/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2008/10/29/#ubuntu-mozillateam.txt

ftaW: GPG error: http://ddebs.ubuntu.com intrepid Release: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG ECDCAD72428D7C01 Ubuntu Debug Symbol Archive Automatic Signing Key <ubuntu-archive@lists.ubuntu.com>00:37
ftasomething wrong with the key00:37
fta[reed], ff should have a progress bar or something when posting forms with lots of data instead of just "Sending request to bugzilla.x.y..."01:08
=== asac_ is now known as asac
gnomefreakanyone with ideas for meetings please add them to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Meetings meeting is going to be on this sunday the 2nd of Nov.08:52
asachi09:03
asacgnomefreak: yeah ;)09:03
gnomefreakasac: hi ;)09:04
gnomefreakasac: do you remember what you did to firegpg concerning the FireGPGCall? and what is an .xpt file?09:07
asacgnomefreak: let me first get some coffee please09:08
gnomefreakgo for it09:08
nikolamHi guys09:10
gnomefreakhi09:10
nikolamIt seems I think that you compiled mozilla-related apps more then once, did you?09:11
gnomefreak.xpt's look like binaries i figured out problem now to try to implement it :(09:12
gnomefreaknikolam: yes09:12
gnomefreakif you mean compiled as in build for Ubuntu09:12
nikolamso that also include some of the major add-ons , right?09:13
gnomefreakgive me a minute09:13
gnomefreaknikolam: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Extensions/List?action=show&redirect=MozillaTeam%2FFirefox3Extensions is a list so far. more will be added for next release but that is where we are atm other than me looking for a bookmarks extension09:15
* gnomefreak goes for smoke09:15
gnomefreaknikolam: outside of a list of what we are working on you would have to tell me more info on what you need09:21
nikolamOk.09:21
nikolamI need enigmail for seamonkey 64-bit.09:21
nikolamhttp://www.mozilla-enigmail.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=29109:22
nikolamhttp://www.mozilla-enigmail.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=29009:22
asacseamonkey is a pita extension wise. it doesnt even have a proper extensions manager09:22
nikolam.. but it has 32-bit enigmail extension.. and not 64-bit one..09:23
nikolamso the source exist.09:23
asacthats not questioned09:23
nikolamThere were successful porting in the past: http://www.mozilla-enigmail.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=282&p=1223&hilit=amd64#p122309:24
asaci dont need that info ;)09:24
asaci know exactly whats up with that as i dumped seamonkey support from the package at some point09:24
asacwe will support it again (once we find time to redo the current package)09:25
asacnikolam: anyway. there source.html instructions should work if you just want a xpi09:25
nikolamhm, may i know what package is that ?09:25
nikolamI want an xpi. But they don`t exactly wor that easy.09:26
nikolamAnd I think that is could work only with Sm downloaded from mozilla site09:26
asacnikolam: follow the instructions on enigmail site. we are ubuntu here so care about packaging.09:27
gnomefreakat the moment the current enigmail .xpi from upstream(nightlys) work with tb 3.009:28
nikolamok, thanks. So from the moment i have working *.xpi onwards, i can contact you here or post a bug to package it for Ubuntu?09:29
gnomefreaknikolam: we have it in archives atm but not for tb3.0 until we fix our curreent package. if you get .xpi from firefox addons or from anywhere other than Ubuntu package bugs would need to be filed upstream. if you use ours or wait until package is fixed than we take bugs for it09:31
gnomefreakno need for a bug report on fixing the package we are well aware that it needs a total overhaul since it is a big mess09:32
nikolamAha. Ok.09:34
nikolamSo May I try differen approach?09:34
nikolamYou are experienced in compiling and making packages, etc..09:34
nikolamWhere should I find more people but on that forum closely-related to that extension?09:35
nikolamI think, more people that could give me suggestions where I am going wrong with doing what i want to do (make Seamonkey 64-bit enigmail)09:36
gnomefreakdont we already have it for sm?09:36
gnomefreakit should be same package atleast i thought it built 64 binaries09:37
gnomefreaknope never mind its only for 3209:37
nikolamI was thinking the same way. We don`t have it for SM right now. Not even 32-bit that is fixed upstream and working.09:37
gnomefreakyes we do09:38
nikolamMaybe we could pack 32-bit for a start?09:38
nikolamyes?09:38
gnomefreaknikolam: http://pastebin.mozilla.org/56382209:38
gnomefreak32 is packages for sm09:38
gnomefreaksee the link above for 32 bit version09:39
gnomefreakunless you are using seamonkey 2.009:39
nikolamnot 2 yet09:40
nikolamso it is package mozilla-thunderbird-enigmail ..09:42
nikolammozilla-seamonkey-enigmail .. ?09:42
gnomefreakasac: we dont want alpha for extensions right09:42
gnomefreaknikolam: install enigmail09:42
gnomefreaksudo apt-get install enigmail09:42
nikolamthis is it? : http://packages.ubuntu.com/intrepid/mozilla-thunderbird-enigmail09:42
gnomefreakit should work with sm09:43
gnomefreakenigmail Replaces: mozilla-thunderbird-enigmail09:43
nikolami have it installed in thunderbird... it does not appear in Sm.09:43
gnomefreakread the lnk i gave you and all should be explained09:43
nikolamok reading09:44
gnomefreakapt-cache says it is09:44
gnomefreaki have a feeling i will be rebuilding it too many times before final release :(09:45
gnomefreakfound perfect extension only its pay for it or use trial version :(09:46
Jazzvaasac, I added clamdrib to the extensions table. I'll update the table later afternoon to show icons of the programs that the extension is compatible with.09:46
gnomefreakJazzva: what does it do?09:48
Jazzvagnomefreak, it should make thunderbird scan e-mails using clamav.09:48
gnomefreakanother perfect one but its prone to crackers:(09:48
gnomefreakJazzva: ah cool :)09:49
Jazzvaperfect one, prone to crackers?09:49
Jazzvagnomefreak, bug 29001409:49
ubottuLaunchpad bug 290014 in ubuntu "clamdrib needs-packaging" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/29001409:49
nikolamgnomefreak, so if I put /etc/thunderbird/enigmail.js in /etc/seamonkey/enigmail.js it will work on Sm?09:49
gnomefreakJazzva: thanks09:49
gnomefreaknikolam: it doesnt work by installing?09:50
nikolamno. just a sec to check it out.09:51
gnomefreakJazzva: is it compatiable with sm as well?09:51
gnomefreakah found it09:52
Jazzvagnomefreak, I don't know. I still haven't seen its install.rdf09:53
gnomefreakJazzva: the home page is http://www.this-page-intentionally-left-blank.org/09:53
gnomefreakJazzva: notice the ~6 words09:53
Jazzva~6 words?09:53
gnomefreakim guessing support is out09:53
gnomefreakJazzva: ther are around 6 word on the page09:54
gnomefreaki cant read them they are too little09:54
Jazzvagnomefreak, it's a link, the words say "this page intentionally left blank" :)09:54
gnomefreakoh ok thanks09:54
Jazzvannp09:54
asacJazzva: thanks09:55
Jazzvanikolam, just a wild guess. does seamonkey  look for extensions inside /usr/lib/seamonkey/extensions/?09:55
asacgnomefreak: enigmail package wont work with seamonkey09:55
asacsupport was dropped ages ago09:55
nikolamgnomefreak, I am re-installing Seamonkey here, I will check it after that.09:55
asaci think debian sarge was the last that had that officially09:55
Jazzvaasac, it won't? ok... nikolam, never mind then.09:55
gnomefreakasac: ah than it should say so in control file09:55
nikolamasac, but... it works for sm 32-bit?..09:55
asacnikolam: no it doesnt work for 32-bit too09:56
asacnikolam: we are talking about packages .. .not .xpi09:56
asacif you are looking for .xpi ask on engimail mailing list how to build it ;)09:56
asacthe source.html instructions should be fine09:56
nikolamthen why is then 32-bit linux version for seamonkey available as .xpi on enigmail site?09:56
gnomefreakbut again we need to overhaul it, who dropped sm support us, debian, or upstream?09:56
asacnikolam: thats enigmail site ... we have nothing to do with that and are not affiliated09:56
asacnikolam: i repeated that a bunch of times now ... so please read what i write ;)09:57
nikolamasac, I know that. but it Works upstream on sm 32-bit.09:57
asacand what?09:57
asacthere isnt a conflict in what i am saying09:57
asacyou have to build it for 64-bit09:57
asacin order to get it work there09:57
asaconly way to do that is to use the upstream instrucitons how to build it09:58
nikolamOk, I am trying to do just that for over a year now..09:58
gnomefreakhmmmmmm maybe i should try to update the .rdf since upstream only supports <=2.0.0.*09:59
nikolami was trying not to ge tin situation that i must use Original Sm build instead of ubuntu build of Sm to make it work. But i guess that must be a first step..09:59
asacnikolam: then thats not for you i guess ;) ... seriously. building enigmail is a pain (even with upstream instruction). doing a proper package is even harder.09:59
asacnikolam: if you cant live without it thats probably the way to go for now yes. we will hopefully get enigmail for seamonkey in jaunty10:00
asacand from there maybe provide backports ... so stay tuned10:00
nikolamhey, telling me.. i am in pain for a very log time for that ;,10:00
nikolamI hope so that it will be in Jaunty10:01
asacit will ... i promise (as of now ;))10:01
nikolambut there is sm2 coming and.. fun fun fun...10:01
asacif we could ship seamonkey 2 it would be much easier10:01
nikolamthat is right..10:01
asacnikolam: yes, that would be better. afaik sm2 has a proper extension manager which makes packaging easy10:02
nikolamhmm i should check out those release dates..10:02
asac(if seamonkey devs didnt drop that imo important release goal now)10:02
nikolamwhen is Jaunty due?10:02
asac6 month10:02
asacits always 6 month10:02
asacintrepid will be released on friday ;)10:03
asachmm even tomorrow ,)10:03
nikolamI can`t wait for Jaunty to start10:03
gnomefreakha i think i found a bookmark sync10:17
gnomefreaksmoke now work in a few10:18
gnomefreakasac: Jazzva why am i getting the feeling that either its not removing FireGPGCall dir. or we need not remove that dir. errors are here: http://pastebin.mozilla.org/56381510:24
gnomefreakor not cleanly removing the dir10:25
Jazzvaok, i'm off. have to hurry to school10:27
asacgnomefreak: there is not error in the paste10:28
gnomefreakasac: its failing to build10:29
gnomefreakit should be there10:29
gnomefreakoh damn10:29
gnomefreakok let me get full error10:29
gnomefreaki tried piping it but i see it didnt give all10:29
asacgnomefreak: can you also brief me on what you are actually trying to do? updating firegpg?10:30
asacis there a new release?10:30
gnomefreakasac: yes updating it10:30
gnomefreakyes 0.6.2 is newest10:30
gnomefreakasac: http://pastebin.mozilla.org/56383510:31
asacgnomefreak: which version was the veresion before?10:32
asacgnomefreak: you tree contains clutter10:32
asacgnomefreak: start from scratch10:32
gnomefreakold version was 0.5.210:33
asacgnomefreak: you most likely started with a cluttered tree10:33
asacand then added all those binaries10:33
asac#10:33
asacdpkg-source: error: cannot represent change to firegpg-0.6.2/FireGPGCall/ipc/public/nsIPipeListener.xpt: binary file contents changed10:33
gnomefreakasac: clutter? no it wasnt all new stuff was removing .svn by hand10:33
asac#10:33
asacdpkg-source: error: cannot represent change to firegpg-0.6.2/FireGPGCall/ipc/public/nsIPipeChannel.xpt: binary file contents changed10:33
asac#10:33
asacdpkg-source: error: cannot represent change to firegpg-0.6.2/FireGPGCall/ipc/public/nsIPipeFilterListener.xpt: binary file contents changed10:33
asac#10:33
asacdpkg-source: error: cannot represent change to firegpg-0.6.2/FireGPGCall/ipc/public/nsIPipeTransport.xpt: binary file contents changed10:33
asac#10:33
asaclike that10:33
asacgnomefreak: not its not new stuff10:33
gnomefreakasac: i knwo what it says10:33
asacits binary cruft you added to the tree10:33
asacgnomefreak: look at the upstream tree in 0.5.210:34
gnomefreakok i thnk ill package it using .xpi instead of svn less work that way10:34
asaci think there are none of the binary components in there10:34
asacgnomefreak: no please not10:34
asacgnomefreak: we hav a branch for that and we should continue to use that10:34
asacalso we cannot use .xpi because its a native extension10:34
gnomefreakok well i need an easy way to remove .svn from all dirs.10:35
asacgnomefreak: .svn isnt your problem here10:35
gnomefreakthan upstream is fucked up since all i did was update to 0.6.2 than removed .svn dirs.10:36
asacgnomefreak: not sure how you updatred to 0.6.210:36
asaci expect that thats the problem10:36
gnomefreakasac: using the wiki10:36
gnomefreakthan wiki needs to be fixed or we need an easier way| better way10:37
asacgnomefreak: i think you started with a bogus branch10:37
asacstart with https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mobile-broadband-provider-info10:37
asacerr10:37
asachttps://code.edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-dev/firefox-extensions/firegpg.ubuntu10:37
gnomefreakyou didnt save the upstream branch10:37
asacgnomefreak: you can always get it from the other branch10:38
asacbut well10:38
asaci dont see why you need to merge in revision 410:38
asacat best start at revision 1 from the branch above again and redo10:38
gnomefreakit was deversed(sp)10:38
asachttps://code.edge.launchpad.net/~gnomefreak/firefox-extensions/firegpg.upstream10:38
asacgnomefreak: yeah. thats bull-shit10:38
asacan upstream branch can never diverge10:38
gnomefreakwell that is what it said while removing .svn10:39
gnomefreaks/while/after10:39
asacgnomefreak: not sure what you are doing10:39
gnomefreakthan i will start with revision 210:39
asacbut i am sure you are doing something wrong10:39
asacgnomefreak: better start with revision 110:39
asacthe removal of .xpt isnt that important10:40
gnomefreakasac: i had to remove the .svn by hand and missed 2 in revision 3 so i got revision 410:40
asacgnomefreak: yeah. but doesnt matter. you can keep the .svn things10:40
asacits not important to remove them10:41
gnomefreakasac: no i couldnt atleawt not using the way the wiki says to upgrade10:41
asacgnomefreak: i dont see your problem. branch revision 1. update to latest svn. done for upstream10:42
gnomefreakasac: it was failing on all the .svn dirs. so if not failing due to that than the upgrade process is scred up on wiki10:42
asacthen you go and merge that to ubuntu branch10:42
asacfailing how?10:42
gnomefreaksame error only with all of the .svn files/dir10:42
asacgnomefreak: then you have a cluttered build tree10:42
asacmost likely because you test built it10:43
gnomefreaki dont remember the link but i showed james_w and fta and they said remove .svn10:43
asacor you didnt properly merge the .svn things down10:43
asacgnomefreak: yeah well. might be. i havent see the error. but in general there shouldnt be a problem10:43
asacyou just need to take care that you merge all the .upstream changes to ubuntu for those .svn files10:44
gnomefreakim betting it was the merge command in update wiki but not sure since i followed dirs.10:44
asacgnomefreak: also you need to use --export-upstream=..... to export the orig10:44
asacgnomefreak: most likely thats the problem for you10:44
asac(e.g. a bad orig)10:44
gnomefreaktar --exclude=.svn -zcvf firegpg_0.6.2.orig.tar.gz firegpg10:45
asacgnomefreak: ok go back to revision 1 ... upgrade to 0.6.2 and merge that to ubuntu10:45
asacgnomefreak: thats wrong10:45
gnomefreakthat gave me tarball10:45
asacgnomefreak: never use that10:45
asacbzr bd --export-upstream=/path/to/upstream/tree --builder= ...10:46
gnomefreakfta told me too so i did10:46
asacyeah ... but its wrong10:46
asacgnomefreak: at least dont exclude the .svn10:46
gnomefreakwhy do we need .svn?10:46
asacotherwise you will get the error ... for which they told you you should remove the .svn10:46
asacgnomefreak: we dont need it, but they dont hurt either10:46
asacalso the orig has to be exactly the same as the .upstrewam branch10:47
asacso if .svn is there we have to use that10:47
gnomefreakok will try it this way than10:47
asacyeah10:47
gnomefreakis bzr branch -# branch/locaton?10:47
asac?10:47
gnomefreakim gonna start with 2 since we got rid of all the native windows crap10:48
asacgnomefreak: at best start with revision 110:48
gnomefreakasac:to pull the revision #10:48
asacgnomefreak: and once we have done that we can do the cleanup10:48
asacgnomefreak: bzr branch -r REVISION branch/location10:49
gnomefreakah ok will redo in a few10:49
gnomefreakasac: your command doesnt make sense (to build orig tarball) above10:52
asacgnomefreak: it makes. the --export-upstream=... bit is important. just use the rest like you did before10:53
gnomefreakbuilder= part would be build command AFAIK10:53
asacgnomefreak: err. thats just an example.10:53
asacits _not_ complete obviously10:53
asac... == stands for ommitted stuff10:53
gnomefreakyes i knwo that but if i add either build command or tar -bleh i have big feeling it wont work10:54
gnomefreakso as i did before is the issue im having with it10:55
asacgnomefreak: just use what you used before to build the .ubuntu tree10:55
asacbut add the --export-upstream bit to produce the tarball from .upstream branch on-the-fly10:55
gnomefreakah10:55
asacafter first export you can copy the orig.tar.gz to the tarballs/ dir and then dont need to export on each and every build10:55
asacgnomefreak: ^^10:55
asac[reed]: network-manager - 0.7~~svn20081018t105859-0ubuntu2~nm3  ... uploaded to https://edge.launchpad.net/~network-manager/+archive ... asked for feedback on bug 27218511:23
ubottuLaunchpad bug 272185 in network-manager-applet "[Intrepid] iwl3945 + iwlagn -- network-manager will not connect to a WPA EAP (Enterprise) network (disassociating by local choice (reason=3) )" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/27218511:23
asacthanks11:23
asacok off for some NM testing12:36
gnomefreakwaiting on licensing issues on excudo (replacement for bookmarksftp) and ill screw with firegpg later tonight.13:23
bfillerasac: do you know if /etc/firefox-3.0/prefs/ubufox.js is tagged as a conffile?18:59
Jazzvaasac, I replied to your comment about Firefox3Extensions vs. MozillaExtensions. In short, it's already redirecting to MozillaTeam/Extensions/List, so it's generic enough for all extensions :)19:00
newz2000hi asac, is there a release happening soon that will cause people who have been using intrepid already to see the start page again?20:06
newz2000asac: unping, it's no big deal20:12
=== jetsaredim is now known as teopnoxa
=== teopnoxa is now known as jetsaredim
asacbfiller: yes its a conffile21:29
asacbfiller: at least i hope ;)21:29
asacbfiller: check dpkg --status or something21:29
bfillerasac: ok, was hoping it wasn't so that it could be diverted via dpkg-divert21:32
=== asac_ is now known as asac
armin76asac: bumb ubuntu!23:18
=== asac_ is now known as asac
=== asac_ is now known as asac

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!