/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2008/10/15/#launchpad-meeting.txt

=== Moot2 is now known as MootBot
=== allenap1 is now known as allenap
=== mrevell is now known as mrevell-lunch
=== mrevell-lunch is now known as mrevell
=== salgado-brb is now known as salgado
barry#startmeeting15:00
MootBotMeeting started at 09:00. The chair is barry.15:00
MootBotCommands Available: [TOPIC], [IDEA], [ACTION], [AGREED], [LINK], [VOTE]15:00
barryhi everybody and welcome to this week's reviewers meeting.  who's here today?15:00
intellectronicame15:00
bigjoolsme15:00
gmbme15:00
sinzuime15:01
allenapme15:01
bacme15:01
salgadome15:01
flacosteme15:01
cprovme15:01
EdwinGrubbsme15:02
barryBjornT_ danilos ping15:03
danilosme15:03
danilos(I have my reminder set for an hour earlier, and then always miss out the real beginning; with DST soon to be off, I should be a regular :))15:03
barrymars: rockstar ping15:04
BjornT_me15:04
barry[TOPIC] agenda15:05
MootBotNew Topic:  agenda15:05
barry * Roll call15:05
barry * If there's time, the old boring script15:05
barry   * Next meeting15:05
barry     * f2f at epic?15:05
barry   * Action items15:05
barry   * Queue status15:05
barry   * Mentoring update15:05
barry[TOPIC] next meeting15:05
MootBotNew Topic:  next meeting15:05
daniloscorner of Kings Cross and...15:05
barrysince we'll all be in london the next two weeks, i propose we suspend the irc meetings and try to find a time to meet f2f15:06
danilos+115:06
bigjoolsdanilos: are you planning on kerb crawling then? :)15:06
barrywe can talk about things to make the meetings better, improve pollination w/asiapac, ways to improve review process, etc15:06
abentleybarry: +115:06
gmb+115:07
intellectronica+115:07
sinzui+115:07
gmbbigjools: Either that or he'll be getting mugged, depending on whom he encounters first.15:07
bigjoolsgmb: the pimp or the ho15:07
barryouch15:07
barry:)15:07
danilosgmb: I am going for an attempted robbery, i.e. someone should try to rob me :)15:07
gmbbigjools: Mind you, danilos  is a big fella, he should be safe.15:07
gmbHah.15:07
gmbdanilos: My point exactly ;)15:08
barry[AGREED] suspend next two weeks irc in favor of f2f in london15:08
MootBotAGREED received:  suspend next two weeks irc in favor of f2f in london15:08
barry[TOPIC] action items15:08
MootBotNew Topic:  action items15:08
barry * flacoste and foundations to look into techniques for eliminating back-patching of schema types (avoiding circular imports)15:08
flacostecarry over15:08
barrydone15:09
barry * barry will move the preimp discussion to the ml15:09
barryi suck and propose we just any related issues over at epic15:09
barry * flacoste to take discussion of rest v. moin to ml15:10
barryflacoste: any word on gary's experiment?15:10
intellectronicawhen you push things to the epic, it's probably a good idea to try and actually schedule it. from what i saw there's a pretty dense plan15:10
flacostegary is progressing15:10
flacostehe should be finished today15:10
barryintellectronica: good oint15:10
flacosteand we will send an email to the list then15:10
barryflacoste: excellent, thanks15:10
barry[ACTION] barry will schedule reveiwers meeting at epic15:10
MootBotACTION received:  barry will schedule reveiwers meeting at epic15:10
barry * rockstar to take discussion of adding launchpadlib tests for exposed api to ml15:11
* barry pokes rockstar15:12
intellectronicafwiw i just got another bug in today which only happens with lplib and which tests like this would have caught ;)15:12
barryoh well, let's move on then ;)15:13
barry * abentley to investigate current code coverage tools for lp tests15:13
abentleyI looked at the existing stuff, and it seems like the opposite of what I want.15:13
abentleyI want to know if the tests run by a test command exercise all new code.15:14
abentleyThe existing work is about determining which tests exercise a given line of code.15:14
danilosabentley: at what granularity?15:14
danilosabentley: so, method or line of code for the opposite direction as well?15:15
abentleydanilos: Ideally, just yes/no granularity.  Either the changes are properly tested or they're not.15:15
abentleySo the obvious implementation is: run the tests with coverage calculation, determine which lines are new, make sure they're covered.15:17
barryabentley: tho iwbn to know which lines /aren't/ covered15:17
abentleybarry: Sure.15:18
barryabentley: any thoughts on putting something like this together?15:18
abentleybarry: You mean, am I willing to do it?15:19
barryabentley: jfdi, man!15:19
abentleybarry: I guess I could hack on it on review day.15:21
BjornT_abentley: in what way does --coverage do the opposite of you want? it seems to tell you which lines are tested, and which aren't. that should be the first step in what you want, isn't it?15:21
abentleyBjornT_: I'm not saying --coverage does.15:21
BjornT_abentley: oh. you said the existing tools did the opposite. i assumed you meant --coverage.15:22
abentleyBjornT_: I was talking about launchpad-specific work that someone did that I was pointed at last week.15:22
BjornT_ah, right15:23
barryabentley: well if you have time, i think it would be a useful tool15:23
barryanyway, that's all i have for today.  does anybody have topics not on the agenda?15:25
abentleyBjornT_: https://launchpad.canonical.com/TestsFromChanges15:25
barryokay then, thanks everyone and see you next time in london!15:27
barry#endmeeting15:27
MootBotMeeting finished at 09:27.15:27
bigjoolssee y'all in The Smoke15:28
=== salgado is now known as salgado-lunch
=== cprov is now known as cprov-lunch
=== salgado-lunch is now known as salgado
=== cprov-lunch is now known as cprov
=== salgado is now known as salgado-afk
jmlhi23:36
mwhudsonbarry isn't here :)23:36

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!