=== asac_ is now known as asac === asac_ is now known as asac === asac_ is now known as asac === mdz_ is now known as mdz === mvo_ is now known as mvo [11:23] morning heno [11:24] morning davmor2 [11:55] hello [11:56] hello stgraber [11:56] * heno does a sanity check of kub oem [11:57] heno: check you got the right cd riddell only uploaded an hour ago [11:57] ok, thanks [12:00] heno: made the same mistake the fiwes are in 1.10.8 of ubiquity [12:02] s/fiwes/files [12:10] heno: direct install works [12:30] hi all [12:31] Hi [12:31] I've just installed Intrepid on my Eee PC 701 and found eeepc-acpi-scripts package broken [12:32] it requires acpi-support package, which is not present [12:35] does anyone use 8.10 on Eee PC? [12:36] nope [12:36] acer aspire one [12:36] but it works on that [12:40] ok, this bug is already reported at launchpad [12:54] heno: oem works here [14:21] first candidate ISOs for final posted [14:22] cool [14:24] how can i upgrade 8.04 to 8.10 RC1? [14:27] * stgraber takes Ubuntu alternate amd64 [14:32] slangasek: Ahead of yourself aren't you ;) [14:32] ? [14:33] First candidate cd's......Wasn't expecting any till at least tomorrow :) [14:34] that means we're on schedule [14:34] :) [14:39] slangasek: is it only alt's at the minute then? [14:39] slangasek: that's great, should happen more often :) [14:39] davmor2: yes, alternates always finish quicker [14:39] (desktop CD build started at the exact same time) [14:40] slangasek: Okay cool :) [14:40] I take: Ubuntu alt amd64 -> erase disk / erase disk + lvm / LTSP / free software only / expert [14:59] oops, kubuntu alternate oversized, respinning [14:59] wlan works oddly - it takes many minutes until I'm able to get the connection [14:59] my wlan is atheros 5006 [15:00] the driver i use is madwifi-hal-0.10.5.6-r3835-20080801 [15:01] it worked all ok before but i've had these problems since i upgraded the os yesterday [15:06] muibe: this is not the best channel on which to seek help for such issues; you may want to try #ubuntu-kernel instead [15:07] muibe: but if you upgraded the OS to Ubuntu 8.10 RC, there are known problems with ath5k in the 2.6.27 kernel - you're probably lucky that it worked at all(!) [15:11] kubuntu alternate respun; first desktop images posted [15:13] slangasek: thanks for the advice ;) [15:15] * heno syncs [15:17] * davmor2 stops syncing as bandwidth is being killed by wubi upgrade [15:19] * pedro_ syncing desktop i386 [15:20] * davmor2 thinks netboot can wait till I have bandwidth in the morning :) [15:24] ok, someone tell me what to test :-) [15:25] kwwii: http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/build/all/all any of these [15:26] davmor2: cool, rysnc-ing now [15:29] heno: How many minimum tests each? [15:30] davmor2: we'll aim for two of each [15:30] Cool :) [15:32] * heno grabs some food [15:43] xubuntu alternates got built with some out-of-date packages due to an archive sync issue; trying a respin [15:56] ok, xubuntu alternates appear fixed [16:21] hey anyone here [16:33] ad_: yes [16:33] hey im trying to install yelp-dbgsym=2.24.0-0ubuntu2.8.10 to backtrace a bug on intrepiud but cant seem to install it [16:37] ad_: That's cause it's not there. I'm not sure if it got integrated into the yelp package itself [16:37] ok then well I run this could you taek a look [16:37] http://pastebin.com/m38d2d98a [16:38] maybe you know whats going wrong [16:38] Hmmm no hang on [16:38] is that correctly backtraced is my first question [16:40] ad_: what's the bug? [16:41] edit will not function after upgrading to Intrepid from Hardy - either running gedit from the menu or terminal renders the same output. [16:41] *gedit [16:59] could someone please check if the spx file in the example folder plays for them? I just did a test install on a system with no soundcard (VM) and totem hangs for me when I try to open it [17:12] mvo: works for me [17:13] half of Ubuntu alternate amd64 is now done [17:14] kwwii: thanks, I think its because I have no working soundcard in the test system (somewhat unusual :) [17:16] yeah, that cannot be the way things should work [17:22] hey anyone here, I wondering if my open/close compiz animations being faulty is worth a bug report [17:23] tuxxy__: what happens [17:24] none of the clos/opene animations work with this error in .xsession [17:24] /usr/bin/compiz.real (animation) - Error: Animation settings mismatch in "Animation Selection" list for Close event. [17:24] this was an upgrade [17:24] mvo: ^ [17:25] /usr/bin/compiz.real (animation) - Error: Animation settings mismatch in "Animation Selection" list for Open event. [17:25] etc [17:26] tuxxy__: I check it out [17:26] no bug then [17:26] thanks [17:27] tuxxy__: thank you! did you change the animation settings or did you stick with the hardy defaults ? [17:28] yes I enabled the new animations plugin and everything seems to work fine except open/close animations and also I get a little distortion with some effects when I minimize/maximize [17:28] usually distortion is in the top window frame maybe an issue with emerald I dont kno [17:29] I plan to fresh install again in 3 days so hopefully that should fix it all although I have my /home partition seperate so I hope it doesnt happen again [17:30] *frsh install [17:31] hardly any animations worked at first until I enabled the enw animations plugin in compiz then my minimize/maximize worked fine but not the open/close [17:33] i also tried the old nvidia driver v173 but no luck [17:36] * stgraber takes Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [17:36] tuxxy__: please add a bugreport just so that this information does not get lost and let me know about the bugnumber when its finished, I'm running a test to see if I can reproduce it [17:37] ok will do, this is on AMD64 - nvidia 8600GTS [17:37] upger [17:37] upgrade to Ibux from Hardy [17:49] mvo: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/289966 [17:49] Launchpad bug 289966 in compiz "Open/Close animations do not function after upgrade to Intrepid" [Undecided,New] [17:56] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/289952 [17:56] Launchpad bug 289952 in update-manager "[8.10] update-manager ignores sources.list during hardy->intrepid upgrade" [Undecided,New] [18:12] OEM tests successful on both desktop and alternate (Ubuntu) [18:29] I'm getting a black screen on kub oem 64-bit (kvm) [18:30] but in a different place this time, after the user config [18:30] davmor2 reported success earlier though [18:31] could someone try that on hw, vm or vbox? [18:31] to rule out kvm-isms [18:56] * heno starts xubuntu 64 alt [19:06] * stgraber takes edubuntu amd64 [19:07] failed [19:07] slangasek: ^ [19:07] it tried to get packages from the internet (as usual) [19:07] libgsm1 and libavcodec51 [19:08] slangasek: what do we expect from the edubuntu addon ? being able to install without internet or just to install (I did have internet enabled when installing so I have it in my sources.list) [19:09] heno: ^ [19:10] hm, it worked here, but I had network [19:11] yeah, with network it'd have downloaded these two packages [19:11] my question is: Is it supposed to install without internet ? [19:11] IIRC it was supposed to but never quite did [19:11] how ungracefully does it fail? [19:11] (since we turned the recommends on) [19:12] I guess you can install most apps individually [19:12] heno: "Some softwares can't be installed because the installer is unable to get some needed packages" or something similar [19:12] so only part of it won't be installed [19:12] I guess those two packages should be seeded [19:13] and I suspect that if I didn't have internet when doing the install it wouldn't even have tried to download these [19:13] sounds like a fairly simple fix - there is certainly space now [19:13] yeah, IIRC we have some free space on the edubuntu CD [19:13] 300+MB [19:13] WinFOSS has been removed now [19:14] oh, ok I'll add that to my testcase change list, so they get removed [19:14] I've counted removed winfoss as a PASS :) [19:15] yeah because it was successfully removed :) [20:08] bdmurray: do you think you could squeeze in a SRU verification ? (for #289855 and #255545)? [20:10] mvo: I'll get with sbeattie and see what we can work out [20:10] mvo: bug 289855 seems the more important of the two is that right? [20:13] mvo_: did you see my last msg? [20:18] bdmurray: no, looks like I disconnected before :/ [20:18] * mvo_ kicks his network [20:20] I'll get with sbeattie and see what we can work out [20:20] bug 289855 seems the more important of the two is that right? [20:20] thanks! its hopefully really easy/straightforward [20:20] the apt one is slightly more important, but they are roughtly equal [20:21] okay [20:42] sbeattie: mvo was looking for some help with sru verification of a hardy2intrepid upgrade [20:43] sbeattie: actually 2 of them [20:43] maybe we can split them between us? [20:43] bdmurray: sure. [20:44] sbeattie: actually dependent on each other [20:44] the update-manager one and the apt one? [20:44] hmm, actually they seem dependent on each other [20:45] yeah, that's them [20:45] I have a hardy vm I could do it with [20:46] I don't mind, I was going to do some more upgrade testing today. [20:47] if nothing else, it's also useful to an upgrade from a system with hardy-proposed enabled as well. [20:51] It might be good for the SRU screencast too - or maybe bug 270777. I have hardware for that