[00:34] <LjL> PriceChild: idled where?
[00:34] <PriceChild> LjL: #archlinux-offtopic
[00:34] <LjL> and they have to do with us...?
[00:35] <LjL> we aren't having an interchannel fight are we?
[00:35] <PriceChild> Nope, all ended now.
[00:35] <LjL> ok, just checking
[00:36] <PriceChild> nothing too bad
[00:42] <nalioth> i still have no freaking idea
[00:43] <nalioth> there's a few old bans here, do we still need all of them?
[02:56] <bruenig> hmmm
[02:56] <jrib> bruenig: no
[02:56] <bruenig> -b please
[02:58] <bruenig> come on now
[02:59] <bruenig> !hi
[02:59] <bruenig> !bot
[03:00] <bruenig> !info coreutils
[03:00] <bruenig> !nvidia
[03:00] <bruenig> !flash
[03:00] <bruenig> !easyubuntu
[03:00] <jrib> bruenig: stop
[03:00] <bruenig> !automatix
[03:00] <bruenig> hmmm
[03:01] <jrib> bruenig: do you have any other concerns?
[03:01] <bruenig> -b plox
[03:01] <Hobbsee> !msgthebot
[03:01] <jrib> bruenig: no.  not today.  Try again in 24 hours
[03:01] <bruenig> come on Hobbsee, help a brother out
[03:01] <Hobbsee> @btlogin
[03:01] <Cheiron> Unknown command, try @list
[03:01] <jrib> ...
[03:01] <Hobbsee> what on *earth* is that doing in here?
[03:02] <Pici> O.o
[03:02] <bruenig> come on fellows, nowhere in the rules does it say not to ctcp
[03:02] <bruenig> how can I know
[03:02] <nalioth> is there something we can help you guys with?
[03:02] <jrib> bruenig: I told you you would be banned.  You decided to ignore that
[03:02] <bruenig> where?
[03:03] <Hobbsee> bruenig: does #ubuntu *look* like a "lets play with bots" channel to you?
[03:03] <jrib> bruenig: in #archlinux, where you first proposed to ctcp #ubuntu
[03:03] <bruenig> I didn't play with bots, I ctcped to see what popular irc clients were
[03:03] <bruenig> in #archlinux? what
[03:04] <nalioth> bruenig: Cheiron: is there something concrete we can help you with?
[03:04] <bruenig> Cheiron: looks like a bot, not sure what you are going to get out of it
[03:04] <bruenig> I am looking for some -b help
[03:04] <nalioth> this is not a support channel
[03:05] <bruenig> you guys handle -b
[03:05] <bruenig> no?
[03:05] <Pici> -b
[03:05] <Pici> ?
[03:05] <bruenig> I got +b from some Floodbot
[03:05] <bruenig> -b, unban that is
[03:06] <nalioth> i've contacted the bots owner
[03:06] <bruenig> what in the world, I have only come to request being unbanned
[03:06] <nalioth> bruenig: it's not going to happen for a while.  have a nice weekend.
[03:06] <bruenig> I did not know /ctcp was disallowed
[03:07] <Pici> jrib said he warned you about it.
[03:07] <Pici> Kris_: Can we help you?
[03:07] <bruenig> jrib told me to try it in #archlinux, after I did it in there
[03:08] <nalioth> the #archlinux channel has been producing "time wasting" trolling into #ubuntu-space for some hours now
[03:08] <Pici> I see.
[03:08] <nalioth> this is just the latest
[03:08] <Hobbsee> you would have thought they'd have better things to do..
[03:08] <nalioth> it's saturday
[03:10] <Pici> !idle | Kris_ 
[03:10] <nalioth> drog: is there anything further we can help you with?
[03:12] <drog> oh, sorry, didn't know idling wasnt allowed
[05:59] <elkbuntu> hint: if you cant read the topic, then you fail op school.
[07:40] <Hobbsee> FYI, emma's been banforwarded until she fixes her connection
[07:40] <jussi01> by me also
[07:40] <Hobbsee> (as i'm sure she'll come in here to complain about it as soon as she looks at irc)
[07:42]  * Flannel was just about to
[07:42] <Flannel> Hobbsee: wait, she has been?  She just joined
[07:42] <Hobbsee> wish she wouldn't join so many channels, on such a bad connection.
[07:42] <Flannel> Ah
[07:42] <Hobbsee> Flannel: i said that when i started.  i haven't finished :P
[07:43] <Flannel> Sounds good.
[07:45] <Hobbsee> pity.  my hypothesis would be that limcore would be the next person to get a -devel-wide channel ban.
[07:45] <Hobbsee> that just got thwarted :-\
[07:46] <wgrant> LimCore does like going OT...
[07:47] <elkbuntu> wgrant, no. he likes starting OT
[07:47] <wgrant> elkbuntu: True, true.
[07:47] <Hobbsee> elkbuntu: no, he likes starting with something to the effect of "ubuntu sucks"
[07:47] <Hobbsee> then quickly goes OT :P
[07:48] <wgrant> Why are you guys so negative?
[07:48] <elkbuntu> wgrant, it's called 'experience'.
[07:48] <Hobbsee> hah
[07:48] <wgrant> elkbuntu: No, no, that's one of the starting lines he's used a couple of times.
[07:50] <elkbuntu> ah
[07:51] <elkbuntu> the answer is the same :Þ
[07:51] <wgrant> Heh.
[07:51] <Hobbsee> i thought the comment about the developers inhibiting development yesterday, by refusing to tone down ubuntu to levels he'd like yesterday was pretty good too.
[07:52] <Hobbsee> and, like, not putting in invasive patches so close to release, and such
[07:52] <elkbuntu> heh
[07:53] <wgrant> At some point you do just have to trust us.
[07:54] <elkbuntu> wgrant, you're expecting sane behaviour from the insane.
[07:54] <wgrant> elkbuntu: Perhaps. But I tend to think any member of ~ubuntu-dev is insane.
[07:55] <elkbuntu> wgrant, there is that...
[08:11] <ikonia> looks like a fun evening
[08:11] <ikonia> the archlinux boys continued to troll. a bot in -ops, limcore kicking off
[08:11] <ikonia> delightful
[08:13] <Hobbsee> ikonia: prepare yourself...
[08:13] <Hobbsee> ikonia: we'll get more mayhem closer to release.
[08:13] <elkbuntu> yeah, we've entered the pre-release fortnight
[08:13] <wgrant> Hmmm. We do have release rather soon, don't we.
[08:46] <ikonia> simple in #ubuntu looks like one of the trolls from arch linux based on a.) asking for linuxqq help b.) his ident
[08:48] <Flannel> What on earth is linuxqq?  linux for crybabies?
[08:50] <Flannel> Ah
[08:50] <ikonia> well, thats the question I was trying to get
[08:50] <ikonia> it could be the pre-packaged stuff that zorrolero was suggesting or the package build setup for arch
[08:51] <Mez> lots of bot abuse
[08:51] <ikonia> yes
[08:51] <ikonia> been a scrappy night 
[08:51] <ikonia> (our time)
[08:52] <Mez> my time too, but I has been at work..
[08:52] <wgrant> @lart Mez
[08:52] <wgrant> !somefactoid
[08:52] <wgrant> <insert bot abuse here>
[08:52] <ikonia> our = me and you -uk
[08:52] <Mez> !botabuse | wgrant
[08:52] <Mez> :P
[08:52] <wgrant> Damn. Caught.
[08:53] <Mez> ;)
[08:53] <Mez> damn... girl I'm really interested in posts to her facebook that she's fallen in love with someone... :'(
[08:54] <Mez> and I thought things were going well with her
[08:54] <Flannel> Mez: maybe it's you!
[08:55] <Mez> you know, I'd never thought that
[08:55] <Mez> though, she said to someone else that she "cant tell him" ... "its an awkward situation" - that soesnt sound like me
[08:56] <elkbuntu> this isnt really the place to discuss this stuff
[08:56]  * Flannel joins #ubuntu-ops-offtopic
[08:56] <Mez> huh?
[08:56] <Mez> oh.. foo...
[08:56] <Flannel> not really.
[08:56]  * Mez thought this was /win 3
[08:57] <Flannel> which one would that be?
[08:57] <Mez> (still getting used to irssi)
[08:58] <Mez> Flannel: a private channel... should have figured out was in the wrong place when your nick popped up
[08:58] <Flannel> Well, shucks.
[09:02] <Mez> ikonia: chill
[09:02] <jussi01> meh... irssi...
[09:03] <jussi01> :P
[09:03] <ikonia> nah, it's just waffling 
[09:03] <ikonia> "ubuntu needs to do this to keep up with windows"
[09:03] <ikonia> "ubuntu should up date it's package more"
[09:03] <ikonia> "ubuntu should put them in /opt"
[09:03] <ikonia> he doesn't even give a reason why he wants a newer version other than it's new
[09:03] <ikonia> it's not needed
[09:05] <wgrant> But OOo 3 is perfectly stable. Stupid devs.
[09:05] <ikonia> "if open office made ubuntu packages would ubuntu include it" ???
[09:17] <Mez> !intrepid
[09:17] <Mez> "Lots of breoken software" .... ???
[09:17] <Mez> not anymore
[09:17] <wgrant> Mez: You never know...
[09:17] <Mez> shouldnt be.
[09:17] <wgrant> Remember the libc6 bug last time? That was 3 weeks before release.
[09:19] <jussi01> and there still is lots of broken software, just not as badly broken as before :D
[10:07] <jussi01> Hello chalcedony, can we help you with something?
[10:34] <Hobbsee> is #ubuntu really quiet, or is it just me?
[10:34] <ikonia> nope, seems quiet
[10:35] <elkbuntu> the botstorm shut everyone up i suspect
[10:36] <wgrant> It's lulling us into a false sense of security before release.
[10:43] <elkbuntu> wgrant, if it were not for past experience, i'd call you a liar.
[10:44] <wgrant> I'm sure I am one.
[11:01] <Hobbsee> eagles, ban evasion due to more idiocy isn't cool.  Stop it.
[11:03] <Hobbsee> in fact, i doubt it is idiocy by now
[11:04] <Hobbsee> @btlogin
[11:08] <ikonia> is chalcedony eagles ?
[11:09] <wgrant> I don't think so...
[11:09] <Hobbsee> no idea, doubt it.
[11:09] <ikonia> where is eagles then ?
[11:09] <wgrant> -motu, as usual.
[11:09] <ikonia> oh
[11:09] <ikonia> how sad
[11:10] <wgrant> You should feel so left out.
[11:10] <ikonia> I'm quite happy being left out
[13:31] <Hobbsee> jussi01: can we grab ubottu in #ubuntu-release please?
[13:31] <jussi01> ubottu: join #ubuntu-release
[13:31] <elkbuntu> clearly, you are not.
[13:32] <Hobbsee> thanks
[13:38] <jussio1> :)
[13:39] <jussio1> damn train 3g connections..
[20:33]  * jrib is enjoying the entire output of a users dmesg in a query
[20:35] <LjL> jrib: hope you have audio notification of events on
[20:36] <nalioth> text to speech might be more fun
[20:38] <jrib> he finally figured out he should close his client
[23:02] <elky_work> HEH
[23:02] <elky_work> whoa, who turned the caps lock on
[23:03] <elky_work> stupid cleaners, i bet
[23:07] <LjL> yeah blame the cleaners
[23:09] <GasFurnace> yo why was i kicked from ubuntu
[23:09] <jussi01> whatever happened to blaming the cat?
[23:09] <LjL> you know why very well GasFurnace, now don't even think about wasting our time here.
[23:10] <GasFurnace> umm my lawnmower got the ubuntu virus
[23:10] <LjL> do you have anything meaningful to say?
[23:10] <GasFurnace> yes
[23:10] <GasFurnace> WHY DID MY LAWNMOWER GET THE UBUNTU VIRUS
[23:11] <LjL> check BT about him
[23:11] <GasFurnace> wo
[23:11] <GasFurnace> wow
[23:12] <GasFurnace> .........................
[23:12] <LjL> !idle
[23:12] <GasFurnace> !idle