| === asac_ is now known as asac | ||
| fta | chromium is messing iup with zlib and libpng symbols, like mozilla, i can't use the system ones, at least not without further tweaks | 00:22 |
|---|---|---|
| tonyyarusso | Ugh. I still have no idea why KompoZer is so horribly broken in 8.10 compared to previous releases. | 00:27 |
| fta | isn't KompoZer dead ? | 00:31 |
| tonyyarusso | well, I haven't heard much from the dev in a long time, so perhaps, but until 9.10 it's the best we have. | 00:33 |
| asac | fta: isnt that just a define? | 00:34 |
| asac | zlib/png | 00:34 |
| fta | yes | 00:34 |
| asac | ok | 00:34 |
| asac | thats at least easy to switch then in theory | 00:35 |
| fta | zlib: symbols are remapped to MOZ_Z_xx for libpng | 00:35 |
| fta | libpng: problem with undefined references to lots of webkit_png_* symbols | 00:35 |
| asac | in chrome? | 00:35 |
| fta | yes | 00:35 |
| asac | ok so they copied the mozilla code ;) | 00:35 |
| fta | yes, parts of it | 00:36 |
| asac | shouldnt that be solved in webkit package already? | 00:36 |
| asac | or is png shipped in chrome itself and not by webkit? | 00:37 |
| fta | both | 00:37 |
| asac | cool ;) | 00:37 |
| fta | third_party/zlib | 00:37 |
| fta | third_party/WebKit/WebCore/platform/image-decoders/zlib | 00:37 |
| asac | ok | 00:37 |
| asac | in theory they ship their own widget thing right? | 00:38 |
| asac | fta: did you sponsor gnomefreaks extensions yet? | 00:38 |
| asac | just remember that he said a had a bunch ready ;O) | 00:38 |
| fta | hm, no, i don't remember him asking me anything | 00:38 |
| fta | http://paste.ubuntu.com/70237/ | 00:39 |
| asac | your patch=? | 00:40 |
| fta | yep | 00:40 |
| asac | submit it ;) | 00:40 |
| fta | i will, it's not complete yet | 00:41 |
| asac | kk | 00:41 |
| fta | well, maybe it is, but my build is still in progress | 00:42 |
| asac | bug 28479 | 00:50 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 28479 in firefox "firefox32 for amd64 => support 32-bit plugins on amd64" [Wishlist,Won't fix] https://launchpad.net/bugs/28479 | 00:50 |
| asac | they want a firefox32 | 00:50 |
| fta | asac, my notes so far: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Chromium | 00:55 |
| fta | not much | 00:55 |
| mconnor | asac: where's the intrepid patches list? | 01:02 |
| fta | mconnor, what for ? | 01:02 |
| mconnor | http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/firefox/firefox-3.0.intrepid/changes is not easy to follow | 01:02 |
| mconnor | fta: you know, so I can yell at you guys again | 01:03 |
| mconnor | or something | 01:03 |
| mconnor | remember, I hate freedom and everything | 01:03 |
| fta | http://patches.ubuntu.com/by-release/extracted/ubuntu/x/xulrunner-1.9/1.9.0.3+nobinonly-0ubuntu1/ | 01:04 |
| fta | http://patches.ubuntu.com/by-release/extracted/ubuntu/f/firefox-3.0/3.0.3+nobinonly-0ubuntu2/ | 01:04 |
| fta | 1.9.1/3.1 are now in there yet, you have to use the branches | 01:05 |
| fta | -now+not | 01:05 |
| mconnor | s'ok, I just need to have a baseline | 01:05 |
| mconnor | fta: thanks | 01:05 |
| fta | mconnor, all those named bzXXX_ are supposed to be upstreamed | 01:06 |
| fta | one day | 01:06 |
| mconnor | uh | 01:07 |
| mconnor | drop_bz418016.patch | 01:07 |
| mconnor | you have jemalloc disabled? | 01:07 |
| fta | hm, i don't think so | 01:08 |
| mconnor | that patch kinda makes it look that way | 01:08 |
| mconnor | anyway, I should do this after I finish reviewing blockers | 01:09 |
| fta | i have it in 3.1 for sure, i'm spamed with zillions of /tmp/jemalloc.XXXX files | 01:09 |
| mconnor | heh | 01:09 |
| fta | $ lsof -p 9989 | grep -c /tmp/jemalloc | 01:10 |
| fta | 283 | 01:10 |
| fta | deleted but still opened so this is vicious | 01:11 |
| mconnor | uh | 01:11 |
| mconnor | weird | 01:11 |
| mconnor | never heard of that | 01:11 |
| fta | firefox-3 9989 fta DEL REG 8,1 35160076 /tmp/jemalloc.EfHUUh | 01:12 |
| fta | firefox-3 9989 fta DEL REG 8,1 35160073 /tmp/jemalloc.32yXGC | 01:12 |
| fta | firefox-3 9989 fta DEL REG 8,1 35160071 /tmp/jemalloc.sWt2vX | 01:12 |
| fta | maybe a leaked filehandle or something | 01:13 |
| mconnor | hmm | 01:13 |
| mconnor | look for an upstream bug? | 01:13 |
| mconnor | I doubt its just you | 01:13 |
| mconnor | also, http://patches.ubuntu.com/by-release/extracted/ubuntu/f/firefox-3.0/3.0.3+nobinonly-0ubuntu2/ubuntu_no_app_updates.patch | 01:13 |
| mconnor | why not just set the pref and be done with it? | 01:13 |
| mconnor | and that, uh, doesn't change the pref? | 01:14 |
| fta | not my patch | 01:15 |
| mconnor | man... | 01:17 |
| mconnor | this is not going to go quickly, is it? | 01:17 |
| mconnor | ok, I'll do it tomorrow | 01:18 |
| mconnor | where I can yell at asac directly | 01:18 |
| fta | ok | 01:18 |
| mconnor | (this is the overdue approval round for branding stuff, its so much cleaner than Fx2!) | 01:18 |
| asac | mconnor: i am on holiday ;) | 01:19 |
| asac | mconnor: the drop patch isnt applied. you have to look at the series file | 01:19 |
| mconnor | asac: where is the series file? | 01:20 |
| asac | mconnor: the pref isnt for app updates isnt enough ... users must not enable app updates | 01:20 |
| mconnor | asac: so lock the pref | 01:20 |
| mconnor | that should work just fine | 01:20 |
| asac | mconnor: lock prefs is something that admins have to use | 01:20 |
| asac | we used that in the past | 01:20 |
| mconnor | no | 01:20 |
| mconnor | why do you think that's true? | 01:21 |
| asac | because you can only have one lock file? | 01:21 |
| mconnor | er | 01:21 |
| mconnor | sec | 01:21 |
| asac | i think we have developed a patch that allows you to do locks in all pref files ... but the app updates patch probably predates that | 01:22 |
| asac | pristine behaviour is that you can configure one general.config.filename ... and in that file you can have lockPref | 01:23 |
| asac | mconnor: the series file in only in the branch or package source ... in debian/patches directory. | 01:23 |
| asac | there also are all the patches so you dont need to switch to the patches.ubuntu.com site and just can navigate there. | 01:24 |
| mconnor | link me please? | 01:24 |
| asac | mconnor: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/firefox/firefox-3.0.intrepid/files | 01:25 |
| asac | there you can navigate the tree | 01:25 |
| asac | go to debian/patches/ | 01:25 |
| mconnor | asac: hmm | 01:27 |
| mconnor | what's the branding stuff? | 01:27 |
| asac | mconnor: we provide that for downstreams and oems that need a different branding (on a packaging level) | 01:30 |
| mconnor | mmm, so you can package up another branding jar without having to rebuild the package, I assume? | 01:33 |
| asac | mconnor: right ... so what we do is have firefox-3.0-branding package ... if you install that you get all firefox ... if you install abrowser-3.0-branding ... everything uses the example "alternative" branding | 01:33 |
| mconnor | hmm | 01:34 |
| mconnor | intriguing | 01:34 |
| asac | mconnor: its ment to be the answer to the critique: | 01:35 |
| asac | "mozilla provides a simple configure switch to use your own branding ... what do you do for packages?" | 01:35 |
| asac | but we are still learning on this, so its definitly not perfect yet. | 01:36 |
| mconnor | asac: yeah | 01:36 |
| fta | mconnor, here is the content of the firefox-3.0-branding package: http://paste.ubuntu.com/70260/ | 01:36 |
| asac | but we are searching for better way then just providing iceweasel or something | 01:36 |
| mconnor | I mean, I think there's a nicer way to do that | 01:36 |
| asac | i appreciate any feedback | 01:36 |
| mconnor | fta: I can entirely predict that | 01:36 |
| fta | which is a good thing i assume :) | 01:37 |
| mconnor | I'm the one who added the /unofficial directory so people could see how easy it was to have alternate branding :) | 01:37 |
| fta | we had to split browser.jar though | 01:37 |
| fta | that should be "upstreamable" :) | 01:38 |
| asac | welll ... | 01:39 |
| fta | the split should not hurt | 01:39 |
| asac | yeah | 01:39 |
| asac | just like i said, we are still somewhat learning how to do this best for all the eventual cases | 01:39 |
| fta | that sub jar and the icons could also be regrouped in a branding directory, that would help too | 01:40 |
| asac | but keeping the branding in a separate chrome jar is probably part of the final solution ... though not 100% sure. maybe it can be better supported in a different way | 01:40 |
| mconnor | hmm | 01:41 |
| mconnor | I thought we kept stuff in a separate jar already | 01:41 |
| mconnor | fair | 01:41 |
| asac | mconnor: nope ... browser.jar | 01:41 |
| asac | and some stuff directly in APP/GRE dir | 01:41 |
| mconnor | huh | 01:42 |
| mconnor | man | 01:42 |
| mconnor | all of the things I don't think enough about :-/ | 01:42 |
| asac | hehe | 01:42 |
| asac | well. its understood that alternate branding is probably not a core feature ;) | 01:43 |
| mconnor | on a product level, no | 01:43 |
| mconnor | on a code level, it kinda is | 01:43 |
| mconnor | it has been for a very long time, really | 01:44 |
| asac | mconnor: there are also other minor issues, like the user-agent string | 01:44 |
| asac | mconnor: some might want to use their own product in that id | 01:44 |
| asac | mconnor: but most probably want to keep firefox in order to be not locked out of some sites | 01:44 |
| mconnor | that should just work, aiui | 01:44 |
| mconnor | well | 01:44 |
| asac | mconnor: i think it encodes the appname | 01:44 |
| asac | during build | 01:44 |
| mconnor | yes | 01:44 |
| mconnor | I think I remember where, even | 01:44 |
| mconnor | but | 01:45 |
| mconnor | we're trying to teach the world to sniff Gecko versions | 01:45 |
| asac | yeah ;) | 01:45 |
| asac | but the world is not enough :) | 01:45 |
| mconnor | yeesh | 01:45 |
| asac | mconnor: how about a campaign: "randomize your user agent parts" ;) ... and then complain to websites | 01:46 |
| asac | hard to guess how to best teach MS to make hotmail work | 01:46 |
| asac | they even stop providing full service if ubuntu is properly encoded | 01:47 |
| mconnor | that's just them being dicks ;) | 01:48 |
| asac | i wouldnt be shocked if they looked through the navigator.plugins array and downgrade their service when they find an openoffice doc plugin installed ;) | 01:49 |
| gnomefreak | i really hate "at" | 05:58 |
| gnomefreak | ok firegpg is set for intrepid in my PPA i am gonna rebuild all of them with target jaunty tonight or tomorrow | 06:23 |
| === fabrice_sp_ is now known as fabrice_sp | ||
| gnomefreak | fta: support for Jaunty isnt in PPAs yet, they say they uploaded but PPAs are not showing them anywhere. | 06:58 |
| asac | gnomefreak: ok thanks | 10:41 |
| asac | gnomefreak: if there are things to upload and i am not here, ask fta too ;) | 10:41 |
| armin76 | asac: gentoo bug 234110 | 10:47 |
| ubottu | Bug 234110 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/234110 is private | 10:47 |
| armin76 | any clue why it would hang? | 10:47 |
| armin76 | bah | 10:47 |
| armin76 | https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=234110 | 10:47 |
| ubottu | bugs.gentoo.org bug 234110 in Applications "www-client/mozilla-firefox-3.0* USE=xulrunner - hangs on first start" [Normal,New] | 10:47 |
| asac | hmm gentoo still has no cert ;)? | 10:52 |
| armin76 | it has a cacert one | 10:52 |
| asac | ok | 10:53 |
| armin76 | brb, kernel upgrade, have a look and let me know :) | 10:53 |
| asac | kernel upgrades appear to take ages on gentoo ;) | 12:22 |
| asac | gtk | 12:22 |
| asac | tell armin that i don't know ... only thing i could imagine is either cruft in the pkglibdir, a missing .autoreg or i dont know ;) | 12:47 |
| asac | ok off for a while again ;) | 12:52 |
| sebner | asac: gentoo .. :P | 12:58 |
| sebner | asac: hf | 12:58 |
| fta | dh_strip debug symbol extraction: ignored packages: | 13:13 |
| fta | objcopy:./usr/lib/chrome/stiAjXMz[.debug_loc]: No space left on device | 13:13 |
| fta | :( | 13:13 |
| [reed] | sheesh, travel plans are going to be the death of me | 17:33 |
| fta | ? | 17:33 |
| [reed] | fta: finalizing UDS travel and such, as I finally got approval from one of my professors to move an exam :( | 17:40 |
| fta | [reed], i need to finish mine too. i totally forgot | 17:41 |
| [reed] | lol | 17:41 |
| fta | a matter of direct flight more expensive than alternatives through 2 or more hops | 17:43 |
| [reed] | yeah, the proposed flight for me is pretty hoppy, too | 17:52 |
| mconnor | fta: 2 hops or two connections? | 21:29 |
| mconnor | a-b-c is ok, a-b-c-d is pushing your luck :) | 21:30 |
| [reed] | I'm a-b-c-d | 21:31 |
| [reed] | where 'a' is my home airport, and 'd' is SFO | 21:31 |
| fta | i have a-b, a-b-c and a-b-c-d, | 21:32 |
| fta | a = paris | 21:32 |
| fta | i have the choice for the connection(s), Toronto, Chicago/Frankfurt, Newark, Cinncinnati, Philadelphia, Detroit, ... | 21:34 |
| fta | http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/src.png | 21:43 |
| fta | most are tests | 21:50 |
| mconnor | [reed]: your home airport is weird though | 21:51 |
| [reed] | yeah | 21:51 |
| [reed] | mconnor: are you going to come to any part of UDS? | 21:51 |
| mconnor | [reed]: tbd | 21:51 |
| mconnor | depends on how today goes | 21:52 |
| [reed] | what's special about today? | 21:52 |
| mconnor | because today I'm looking at the intrepid patchset | 21:52 |
| [reed] | ah | 21:52 |
| mconnor | and if I find something that causes problems, I'm sure I'll get lynched | 21:52 |
| mconnor | ;) | 21:52 |
| [reed] | hehe | 21:53 |
| fta | but intrepid is already out.. so why now? | 21:54 |
| mconnor | because we're actually going to have a formal trademark usage agreement, rather than just ad-hoc stuff | 21:55 |
| fta | oh | 21:55 |
| mconnor | also, because we've always required that, even without contracts, as a prereq | 21:56 |
| mconnor | that we haven't done it yet kinda sucks | 21:56 |
| mconnor | just because the horse has left the barn doesn't mean you can't put the horse back in the barn, you just can't close the door and do any good | 21:56 |
| * mconnor grumbles a little | 22:34 | |
| fta | ? | 22:34 |
| mconnor | seeing stuff in a patches list for a bug that was resolved invalid a year ago is slightly frustrating | 22:35 |
| mconnor | especially when the patch was rejected | 22:35 |
| fta | which one ? | 22:35 |
| mconnor | sec | 22:35 |
| mconnor | bz386904_config_rules_install_dist_files.patch | 22:35 |
| mconnor | see https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386904 | 22:35 |
| ubottu | Mozilla bug 386904 in Build Config "DIST_FILES and DIST_CHROME_FILES not implemented for install:: target in config/rules.mk" [Normal,Resolved: invalid] | 22:36 |
| mconnor | the patch is wrong, and no longer needed in any case | 22:36 |
| mconnor | bad asac, no donut | 22:36 |
| [reed] | are you sure it's being used? there are patches in the repo that aren't used | 22:36 |
| [reed] | also, make sure to look at both firefox and xulrunner patches | 22:36 |
| [reed] | two different patch sets | 22:37 |
| mconnor | its in the series file | 22:37 |
| [reed] | ok | 22:37 |
| mconnor | also, seriously, are you telling me how to do my job? :P | 22:37 |
| mconnor | this isn't my first time at this here rodeo | 22:37 |
| mconnor | and I haven't looked at the xulrunner patches because, for the most part, I don't care | 22:38 |
| [reed] | no, just offering helpful suggestions in case you didn't know | 22:38 |
| mconnor | [reed]: see, that's what you _think_ you're doing... :P | 22:39 |
| fta | hm, we have that patch since trunk 20070703 | 22:39 |
| mconnor | that was before the upstream bug got filed | 22:42 |
| mconnor | and bsmedberg rejected the patch two weeks later | 22:42 |
| [reed] | mconnor: just checking actual patches or ubufox too? | 22:42 |
| mconnor | and it got left anyway | 22:42 |
| mconnor | [reed]: ubufox is tomorrow | 22:42 |
| mconnor | yay me | 22:42 |
| [reed] | k | 22:42 |
| mconnor | you're doing a bad job of being on sabbatical, btw | 22:43 |
| fta | mconnor, i think asac just forgot about it, no evil intention here | 22:43 |
| mconnor | fta: I'm not saying evil | 22:43 |
| mconnor | I'm saying "this is frustrating" | 22:43 |
| === jdstrand_ is now known as jdstrand | ||
| mconnor | because he would have gotten mail explaining why that patch was wrong, and he did nothing about it | 22:44 |
| mconnor | fta: btw, where are the build configs stored? | 22:45 |
| fta | in debian/rules | 22:45 |
| mconnor | ow | 22:47 |
| mconnor | that's so... elaborate | 22:47 |
| fta | :) | 22:47 |
| mconnor | why do you guys specify so many build flags explicitly? | 22:48 |
| mconnor | also, why do you disable reporter? | 22:48 |
| mconnor | oh, you ship it with xulrunner | 22:49 |
| mconnor | oy, ok | 22:49 |
| fta | because we have apport pushing core dumps to launchpad, where they are retraced by a bot and published in a bug | 22:49 |
| mconnor | not crashreporter | 22:51 |
| mconnor | though, really, I still wish you wouldn't do that | 22:51 |
| mconnor | but that's a separate discussion about how to not have linux distros hiding their crash data from us | 22:51 |
| fta | what? crashreporter ? | 22:51 |
| [reed] | I don't think they're hiding it... just think that we need to integrate better | 22:52 |
| fta | we had several discussions about that | 22:52 |
| fta | including at the last uds | 22:52 |
| mconnor | hiding is pejorative | 22:52 |
| mconnor | I mean that we don't have a unified view of crashes | 22:53 |
| mconnor | because every distro does something different | 22:53 |
| mconnor | and we can't roll that up easily | 22:53 |
| mconnor | I also wish you guys ran unit tests | 22:57 |
| fta | it's not something our builders can do. we need dedicated boxes. | 23:01 |
| fta | i'm not canonical, but i think asac discussed that internally with the ubuntu QA team | 23:01 |
| fta | unfortunately, nothing happened since | 23:02 |
| mconnor | you have an hppa build? | 23:05 |
| fta | yes, but not officially supported | 23:07 |
| fta | i.e. best effort | 23:07 |
| mconnor | ok | 23:07 |
| mconnor | there's a newer version of the patch in the bug | 23:08 |
| mconnor | https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=436133 | 23:08 |
| ubottu | Mozilla bug 436133 in Networking: Cookies "Cookies build failure on hppa" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] | 23:08 |
| mconnor | which is on trunk already | 23:08 |
| mconnor | at least that was r+ ;) | 23:09 |
| mconnor | do all of these changes have launchpad numbers somewhere? | 23:10 |
| mconnor | and the convention is just old? | 23:10 |
| mconnor | er, new? | 23:10 |
| fta | lpxxxx mean there's a bug in launchpad | 23:11 |
| fta | means | 23:11 |
| mconnor | yeah, and bz is bmo, but there's a bunch that have neither | 23:11 |
| mconnor | and I don't have good details on those if I can't look stuff up | 23:12 |
| fta | well, those without lp or bz are explained somewhere in debian/changelog | 23:14 |
| mconnor | fta: except without actually being linked to the patch itself, in many cases | 23:24 |
| mconnor | really, I should just give you guys a list and ask what's up | 23:25 |
| fta | you should find a "add debian/patches/whatever" somewhere in debian/changelog, at least if it's from asac or me, we are really consistent about that | 23:26 |
| fta | but a list of questions would be fine too | 23:27 |
| mconnor | what emails should I use? | 23:27 |
| [reed] | fta@ubuntu.com, asac@ubuntu.com, probably... and CC me if you want me watching/poking, too | 23:28 |
| fta | yes | 23:28 |
| mconnor | ok | 23:28 |
| mconnor | http://people.mozilla.com/~mconnor/trademark-review/Ubuntu/Round%201/ is basically what I'm doing | 23:29 |
| mconnor | (also, boy is omnioutliner nice for this) | 23:29 |
| fta | ftbfs-with-branding-dir is no longer needed, i thought i already removed it | 23:31 |
| fta | installer_shouldnt_copy_xulrunner got a r- from bs, the feature is needed but not that way | 23:32 |
| fta | installer_use_stdout_for_missing_files got a r+ from bs and landed in trunk | 23:33 |
| fta | [reed], do you have the bug # ? | 23:33 |
| [reed] | looking | 23:34 |
| fta | nspr_flags_by_pkg_config_hack is needed because we use system nspr and we don't have the nspr sources in the xul/ff tarballs | 23:34 |
| fta | mconnor, ^^ | 23:34 |
| mconnor | w00t, awesome | 23:35 |
| [reed] | 460911 nor -- fta+bugzilla@sofaraway.org RESO FIXE Linu Make the installer complain about missing files on stdout | 23:35 |
| [reed] | 460913 nor -- fta+bugzilla@sofaraway.org ASSI Linu Installer shouldn't copy xulrunner files into Firefox install directory | 23:35 |
| [reed] | 460915 nor -- asac@jwsdot.com RESO INVA Linu Build problem when using --with-branding-dir | 23:35 |
| [reed] | 460917 maj -- asac@jwsdot.com ASSI Linu New plugins only recognized after restarting Firefox | 23:35 |
| fta | dont_depend_on_nspr_sources, same thing | 23:35 |
| mconnor | ew | 23:35 |
| mconnor | paste-nasty | 23:35 |
| fta | (looks fine here) | 23:36 |
| fta | mozilla bug 460911 | 23:36 |
| ubottu | Mozilla bug 460911 in Installer: XPInstall Engine "Make the installer complain about missing files on stdout" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460911 | 23:36 |
| fta | mozilla bug 460913 | 23:36 |
| ubottu | Mozilla bug 460913 in Build Config "Installer shouldn't copy xulrunner files into Firefox install directory" [Normal,Assigned] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460913 | 23:36 |
| fta | mozilla bug 460915 | 23:36 |
| ubottu | Mozilla bug 460915 in General "Build problem when using --with-branding-dir" [Normal,Resolved: invalid] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460915 | 23:36 |
| fta | mozilla bug 460917 | 23:36 |
| ubottu | Mozilla bug 460917 in Plugin Finder Service "New plugins only recognized after restarting Firefox" [Major,Assigned] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460917 | 23:36 |
| mconnor | fta: I'm using irssi, it doesn't like some things | 23:36 |
| fta | regarding 460913, i need to work in this, i have it in ff3.0/ff3.1/prism/fennec/xul-explorer/instantbird/bluegriffon | 23:39 |
| mconnor | bluegriffon? | 23:40 |
| fta | the new nvu from glazou | 23:40 |
| mconnor | ah | 23:40 |
| fta | i have experimental packages for all those | 23:41 |
| mconnor | fwiw, my goal here is to minimize the "special" patches distros end up with | 23:43 |
| mconnor | because really, other than maybe build config stuff, and some alternate bookmarks, I don't see why everything else can't just live in mozilla.org Hg | 23:44 |
| fta | i agree | 23:44 |
| mconnor | hmm | 23:45 |
| mconnor | Dave Townsend's comment in the plugin reload bug is apt | 23:45 |
| mconnor | in 460917 | 23:46 |
| fta | patch from asac, i don't know the details behind this one | 23:47 |
| mconnor | ok | 23:49 |
| mconnor | I mean, this is a process, not a binary decision | 23:49 |
| mconnor | I'm not, despite what some would think, trying to do bad things :) | 23:50 |
| fta | [reed], you guys should have a builder tracking the qt build, it doesn't even build | 23:50 |
| fta | mconnor, i'm sure you're not evil :) | 23:50 |
| [reed] | file a bug :) | 23:51 |
| fta | [reed], i have | 23:51 |
| [reed] | to get a qt build machine? | 23:51 |
| fta | not, the build issue | 23:51 |
| fta | -not+no | 23:51 |
| mconnor | builders for new platforms are unlikely to happen until January or so | 23:52 |
| mconnor | we're still working on getting builds on Mercurial fully automated | 23:52 |
| mconnor | and stabilizing our unit test infrastructure | 23:52 |
| fta | [reed], i just didn't have time to produce a patch so far | 23:52 |
| fta | mozilla bug 463872 | 23:52 |
| ubottu | Mozilla bug 463872 in GFX "Cairo-qpainter build is broken after latest cairo update" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=463872 | 23:52 |
| fta | it's not fixed | 23:53 |
| mconnor | also, its qt | 23:54 |
| mconnor | so... meh ;) | 23:54 |
| [reed] | then reopen? | 23:54 |
| fta | i'm trying to have a build for both qt and gtk in the same (3.1) branch | 23:54 |
| fta | some kde users are producing rogue packages | 23:55 |
| mconnor | rogue packages? | 23:57 |
| mconnor | using unofficial branding, I hope! | 23:57 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!
