[00:46] <hammer> hello
[09:18] <huats> morning everyone
[09:18] <seb128> lut huats
[09:18] <huats> hello seb128
[11:42] <seb128> pedro_: hi
[11:42] <seb128> pedro_: dunno if you got my message before
[11:42] <seb128> pedro_: rhythmbox not listing some devices can be bug #291810, ask those users to try the update
[11:42] <pedro_> hello seb128
[11:42] <pedro_> ah no i didn't
[11:42] <pedro_> seb128: ok will do it, thanks you
[11:43] <seb128> you're welcome ;-)
[11:43] <seb128> you have been faster than me to triage the new one
[11:45] <pedro_> hehe ok already commented on the new one
[12:06] <pitti> pochu: in the future, please use "LP: #" in changelogs, not "lp: #"; the former is recognized in dpkg for auto-closing bugs, the latter isn't
[12:07] <pitti> pochu: it's okay for the pending SRUs, since I have to manually set the bug state anyway, but it matters for the development release
[13:40] <hggdh> seb128, the proposed fix for evo is published in the PPA
[13:41] <seb128> hggdh: thanks
[13:41] <seb128> hggdh: any user reply yet? they rolled also new tarballs today, do you know if those changes are in the new version?
[13:44] <ember_> what's the best pratice in a package using debhelper and i want so simply change an <include>? add patch system or patch it inline?
[13:45] <hggdh> seb128, I do not know, but wil check. Since the patches are not marked as committed in the bug, I am not sure.
[13:45] <hggdh> and no user reply so far
[13:48] <seb128> hggdh: ok, I doubt they will in the new version anyway, srag said there was a new string
[13:51] <hggdh> seb128, yes, the text changed in a message
[13:51] <seb128> ok, so in the new stable
[13:51] <seb128> we will likely do the new version update next week
[13:51] <hggdh> k
[13:51] <seb128> let's see if some users comment about the patches before that in which case we can use those too
[13:52] <hggdh> yes... right now I do not know if it is working... the other one seems to still have a problem
[17:46] <alexbh> hallo... does anybody speak english here?
[17:46] <BugMaN> hmmm maybe all of us :)
[17:46] <Nafallo> the desktop team mostly speaks french :-)
[17:47] <pochu> pitti: the case doesn't matter... the problem is that I used Debian's dpkg to generate the changes file, so it didn't generate Launchpad-Bugs-Fixed field in the changes file. Anyway, thanks for the notice, I'll avoid that in the future :)
[17:47] <BugMaN> Nafallo: :)
[17:47] <pitti> pochu: ah :)
[17:47] <pochu> pitti: thanks for approving them btw :)
[17:48] <alexbh> ohh gut.... i just dont tknow which channel to use... i m not german... just came to Germany a month ago and need to buy a Web camera... but I dont kow which one can work in my ubuntu
[17:49] <BugMaN> alexbh: for this tyr to ask on #ubuntu
[17:49] <alexbh> ohhh..i m so stupid.. i though this was the DE - german chanel sorry
[17:49] <BugMaN> alexbh: official support channel
[17:49] <BugMaN> de = desktop :)
[17:49] <BugMaN> alexbh: maybe exists #ubuntu-de
[17:49] <alexbh> yeah... i did but they seem not to understand
[17:50] <alexbh> im there also...
[17:53] <fta> seb128: forgot to pass this to you: http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/cairo/ this is for jaunty.
[17:55] <seb128> fta: I've stopped working for today but ping me again next week, debian has 1.8.2 could be worth looking if it can be synced and do a 1.8.2-0ubuntu1 sru to intrepid
[20:16] <ember> pochu: there?
[20:23] <pochu> hi ember :)
[20:23] <pochu> (yes) ;)
[20:23] <ember> consider adding this on new liferea upload
[20:23] <ember> http://pfragoso.org/ubuntu/02_lpi
[20:23] <ember> hi :o
[20:23] <ember> i've worked using the 1.4.20 in your ppa
[20:24] <pochu> cool
[20:24] <pochu> I plan to get 1.5.x into Jaunty when it gets a bit better
[20:24] <pochu> right now it's a bit unresponsive at some times
[20:24] <pochu> when that's fixed I'll get it uploaded
[20:25] <pochu> but I think I'll prepare 1.4.22 (once it's released)
[20:25] <pochu> ember: I'll look at your patch when I do so :)
[20:26] <ember> cool, it should work for the 1.4.x
[21:06] <Laney> What's that page norsetto made listing all the apps that the desktop team takes care of and their versions in various places?
[21:09] <pochu> Laney: http://norsetto.890m.com/desktop_packages.php
[21:09] <Laney> winner
[21:13] <ember_> btw norsetto should update that for 2.25
[21:13] <Laney> Can I do the gnome-games 2.24.1.1 update?
[21:15] <Laney> I guess there should be one tracking each supported/development ubuntu release
[21:16] <dobey> ember_: looks like it already is? glib 2.19.0 is listed...
[21:16] <ember> ye glib it is but the rest is not 2.25.x ones
[21:16] <dobey> there hasn't been a 2.25.x release yet
[21:17] <dobey> i think glib is probably the only thing that's made a release so far
[21:17] <ember> ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/teams/releng/2.25.1/versions
[21:20] <dobey> oh. was this week. i didn't even know it was scheduled yet
[21:20] <dobey> which explains why none of my things have 2.25.1 releases there
[21:20] <ember> and http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-announce-list/2008-November/msg00023.html
[21:22] <dobey> yeah
[21:26] <Laney> Will I need to get gnome-games 2.24.1.1 into Jaunty given that 2.25.1 is already out?
[21:30] <pochu> Laney: I don't think so, you can directly prepare 2.25.1
[21:30] <Laney> pochu: I mean for the Intrepid SRU
[21:31] <Laney> (we track GNOME stable releases, right?)
[21:33] <Laney> (or at least we want this one as it fixes a crasher)
[21:37] <pochu> Laney: you can upload 2.25.1 to Jaunty and 2.24.1.1 to Intrepid
[21:38] <Laney> thanks, that's what I wanted to know
[21:38] <pochu> no need to get 2.24.1.1 into Jaunty if you get 2.25.1
[21:38] <Laney> I read that it has to be fixed in the dev release first
[21:38] <Laney> but that seems silly in this case
[21:42] <pochu> well yeah, it has to be fixed in the devel release
[21:42] <pochu> but 2.25.1 should include fixes in 2.24.1.1
[21:48] <Laney> right
[21:49] <Laney> so it doesn't have to be explicitly fixed in the same way
[21:51] <pochu> yeah
[21:52] <ronhalfdanr> anybody home
[22:11] <Laney> bah
[22:11] <Laney> How can I get autoconf to only update the configure script, not the various makefile.ins
[22:17] <pochu> Laney: did you run autoconf or autoreconf?
[22:18] <pochu> Laney: 'autoconf -f && rm -r autom4te.cache' should do that
[22:18] <Laney> pochu: autoconf
[22:18] <pochu> I don't think autoconf calls automake...
[22:19] <Laney> Something else is then
[22:20] <Laney> oh, never mind.
[23:02] <mvo_> laney: please check "rmadison gnome-terminal" - 2.24.1.1 is in jaunty and intrepid-proposed now