xulrunner 1.9.1 for intrepid/universe" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/274187 | 22:06 |
| asac | fta: what should we do? | 22:14 |
| asac | sebner: my job is to be 24/7 on IRC :) | 22:14 |
| fta | asac, i'm asking you | 22:15 |
| sebner | asac: and working on nm stuff? ^^ | 22:16 |
| asac | sebner: mozilla + nm ... yes. | 22:16 |
| sebner | asac: but afaik are you not a canoncial employee right= | 22:17 |
| asac | not right ;) | 22:17 |
| sebner | asac: but where is the canoncial mail adress :P :P :P | 22:18 |
| asac | sebner: he? | 22:18 |
| asac | sebner: all my last patchmails were with that address | 22:18 |
| sebner | asac: O_o | 22:18 |
| sebner | asac: but not mentioned on LP | 22:18 |
| asac | sebner: it is | 22:19 |
| asac | or not? | 22:19 |
| fta | lol | 22:19 |
| sebner | Email: asac@jwsdot.com | 22:19 |
| sebner | asac@debian.org | 22:19 |
| sebner | asac@ubuntu.com | 22:19 |
| asac | https://edge.launchpad.net/~asac/+participation | 22:19 |
| asac | yeah | 22:20 |
| asac | but you are right | 22:20 |
| sebner | asac: in what case? ^^ | 22:20 |
| asac | that i should add that address | 22:20 |
| sebner | +1 | 22:20 |
| sebner | asac: omg. Now that I know that you are a canoncial guy I'll disturb you more less. :D | 22:21 |
| asac | sebner: done | 22:21 |
| asac | sebner: huh? thought you would more feel like: now i can bug him more ;) | 22:22 |
| asac | relief... NM in hardy ppa builds again | 22:22 |
| sebner | asac: no, it is a difference if I annoy a contributor or a employee ;) | 22:22 |
| asac | had to switch to automake 1.10 | 22:22 |
| asac | sebner: yeah. but i employees in some way get paid to be annoyed :) | 22:23 |
| fta | sebner, why would you annoy contributors more than employees ? i would do the opposite | 22:24 |
| sebner | asac: well but not like me. I don't help you with my annoyments ^^ | 22:24 |
| asac | hehe | 22:24 |
| sebner | fta: dunno, I have more respect with *official* Canoncial guys | 22:24 |
| sebner | nearly the same as I would annoy mark | 22:24 |
| fta | i respect contributors, they give their time to the project for free | 22:25 |
| asac | fta++ | 22:25 |
| asac | though i spend most of my sparetime here too ;) | 22:25 |
| * fta hugs asac | 22:26 | |
| sebner | asac: that's also something I wanted to say. you are like horseman dholbach ^^ | 22:26 |
| * sebner hugs asac too | 22:26 | |
| asac | welcome ;) | 22:26 |
| sebner | asac: don't get burned out! ;) | 22:27 |
| asac | there is nothing left to burn ;) | 22:27 |
| sebner | that's bad xD | 22:27 |
| asac | well. could be worse ;) | 22:28 |
| sebner | kk ^^ | 22:28 |
| * sebner also hugs fta for giving your time time to the project for free ;) | 22:30 | |
| asac | fta: i really have no clue what we should do for firefox 3.1. i knew that there would be discussion | 22:31 |
| asac | and scottk being an opponent was obvious as well | 22:31 |
| asac | but the points of gutsy 3.0 maintenance are valid and some appear not to buy the 6 month support offer | 22:32 |
| fta | but noone stepped up to help on backporting either | 22:32 |
| asac | yeah. true | 22:33 |
| asac | but as scottk says: he says that MOTU cannot maintain firefox ... which isnt really true | 22:34 |
| asac | in some way it is. but for backports that shouldnt matter much (at least thats my understanding) | 22:34 |
| asac | i think one way to take away that argument would be to not use the official branding | 22:35 |
| sebner | asac: I really was wondering because I thought he means you. ^^ | 22:35 |
| fta | asac, what would the upgrade in gutsy be ? 3.0b5 -> 3.0.3 ? or 3.0b5 + an almost impossible list of security patches to identify ? | 22:38 |
| asac | fta: no it would be a -backport | 22:39 |
| asac | fta: back then we got the clearence by the motu-release folks by the assumption that updates would go to backports | 22:39 |
| asac | that happened until hardy came out | 22:39 |
| asac | from there on nobody ever asked about that | 22:39 |
| asac | and similar nobody wanted to contribute to that anymore | 22:40 |
| asac | fta: with some luck the current package has enough control/rules wisdome that it just builds in gutsy | 22:40 |
| asac | (e.g. auto detection of nss/nspr/cairo and stuff) | 22:40 |
| asac | but given that the last build was b3 i have the feeling that it wont work nicely | 22:41 |
| asac | also we probably would need to upload a batch of respins for rdepends for htis upload (but not afterwards) | 22:41 |
| asac | hmm | 22:41 |
| asac | thats true, but the cout is zero :) | 22:42 |
| asac | hehe | 22:42 |
| asac | so well. yeah. just seeing if current package builds in gutsy would be good i guess | 22:42 |
| asac | also dropping official branding might help to not make the trademark things applicable for that build | 22:42 |
| asac | most likely we need mozilla-devscripts bump in -backports too then | 22:43 |
| asac | fta: if that works well we could also think about doing a proper SRU | 22:44 |
| asac | fta: most likely that would be the right thing to do | 22:44 |
| asac | iirc we had a gutsy branch | 22:45 |
| fta | was mozilla-devscripts already in gutsy? | 22:45 |
| fta | gutsy-backports 0.06~gutsy1 | 22:46 |
| fta | hardy has 0.07 | 22:46 |
| fta | intrepid 0.10 | 22:46 |
| asac | fta: not sure what we need ;) | 22:47 |
| asac | fta: most likely the one with the lp-xpi-export.mk | 22:47 |
| asac | guess that was in hardy earliest | 22:47 |
| asac | but maybe the backports thing is nough | 22:47 |
| asac | fta: i guess we need to drop the minimum versions from nspr/nss | 22:48 |
| asac | fta: but lets check if thats already done on a .gutsy branch or something | 22:48 |
| asac | fta: https://edge.launchpad.net/~asac/+participation | 22:48 |
| asac | oops | 22:48 |
| asac | https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/firefox/firefox-3.0.gutsy-backports | 22:48 |
| asac | fta: ^^ | 22:48 |
| asac | maybe just merging latest 3.0 on top of that flies ;) | 22:48 |
| asac | https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/xulrunner/xulrunner-1.9.gutsy-backports | 22:49 |
| fta | 0.06 is the oldest with the last lp-locale-export.mk | 22:49 |
| asac | hmm | 22:49 |
| asac | on the xulrunner branch there are commits up to 1.9.0.1+build1 | 22:49 |
| asac | did i do that while sleeping? | 22:50 |
| asac | uploaded is ~b4 | 22:50 |
| asac | even rc2 was backported | 22:50 |
| asac | and you did the rc1 backport ;) | 22:50 |
| asac | fta: what is going on? | 22:51 |
| asac | 124. By Fabien Tassin on 2008-05-26 | 22:51 |
| asac | * Merge RELEASE 1.9~rc1+nobinonly-0ubuntu2 to ubuntu/intrepid from | 22:51 |
| asac | xulrunner-1.9.head #269 | 22:51 |
| asac | we merged to that branch until 2 monthes ago= | 22:51 |
| asac | ? | 22:51 |
| asac | if that branch works well then there is a good chance that it may work ;) | 22:52 |
| fta | what branch is that? | 22:53 |
| asac | fta: 124. By Fabien Tassin on 2008-05-26 | 22:53 |
| asac | * Merge RELEASE 1.9~rc1+nobinonly-0ubuntu2 to ubuntu/intrepid from | 22:53 |
| asac | shit | 22:53 |
| asac | xulrunner-1.9.head #269 | 22:53 |
| asac | 23:48 < asac> https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/firefox/firefox-3.0.gutsy-backports | 22:53 |
| asac | 23:49 < asac> https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/xulrunner/xulrunner-1.9.gutsy-backports | 22:53 |
| asac | fta: ^^ | 22:53 |
| asac | maybe i tried to update 1.9.0.1 and then forgot about that? | 22:54 |
| asac | looks like | 22:54 |
| fta | i don't think i ever touched those gutsy-backports branches | 22:54 |
| asac | fta: yeah. the commit from you is from .head | 22:55 |
| asac | it was created after intrepid cycle started | 22:55 |
| asac | i have that branch here ;) | 22:56 |
| asac | lets see if i uploaded that to a ppa | 22:57 |
| asac | no | 22:57 |
| asac | ok let me try gutsy build | 22:58 |
| * asac installs mozilla-devscripts from -backports | 22:59 | |
| fta | xul should work, we still have mozilla-devscripts (>= 0.06~) now | 23:04 |
| asac | yeah cool | 23:05 |
| asac | trying that now | 23:05 |
| asac | lets see how unhappy gcc or something is ;) | 23:05 |
| asac | ok seems like its happily spinning ... for now :) | 23:09 |
| asac | fta: http://glandium.org/blog/?p=208 | 23:13 |
| asac | did he resurrect the bandaid or backported 3.1 way? whats your bet? | 23:14 |
| fta | do we still suffer from this ? | 23:22 |
| asac | fta: would need to test | 23:23 |
| asac | hopefully its fixed in x | 23:23 |
| asac | but i doubt it is | 23:23 |
| asac | xaa is just unmaintained and probably only gets worse | 23:23 |
| fta | does he speak Japanese too ? http://people.debian.org/~glandium/Vista.png | 23:24 |
| asac | yes | 23:24 |
| asac | fta: those branches are dump | 23:44 |
| asac | xulrunner is ok | 23:45 |
| asac | but ffox has too many issues imo | 23:45 |
| fta | ? | 23:45 |
| asac | also we shouldnt base gutsy on intrepid | 23:45 |
| asac | but on hardy | 23:45 |
| asac | if not a independent branch completely | 23:45 |
| asac | fta: well. the backport work like removing firefox meta package, removing conflict on firefox << 3 | 23:45 |
| asac | removing command | 23:45 |
| asac | ;) | 23:45 |
| asac | fixing .desktop accordingly | 23:45 |
| asac | jdong already did that from what i recall | 23:46 |
| asac | so maybe we should start with replaying those uploads on whatever version was initially released to gutsy :( | 23:46 |
| asac | but well | 23:46 |
| asac | most likely we should start from current yhardy or something | 23:46 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!
