[09:17] <ubuntu-vn> i'm in Ubuntu VietNam
[09:17] <ubuntu-vn> how can i get a channel #ubuntu-vn?
[09:17] <ubuntu-vn> hi every body
[09:20] <ubuntu-vn> anyone is there
[09:28] <ubuntu-vn> hello
[09:29] <ubuntu-vn> anyone in here?
[09:39] <jussi01> !weekend | ubuntu-vn
[12:21] <BuiSyPhong> hi everybody
[12:22] <BuiSyPhong> hope you are well ;)
[12:22] <BuiSyPhong> Just to inform you guyz that #ubuntu-vn was succesfully created and configured
[12:22] <BuiSyPhong> it's chatroom for ubuntu vn at ubuntu-vn.com
[13:34] <sysdef> is it possible for an user called _sysdef (not me) to get a @ubuntu/member/sysdef cloak?
[13:36] <Rafik> sysdef, i think it's based on your launchpad id
[14:11] <PriceChild> sysdef: We won't be giving out identical cloaks for that reason.
[14:11] <PriceChild> Rafik: that would seem sensible, but atm it isn't.
[14:18] <sysdef> PriceChild: so it isn't possible that _lux will get @ubuntu/member/lux if he don't own the freenode account lux? usualy
[14:20] <PriceChild> Its possible if we are lax.
[14:21] <PriceChild> Perhaps we should change cloaks to launchpad ids, and make all newones launchpad ids. sysdef i assume you believe this situation is about to occur?
[14:22] <sysdef> i just wonder what will happens if the original user lux ask for an ubuntu member cloak then
[14:24] <Rafik> PriceChild, yes I think cloaks should use launchpad ids, just like @ubuntu.com email addresses
[14:24] <sysdef> in the case of lux i will not happen, because lux is just a bot account ;> i just saw a user with ubuntu/member/lux an thought wtf?
[14:25] <sysdef> and*, -?
[14:25] <PriceChild> ah yes I see.
[14:25] <PriceChild> sysdef: lux is a bot account?
[14:26] <sysdef> i run a bot under that account for years - assigned to my account
[14:26] <PriceChild> sysdef: please don't run bots identified to a nick with an ubuntu/member cloak
[14:27] <sysdef> err. i'm not _lux
[14:28] <sysdef> and i stopped to run a bot with my user rights because it's much too risky
[14:31] <PriceChild> elkbuntu: nalioth: LjL: What do you think about the dodgy way we name cloaks currently? Do you think we should be using launchpad account names?
[14:36] <sysdef> PriceChild: hmm, ... i created a launchpad account called 'christel'. can i get the cloak @ubuntu/member/christel now? .oO( i this a better idea? )
[14:39] <sysdef> just my $0.02 ... i know you will find a good way. have a nice sunday!
[14:52] <PriceChild> no he didn't..
[14:53]  * PriceChild goes off and registers sysdef___
[14:53] <PriceChild> I know what we should do.
[14:54] <PriceChild> Launchpad gives you a unique identifier for openids as usernames change, letsuse that :D
[14:54]  * PriceChild changes his cloak to freenode/staff/ubuntu/me
[14:54] <PriceChild> mber.k3tnrHG
[15:00] <Rafik> PriceChild, it's much more expressive when you use the LP id. This way we can easily find the LP page (for more infos, email address, etc..). A copy/paste of id from @ubuntu/member/id to http://launchpad.net/~id will do it. Plus, the LP id is also used for the @ubuntu.com address :)
[15:02] <PriceChild> Rafik: I was joking about using the unique identifier.
[15:02] <Rafik> PriceChild, ^.^
[15:02] <PriceChild> Just pointing out that launchpad urls can be changed like launchpad account names.
[15:03] <PriceChild> although I don't believe launchpad names can have non-dns characters which makes it easier to make cloaks
[15:04] <Rafik> True. also i don't think ubuntu members will change their id because of the email address
[15:06] <Rafik> (I changed my id before applying for ubuntu membership :-) )
[16:21] <nalioth> PriceChild: i think our naming scheme is just fine.  project GCs can request _any_ cloak content for their users ( look at any drupal user for an example )
[20:57] <ahmed_> !list