=== BaD-AcerLaptop is now known as BaD_CrC [01:15] anyone else having problems with navigation buttons in firefox (running intrepid 64) [01:20] hmm must have corrupted my profile somehow :(. "rm ~/.mozilla" fixed the problem === nellery_ is now known as nellery [08:15] I am "trying out" the assigning a package to a bug report task. I'm looking at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/292355 Should I assign it to xorg? [08:15] Launchpad bug 292355 in ubuntu "no display when using kubuntu installation cd" [Undecided,New] [08:15] or are there more steps that I should think about first === calc_ is now known as calc [12:21] Bug 287244 changed to: Confirmed - Not just me that has the problem on the CQ50 [12:22] Launchpad bug 287244 in ubuntu "[intrepid] Compaq Presario CQ50 cannot install/boot" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/287244 [12:26] Question: What does the command lspci -nnv show that is any different from the standard lspci command [12:26] ? [12:27] xteejx: device IDs and more detailed information [12:29] So if I get Ubuntu to boot at all then I should copy the output of that into my bug report for more info? === bureflux is now known as afflux === jtisme is now known as jt66 [13:59] bug 186449 is a wishlist item [13:59] Launchpad bug 186449 in synaptic ""Mark all Upgrades" should be grayed out if there are no upgrades" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/186449 [14:00] bug 155930 has priority low [14:00] Launchpad bug 155930 in synaptic ""Unmark all" clears the package list (!)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/155930 [14:00] could somebody mark those appropriately? [14:24] Hi there ! I'd like to join the ubuntu bugsquad team... the only question is... how do I get started ? [14:25] I just opened an account on launchpad [14:25] I am trying to backtrace plasma, but after installing kdebase-workspace-dbg the gdb log says "The program has no registers now." Am I missing something? [14:25] read the wiki [14:25] franswa99: great [14:25] I see that one of the tasks is "assigning packages" but I'm not so sure to know how to do that [14:26] I mean: I can see the bugs that have no package [14:26] but I'm not sure in which package they belong [14:26] franswa99: AFAICT you read through a bug report, possibly ask questions to the reporter, and decide which package the bug belongs to [14:27] that's why it sometimes takes time: communicate with the reporter [14:27] do google [14:27] etc. [14:27] and of course, you can always ask help here. [14:28] (as I just did at the beginning of your questions...) [14:28] ok [14:28] and is there a place where I can see the list of possible packages [14:29] to which a bug can be assigned? [14:29] launchpad has a list [14:29] * Elbrus is looking [14:31] well, what I was looking for is different, but basically ALL ubuntu packages are candidates. [14:32] and how do you ask questions to the reporter in launchpad? [14:32] franswa99: by the way, don't worry if it takes some time to get a feeling for it [14:32] ok ! [14:32] just add a comment [14:32] ok thanks [14:33] if you ask for more information, you usually can set the status to incomplete [14:33] franswa99: I would read the articles found here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BugSquad/KnowledgeBase [14:34] franswa99: specifically see the canned responses or "standard replies" section [14:34] great thanks [14:34] didn# [14:34] didn't read those ones [14:34] franswa99: there is also a great youtube video tutorial on assigning packages, you will get the hang of it [14:35] angusthefuzz: would you have an url??? [14:35] franswa99: if you have trouble, just ask questions here, someone should be around to give you some mentoring [14:35] * Elbrus would like to see it too [14:35] one second, i will find ity [14:36] :) [08:27] and of course, you can always ask help here. [14:36] http://videos.ubuntu.com/qa/assigning-packages-to-bugs.ogg [14:36] angusthefuzz: thanks [14:36] (okay I lied, it wasnt youtube, but it is very helpful) [14:36] thanks [14:37] thank you both for helping [14:40] because the question with franswa99 sort of shaded my question I as it again: [14:40] [08:25] I am trying to backtrace plasma, but after installing kdebase-workspace-dbg the gdb log says "The program has no registers now." Am I missing something? [14:40] s/with/from [16:38] Hey world. [16:39] Where would a GNOME d-n-d bug (that dragging from the run dialog / a launcher to the "sessions" window should add that launcher as a startup item) go? (it affects 3 different applications) [16:41] lfaraone: add it to all three then? (via also affects) [16:41] can you give bug number? [16:41] Elbrus: doens't have one yet. [16:41] ok [16:41] Elbrus: I'm going to report it ina minute. [16:42] you can make in Launchpad that the bug affects multiple packages [16:42] s/make/mark [16:43] Is there an easy way to tell what pulled in a certain package, ie what depended/recommended it such that it is now installed? [16:44] mrooney: rdepends. [16:44] lfaraone: thanks! [16:44] mrooney: ie "$ apt-cache rdepends bash [16:44] mrooney: No problem. [16:45] lfaraone: it was my understand that drag-n-drop bugs should be filed under the drop application, unless there is so reason to believe the drag'd information is incorrect [16:45] angusthefuzz: Ah, OK. [16:46] * lfaraone goes on a bug-reporting binge. [16:51] Ok, can someone confirm 292684 for me? (try to drag a launcher into gnome-session-properties) Oh, and it's wishlist, right? (I don't want to set my own bug priority) [16:52] * bug 292684 [16:52] Launchpad bug 292684 in gnome-session "Launcher items cannot be dragged into gnome-session-properties" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/292684 [17:02] lfaraone: can you be more verbosive? I don't know now what to do to reproduce this bug (sorry, I don't understand the text) [17:02] Elbrus: ah, sorry. [17:03] Elbrus: Ok, there are launchers on your desktop, right? (links to applications) [17:03] I don't have any on my desktop. [17:04] Elbrus: Ok, create a launcher by doing "alt + f2" , typing the app name, and dragging the icon to the desktop [17:04] lfaraone: i am able to drag from the panel to sessions without a problem, is that not specific enough? [17:04] Elbrus: in this case, we'll make a link to "gnome-terminal" [17:04] * Elbrus will do [17:04] angusthefuzz: ah... odd... [17:04] angusthefuzz: oh. oops. [17:04] angusthefuzz: odd, that didn't work last time I tried it. [17:05] * lfaraone marks bug as invald. [17:05] heh [17:05] angusthefuzz: while you're there, are there a lot of GNOME entries with "no description"? [17:05] angusthefuzz: (that's another bug (a usability/"noob" bug) I'm gonna report) [17:06] yes lfaraone there are a lot with no description [17:07] angusthefuzz: do you agree that that is a usability problem? (people should be able to understand why things do what they do on startup...) [17:07] lfaraone: I agree [17:07] angusthefuzz: Ok. /me reportbugs [17:08] angusthefuzz: That'd be one report with multiple "affects", right? [17:08] correct [17:08] actually, i am not sure where the descriptions are derived from [17:10] angusthefuzz: I'll ask in -motu [17:10] sounds like a plan [17:37] hi, who is is responsible for the emacs 2.3 on ubuntu. i'd like to point out that there isn't even a link to start it [17:37] it's the ver. of emacs with AA fonts [17:44] is anyone around? [17:47] mohbana: usually it is motu (Masters of the Universe) but emacs is core (see http://packages.ubuntu.com/intrepid/emacs) [17:48] #ubuntu-dev [17:48] I think [17:49] Oh, and it's version 22 [17:50] Elbrus, not it's 23 i'm referring to === bddebian2 is now known as bddebian [18:25] does anyone have an opinion about bug #292362 [18:25] Launchpad bug 292362 in ubuntu "moon is flat (according to the KDE4 logout dialog)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/292362 [18:28] ummm, ask them to produce a mockup of what would make it look spherical instead of "flat" because I can't see this as an issue at all, I think we all know what we get when we represent a 3d object in 2d space. [18:28] i didnt know if it should be invalidated outright because monitors are 2d [18:28] but okay, I like your method better [18:31] angusthefuzz: even in the most absurb of bugs it is best to give them a chance to fully explain themselves. [18:31] greg-g: that is good to keep in mind, thanks [18:31] sometimes its hard not to be snippy [18:31] since there are people with real problems out there [18:33] angusthefuzz: yeah, I know. If you find yourself about to post a snippy comment, it is best to breathe and come back to it later :) [18:33] yeah, it hasnt happened yet [18:34] hi, i'm getting a problem with the shutdown dialog in intrepid ibex, where both hibernate and help are assigned the same shortkey (h) [18:34] I've caught myself before doing it a couple of times, so just wait, you'll get there soon enough if you look at a sufficiently large number of bugs ;) [18:35] also the shutdown window isn't in focus when i press the power button [18:35] what app do i file that bug on? [18:35] yaxu: I see "Shut Down" as having the S underlined [18:36] greg-g: how about hibernate [18:36] I'm not going to press "h" right now because I am in the middle of things, but can you take a screenshot of what you see? [18:36] sure [18:36] yaxu: hibernate has the "H" underlined [18:36] greg-g: and help? [18:37] i mean the help button [18:38] greg-g: http://yaxu.org/hibernate.png [18:38] greg-g: for me both hibernate and help have H underlined, so alt-h do nothing [18:39] oh, I misunderstood you [18:39] no need to try to press alt-h, you can see both with h underlined as you say [18:39] sorry about that [18:39] no prob [18:39] and then I had the dialog open too long and it just shutdown my computer, hence the dealy [18:39] :( [18:39] delay [18:40] sorry about that [18:40] hope you didn't lose any important state [18:40] yaxu: so it does nothing for you when you press alt+h? [18:40] i'll double check [18:40] yaxu: nope, I'm good, thanks though [18:40] ok it does _something_ [18:41] it cycles between the two buttons [18:41] whereas if I did alt-s it shuts down right away [18:41] and in the previous ubuntu alt-h hibernated straight away [18:46] Well that confirms it so i'll definitely report it, thanks [18:46] seems i don't need to specify a particular package [18:47] i'll stick a warning about the timeout on the report too! [18:47] yaxu: sorry, I was just trying to find the right package, and it is "gnome-session" [18:48] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-session/+filebug [18:56] ah thanks greg-g [18:56] i just submitted, but i will edit [18:56] yaxu: what is the bug number? [18:57] 292734 [18:58] confirmed it [18:59] actually, that is a simple enough bug that I just set it to triaged [19:29] thanks greg [19:29] yaxu: no problem, thanks for reporting [19:32] a pleasure [19:32] * yaxu goes to find more [19:44] is it a bug if alsa fails to reload its settings after a reboot? [19:46] I can type sudo alsa-ctl restore and then they are restored just not say in rc.local [19:48] I have a problem with DVD drive. Every time I try eject dvd or cd it ejects and takes it back immediately. Against what I need to report bug? [20:44] hm, the cruft remover seems to have uninstalled an application, somehow === thunderstruck is now known as gnomefreak [21:16] mrooney: cruft remover did something to my grub menu.lst which made Ubunu unbootable and I had to go through lots of trouble fixing it [21:16] I no longer trust it.. [21:20] mrooney: cruft remover removed non cruft data sometime back for me too === jacob is now known as jacob`` === jacob`` is now known as jacob [22:46] I am not sure whether this bug (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/258584) is fixed in 8.10. Anyway, my screen became and stayed black when I set the resolution too high. [22:46] Launchpad bug 258584 in xserver-xorg-video-intel "[82G33/G31] Changing screen resolution results in a black screen" [Undecided,Fix released] [22:47] I installed 8.10 today so it probably has this fix or? [22:48] How can I know whether this is a new bug. [22:49] Heooo: yes, it is supposed to be fixed in Intrepid [22:50] murdok: Is this fix in the newest 8.10 Ubuntu? [22:50] If you are experiencing the same, you can reopen the bug explaining the reason, it can be a regression [22:50] yes [22:50] murdok: Ok, I will open the bug. First, I will replicate it. [22:55] Btw is it normal that the screen become blurry and black-greyish at some resolutions? === nhandler_ is now known as nhandler