[00:00] rgreening, [Mon 21:56] rgreening, ok, sure. i need to work on the merge of the packaging 1st [00:00] by merge, i meant convergence [00:01] fta: cool. Well, let me know when I can be of assistance. :) [00:05] rgreening, sure [00:09] [reed]: http://paste.ubuntu.com/67028/ ... maybe that is enough for your openvpn connection? [00:09] i checked the other parameters and they seem ok [00:10] * asac_ wonders how to get something like that into gconf [00:11] <[reed]> want me to send you some %gconf.xml files? [00:11] good question ;) [00:11] just a snippet? [00:12] <[reed]> I can tarball up my entire ~/.gconf/system/networking/vpn_connections directory if it helps [00:12] <[reed]> as long as you don't post it anywhere public :) [00:12] [reed]: no i think just two would be enough [00:12] e.g. one openvpn thing and the vpnc maybe [00:12] <[reed]> ok === asac_ is now known as asac [00:13] [reed]: the wireless settings were not migrated either? [00:13] <[reed]> I see two [00:14] <[reed]> so, it migrated two... out of how many, I dunno [00:14] * [reed] looks [00:14] <[reed]> two out of 29 [00:14] hah [00:14] [reed]: did you create the two afterwards? [00:14] <[reed]> nope [00:14] <[reed]> this laptop is wired [00:14] <[reed]> so, haven't touched wireless setting [00:14] <[reed]> s [00:15] ok. at least this indicates the the migration code is run [00:15] which is a good thing on its own :) [00:15] * asac thinks positive [00:15] <[reed]> lol [00:15] <[reed]> so, you want vpnc, openvpn, and one of my wireless networks that failed? [00:16] [reed]: if there is a line for the wireless that would be good [00:16] [reed]: maybe you see the difference? [00:16] are those of different type? have different fields? [00:18] * asac [reed] see any difference when looking into two? [00:18] oops ;) [00:31] [reed], my ff3.1 is using ~30% cpu even when idle :( [00:31] [reed], still nothing to identify which tab is the pig? [00:53] i opened a huge mxr source page and it made 3.1 freeze ;) [00:54] for about 20 seconds [00:57] bad firefox [00:57] use chrome ;) [00:57] fta: did you port chrome yet? [00:57] get on that! [00:57] lol [00:59] jcastro, is there some activity on the debian side regarding chromium? [00:59] fta: not afaik [00:59] I am unsure [01:07] asac, \o/ http://paste.ubuntu.com/67047/ [01:10] fta: cool [01:10] fta: thats relief i guess ;) [01:12] yep, it was about time [01:13] maybe it will load faster [01:49] finally, i've updated seamonkey-2.0 to hg/comm-central === rgreening_ is now known as rgreening === rgreening_ is now known as rgreening [11:38] * gnomefreak seeing alot of lock ups with tbird-3 :( [11:39] ill be around for a bit while i set up everything [11:56] does sunbird work for anyone? [11:56] 0.8 [11:57] seems i cant add a calendar at all [11:57] hi [11:57] hi [11:59] gnomefreak: works for me afaict [11:59] remote caalendar works? [12:00] im gonna try MT version [12:04] which remote service? [12:04] google doesnt work afaik [12:05] asac: fridge.ubuntu.com events but MT version is working but the one in intrepid didnt work [12:06] i removed the dir in $HOME/../.mozill [12:21] gnomefreak: whats the difference of MT vs. intrepid version? [12:21] isnt that the same branch? [12:22] asac: i thought so but one works and one doesnt atleast here [12:22] gnomefreak: could you check the version string for differences? [12:22] also do a debdiff on the sources to compare please [12:22] asac: the diffs are in the PPAs [12:24] my PPA is the one in intrepid although i built it for hardy. but i will try intrepids again maybe i just need new profile [12:24] hardy stuff is outdated afaik [12:29] once released in intrepid we didnt change anything so it should be the same other than the latest changelog [12:30] ill be back. once you release 0.9 back to me i have a few things i would like to test than i can relelase it to hardy intrepid in the PPA [12:31] ill be back this is a pain in the ass :( im making new bookmark file by merging firefoxes into flock so i can save flocks and add it to ff and friends [12:41] we still never changed the icon for it [12:49] gnomefreak: oh ... so i am suposed to deal with sunbird 0.9 ;) [12:49] gtk ;) [12:49] but yeah. i hope its easy to do and debian also wants this stuff [12:49] yep remember there was the timezone issue you wanted to hack [12:49] timezone issue? ah ...yeah [12:49] gnomefreak: now i remember ;) [12:49] gnomefreak: so you started on 0.9 branch already right? [12:50] as far as the icon IIRC you changed it but never changed it in .desktop file [12:50] gnomefreak: si that in your code repo? [12:50] asac: yep i have [12:50] hold on ill get it [12:50] cool [12:51] https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~gnomefreak/sunbird/ubuntu-0.x asac [12:51] gnomefreak: ok cool [12:51] gnomefreak: so it works in general, except that the timeszon stuff is missing right? [12:52] asac: no it installs but you cant do anything with it due to the timezone crap [12:52] gnomefreak: yeah. but it builds ;) [12:53] yep sure does [12:53] gnomefreak: do we use the compare.mk stuff from fta ? [12:53] e.g. to get info in case files that are in dist/ are not installed in binary tree [12:53] i think we should add that [12:53] i dont think so, adding that sounds fine to me [12:53] i havent looked at that since this is first im hearing about it [12:54] sure [12:54] not even sure if it works out of box [12:54] if not we should see if we can fix that [12:55] * gnomefreak thinks people have gone nuts, wanting LP to ask gender when signing the COC to make sure the name is ok in spanish [12:55] asac: do you have it handy so i can look at it [12:56] maybe i have seen it now that i think of it [12:57] its just one inlude in rules [12:57] xul has it [12:57] ffox probsbly too [12:58] yeah i think i remember seeing it [12:59] gnomefreak: hmm ... seems to be not a distinct include [12:59] but something that gets pulled in by include /usr/share/mozilla-devscripts/$(DEB_MOZ_APPLICATION).mk [12:59] most likely [12:59] lets check with fta before pursuing this [12:59] k [13:01] i have dapper release schedule bookmarked still :( [13:01] gnomefreak: when is next dapper release? [13:01] :) [13:01] :) [13:02] Hello guys, hope i'm not interupting [13:02] greg: you interrupt the slicense ;) [13:02] silence ;) [13:02] hehe [13:03] I wanted to lurk while i work through https://wiki.edubuntu.org/MozillaTeam/XulApps/Packaging [13:09] greg: welcome [13:09] greg: any specific xulapp you are looking at [13:09] ? [13:09] Thanks asac. [13:09] greg: or just in general? [13:10] Yup, I'm trying to get my http://aliwal.googlecode.com packaged [13:11] cool. [13:11] greg: is that a xul app that has its own native componentns? [13:12] or just chrome code? [13:12] and javascript components obviously ;) [13:12] It's all chrome. A thin XUL wrapper around two HTML pages really [13:12] greg: should be quite easy then [13:13] greg: i think most parts of that page are overkill for you then [13:13] greg: how do they ship their sources? do they have a build system? [13:14] it's an ant build process. I ripped of the prism packaging so a starting point and now have a .orig.tar.gz [13:14] greg: what does it produce? e.g. the ant thing? [13:15] i seemed to have lost seamonkey-2 i cant find it in repos [13:15] just a tree with a xulapp? [13:15] or a jar or something? [13:15] * asac not even source if xulapps can be deplyoed as a jar [13:15] anyway ... moving to a different place nowö. [13:15] bbiw [13:16] yes, a directory tree with an application.ini [13:17] greg: ok that should be easy then [13:18] An examples I could follow? debian/control etc is giving me a hard time [13:18] greg: we should wait for fta ... he wrote the instrucitons on the wiki [13:18] asac: btw can you give me an idea where in upstream mozilla bugs i can watch/follow you? i was unablet o find it [13:19] greg: its best when he is here so we can address the issues identified with the wiki page directly [13:19] greg: debian control should be similar to prism i guess [13:19] just that you dont need all the "app" packages [13:19] just the main package one [13:20] is there an extension or an Xul packaged app? [13:20] ok moving for real ;) [13:20] Sorry, no mozilla bug. Ta though, will keep an eye out for fta [13:34] damn forgot :( [13:41] sunbird bug seems to be a profile one. new profile fixed it [14:04] gnomefreak: hmm [14:05] gnomefreak: so unreproducible ... bad [14:05] gnomefreak: still have the other profile? [14:05] nope [14:06] it was just me i figure so im not too concerned with it [14:13] * gnomefreak off for a bit [16:19] @time [16:19] Current time in Etc/UTC: November 04 2008, 16:19:31 - Current meeting: Server Team [16:49] greg, asac: i don't have time right now but my tutorial could sure be improved. I've packaged as xulapps prism (>= 0.9.1), fennec (1.0), xul-explorer and instantbird since i wrote that tutorial so things are definitely better and i should be able to make the workflow easier. [16:49] btw, all those packages are in branches on lp, and in my ppa, if you care to have a look [16:49] Hello mate, thanks for dropping by [16:50] I think i'm making progress through sheer dumb luck at the moment [16:50] XULExplorer sounds like an idea example [16:51] I had a dig for it ealier but came up empty handed. Is it available in a PPA or somewhere ? [16:51] it is [16:52] https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/xul-explorer/xul-explorer.head [16:55] that package is clean, it uses the full thing: cdbs, quilt and mozilla-devscripts (for mozclient so it does the tarball for you, and xulapps) [16:56] i have to go now. let me know if you have issues understanding it [17:05] Superb! Thanks I'll let you know how I get on. [20:40] fta: songbird 1.0rc1 is ready: http://blog.songbirdnest.com/2008/11/04/songbird-10-release-candidate-1-is-available-for-testing/ [20:49] (but not tagged yet i don't think) [20:52] hi [20:53] stevel, i need a tag to create the proper tarball :( [20:57] isnt that svn? [20:57] fta: ? [20:57] asac, it is [20:57] fta: revision number snapshot then ;) [20:58] svn tags are a bit special, kind of frozen branches [20:58] foo/trunk => foo/tags/my_tag [20:59] there's not guaranty that foo/tags/my_tag comes from trunk, it could be from a sub branch, which i suspect is true for sb [20:59] fta: well. you can still pick a revision number there [20:59] fta: technically they are just branches [21:00] a tag in svn is just a copy [21:00] yes [21:00] fta: anyway. if you say you dont know how to get the RC sourcen then i agree [21:00] thought you said you couldnt release a revision number as a RC1 ;) [21:00] but they have a branch for 1.0, while trunk is already 1.1.0pre [21:00] yeah. you could just pick a revision from 1.0 branch then [21:01] sure but i need to update my get-orig-source rule, while i already support proper tags [21:01] ok ;) [21:01] this tarball is quite complex :( [21:02] i understand that [21:02] xul, taglib in addition to sn [21:02] i wouldnt put effort into that either ;) [21:02] sb [21:02] but wait for real release if nothing happens [21:03] i hope stevel could motivate preed to create that RC1 tag ;) [21:11] yeah that would be the best option ;) [21:12] lol https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.0/+bug/217211/comments/6 [21:12] Launchpad bug 217211 in firefox-3.0 "firefox doesn't allow kerio mailserver to send mail" [Undecided,Invalid] [21:13] at least some fun when reading bugs [22:20] [reed], when is 1.9.1b2 due ? [22:21] <[reed]> freeze is tonight [22:21] <[reed]> I think another couple of weeks [22:21] oh, great === mconnor_ is now known as mconnor