[00:17] beuno: search should be fully fixed now [00:17] Peng_: thanks for that fix if I didn't already say so. [00:23] :) [00:47] Hi, is there any documentation on setting up loggerhead? [00:47] I'm trying to figure out how to configure apache to forward requests to it, but not really having a lot of luck [00:57] lamalex: uhm, 'serve-branches.py PATH' [00:57] lamalex: then in apache just setup a proxypass [01:02] i did that... it's not working [01:10] lamalex: check its working directly [01:10] that you can use ff on the localhost port 8080 (where loggerhead starts) [01:10] oh, there is also an optionI think to enable host munging via apache - in server-branches [01:12] yah, i didn't want to do localhost because that means having to ssh portforward [01:12] which while not hard [01:12] is just annoying [01:12] but i'll try it [01:13] ok yah it's working on localhost === mw is now known as mw|out [01:50] lamalex: make sure you have python-pastedeploy installed [01:51] lifeless: yah, i do [01:52] lamalex: specify --prefix=/apacheprefix/ [01:52] lamalex: to serve-branches [01:52] e.g. if you want loggerhead at http://host/loggerhead/ [01:52] specify --prefix=/loggerhead/ [01:53] (IIRC - the help could be better on this) [01:57] what about if i want bzr.host.com [02:11] it should autodetect the host === timchen119 is now known as nasloc__ [02:35] spiv: did you have other stuff for 1.9? is it up for review, merged, or not ready yet? [02:42] poolie: nothing else for 1.9, no [03:27] spiv: so server side autopacks have made it for 1.9? [03:27] thumper: yes [03:27] w00t [03:27] I wonder if this fixes a problem we were having on LP [03:28] poolie: is format 1.9 the default format? [03:28] I didn't follow the answer to that one before [03:28] no [03:29] it also has some fixes for the transient pack-file-not-found bug === ronny is now known as Guest45994 [04:37] I exported a svn repository to my local machine, set it as a bzr repository and made a hundred or so revisions. I now have commit access to the svn repo. Is it possible to push my individual bzr commits to the svn repo? [04:40] gauthierm: i *think* just pushing back will move them across, but i've barely used bzr-svn myself === ronny is now known as Guest58216 [04:54] bzr crashed when I tried to merge my bzr changes into svn. [04:57] Looks like its bug #240597. [04:57] Launchpad bug 240597 in bzr-svn "bzr crashed on merging from local bzr branch into a local svn branch" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/240597 [04:57] heh, you're good. [04:57] wait, you're a robot! [04:58] I'll sort it out tomorrow. [05:52] lifeless: ping? can you read bug 293440? [05:52] Launchpad bug 293440 in bzr "Cannot commit to bound svn branch: "invalid property value 'branch-nick' for None"" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/293440 [05:54] poolie: I am assuming the new code in 1.8 did something like 'config = master.get_config()' ... rather than 'master_nick = master.nick' [05:54] poolie: yes, I am able to read it [05:55] and your patch looks decent [05:56] (decent and appropriate) [05:58] thanks === poolie changed the topic of #bzr to: Bazaar version control system | http://bazaar-vcs.org | 1.9 released 7 Nov | http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/ | http://planet.bazaar-vcs.org/ [06:36] Whee :) [06:36] yep [06:37] BTW, the NEWS file says 1.9 was released on 2008-10-31, not that 1.9rc1 was. [06:38] yes [06:38] it's fixed in the actual 1.9 [06:38] if you're looking on the web it may take a little while to update [06:38] ah [06:38] now that was actually pretty easy [06:39] automation yay [06:40] ok :) [06:42] is there any status on monodevelop-bzr other than "it still does nothing"? [07:18] hi all [07:20] hi === Guest58216 is now known as ronny [10:00] gnight [10:15] jelmer: you there? [11:21] jszakmeister, hi [11:21] Hey! [11:22] I reported a bug a few days ago: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bzr-svn/+bug/291370 [11:22] Launchpad bug 291370 in bzr-svn "bzr-svn seems to corrupt a knit repository" [Undecided,New] [11:22] I was curious if you had seen something like that before. [11:22] I thought I was using a "typical" workflow with bzr-svn... but perhaps I'm doing something wrong. [11:23] Oh, and I just tried to reproduce with bzr 1.9 and bzr-svn 0.4.14... I get a different error, but it still backtraces. [11:26] brb... [11:34] ...alright, I'm back. [11:41] 'morning === verterok_ is now known as verterok [11:41] jszakmeister, thanks [11:41] jszakmeister, I'll see if I can reproduce here [11:42] jelmer: I added a script for the new bzr 1.9 release... but that produces a different error at the moment: alueError: invalid property value 'branch-nick' for None [11:43] ...and thanks for looking into it. I appreciate it! === jszakmeister is now known as jszakmeister|awa === Rolly is now known as kumi [13:49] Could someone help me diagnose what's going on in http://paste.pocoo.org/show/90470/? [13:51] broken server that responds 302 instead of 404 to a missing page? [13:51] Right, that's what I thought. [13:52] luks: Thanks. :) [14:16] hmm. bzr-svn is not built in the ppa [14:16] I tried getting the latest tarball but when doing make I get this: [14:17] http://pastebin.com/d6f2ed19f [14:17] any ideas? === beuno_ is now known as beuno [14:28] nekohayo, you need to have libsvn-dev installde [14:28] *installed [14:29] that should be mentionned in the INSTALL file or wiki :) [14:30] it is :-) [14:30] Requirements/Subversion development files in INSTALL [14:32] jelmer: http://pastebin.com/d641f37ac I couldn't find a package named rst2html? what did I miss? [14:33] nekohayo, install python-docutils [14:44] it builds! :) [15:03] beuno, hi === kiko is now known as kiko-fud === thekorn_ is now known as thekorn [15:39] jelmer, hi [15:40] beuno, now I forgot what I wanted to ask :-( [15:41] jelmer, still nice that you said hi [15:41] we can leave it at that until you remember [15:41] :-) [15:41] looking forward to the new loggerhead btw [15:42] the new code.bitlbee.org should also be running it soon, in favor of bzr-hgweb [15:43] cool, it's been a while since we released [16:02] i've got an old mercurial repository I want to convert to bzr. how are people doing that these days? [16:02] neither bzr-hg or bzr-hgimport seem to work with the latest versions of things. [16:04] dash: fastexport and fastimport, I think. [16:04] bzr-fastimport with soem of the git exporters, probably [16:05] is there a bzr-svn for bzr 1.9? Or shall I repackage the 1.6-1.7 version to allow 1.9? [16:07] Odd_Bloke: Fancy. Looks like that did the job [16:07] thanks guys :) [16:07] uniscript, there is a bzr-svn for 1.9, 0.4.14 [16:08] any plans for a package? each time bzr comes out I lose bzr-svn [16:08] :( [16:08] uniscript, there's already a debian package, http://bzr.debian.org/pkg-bazaar/bzr-svn/experimental/ [16:08] directory is empty [16:08] it's a bzr branch [16:09] the actual package can be found at http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=bzr-svn [16:09] ta [16:16] hmm no i386 support and I get tied in dependency knots trying to build the thing [16:23] uniscript, what sort of dependency knots? [16:24] pdebuild depends on 1.9 and debuild has sqlite3 problems due to using medibuntu [16:37] hey bzr folks :) [16:37] but why is debian bzr-svn 0.4.14 not available for i386? [16:38] I'm looking at a bzr backport to Hardy. Would like to get Jaunty up to 1.9 first [16:38] * jdong grabs changelog of 1.9~rc1 vs 1.9 [16:40] jdong: 1.9-1 is in Debian if you hadn't seen it [16:40] james_w: obviously I should stop using packages.d.o :) [16:40] * jdong clobbers that shortcut for a p.qa.d.o one :) [16:40] good choice :-) [16:41] james_w: is there a sync request open for jaunty yet? === ahasenack is now known as pandora [16:41] jdong: nah, I assumed it would auto-sync [16:42] yeah, it will [16:42] jelmer: hey, is everything in shape for bzr 1.9 in Debian? [16:43] yeah ok the problem ("problem") is sid only has 1.5-1.1 from what I can see [16:43] jdong, we can't upload to sid yet because it's kept open for uploads for lenny [16:43] ah, of course [16:44] jdong: would you like to request it, or shall I do it? [16:44] uniscript, the debian auto-builders haven't build bzr-svn yet for i386 (but they haven't built bzr itself either yet, so that shouldn't be a problem) [16:44] james_w, Yeah, everything in Debian should be in shape for 1.9 [16:44] james_w: please do, you are more experienced with the stack of packages involved :) [16:45] jelmer: great, thanks. We're going to work on backporting it to Intrepid/Hardy so we need a group that works well together. [16:45] awesome :) === kiko-fud is now known as kiko [17:01] james_w, I gave the .orig.tar.gz checksum issue some more thought [17:02] cool [17:02] james_w, I think the best solution would probably be to use the version from the apt repository if there is one, and otherwise generate one [17:03] james_w, would that make sense? [17:03] that could work === jason_ is now known as DBO [17:28] james_w, do you have any idea about 466244 and 477431 ? it seems to me like they're both pycentral bugs [17:28] (Debian bugs) [17:30] yeah, not sure about them [17:32] Can ubottu be goaded into linking to Debian bugs? [17:35] debian bug 466244 [17:35] Debian bug 466244 in bzr "bzr: Left python files behind after being removed" [Important,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/466244 [17:36] Debian bugs 466244 and 477431? [17:36] Debian bug 466244 in bzr "bzr: Left python files behind after being removed" [Important,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/466244 [17:36] Debian bug 477431 in bzr "bzrlib/patches.py gets in the way for configuration of python2.4-minimal" [Important,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/477431 [17:36] Sweet. [18:24] beuno, ok, I promise that's enough bugs from me today. :) [18:58] asdfasdfso I'm writing up documentation on bzr-svn for a presentation to coworkers... [18:58] and I noticed an inconsistency: [18:59] when I push my trunk back to svn, I just 'bzr push $REPO/trunk' [18:59] but if I'm working on a new branch that I want to mirror in svn, I have to 'bzr svn-push $REPO/branches/mybranch' [18:59] should I be using svn-push in both cases? [19:16] NfNitLoop: no, svn-push is a special case to handle svn's need to atomically create the new branch [19:21] so I should only use svn-push to create a new branch in svn, but 'push' is fine to update an exitsting branch w/ new changes? [19:26] NfNitLoop: yes === kiko is now known as kiko-afk [20:29] Who was I bugging about olive the other day? I think it was jelmer ? [20:29] emmajane: Yep :-) Hi! [20:29] jelmer, hey :) [20:30] I have a qustion that *might* be a bug but I'm not sure. [20:30] I'm just going to pastebin some output [20:30] http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/68977/ [20:30] I get this dump when I start olive from a directory that has no .bzr folder [20:31] Sheesh. Man, somebody is going to say jelmer's name while he's asleep, and we'll all be sure he's dead when he doesn't respond... [20:31] fullermd, hehe [20:32] 'morning fullermd :-) [20:32] emmajane, Yeah, that's definitely a bug [20:32] jelmer, and this is when I start it with .bzr in the same folder: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/68979/ [20:32] jelmer, same bug? [20:33] jelmer, I think it's the same output but I'm feeling crosseyed at python outputs... [20:33] emmajane, yes, I think so [20:33] jelmer, kay. [20:33] jelmer, thanks. :) [20:33] jelmer, suggested title for the bug? [20:33] emmajane, Generally, I think any terminal output from bzr-gtk (other than "can't open display") would be a bug [20:33] "garbage on start" probably won't cut it. ;) [20:34] kay :) [20:34] Hm, I get some... [20:34] emmajane: perhaps something like "finalized floating point object used" [20:34] s/point// [20:34] jelmer, oooo that makes me sound clever :) [20:34] Used to anyway. Don't see it in a quick check. [20:36] emmajane: I'm just rephrasing the error message as short as possible; I have no clue what's going on either at this point (-: [20:36] hehehe [20:39] jelmer, submitted. [20:39] emmajane, thanks! [20:39] jelmer, thanks for clarifying that it was "bad" output... [20:54] I have just updated to bzr 1.9 and there are two new repo-formats [20:54] Which one is to choose? I don't really understand what this rich-root thing is. [20:55] Leonidas: If you're not using a rich-root format already (rich-root, rich-root-pack, ...), you don't need to. [20:57] Peng_: I have pack-0.92, so which one would be best? [20:58] to clarify: I don't need backwards-compatibility, so I don't need to stick to an older format [20:59] Leonidas, 1.9 === Spaz is now known as Meowcat [20:59] jelmer: does it support stacking? bzr help formats is a bit ambivalent in this regard. === Meowcat is now known as Spaz [21:00] Leonidas, yes, it does [21:00] ok, great. [21:00] the branch format 0.15 is still the most recent, right? [21:02] I thought stacking had a new branch and new repo format. === Spaz is now known as Kittens [21:03] jelmer, I found olive to be full of fail for downloading a branch. Do you know if you've been able to get it to work? Or should I just download using the command line utility? [21:04] Leonidas, No, 1.9 has a new format. 0.15 is ancient, btw, much older than 0.92 [21:05] emmajane, About to get coffee, I'll give it a try after that [21:05] jelmer, no worries. [21:10] jelmer: how to update these? bzr update on each checkout? [21:11] jelmer: 0.15 is ancient, but somehow since I started using bzr 0.15 on that project, I somehow missed updating the branches & checkouts because I didn't know that there were new formats. [21:20] 0.15's Branch 6 was the newest branch format until the 1.6 format. [21:25] * Leonidas will update all that stuff today, after he's done with todays commits [21:31] All the latest branch format buys you is stacking, so you don't really need to bother. [21:35] And without the branch format upgrade, you probably end up with another one of those "unknown" formats. Fun for the whole family. [21:37] Heh, yep. [22:12] Leonidas: we nag after a while [22:12] hey lifeless [22:13] didn't get a chance to investigate moving to 1.9 today [22:13] no worries [22:14] they branches use 1.6, so 1.9 would just be GraphIndex, correct? [22:16] yes [22:16] 'just' [22:16] (btree index btw, graphindex is what < 1.9 uses) [22:16] oh, yeah, sorry [22:17] I'm away next week, but I'll see if I have time to run a script to do it [22:17] the initial flood to jaunty died down today, so it would be feasible to do it at this point [22:18] I could kick it off tonight I guess [22:35] If it's relevant, there's a script to convert from packs to btrees more efficiently. http://bundlebuggy.aaronbentley.com/project/bzr/request/%3C49133617.8080600%40arbash-meinel.com%3E [22:36] yeah [22:36] thanks [22:41] it would be nice to see that integrated into "bzr upgrade" [22:44] Yeah. The review comments discuss that. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.bazaar-ng.general/48951/focus=48962 [22:47] ok, update went without problems. I got some 'unknown' format repositories, so I just updated all. [22:48] And it was quite fast. Not like last time === Kittens is now known as Paradoxataur