lifeless | beuno: search should be fully fixed now | 00:17 |
---|---|---|
lifeless | Peng_: thanks for that fix if I didn't already say so. | 00:17 |
Peng_ | :) | 00:23 |
lamalex | Hi, is there any documentation on setting up loggerhead? | 00:47 |
lamalex | I'm trying to figure out how to configure apache to forward requests to it, but not really having a lot of luck | 00:47 |
lifeless | lamalex: uhm, 'serve-branches.py PATH' | 00:57 |
lifeless | lamalex: then in apache just setup a proxypass | 00:57 |
lamalex | i did that... it's not working | 01:02 |
lifeless | lamalex: check its working directly | 01:10 |
lifeless | that you can use ff on the localhost port 8080 (where loggerhead starts) | 01:10 |
lifeless | oh, there is also an optionI think to enable host munging via apache - in server-branches | 01:10 |
lamalex | yah, i didn't want to do localhost because that means having to ssh portforward | 01:12 |
lamalex | which while not hard | 01:12 |
lamalex | is just annoying | 01:12 |
lamalex | but i'll try it | 01:12 |
lamalex | ok yah it's working on localhost | 01:13 |
=== mw is now known as mw|out | ||
lifeless | lamalex: make sure you have python-pastedeploy installed | 01:50 |
lamalex | lifeless: yah, i do | 01:51 |
lifeless | lamalex: specify --prefix=/apacheprefix/ | 01:52 |
lifeless | lamalex: to serve-branches | 01:52 |
lifeless | e.g. if you want loggerhead at http://host/loggerhead/ | 01:52 |
lifeless | specify --prefix=/loggerhead/ | 01:52 |
lifeless | (IIRC - the help could be better on this) | 01:53 |
lamalex | what about if i want bzr.host.com | 01:57 |
lifeless | it should autodetect the host | 02:11 |
=== timchen119 is now known as nasloc__ | ||
poolie | spiv: did you have other stuff for 1.9? is it up for review, merged, or not ready yet? | 02:35 |
spiv | poolie: nothing else for 1.9, no | 02:42 |
thumper | spiv: so server side autopacks have made it for 1.9? | 03:27 |
poolie | thumper: yes | 03:27 |
thumper | w00t | 03:27 |
thumper | I wonder if this fixes a problem we were having on LP | 03:27 |
thumper | poolie: is format 1.9 the default format? | 03:28 |
thumper | I didn't follow the answer to that one before | 03:28 |
poolie | no | 03:28 |
poolie | it also has some fixes for the transient pack-file-not-found bug | 03:29 |
=== ronny is now known as Guest45994 | ||
gauthierm | I exported a svn repository to my local machine, set it as a bzr repository and made a hundred or so revisions. I now have commit access to the svn repo. Is it possible to push my individual bzr commits to the svn repo? | 04:37 |
poolie | gauthierm: i *think* just pushing back will move them across, but i've barely used bzr-svn myself | 04:40 |
=== ronny is now known as Guest58216 | ||
gauthierm | bzr crashed when I tried to merge my bzr changes into svn. | 04:54 |
gauthierm | Looks like its bug #240597. | 04:57 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 240597 in bzr-svn "bzr crashed on merging from local bzr branch into a local svn branch" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/240597 | 04:57 |
gauthierm | heh, you're good. | 04:57 |
gauthierm | wait, you're a robot! | 04:57 |
gauthierm | I'll sort it out tomorrow. | 04:58 |
poolie | lifeless: ping? can you read bug 293440? | 05:52 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 293440 in bzr "Cannot commit to bound svn branch: "invalid property value 'branch-nick' for None"" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/293440 | 05:52 |
lifeless | poolie: I am assuming the new code in 1.8 did something like 'config = master.get_config()' ... rather than 'master_nick = master.nick' | 05:54 |
lifeless | poolie: yes, I am able to read it | 05:54 |
lifeless | and your patch looks decent | 05:55 |
lifeless | (decent and appropriate) | 05:56 |
poolie | thanks | 05:58 |
=== poolie changed the topic of #bzr to: Bazaar version control system | http://bazaar-vcs.org | 1.9 released 7 Nov | http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | http://planet.bazaar-vcs.org/ | ||
Peng_ | Whee :) | 06:36 |
poolie | yep | 06:36 |
Peng_ | BTW, the NEWS file says 1.9 was released on 2008-10-31, not that 1.9rc1 was. | 06:37 |
poolie | yes | 06:38 |
poolie | it's fixed in the actual 1.9 | 06:38 |
poolie | if you're looking on the web it may take a little while to update | 06:38 |
poolie | ah | 06:38 |
poolie | now that was actually pretty easy | 06:38 |
poolie | automation yay | 06:39 |
Peng_ | ok :) | 06:40 |
DBO | is there any status on monodevelop-bzr other than "it still does nothing"? | 06:42 |
vila | hi all | 07:18 |
lifeless | hi | 07:20 |
=== Guest58216 is now known as ronny | ||
lifeless | gnight | 10:00 |
jszakmeister | jelmer: you there? | 10:15 |
jelmer | jszakmeister, hi | 11:21 |
jszakmeister | Hey! | 11:21 |
jszakmeister | I reported a bug a few days ago: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bzr-svn/+bug/291370 | 11:22 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 291370 in bzr-svn "bzr-svn seems to corrupt a knit repository" [Undecided,New] | 11:22 |
jszakmeister | I was curious if you had seen something like that before. | 11:22 |
jszakmeister | I thought I was using a "typical" workflow with bzr-svn... but perhaps I'm doing something wrong. | 11:22 |
jszakmeister | Oh, and I just tried to reproduce with bzr 1.9 and bzr-svn 0.4.14... I get a different error, but it still backtraces. | 11:23 |
jszakmeister | brb... | 11:26 |
jszakmeister | ...alright, I'm back. | 11:34 |
verterok_ | 'morning | 11:41 |
=== verterok_ is now known as verterok | ||
jelmer | jszakmeister, thanks | 11:41 |
jelmer | jszakmeister, I'll see if I can reproduce here | 11:41 |
jszakmeister | jelmer: I added a script for the new bzr 1.9 release... but that produces a different error at the moment: alueError: invalid property value 'branch-nick' for None | 11:42 |
jszakmeister | ...and thanks for looking into it. I appreciate it! | 11:43 |
=== jszakmeister is now known as jszakmeister|awa | ||
=== Rolly is now known as kumi | ||
Odd_Bloke | Could someone help me diagnose what's going on in http://paste.pocoo.org/show/90470/? | 13:49 |
luks | broken server that responds 302 instead of 404 to a missing page? | 13:51 |
Odd_Bloke | Right, that's what I thought. | 13:51 |
Odd_Bloke | luks: Thanks. :) | 13:52 |
nekohayo | hmm. bzr-svn is not built in the ppa | 14:16 |
nekohayo | I tried getting the latest tarball but when doing make I get this: | 14:16 |
nekohayo | http://pastebin.com/d6f2ed19f | 14:17 |
nekohayo | any ideas? | 14:17 |
=== beuno_ is now known as beuno | ||
jelmer | nekohayo, you need to have libsvn-dev installde | 14:28 |
jelmer | *installed | 14:28 |
nekohayo | that should be mentionned in the INSTALL file or wiki :) | 14:29 |
jelmer | it is :-) | 14:30 |
jelmer | Requirements/Subversion development files in INSTALL | 14:30 |
nekohayo | jelmer: http://pastebin.com/d641f37ac I couldn't find a package named rst2html? what did I miss? | 14:32 |
jelmer | nekohayo, install python-docutils | 14:33 |
nekohayo | it builds! :) | 14:44 |
jelmer | beuno, hi | 15:03 |
=== kiko is now known as kiko-fud | ||
=== thekorn_ is now known as thekorn | ||
beuno | jelmer, hi | 15:39 |
jelmer | beuno, now I forgot what I wanted to ask :-( | 15:40 |
beuno | jelmer, still nice that you said hi | 15:41 |
beuno | we can leave it at that until you remember | 15:41 |
jelmer | :-) | 15:41 |
jelmer | looking forward to the new loggerhead btw | 15:41 |
jelmer | the new code.bitlbee.org should also be running it soon, in favor of bzr-hgweb | 15:42 |
beuno | cool, it's been a while since we released | 15:43 |
dash | i've got an old mercurial repository I want to convert to bzr. how are people doing that these days? | 16:02 |
dash | neither bzr-hg or bzr-hgimport seem to work with the latest versions of things. | 16:02 |
Odd_Bloke | dash: fastexport and fastimport, I think. | 16:04 |
luks | bzr-fastimport with soem of the git exporters, probably | 16:04 |
uniscript | is there a bzr-svn for bzr 1.9? Or shall I repackage the 1.6-1.7 version to allow 1.9? | 16:05 |
dash | Odd_Bloke: Fancy. Looks like that did the job | 16:07 |
dash | thanks guys :) | 16:07 |
jelmer | uniscript, there is a bzr-svn for 1.9, 0.4.14 | 16:07 |
uniscript | any plans for a package? each time bzr comes out I lose bzr-svn | 16:08 |
uniscript | :( | 16:08 |
jelmer | uniscript, there's already a debian package, http://bzr.debian.org/pkg-bazaar/bzr-svn/experimental/ | 16:08 |
uniscript | directory is empty | 16:08 |
jelmer | it's a bzr branch | 16:08 |
jelmer | the actual package can be found at http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=bzr-svn | 16:09 |
uniscript | ta | 16:09 |
uniscript | hmm no i386 support and I get tied in dependency knots trying to build the thing | 16:16 |
jelmer | uniscript, what sort of dependency knots? | 16:23 |
uniscript | pdebuild depends on 1.9 and debuild has sqlite3 problems due to using medibuntu | 16:24 |
jdong | hey bzr folks :) | 16:37 |
uniscript | but why is debian bzr-svn 0.4.14 not available for i386? | 16:37 |
jdong | I'm looking at a bzr backport to Hardy. Would like to get Jaunty up to 1.9 first | 16:38 |
* jdong grabs changelog of 1.9~rc1 vs 1.9 | 16:38 | |
james_w | jdong: 1.9-1 is in Debian if you hadn't seen it | 16:40 |
jdong | james_w: obviously I should stop using packages.d.o :) | 16:40 |
* jdong clobbers that shortcut for a p.qa.d.o one :) | 16:40 | |
james_w | good choice :-) | 16:40 |
jdong | james_w: is there a sync request open for jaunty yet? | 16:41 |
=== ahasenack is now known as pandora | ||
james_w | jdong: nah, I assumed it would auto-sync | 16:41 |
james_w | yeah, it will | 16:42 |
james_w | jelmer: hey, is everything in shape for bzr 1.9 in Debian? | 16:42 |
jdong | yeah ok the problem ("problem") is sid only has 1.5-1.1 from what I can see | 16:43 |
jelmer | jdong, we can't upload to sid yet because it's kept open for uploads for lenny | 16:43 |
james_w | ah, of course | 16:43 |
james_w | jdong: would you like to request it, or shall I do it? | 16:44 |
jelmer | uniscript, the debian auto-builders haven't build bzr-svn yet for i386 (but they haven't built bzr itself either yet, so that shouldn't be a problem) | 16:44 |
jelmer | james_w, Yeah, everything in Debian should be in shape for 1.9 | 16:44 |
jdong | james_w: please do, you are more experienced with the stack of packages involved :) | 16:44 |
james_w | jelmer: great, thanks. We're going to work on backporting it to Intrepid/Hardy so we need a group that works well together. | 16:45 |
jdong | awesome :) | 16:45 |
=== kiko-fud is now known as kiko | ||
jelmer | james_w, I gave the .orig.tar.gz checksum issue some more thought | 17:01 |
james_w | cool | 17:02 |
jelmer | james_w, I think the best solution would probably be to use the version from the apt repository if there is one, and otherwise generate one | 17:02 |
jelmer | james_w, would that make sense? | 17:03 |
james_w | that could work | 17:03 |
=== jason_ is now known as DBO | ||
jelmer | james_w, do you have any idea about 466244 and 477431 ? it seems to me like they're both pycentral bugs | 17:28 |
jelmer | (Debian bugs) | 17:28 |
james_w | yeah, not sure about them | 17:30 |
Odd_Bloke | Can ubottu be goaded into linking to Debian bugs? | 17:32 |
james_w | debian bug 466244 | 17:35 |
ubottu | Debian bug 466244 in bzr "bzr: Left python files behind after being removed" [Important,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/466244 | 17:35 |
Odd_Bloke | Debian bugs 466244 and 477431? | 17:36 |
ubottu | Debian bug 466244 in bzr "bzr: Left python files behind after being removed" [Important,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/466244 | 17:36 |
ubottu | Debian bug 477431 in bzr "bzrlib/patches.py gets in the way for configuration of python2.4-minimal" [Important,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/477431 | 17:36 |
Odd_Bloke | Sweet. | 17:36 |
emmajane | beuno, ok, I promise that's enough bugs from me today. :) | 18:24 |
NfNitLoop | asdfasdfso I'm writing up documentation on bzr-svn for a presentation to coworkers... | 18:58 |
NfNitLoop | and I noticed an inconsistency: | 18:58 |
NfNitLoop | when I push my trunk back to svn, I just 'bzr push $REPO/trunk' | 18:59 |
NfNitLoop | but if I'm working on a new branch that I want to mirror in svn, I have to 'bzr svn-push $REPO/branches/mybranch' | 18:59 |
NfNitLoop | should I be using svn-push in both cases? | 18:59 |
lifeless | NfNitLoop: no, svn-push is a special case to handle svn's need to atomically create the new branch | 19:16 |
NfNitLoop | so I should only use svn-push to create a new branch in svn, but 'push' is fine to update an exitsting branch w/ new changes? | 19:21 |
lifeless | NfNitLoop: yes | 19:26 |
=== kiko is now known as kiko-afk | ||
emmajane | Who was I bugging about olive the other day? I think it was jelmer ? | 20:29 |
jelmer | emmajane: Yep :-) Hi! | 20:29 |
emmajane | jelmer, hey :) | 20:29 |
emmajane | I have a qustion that *might* be a bug but I'm not sure. | 20:30 |
emmajane | I'm just going to pastebin some output | 20:30 |
emmajane | http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/68977/ | 20:30 |
emmajane | I get this dump when I start olive from a directory that has no .bzr folder | 20:30 |
fullermd | Sheesh. Man, somebody is going to say jelmer's name while he's asleep, and we'll all be sure he's dead when he doesn't respond... | 20:31 |
emmajane | fullermd, hehe | 20:31 |
jelmer | 'morning fullermd :-) | 20:32 |
jelmer | emmajane, Yeah, that's definitely a bug | 20:32 |
emmajane | jelmer, and this is when I start it with .bzr in the same folder: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/68979/ | 20:32 |
emmajane | jelmer, same bug? | 20:32 |
emmajane | jelmer, I think it's the same output but I'm feeling crosseyed at python outputs... | 20:33 |
jelmer | emmajane, yes, I think so | 20:33 |
emmajane | jelmer, kay. | 20:33 |
emmajane | jelmer, thanks. :) | 20:33 |
emmajane | jelmer, suggested title for the bug? | 20:33 |
jelmer | emmajane, Generally, I think any terminal output from bzr-gtk (other than "can't open display") would be a bug | 20:33 |
emmajane | "garbage on start" probably won't cut it. ;) | 20:33 |
emmajane | kay :) | 20:34 |
fullermd | Hm, I get some... | 20:34 |
jelmer | emmajane: perhaps something like "finalized floating point object used" | 20:34 |
jelmer | s/point// | 20:34 |
emmajane | jelmer, oooo that makes me sound clever :) | 20:34 |
fullermd | Used to anyway. Don't see it in a quick check. | 20:34 |
jelmer | emmajane: I'm just rephrasing the error message as short as possible; I have no clue what's going on either at this point (-: | 20:36 |
emmajane | hehehe | 20:36 |
emmajane | jelmer, submitted. | 20:39 |
jelmer | emmajane, thanks! | 20:39 |
emmajane | jelmer, thanks for clarifying that it was "bad" output... | 20:39 |
Leonidas | I have just updated to bzr 1.9 and there are two new repo-formats | 20:54 |
Leonidas | Which one is to choose? I don't really understand what this rich-root thing is. | 20:54 |
Peng_ | Leonidas: If you're not using a rich-root format already (rich-root, rich-root-pack, ...), you don't need to. | 20:55 |
Leonidas | Peng_: I have pack-0.92, so which one would be best? | 20:57 |
Leonidas | to clarify: I don't need backwards-compatibility, so I don't need to stick to an older format | 20:58 |
jelmer | Leonidas, 1.9 | 20:59 |
=== Spaz is now known as Meowcat | ||
Leonidas | jelmer: does it support stacking? bzr help formats is a bit ambivalent in this regard. | 20:59 |
=== Meowcat is now known as Spaz | ||
jelmer | Leonidas, yes, it does | 21:00 |
Leonidas | ok, great. | 21:00 |
Leonidas | the branch format 0.15 is still the most recent, right? | 21:00 |
fullermd | I thought stacking had a new branch and new repo format. | 21:02 |
=== Spaz is now known as Kittens | ||
emmajane | jelmer, I found olive to be full of fail for downloading a branch. Do you know if you've been able to get it to work? Or should I just download using the command line utility? | 21:03 |
jelmer | Leonidas, No, 1.9 has a new format. 0.15 is ancient, btw, much older than 0.92 | 21:04 |
jelmer | emmajane, About to get coffee, I'll give it a try after that | 21:05 |
emmajane | jelmer, no worries. | 21:05 |
Leonidas | jelmer: how to update these? bzr update on each checkout? | 21:10 |
Leonidas | jelmer: 0.15 is ancient, but somehow since I started using bzr 0.15 on that project, I somehow missed updating the branches & checkouts because I didn't know that there were new formats. | 21:11 |
Peng_ | 0.15's Branch 6 was the newest branch format until the 1.6 format. | 21:20 |
* Leonidas will update all that stuff today, after he's done with todays commits | 21:25 | |
Peng_ | All the latest branch format buys you is stacking, so you don't really need to bother. | 21:31 |
fullermd | And without the branch format upgrade, you probably end up with another one of those "unknown" formats. Fun for the whole family. | 21:35 |
Peng_ | Heh, yep. | 21:37 |
lifeless | Leonidas: we nag after a while | 22:12 |
james_w | hey lifeless | 22:12 |
james_w | didn't get a chance to investigate moving to 1.9 today | 22:13 |
lifeless | no worries | 22:13 |
james_w | they branches use 1.6, so 1.9 would just be GraphIndex, correct? | 22:14 |
lifeless | yes | 22:16 |
lifeless | 'just' | 22:16 |
lifeless | (btree index btw, graphindex is what < 1.9 uses) | 22:16 |
james_w | oh, yeah, sorry | 22:16 |
james_w | I'm away next week, but I'll see if I have time to run a script to do it | 22:17 |
james_w | the initial flood to jaunty died down today, so it would be feasible to do it at this point | 22:17 |
james_w | I could kick it off tonight I guess | 22:18 |
Peng_ | If it's relevant, there's a script to convert from packs to btrees more efficiently. http://bundlebuggy.aaronbentley.com/project/bzr/request/%3C49133617.8080600%40arbash-meinel.com%3E | 22:35 |
james_w | yeah | 22:36 |
james_w | thanks | 22:36 |
jelmer | it would be nice to see that integrated into "bzr upgrade" | 22:41 |
Peng_ | Yeah. The review comments discuss that. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.bazaar-ng.general/48951/focus=48962 | 22:44 |
Leonidas | ok, update went without problems. I got some 'unknown' format repositories, so I just updated all. | 22:47 |
Leonidas | And it was quite fast. Not like last time | 22:48 |
=== Kittens is now known as Paradoxataur |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!