[01:25] Is there any way to get rid of all of my old gpg keys? [01:26] I just made a different one now and there's about 6 from when I was figuring out what I was doing and I thought I needed one for each email [01:46] anybody know? [01:47] MTecknology: You can always revoke them. [01:47] RAOF: I deactivated them on LP and revoked one - but I don't have the older stuff [01:49] Oh. Dunno. [01:49] :( [01:49] I think the answer there is "Surely you've got the revocation certificates printed out and stored in a safe place"? [01:50] lol [01:50] This was before I really understood what a key was [01:55] MTecknology: Suggest ask a question against launchpad itself? Doesn't appear to be a way via the admin UI. https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad [01:58] kirkland: hah. Good luck with that. [02:00] Hobbsee: with what? [02:00] kirkland: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/288147, based on the treatment mine got. [02:00] Ubuntu bug 288147 in launchpad "provide a non-linked bug number at the top of bug pages" [Undecided,New] [02:01] Hobbsee: i got the impression beuno would help ut [02:01] spm: thanks - got that done [02:01] Hobbsee: he asked me to assign it to him, anyway [02:01] Hobbsee: hi - long time since i annoyed you [02:01] hey MTecknology! [02:01] How ya been? [02:02] kirkland: ahhh. with mine, i just got a completely nonsensical response, then got told it didnt' block anyone, so wouldn't be fixed. [02:02] kirkland: pity 5-a-day and such isn't automated, as that would cut down a big use case forit [02:03] yeah, he's pretty insistent that that link has to be there... i'm just asking for the bug number to be printed *somewhere* on the page selectable [02:06] kirkland: that's true. He'll probably sya "it's selectable in the URL" though [02:06] which is true - it is - it's just a pain to get at it that wya [02:06] too much precision required [02:06] double-click to highlight word is so much easier [02:07] it has been a major pain in my side all day [02:07] Hobbsee: You should come back into -offtopic sometime. [02:07] RAOF: spm: thanks again [02:07] kirkland: that was my logic, yes. [02:08] Hobbsee: glad to hear i'm not the only one ;-) [02:09] kirkland: no, at least 4 people have complained about it so far:) [02:10] Hobbsee: cool, subscribe 'em to the bug === RAOF_ is now known as RAOF === fenris_ is now known as e-jat [04:51] morning [04:53] is there any way to export the blueprints for a project to some offline storage? === cjwatson_ is now known as cjwatson === sabdfl1 is now known as sabdfl_epic === doko_ is now known as doko [11:57] ping kiko [11:58] nizarus, yeah, I'm actually waiting on barry on that one :) [11:58] ok great :) sorry for my spam [12:10] wassit? [12:10] hi barry [12:11] https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/44720 [12:12] * barry looks [12:13] kiko, barry is here :) [12:14] nizarus: i've purged your ml, so you should be able to rename the team now [12:14] * barry observes that kiko is also able to do it :) [12:15] we would not rename it [12:15] we would remove it [12:15] and keep the ML :/ [12:16] barry ? [12:16] i rename it now [12:17] can we remove it [12:17] https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-tn-old [12:22] barry: i will put on place the new team so the team to be removed is ubuntu-tn-old not ubuntu-tn [12:22] barry are you ok ? [12:23] * nizarus waiting for ok before proceeding [12:23] nizarus: extreme busy-ness going on here, let me poke him [12:24] nizarus: he's typing a reply now :) [12:24] nizarus: i can't remove teams, but the team owner can now rename ubuntu-tn [12:24] nizarus: so if you just want to rename ubuntu-tn to whatever, you can do that now [12:24] i m the team owner [12:24] nizarus: if you want to remove ubuntu-tn, that should be possible too, though i don't have permissions to do that [12:25] nizarus: will a team rename work for you? [12:25] but yes i renamed it [12:26] yes i renamed it [12:26] how can i remove it now [12:26] nizarus: ping kiko [12:26] ping kiko :) [12:27] * barry physically pokes kiko [12:27] hi folks, ok this is stupid, but I'm pretty sure I've registered an acc on launchpad before but can't seem to figure out the data - I only logged in to report one bug and forgot what email I used to register... can somebody help me out on this please? [12:28] * nizarus virtually waiting [12:28] backenfutter: if you can remember any bits of it you can search at https://launchpad.net/people [12:28] particularly if you gave your full name [12:28] nizarus: kiko will do it in a few minutes [12:29] nizarus, will do [12:29] backenfutter: if you register yourself a new account and subsequently find the old one, the two accounts can be merged [12:29] thx barry, kiko the team to remove now is ubuntu-tn-old [12:29] cjwatson, k, I guess I found the acc but can't see the email, cause I'm not logged in https://launchpad.net/~brian-wiborg [12:30] nizarus, cool [12:30] kiko: tell me when it's done to commit the new team [12:30] nizarus, done. [12:31] yesssssssss :) [12:31] thx kiko and barry [12:53] Going through my emails I am realizing, that I've never seem to have received LP emails - I also must have deleted the reg email, cause I cant find it anywhere... What steps can I do to recover my acc? [12:58] backenfutter: do you remember the bug that you reported ? [12:58] nizarus, just had a buddy check... it is Bug #255811 [12:58] Launchpad bug 255811 in gdesklets "gDesklets segfaults after fresh installation" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/255811 [12:58] gDesklets [13:00] so your account is : https://launchpad.net/~brian-wiborg [13:00] yes [13:01] cjwatson and mwhudson was asking for that no ? [13:02] yeah, they first replied to my question and gave first advice on recoverage [13:03] but I tried em all and none worked [13:04] backenfutter: try to re ping them [13:04] k [13:04] i'm not a LP admin sorry [13:05] nizarus, lol seems it worked with the last one this time [13:05] D'oh [13:05] thx for the help ;-) [13:05] :) ok cool :) === thunders1ruck is now known as gnomefreak [14:34] hi [14:34] is anyone looking at bug 286269 ? [14:34] Launchpad bug 286269 in malone ""unsubscribe" requires space but it aint on HELP" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/286269 [14:36] * Hobbsee notes it's probably a wiki, and you can probably edit it yourself. [14:37] yes, it is a wiki. [14:38] will it update the email sent by help? [14:39] the email sent by help? [14:39] it's fixed https://help.launchpad.net/Bugs/EmailInterface#unsubscribe [14:39] I've seen the last date change [14:39] but will it update the email ? [14:41] i've no idea what the email it sends is. Try it. [14:41] it takes a while to sync [14:41] I've been down that road a few times in the past [14:42] well, aftre that, you'll just have to hope htat a launchpad person views this page. [14:42] apparently there is no help contact yet today [14:43] it hasn't been all week [14:43] on the hours I come here [14:43] lol [14:43] they only do the european workign week. [14:43] but i'm not sure - i think they were slack for at least part of last week, from memory [14:44] of course, i might be remembering completely wrong [14:44] Sometimes it's the european days, and sometimes it's the americas days. [14:50] hey hi, how to upgrade my remote branch on launchpad === thunderstruck is now known as gnomefreak [15:02] sorry https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+mirror/ubuntu.fastbull.org-release lastprobed 13 hours ago [15:02] we are now uptodate [15:02] but no more probe are done on our mirror === thunderstruck is now known as gnomefreak === persia_ is now known as persia === krish is now known as eyewitness === eyewitness is now known as spidy === spidy is now known as krish === thekorn_ is now known as thekorn [16:15] Is there any way of getting a dump of the launchpad postings for Ubuntu project for "Problem Management"? === thunderstruck is now known as gnomefreak [16:31] Hi folks [16:31] https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kourou/+bug/288767/+nominate + intrepid => OOPS [16:31] Ubuntu bug 288767 in kourou "Categores with special chars (like umlauts) are empty" [High,Confirmed] [16:31] (Error ID: OOPS-1028EA70) [16:31] lool: does it work on !edge? [16:32] ogra tested, I think it doesn't work there either [16:32] 17:27 < ogra> bah, me too [16:32] mwhudson: Yep, confirmed [16:33] * mwhudson taps his feet waiting for the oops file to sync [16:33] * lool disappears for some minutes [16:33] lool: do you or ogra have an older oops id? [16:33] ok [16:34] mwhudson: sorry no; I got multiple, but can't go back [16:34] fair enough [16:42] Would someone please check and see if soyuz is eating uploads. I'm trying to get a security patch uploaded before Intrepid closes and the upload seems to vanish into thin air. [16:42] Package is fetchmail. [16:42] thats a peculiar error [16:42] lool's, i mean [16:42] You call me a liar? [16:43] ScottK: checking. [16:43] lool: ? [16:43] cprov: Thanks. [16:43] mwhudson: oh well, end of week puns sorry [16:43] peculiar, liar, ok, I shut up [16:43] lool: i see :) [16:44] ScottK: we have a *known* problem. [16:44] cprov: OK. How do I work around this issue to get the bug fixed before Intrepid closes? [16:45] ScottK: wait. [16:45] cprov: Wait and try again (if so how long) or wait and you'll tell me? [16:49] ScottK: no, wait, like "wait while we are fixing it for you" your source will be processed automatically. [16:50] cprov: OK. Thanks. [16:50] Hi, I uploaded my project's first translation template, is there any way to speed up the approval process (assuming it's OK)? [16:51] danilos: ^ [16:54] newz2000: yeah, ping jtv, but in general, it's not desirable unless it's very important (he does approvals as they are uploaded) === salgado is now known as salgado-afk === danilos is now known as danilo-afk [16:55] ok, thanks [17:03] mwhudson: Do I need to file a bug about it? I'm about to disappear for the WE [17:14] cprov: Was fetchmail special somehow or is my next upload going to get hung up too? === stub1 is now known as stub [18:00] cprov: Please add adept to your list of uploads to find. It seems to have gone missing as well. [18:24] cprov: Thanks. [18:32] ScottK: everything from you processed ? [18:32] cprov: Yes. [18:32] Release team is back in business. [18:32] ScottK: ok [18:32] And bug nominations are working again too. === salgado-afk is now known as salgado [19:40] Hi [19:40] i can't dput to my personal ppa :/ [19:40] the upload freeze [19:41] same problem than in this thread : http://ph.ubuntuforums.com/showthread.php?t=679391 [19:41] any idea ? [19:41] dput work well with small packages === salgado is now known as salgado-afk [20:27] so I am thinking of switching a project from Assembla.com to Launchpad.net but there is a feature I have not found in launchpad [20:27] that is the ability to commit a change and automatically connect it to a bug by doing something like svn -m "test #123" to indicate that the bug is ready to be tested and automatically send an email to the people involved in that bug [20:29] I think the story is that you use a plugin that invokes something from https://help.launchpad.net/MaloneXMLRPC [20:34] There's definitely a way to automatically mark bugs Fix Committed when updating a branch. No idea how it works though. [20:37] https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/27140 [20:38] not sure if there's something newer than the answer given there [20:39] exarkun: thanks. but installing such plugin is not possible to do on launchpad.net itself, right? [20:39] it would work only if i have a locally hosted version of launchpad? [20:43] andresmh: Or each developer could install the plugin locally. [20:43] andresmh: It would be a bzr plugin that talks to launchpad. [20:43] i see [20:45] another question about launchpad.net, do you know if the translation feature automatically detects strings to be translated in the source code and generates a list? [20:46] my project is using PHP and I print translate-able string by doing ___("foobar"); [20:48] afaik it doesn't, but something like gettext can probably extract those. === stub1 is now known as stub [21:10] far less PPA build machines?? is that temporary? === stub1 is now known as stub [21:29] Hello. I was looking at a project earlier today and noticed that bugs have a status showing that a fix has been committed. Does that get tied to a particular revision? [21:29] Or is that just a manual status flag? [21:30] NfNitLoop, it doesn't get tied to a specific revision at the moment [21:30] manual status flag [21:35] aah, ok. [21:35] that explains why I couldn't find that info, then. :p [21:35] :) [21:35] another question... is any of the code that runs launchpad.net OSS? [21:35] It would be awesome to be able to use a private instance of launchpad for my company. [21:36] (whose source is unfortunately *not* OSS.) [21:43] it's no OSS yet [21:43] it will be next year [21:43] july-ish I think [21:57] very neat. :) [23:09] Is there a launchpad tool floating around to batch build/upload source packages across different distros? [23:14] awmcclain, Not really. There is a mechanism to publish a PPA package between different releases of Ubuntu (including recompilation for each release, if desired). [23:14] persia: Yes! Exactly what I'm looking for! === soren_ is now known as soren [23:16] awmcclain, Upload to the oldest release you intend to support. Then look for the tool to copy packages. If you want to recompile, don't check the "Also copy binaries" option. [23:17] persia: Thank you! Perfect. [23:17] You can't copy from newer releases to older releases, but you can from older releases to newer. [23:17] Has anybody out there got pointers to any example code that talks to the Launchpad API from Java code? [23:18] persia: Erk, you can't recompile like that. [23:18] persia: Remember, we use pools. [23:18] Why they don't have the backporting tool implemented in the web UI, I'm not entirely sure, but until then you can't rebuild without a different upload. [23:19] wgrant, Then what happens if you copy from the older to the newer release in your PPA and don't check the "Also copy binaries" option? [23:20] Does it copy source and let it rot? Does it break the pool? [23:20] persia: You can't any more. [23:20] It will refuse [23:20] Ah. It was a bug, and fixed. [23:20] But previously your builds would fail to upload, and things would get mildly unpleasant. [23:20] awmcclain, Ignore my recommendation : it doesn't work. [23:21] :'( [23:21] well. drat. [23:21] do i have to debuild 3 times for every package? [23:21] wgrant, Can you still do source+binary copy? [23:21] s/do/so [23:21] persia: Yes. [23:22] persia: that won't work, ti needs to recompile [23:22] awmcclain: Why? [23:22] Copying forward is often safe. [23:22] library transitions? [23:22] Unless there's been a soname break. [23:22] Copying back might well not work. [23:22] wgrant: I'm uploading 12 packages, some of which have been included already in intrepid. [23:23] wgrant, That's been unavailable for longer, unless it got unfixed at some point. [23:23] persia: Which? [23:23] wgrant: I don't want to link against the depend libraries i've built when they're in the repo already [23:23] having the same source version with different binaries would be interesting [23:24] copying packages from newer to older releases in a PPA. [23:24] ajmitch: And also impossible without pools. [23:24] persia: It worked for me a couple of months ago. [23:24] I knew it was safe, so I did it. [23:24] LP shouldn't stop me from doing things that might work. [23:24] wgrant, Then it's been unfixed. [23:24] wgrant: I know [23:25] ajmitch, there's *lots* of examples of same source version and different binaries in PPAs. [23:26] persia: Where? [23:26] That's not possible. [23:27] wgrant, It's not possible in a single PPA. You and I can both upload hello_7.8.9-42letsbreakstuff to our individual PPAs without a problem, as long as we don't link them. [23:27] Ah. [23:28] right, I was meaning in a single PPA [23:28] Oh. That's different. [23:28] They're separate archives, so it's not entirely relevant. [23:28] * wgrant bashes X dead.