[00:59] * PrivateVoid waves to everyone === BaD-CrC is now known as BaD-Laptop [07:58] Hello i want start testing packages can anyone give me start point ? === mdz_ is now known as mdz === asac_ is now known as asac [12:29] does anyone know how to connect to a kvm instance running on a remote machine with -vnc? [12:30] heno: you need to get the vnc port and then point your vnc client to the vm_host_ip:vnc_port [12:30] heno: the default port is 5900 [12:31] heno: I usually use: vinagre vm_host_ip:5900 [12:38] mathiaz: right, that was my guess too, but it doesn't work :( I can vnc into the desktop of the machine (isis:5900) itself from this box (hp) but not into the kvm session running on isis:5901. I can reach the kvm from isis itself though at localhost:5901 [12:38] heno: is the vnc client listening on all the ip or the just localhost? [12:39] heno: there may be a firewall in between also [12:39] heno: what I usually do is to do local port forwarding with an an ssh client [12:42] mathiaz: I don't know where it's listening, but the vnc session made by the normal vnc-server comes through just fine. The machines are both under my desk and there are no firewalls running on either AFAICT [12:43] I can try port forwarding [12:43] heno: kvm -vnc may only listen on localhost by default [12:46] heno: you may wanna try starting the kvm process with -vnc 0.0.0.0:5901 [12:47] mathiaz: actually '0.0.0.0' or the IP of he machine? (is it an IP mask?) [12:48] heno: the ip is the list of host that are allowed to connect to the vnc server [12:48] heno: 0.0.0.0 means - anyone can connect to the vnc server [12:52] mathiaz: no luck. with that it won't connect from the local machine either. Nor does -vnc actual-ip:5901 work [12:54] heno: hm - what does netstat on the vm host says when kvm is started? [12:55] heno: it seems that local port fowarding is the other option you have [12:58] netstat says it's listening to 5900 (regular vnc-server) but not 5901 (kvm) [12:58] mathiaz: is 'ssh -L 5902:proxy:5902 henrik@isis-ip the command I should use? [12:59] where isis is the machine kvm is running [13:00] heno: vncviewer -via henrik@isis-ip localhost::5902 [13:00] heno: hm - the problem is that 5901 isn't opened [13:00] heno: so it seems that kvm isn't running a vnc server at all [13:01] heno: are you using kvm directly or libvirt to manage your vm guests? [13:05] mathiaz: I'm running it directly. I think it's running a server because it works fine on the local machine. Port forwarding worked btw, thanks! === davmor2 is now known as davmor2_lunch [13:08] now I just need to get it working in vinagre [13:23] morning all :-) [13:47] morning ara! [13:47] morning heno :-) === davmor2_lunch is now known as davmor2 [14:22] testing on hardware of bug 246269 would be appreciated [14:23] boot with the option vga=792 set in grub [14:33] stgraber, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/Cases updated. Is that what you wanted, or are you looking for something different? [14:34] * persia fixes a copy & paste error [14:36] persia: well, that's only one testcase but I guess in your case it covers everything (you don't have different ways of installing, do you ?) so that should be good [14:37] stgraber, That's really all we wanted. The main goal is to make sure that some humans have actually looked at the images and that we can select a known-good-image for beta, RC, etc. [14:38] Things working would be neat, but the basic image and install tests most of the essential bits. [14:38] And no, there's no alternate CD. [14:48] stgraber, Also, how would it impact you to remove the "Mobile Testing" section from w.u.c/Testing/Cases ? As I understand it, those are out of date and not maintained. [14:49] The pages themselves are probably interesting to be resurrected at some point : they just aren't a current set of tests. [15:06] * heno is away for a bit [15:13] anyone having any success with getting intrepid's flash to work with ustream.tv or 12seconds.tv? [15:14] I got discon after asking... so here goes the questions again... sorry for the duplicate [15:14] anyone having any success with getting intrepid's flash to work with ustream.tv or 12seconds.tv? [15:15] PrivateVoid, Which flash do you have installed? [15:15] the one from the repos -- I believe it is version 10 [15:16] Well, I suspect you have flashplugin-nonfree. Some people find adobe-flashplugin works differently. I don't use either, so I'm just guessing. [15:32] is ISO testing going on? or not yet? [15:33] not yet [15:33] ook, then I'll return later [15:33] Doesn't that usually start after the tuesday builds (so ~ 3:00 UTC, or in ~ 12 hours) [15:34] persia: we were hoping to get in early so we could get better testing coverage under less pressure, but it was not to be :) [15:36] davmor2, Yeah : you would have had to prep the developers, as there were too many changes today. [15:37] persia: I think heno sent out a mail to those lines :) [15:37] Oh. I haven't seen it yet. I did see a lot of changes, so I suspect others haven't seen it either. [15:37] ce la vie anyway :) [15:38] changes to core things like the installer too :) [15:38] persia: I know that's why I'm waiting on the email to say I can start testing for real :) [15:39] oh and tested upgrade on my main machine too :) [15:40] yes... I have non-free persia... [15:40] there is an adobe-flashplugin in the repos for 64bit? [15:41] persia: I have adobe installed too [15:42] davmor2 - my issue with adobe is that streaming does not function when I try to broadcast on ustream.tv or 12seconds.tv [15:42] Pass [15:42] it works fine under 8.04 and flashplugin-nonfree [15:43] but with 8.10 and the Adobe 10 version of flashplugin-nonfree it does not... [15:43] but if there is a different option as persia said then I will try that when I get hom tonight [15:43] the rest of flash 10 works better... no more menus going under images, etc. [16:15] have you noticed lately that apport gives "wrong" close messages? like "firefox closed unexpectely" and alike, that are not true? [16:15] ara, Are you sure they aren't true? Maybe it crashed when closing when you logged out last time? [16:16] persia: i just tried that in a fresh installed intrepid [16:17] ara, So you got that message when firefox had *never* run? [16:18] persia: yes, I think so. I will double check that, though [16:19] ara, Please file that bug before you do : I'm *really* curious to see what crashed. [16:19] (as apport is surely reacting to *something* in /var/crash [16:19] persia: ok, will do [16:20] I don't have it here [16:22] davmor2, Which is precisely the interesting bit :) Luckily, apport should show us exactly what crashed. Whether we care is an entirely different matter. [16:22] :) [16:24] persia: I cannot report, as it is so freshly installed intrepid, that it needed to get updates. If it happens again after the update, I will report again [16:26] ara, Why can't you report it? apport doesn't let you? [16:26] ara, Really, I'm only curious how firefox got started if you say it didn't start, and the apport data was the easiest way to check. [17:27] persia: if she was trying to report something else via apport and firefox crashed... [17:32] * ara -> lunch [17:32] sbeattie, Exactly. That's why I was curious. Anything apport reports should be true, although it may be confused. [17:33] right, but its a bit problematic if firefox's configuration is hosed enough that it fails on every restart... [17:35] Or even just the first restart after an install. That's why I wanted the apport report, rather than waiting for upgrade, and seeing if it still happens. While it might not need fixing, it at least shows what crashed, and maybe why. [18:35] I am trying to install ubuntu 8.10 beta on an acer machine, but there is some trouble loading gdm, is this something the testing team is interested in? [19:16] kryptomorf: do you get the live cd up and running? [19:28] no thats the problem [19:37] kryptomorf: could you try the latest daily image? http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/current/ [19:39] sure [19:40] (the 32-bit one is slightly over-sized) [19:42] yes I see, ill see if I can find an empty DVD [20:15] first RC test images up [20:15] will definitely have some rerolls yet, I already know of at least one critical bug on them [20:17] heno: i have tested with the daily image, and its still the the same - gdm crashed and ubuntu drops to some tty [20:34] * afflux grabs alternate-amd64 [20:42] stgraber: It seems that the list of test cases on the qa tracker hasn't been updated with the latest version of the ServerInstall wiki page [20:42] stgraber: tests have been added to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/Cases/ServerInstall [20:43] stgraber: and they haven't been added to the qa tracker. [21:30] mathiaz: yeah, I know. I have the new Ubuntu mobile one only since this morning, I'll be updating them tonight and ping a sysadmin to do the SQL update. [22:43] mathiaz: around ? [22:43] mathiaz: you added the JeOS testcase, we currently have a separate image with that testcase on the tracker is this one obsolete ? [22:44] stgraber: you can remove the JeOS images [22:44] ok [22:44] stgraber: as of intrepid JeOS is part of the -server iso and not an separate iso anymore [22:44] ok, and these JeOS testcases are for both amd64 and i386 ? [22:44] (the previous JeOS was i386 only) [22:53] mathiaz: ^ [22:54] stgraber: yes - both amd64 and i386 are supported [22:54] ok [22:56] persia: ping [22:56] persia: Ubuntu Mobile and Ubuntu MID, what arch is that ? [22:58] lpia ? [23:00] hmm, that doesn't really matter in fact as there is only one image anyway, I'll just not specify an architecture