[01:25] <MTecknology> Is there any way to get rid of all of my old gpg keys?
[01:26] <MTecknology> I just made a different one now and there's about 6 from when I was figuring out what I was doing and I thought I needed one for each email
[01:46] <MTecknology> anybody know?
[01:47] <RAOF> MTecknology: You can always revoke them.
[01:47] <MTecknology> RAOF: I deactivated them on LP and revoked one - but I don't have the older stuff
[01:49] <RAOF> Oh.  Dunno.
[01:49] <MTecknology> :(
[01:49] <RAOF> I think the answer there is "Surely you've got the revocation certificates printed out and stored in a safe place"?
[01:50] <MTecknology> lol
[01:50] <MTecknology> This was before I really understood what a key was
[01:55] <spm> MTecknology: Suggest ask a question against launchpad itself? Doesn't appear to be a way via the admin UI. https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad
[01:58] <Hobbsee> kirkland: hah.  Good luck with that.
[02:00] <kirkland> Hobbsee: with what?
[02:00] <Hobbsee> kirkland: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/288147, based on the treatment mine got.
[02:01] <kirkland> Hobbsee: i got the impression beuno would help ut
[02:01] <MTecknology> spm: thanks - got that done
[02:01] <kirkland> Hobbsee: he asked me to assign it to him, anyway
[02:01] <MTecknology> Hobbsee: hi - long time since i annoyed you
[02:01] <Hobbsee> hey MTecknology!
[02:01] <MTecknology> How ya been?
[02:02] <Hobbsee> kirkland: ahhh.  with mine, i just got a completely nonsensical response, then got told it didnt' block anyone, so wouldn't be fixed.
[02:02] <Hobbsee> kirkland: pity 5-a-day and such isn't automated, as that would cut down a big use case forit
[02:03] <kirkland> yeah, he's pretty insistent that that link has to be there...  i'm just asking for the bug number to be printed *somewhere* on the page selectable
[02:06] <Hobbsee> kirkland: that's true.  He'll probably sya "it's selectable in the URL" though
[02:06] <Hobbsee> which is true - it is - it's just a pain to get at it that wya
[02:06] <kirkland> too much precision required
[02:06] <kirkland> double-click to highlight word is so much easier
[02:07] <kirkland> it has been a major pain in my side all day
[02:07] <MTecknology> Hobbsee: You should come back into -offtopic sometime.
[02:07] <MTecknology> RAOF: spm: thanks again
[02:07] <Hobbsee> kirkland: that was my logic, yes.
[02:08] <kirkland> Hobbsee: glad to hear i'm not the only one ;-)
[02:09] <Hobbsee> kirkland: no, at least 4 people have complained about it so far:)
[02:10] <kirkland> Hobbsee: cool, subscribe 'em to the bug
[04:51] <kblin> morning
[04:53] <kblin> is there any way to export the blueprints for a project to some offline storage?
[11:57] <nizarus> ping kiko
[11:58] <kiko> nizarus, yeah, I'm actually waiting on barry on that one :)
[11:58] <nizarus> ok great :) sorry for my spam
[12:10] <barry> wassit?
[12:10] <nizarus> hi barry
[12:11] <nizarus> https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/44720
[12:12]  * barry looks
[12:13] <nizarus> kiko, barry is here :)
[12:14] <barry> nizarus: i've purged your ml, so you should be able to rename the team now
[12:14]  * barry observes that kiko is also able to do it :)
[12:15] <nizarus> we would not rename it
[12:15] <nizarus> we would remove it
[12:15] <nizarus> and keep the ML :/
[12:16] <nizarus> barry ?
[12:16] <nizarus> i rename it now
[12:17] <nizarus> can we remove it
[12:17] <nizarus> https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-tn-old
[12:22] <nizarus> barry: i will put on place the new team so the team to be removed is ubuntu-tn-old not ubuntu-tn
[12:22] <nizarus> barry are you ok ?
[12:23]  * nizarus waiting for ok before proceeding 
[12:23] <mwhudson> nizarus: extreme busy-ness going on here, let me poke him
[12:24] <mwhudson> nizarus: he's typing a reply now :)
[12:24] <barry> nizarus: i can't remove teams, but the team owner can now rename ubuntu-tn
[12:24] <barry> nizarus: so if you just want to rename ubuntu-tn to whatever, you can do that now
[12:24] <nizarus> i m the team owner
[12:24] <barry> nizarus: if you want to remove ubuntu-tn, that should be possible too, though i don't have permissions to do that
[12:25] <barry> nizarus: will a team rename work for you?
[12:25] <nizarus> but yes i renamed it
[12:26] <nizarus> yes i renamed it
[12:26] <nizarus> how can i remove it now
[12:26] <barry> nizarus: ping kiko
[12:26] <nizarus> ping kiko :)
[12:27]  * barry physically pokes kiko
[12:27] <backenfutter> hi folks, ok this is stupid, but I'm pretty sure I've registered an acc on launchpad before but can't seem to figure out the data - I only logged in to report one bug and forgot what email I used to register... can somebody help me out on this please?
[12:28]  * nizarus virtually waiting 
[12:28] <cjwatson> backenfutter: if you can remember any bits of it you can search at https://launchpad.net/people
[12:28] <cjwatson> particularly if you gave your full name
[12:28] <barry> nizarus: kiko will do it in a few minutes
[12:29] <kiko> nizarus, will do
[12:29] <mwhudson> backenfutter: if you register yourself a new account and subsequently find the old one, the two accounts can be merged
[12:29] <nizarus> thx barry, kiko the team to remove now is ubuntu-tn-old
[12:29] <backenfutter> cjwatson, k, I guess I found the acc but can't see the email, cause I'm not logged in https://launchpad.net/~brian-wiborg
[12:30] <kiko> nizarus, cool
[12:30] <nizarus> kiko: tell me when it's done to commit the new team
[12:30] <kiko> nizarus, done.
[12:31] <nizarus> yesssssssss :)
[12:31] <nizarus> thx kiko and barry
[12:53] <backenfutter> Going through my emails I am realizing, that I've never seem to have received LP emails - I also must have deleted the reg email, cause I cant find it anywhere... What steps can I do to recover my acc?
[12:58] <nizarus> backenfutter: do you remember the bug that you reported ?
[12:58] <backenfutter> nizarus, just had a buddy check... it is Bug #255811
[12:58] <backenfutter> gDesklets
[13:00] <nizarus> so your account is : https://launchpad.net/~brian-wiborg
[13:00] <backenfutter> yes
[13:01] <nizarus> cjwatson and mwhudson was asking for that no ?
[13:02] <backenfutter> yeah, they first replied to my question and gave first advice on recoverage
[13:03] <backenfutter> but I tried em all and none worked
[13:04] <nizarus> backenfutter: try to re ping them
[13:04] <backenfutter> k
[13:04] <nizarus> i'm not a LP admin sorry
[13:05] <backenfutter> nizarus, lol seems it worked with the last one this time
[13:05] <backenfutter> D'oh
[13:05] <backenfutter> thx for the help ;-)
[13:05] <nizarus> :) ok cool :)
[14:34] <BUGabundo_work> hi
[14:34] <BUGabundo_work> is anyone looking at bug  286269 ?
[14:36]  * Hobbsee notes it's probably a wiki, and you can probably edit it yourself.
[14:37] <Hobbsee> yes, it is a wiki.
[14:38] <BUGabundo_work> will it update the email sent by help?
[14:39] <Hobbsee> the email sent by help?
[14:39] <Hobbsee> it's fixed https://help.launchpad.net/Bugs/EmailInterface#unsubscribe
[14:39] <BUGabundo_work> I've seen the last date change
[14:39] <BUGabundo_work> but will it update the email ?
[14:41] <Hobbsee> i've no idea what the email it sends is.  Try it.
[14:41] <BUGabundo_work> it takes a while to sync
[14:41] <BUGabundo_work> I've been down that road a few times in the past
[14:42] <Hobbsee> well, aftre that, you'll just have to hope htat a launchpad person views this page.
[14:42] <Hobbsee> apparently there is no help contact yet today
[14:43] <BUGabundo_work> it hasn't been all week
[14:43] <BUGabundo_work> on the hours I come here
[14:43] <BUGabundo_work> lol
[14:43] <Hobbsee> they only do the european workign week.
[14:43] <Hobbsee> but i'm not sure - i think they were slack for at least part of last week, from memory
[14:44] <Hobbsee> of course, i might be remembering completely wrong
[14:44] <persia> Sometimes it's the european days, and sometimes it's the americas days.
[14:50] <krish> hey hi, how to upgrade my remote branch on launchpad
[15:02] <bostik> sorry https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+mirror/ubuntu.fastbull.org-release lastprobed 13 hours ago
[15:02] <bostik> we are now uptodate
[15:02] <bostik> but no more probe are done on our mirror
[16:15] <gurrier> Is there any way of getting a dump of the launchpad postings for Ubuntu project for "Problem Management"?
[16:31] <lool> Hi folks
[16:31] <lool> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kourou/+bug/288767/+nominate + intrepid => OOPS
[16:31] <lool>  (Error ID: OOPS-1028EA70)
[16:31] <mwhudson> lool: does it work on !edge?
[16:32] <lool> ogra tested, I think it doesn't work there either
[16:32] <lool> 17:27 < ogra> bah, me too
[16:32] <lool> mwhudson: Yep, confirmed
[16:33]  * mwhudson taps his feet waiting for the oops file to sync
[16:33]  * lool disappears for some minutes
[16:33] <mwhudson> lool: do you or ogra have an older oops id?
[16:33] <mwhudson> ok
[16:34] <lool> mwhudson: sorry no; I got multiple, but can't go back
[16:34] <mwhudson> fair enough
[16:42] <ScottK> Would someone please check and see if soyuz is eating uploads.  I'm trying to get a security patch uploaded before Intrepid closes and the upload seems to vanish into thin air.
[16:42] <ScottK> Package is fetchmail.
[16:42] <mwhudson> thats a peculiar error
[16:42] <mwhudson> lool's, i mean
[16:42] <lool> You call me a liar?
[16:43] <cprov> ScottK: checking.
[16:43] <mwhudson> lool: ?
[16:43] <ScottK> cprov: Thanks.
[16:43] <lool> mwhudson: oh well, end of week puns sorry
[16:43] <lool> peculiar, liar, ok, I shut up
[16:43] <mwhudson> lool: i see :)
[16:44] <cprov> ScottK: we have a *known* problem.
[16:44] <ScottK> cprov: OK.  How do I work around this issue to get the bug fixed before Intrepid closes?
[16:45] <cprov> ScottK: wait.
[16:45] <ScottK> cprov: Wait and try again (if so how long) or wait and you'll tell me?
[16:49] <cprov> ScottK: no, wait, like "wait while we are fixing it for you" your source will be processed automatically.
[16:50] <ScottK> cprov: OK.  Thanks.
[16:50] <newz2000> Hi, I uploaded my project's first translation template, is there any way to speed up the approval process (assuming it's OK)?
[16:51] <bigjools> danilos: ^
[16:54] <danilos> newz2000: yeah, ping jtv, but in general, it's not desirable unless it's very important (he does approvals as they are uploaded)
[16:55] <newz2000> ok, thanks
[17:03] <lool> mwhudson: Do I need to file a bug about it?  I'm about to disappear for the WE
[17:14] <ScottK> cprov: Was fetchmail special somehow or is my next upload going to get hung up too?
[18:00] <ScottK> cprov: Please add adept to your list of uploads to find.  It seems to have gone missing as well.
[18:24] <ScottK> cprov: Thanks.
[18:32] <cprov> ScottK: everything from you processed ?
[18:32] <ScottK> cprov: Yes.
[18:32] <ScottK> Release team is back in business.
[18:32] <cprov> ScottK: ok
[18:32] <ScottK> And bug nominations are working again too.
[19:40] <kagou> Hi
[19:40] <kagou> i can't dput to my personal ppa :/
[19:40] <kagou> the upload freeze
[19:41] <kagou> same problem than in this thread : http://ph.ubuntuforums.com/showthread.php?t=679391
[19:41] <kagou> any idea ?
[19:41] <kagou> dput work well with small packages
[20:27] <andresmh> so I am thinking of switching a project from Assembla.com to Launchpad.net but there is a  feature I have not found in launchpad
[20:27] <andresmh> that is the  ability to commit a change and automatically connect it to a bug by doing something like svn -m "test #123" to indicate that the bug is ready to be tested and automatically send an email to the people involved in that bug
[20:29] <exarkun> I think the story is that you use a plugin that invokes something from https://help.launchpad.net/MaloneXMLRPC
[20:34] <persia> There's definitely a way to automatically mark bugs Fix Committed when updating a branch.  No idea how it works though.
[20:37] <exarkun> https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/27140
[20:38] <exarkun> not sure if there's something newer than the answer given there
[20:39] <andresmh> exarkun: thanks. but installing such plugin is not possible to do on launchpad.net itself, right?
[20:39] <andresmh> it would work only if i have a locally hosted version of launchpad?
[20:43] <exarkun> andresmh: Or each developer could install the plugin locally.
[20:43] <exarkun> andresmh: It would be a bzr plugin that talks to launchpad.
[20:43] <andresmh> i see
[20:45] <andresmh> another question about launchpad.net, do you know if the translation feature automatically detects strings to be translated in the source code and generates a list?
[20:46] <andresmh> my project is using PHP and I print translate-able string by doing ___("foobar");
[20:48] <exarkun> afaik it doesn't, but something like gettext can probably extract those.
[21:10] <fta> far less PPA build machines?? is that temporary?
[21:29] <NfNitLoop> Hello.   I was looking at a project earlier today and noticed that bugs have a status showing that a fix has been committed.  Does that get tied to a particular revision?
[21:29] <NfNitLoop> Or is that just a manual status flag?
[21:30] <beuno> NfNitLoop, it doesn't get tied to a specific revision at the moment
[21:30] <beuno> manual status flag
[21:35] <NfNitLoop> aah, ok.
[21:35] <NfNitLoop> that explains why I couldn't find that info, then. :p
[21:35] <beuno> :)
[21:35] <NfNitLoop> another question... is any of the code that runs launchpad.net OSS?
[21:35] <NfNitLoop> It would be awesome to be able to use a private instance of launchpad for my company.
[21:36] <NfNitLoop> (whose source is unfortunately *not* OSS.)
[21:43] <beuno> it's no OSS yet
[21:43] <beuno> it will be next year
[21:43] <beuno> july-ish I think
[21:57] <NfNitLoop> very neat. :)
[23:09] <awmcclain> Is there a launchpad tool floating around to batch build/upload source packages across different distros?
[23:14] <persia> awmcclain, Not really.  There is a mechanism to publish a PPA package between different releases of Ubuntu (including recompilation for each release, if desired).
[23:14] <awmcclain> persia: Yes! Exactly what I'm looking for!
[23:16] <persia> awmcclain, Upload to the oldest release you intend to support.  Then look for the tool to copy packages.  If you want to recompile, don't check the "Also copy binaries" option.
[23:17] <awmcclain> persia: Thank you! Perfect.
[23:17] <persia> You can't copy from newer releases to older releases, but you can from older releases to newer.
[23:17] <jerryk> Has anybody out there got pointers to any example code that talks to the Launchpad API from Java code?
[23:18] <wgrant> persia: Erk, you can't recompile like that.
[23:18] <wgrant> persia: Remember, we use pools.
[23:18] <wgrant> Why they don't have the backporting tool implemented in the web UI, I'm not entirely sure, but until then you can't rebuild without a different upload.
[23:19] <persia> wgrant, Then what happens if you copy from the older to the newer release in your PPA and don't check the "Also copy binaries" option?
[23:20] <persia> Does it copy source and let it rot?  Does it break the pool?
[23:20] <wgrant> persia: You can't any more.
[23:20] <wgrant> It will refuse
[23:20] <persia> Ah.  It was a bug, and fixed.
[23:20] <wgrant> But previously your builds would fail to upload, and things would get mildly unpleasant.
[23:20] <persia> awmcclain, Ignore my recommendation : it doesn't work.
[23:21] <awmcclain> :'(
[23:21] <awmcclain> well. drat.
[23:21] <awmcclain> do i have to debuild 3 times for every package?
[23:21] <persia> wgrant, Can you still do source+binary copy?
[23:21] <awmcclain> s/do/so
[23:21] <wgrant> persia: Yes.
[23:22] <awmcclain> persia: that won't work, ti needs to recompile
[23:22] <wgrant> awmcclain: Why?
[23:22] <wgrant> Copying forward is often safe.
[23:22] <persia> library transitions?
[23:22] <wgrant> Unless there's been a soname break.
[23:22] <wgrant> Copying back might well not work.
[23:22] <awmcclain> wgrant: I'm uploading 12 packages, some of which have been included already in intrepid.
[23:23] <persia> wgrant, That's been unavailable for longer, unless it got unfixed at some point.
[23:23] <wgrant> persia: Which?
[23:23] <awmcclain> wgrant: I don't want to link against the depend libraries i've built when they're in the repo already
[23:23] <ajmitch> having the same source version with different binaries would be interesting
[23:24] <persia> copying packages from newer to older releases in a PPA.
[23:24] <wgrant> ajmitch: And also impossible without pools.
[23:24] <wgrant> persia: It worked for me a couple of months ago.
[23:24] <wgrant> I knew it was safe, so I did it.
[23:24] <wgrant> LP shouldn't stop me from doing things that might work.
[23:24] <persia> wgrant, Then it's been unfixed.
[23:24] <ajmitch> wgrant: I know
[23:25] <persia> ajmitch, there's *lots* of examples of same source version and different binaries in PPAs.
[23:26] <wgrant> persia: Where?
[23:26] <wgrant> That's not possible.
[23:27] <persia> wgrant, It's not possible in a single PPA.  You and I can both upload hello_7.8.9-42letsbreakstuff to our individual PPAs without a problem, as long as we don't link them.
[23:27] <wgrant> Ah.
[23:28] <ajmitch> right, I was meaning in a single PPA
[23:28] <persia> Oh.  That's different.
[23:28] <wgrant> They're separate archives, so it's not entirely relevant.
[23:28]  * wgrant bashes X dead.