/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2008/11/07/#bzr.txt

lifelessbeuno: search should be fully fixed now00:17
lifelessPeng_: thanks for that fix if I didn't already say so.00:17
Peng_:)00:23
lamalexHi, is there any documentation on setting up loggerhead?00:47
lamalexI'm trying to figure out how to configure apache to forward requests to it, but not really having a lot of luck00:47
lifelesslamalex: uhm, 'serve-branches.py PATH'00:57
lifelesslamalex: then in apache just setup a proxypass00:57
lamalexi did that... it's not working01:02
lifelesslamalex: check its working directly01:10
lifelessthat you can use ff on the localhost port 8080 (where loggerhead starts)01:10
lifelessoh, there is also an optionI think to enable host munging via apache - in server-branches01:10
lamalexyah, i didn't want to do localhost because that means having to ssh portforward01:12
lamalexwhich while not hard01:12
lamalexis just annoying01:12
lamalexbut i'll try it01:12
lamalexok yah it's working on localhost01:13
=== mw is now known as mw|out
lifelesslamalex: make sure you have python-pastedeploy installed01:50
lamalexlifeless: yah, i do01:51
lifelesslamalex: specify --prefix=/apacheprefix/01:52
lifelesslamalex: to serve-branches01:52
lifelesse.g. if you want loggerhead at http://host/loggerhead/01:52
lifelessspecify --prefix=/loggerhead/01:52
lifeless(IIRC - the help could be better on this)01:53
lamalexwhat about if i want bzr.host.com01:57
lifelessit should autodetect the host02:11
=== timchen119 is now known as nasloc__
pooliespiv: did you have other stuff for 1.9? is it up for review, merged, or not ready yet?02:35
spivpoolie: nothing else for 1.9, no02:42
thumperspiv: so server side autopacks have made it for 1.9?03:27
pooliethumper: yes03:27
thumperw00t03:27
thumperI wonder if this fixes a problem we were having on LP03:27
thumperpoolie: is format 1.9 the default format?03:28
thumperI didn't follow the answer to that one before03:28
poolieno03:28
poolieit also has some fixes for the transient pack-file-not-found bug03:29
=== ronny is now known as Guest45994
gauthiermI exported a svn repository to my local machine, set it as a bzr repository and made a hundred or so revisions. I now have commit access to the svn repo. Is it possible to push my individual bzr commits to the svn repo?04:37
pooliegauthierm: i *think* just pushing back will move them across, but i've barely used bzr-svn myself04:40
=== ronny is now known as Guest58216
gauthiermbzr crashed when I tried to merge my bzr changes into svn.04:54
gauthiermLooks like its bug #240597.04:57
ubottuLaunchpad bug 240597 in bzr-svn "bzr crashed on merging from local bzr branch into a local svn branch" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/24059704:57
gauthiermheh, you're good.04:57
gauthiermwait, you're a robot!04:57
gauthiermI'll sort it out tomorrow.04:58
poolielifeless: ping? can you read bug 293440?05:52
ubottuLaunchpad bug 293440 in bzr "Cannot commit to bound svn branch: "invalid property value 'branch-nick' for None"" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/29344005:52
lifelesspoolie: I am assuming the new code in 1.8 did something like 'config = master.get_config()' ... rather than 'master_nick = master.nick'05:54
lifelesspoolie: yes, I am able to read it05:54
lifelessand your patch looks decent05:55
lifeless(decent and appropriate)05:56
pooliethanks05:58
=== poolie changed the topic of #bzr to: Bazaar version control system | http://bazaar-vcs.org | 1.9 released 7 Nov | http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | http://planet.bazaar-vcs.org/
Peng_Whee :)06:36
poolieyep06:36
Peng_BTW, the NEWS file says 1.9 was released on 2008-10-31, not that 1.9rc1 was.06:37
poolieyes06:38
poolieit's fixed in the actual 1.906:38
poolieif you're looking on the web it may take a little while to update06:38
poolieah06:38
poolienow that was actually pretty easy06:38
poolieautomation yay06:39
Peng_ok :)06:40
DBOis there any status on monodevelop-bzr other than "it still does nothing"?06:42
vilahi all07:18
lifelesshi07:20
=== Guest58216 is now known as ronny
lifelessgnight10:00
jszakmeisterjelmer: you there?10:15
jelmerjszakmeister, hi11:21
jszakmeisterHey!11:21
jszakmeisterI reported a bug a few days ago: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bzr-svn/+bug/29137011:22
ubottuLaunchpad bug 291370 in bzr-svn "bzr-svn seems to corrupt a knit repository" [Undecided,New]11:22
jszakmeisterI was curious if you had seen something like that before.11:22
jszakmeisterI thought I was using a "typical" workflow with bzr-svn... but perhaps I'm doing something wrong.11:22
jszakmeisterOh, and I just tried to reproduce with bzr 1.9 and bzr-svn 0.4.14... I get a different error, but it still backtraces.11:23
jszakmeisterbrb...11:26
jszakmeister...alright, I'm back.11:34
verterok_'morning11:41
=== verterok_ is now known as verterok
jelmerjszakmeister, thanks11:41
jelmerjszakmeister, I'll see if I can reproduce here11:41
jszakmeisterjelmer: I added a script for the new bzr 1.9 release... but that produces a different error at the moment: alueError: invalid property value 'branch-nick' for None11:42
jszakmeister...and thanks for looking into it.  I appreciate it!11:43
=== jszakmeister is now known as jszakmeister|awa
=== Rolly is now known as kumi
Odd_BlokeCould someone help me diagnose what's going on in http://paste.pocoo.org/show/90470/?13:49
luksbroken server that responds 302 instead of 404 to a missing page?13:51
Odd_BlokeRight, that's what I thought.13:51
Odd_Blokeluks: Thanks. :)13:52
nekohayohmm. bzr-svn is not built in the ppa14:16
nekohayoI tried getting the latest tarball but when doing make I get this:14:16
nekohayohttp://pastebin.com/d6f2ed19f14:17
nekohayoany ideas?14:17
=== beuno_ is now known as beuno
jelmernekohayo, you need to have libsvn-dev installde14:28
jelmer*installed14:28
nekohayothat should be mentionned in the INSTALL file or wiki :)14:29
jelmerit is :-)14:30
jelmerRequirements/Subversion development files in INSTALL14:30
nekohayojelmer: http://pastebin.com/d641f37ac I couldn't find a package named rst2html? what did I miss?14:32
jelmernekohayo, install python-docutils14:33
nekohayoit builds! :)14:44
jelmerbeuno, hi15:03
=== kiko is now known as kiko-fud
=== thekorn_ is now known as thekorn
beunojelmer, hi15:39
jelmerbeuno, now I forgot what I wanted to ask :-(15:40
beunojelmer, still nice that you said hi15:41
beunowe can leave it at that until you remember15:41
jelmer:-)15:41
jelmerlooking forward to the new loggerhead btw15:41
jelmerthe new code.bitlbee.org should also be running it soon, in favor of bzr-hgweb15:42
beunocool, it's been a while since we released15:43
dashi've got an old mercurial repository I want to convert to bzr. how are people doing that these days?16:02
dashneither bzr-hg or bzr-hgimport seem to work with the latest versions of things.16:02
Odd_Blokedash: fastexport and fastimport, I think.16:04
luksbzr-fastimport with soem of the git exporters, probably16:04
uniscriptis there a bzr-svn for bzr 1.9? Or shall I repackage the 1.6-1.7 version to allow 1.9?16:05
dashOdd_Bloke: Fancy. Looks like that did the job16:07
dashthanks guys :)16:07
jelmeruniscript, there is a bzr-svn for 1.9, 0.4.1416:07
uniscriptany plans for a package? each time bzr comes out I lose bzr-svn16:08
uniscript:(16:08
jelmeruniscript, there's already a debian package, http://bzr.debian.org/pkg-bazaar/bzr-svn/experimental/16:08
uniscriptdirectory is empty16:08
jelmerit's a bzr branch16:08
jelmerthe actual package can be found at http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=bzr-svn16:09
uniscriptta16:09
uniscripthmm no i386 support and I get tied in dependency knots trying to build the thing16:16
jelmeruniscript, what sort of dependency knots?16:23
uniscriptpdebuild depends on 1.9 and debuild has sqlite3 problems due to using medibuntu16:24
jdonghey bzr folks :)16:37
uniscriptbut why is debian bzr-svn 0.4.14 not available for i386?16:37
jdongI'm looking at a bzr backport to Hardy. Would like to get Jaunty up to 1.9 first16:38
* jdong grabs changelog of 1.9~rc1 vs 1.916:38
james_wjdong: 1.9-1 is in Debian if you hadn't seen it16:40
jdongjames_w: obviously I should stop using packages.d.o :)16:40
* jdong clobbers that shortcut for a p.qa.d.o one :)16:40
james_wgood choice :-)16:40
jdongjames_w: is there a sync request open for jaunty yet?16:41
=== ahasenack is now known as pandora
james_wjdong: nah, I assumed it would auto-sync16:41
james_wyeah, it will16:42
james_wjelmer: hey, is everything in shape for bzr 1.9 in Debian?16:42
jdongyeah ok the problem ("problem") is sid only has 1.5-1.1 from what I can see16:43
jelmerjdong, we can't upload to sid yet because it's kept open for uploads for lenny16:43
james_wah, of course16:43
james_wjdong: would you like to request it, or shall I do it?16:44
jelmeruniscript, the debian auto-builders haven't build bzr-svn yet for i386 (but they haven't built bzr itself either yet, so that shouldn't be a problem)16:44
jelmerjames_w, Yeah, everything in Debian should be in shape for 1.916:44
jdongjames_w: please do, you are more experienced with the stack of packages involved :)16:44
james_wjelmer: great, thanks. We're going to work on backporting it to Intrepid/Hardy so we need a group that works well together.16:45
jdongawesome :)16:45
=== kiko-fud is now known as kiko
jelmerjames_w, I gave the .orig.tar.gz checksum issue some more thought17:01
james_wcool17:02
jelmerjames_w, I think the best solution would probably be to use the version from the apt repository if there is one, and otherwise generate one17:02
jelmerjames_w, would that make sense?17:03
james_wthat could work17:03
=== jason_ is now known as DBO
jelmerjames_w, do you have any idea about 466244 and  477431 ? it seems to me like they're both pycentral bugs17:28
jelmer(Debian bugs)17:28
james_wyeah, not sure about them17:30
Odd_BlokeCan ubottu be goaded into linking to Debian bugs?17:32
james_wdebian bug 46624417:35
ubottuDebian bug 466244 in bzr "bzr: Left python files behind after being removed" [Important,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/46624417:35
Odd_BlokeDebian bugs 466244 and 477431?17:36
ubottuDebian bug 466244 in bzr "bzr: Left python files behind after being removed" [Important,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/46624417:36
ubottuDebian bug 477431 in bzr "bzrlib/patches.py gets in the way for configuration of python2.4-minimal" [Important,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/47743117:36
Odd_BlokeSweet.17:36
emmajanebeuno, ok, I promise that's enough bugs from me today. :)18:24
NfNitLoopasdfasdfso I'm writing up documentation on bzr-svn for a presentation to coworkers...18:58
NfNitLoopand I noticed an inconsistency:18:58
NfNitLoopwhen I push my trunk back to svn, I just 'bzr push $REPO/trunk'18:59
NfNitLoopbut if I'm working on a new branch that I want to mirror in svn, I have to 'bzr svn-push $REPO/branches/mybranch'18:59
NfNitLoopshould I be using svn-push in both cases?18:59
lifelessNfNitLoop: no, svn-push is a special case to handle svn's need to atomically create the new branch19:16
NfNitLoopso I should only use svn-push to create a new branch in svn, but 'push' is fine to update an exitsting branch w/ new changes?19:21
lifelessNfNitLoop: yes19:26
=== kiko is now known as kiko-afk
emmajaneWho was I bugging about olive the other day? I think it was jelmer ?20:29
jelmeremmajane: Yep :-) Hi!20:29
emmajanejelmer, hey :)20:29
emmajaneI have a qustion that *might* be a bug but I'm not sure.20:30
emmajaneI'm just going to pastebin some output20:30
emmajanehttp://pastebin.ubuntu.com/68977/20:30
emmajaneI get this dump when I start olive from a directory that has no .bzr folder20:30
fullermdSheesh.  Man, somebody is going to say jelmer's name while he's asleep, and we'll all be sure he's dead when he doesn't respond...20:31
emmajanefullermd, hehe20:31
jelmer'morning fullermd :-)20:32
jelmeremmajane, Yeah, that's definitely a bug20:32
emmajanejelmer, and this is when I start it with .bzr in the same folder: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/68979/20:32
emmajanejelmer, same bug?20:32
emmajanejelmer, I think it's the same output but I'm feeling crosseyed at python outputs...20:33
jelmeremmajane, yes, I think so20:33
emmajanejelmer, kay.20:33
emmajanejelmer, thanks. :)20:33
emmajanejelmer, suggested title for the bug?20:33
jelmeremmajane, Generally, I think any terminal output from bzr-gtk (other than "can't open display") would be a bug20:33
emmajane"garbage on start" probably won't cut it. ;)20:33
emmajanekay :)20:34
fullermdHm, I get some...20:34
jelmeremmajane: perhaps something like "finalized floating point object used"20:34
jelmers/point//20:34
emmajanejelmer, oooo that makes me sound clever :)20:34
fullermdUsed to anyway.  Don't see it in a quick check.20:34
jelmeremmajane: I'm just rephrasing the error message as short as possible; I have no clue what's going on either at this point (-:20:36
emmajanehehehe20:36
emmajanejelmer, submitted.20:39
jelmeremmajane, thanks!20:39
emmajanejelmer, thanks for clarifying that it was "bad" output...20:39
LeonidasI have just updated to bzr 1.9 and there are two new repo-formats20:54
LeonidasWhich one is to choose? I don't really understand what this rich-root thing is.20:54
Peng_Leonidas: If you're not using a rich-root format already (rich-root, rich-root-pack, ...), you don't need to.20:55
LeonidasPeng_: I have pack-0.92, so which one would be best?20:57
Leonidasto clarify: I don't need backwards-compatibility, so I don't need to stick to an older format20:58
jelmerLeonidas, 1.920:59
=== Spaz is now known as Meowcat
Leonidasjelmer: does it support stacking? bzr help formats is a bit ambivalent in this regard.20:59
=== Meowcat is now known as Spaz
jelmerLeonidas, yes, it does21:00
Leonidasok, great.21:00
Leonidasthe branch format 0.15 is still the most recent, right?21:00
fullermdI thought stacking had a new branch and new repo format.21:02
=== Spaz is now known as Kittens
emmajanejelmer, I found olive to be full of fail for downloading a branch. Do you know if you've been able to get it to work? Or should I just download using the command line utility?21:03
jelmerLeonidas, No, 1.9 has a new format. 0.15 is ancient, btw, much older than 0.9221:04
jelmeremmajane, About to get coffee, I'll give it a try after that21:05
emmajanejelmer, no worries.21:05
Leonidasjelmer: how to update these? bzr update on each checkout?21:10
Leonidasjelmer: 0.15 is ancient, but somehow since I started using bzr 0.15 on that project, I somehow missed updating the branches & checkouts because I didn't know that there were new formats.21:11
Peng_0.15's Branch 6 was the newest branch format until the 1.6 format.21:20
* Leonidas will update all that stuff today, after he's done with todays commits21:25
Peng_All the latest branch format buys you is stacking, so you don't really need to bother.21:31
fullermdAnd without the branch format upgrade, you probably end up with another one of those "unknown" formats.  Fun for the whole family.21:35
Peng_Heh, yep.21:37
lifelessLeonidas: we nag after a while22:12
james_whey lifeless22:12
james_wdidn't get a chance to investigate moving to 1.9 today22:13
lifelessno worries22:13
james_wthey branches use 1.6, so 1.9 would just be GraphIndex, correct?22:14
lifelessyes22:16
lifeless'just'22:16
lifeless(btree index btw, graphindex is what < 1.9 uses)22:16
james_woh, yeah, sorry22:16
james_wI'm away next week, but I'll see if I have time to run a script to do it22:17
james_wthe initial flood to jaunty died down today, so it would be feasible to do it at this point22:17
james_wI could kick it off tonight I guess22:18
Peng_If it's relevant, there's a script to convert from packs to btrees more efficiently. http://bundlebuggy.aaronbentley.com/project/bzr/request/%3C49133617.8080600%40arbash-meinel.com%3E22:35
james_wyeah22:36
james_wthanks22:36
jelmerit would be nice to see that integrated into "bzr upgrade"22:41
Peng_Yeah. The review comments discuss that. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.bazaar-ng.general/48951/focus=4896222:44
Leonidasok, update went without problems. I got some 'unknown' format repositories, so I just updated all.22:47
LeonidasAnd it was quite fast. Not like last time22:48
=== Kittens is now known as Paradoxataur

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!