[00:03] <spm> teferi: what was the question number for your GPG request? I'll assign to our group so it doesn't get forgotten :-)
[00:03] <teferi> spm: 51184
[00:03] <wgrant> spm: I suspect that merging the accounts is the solution.
[00:03] <teferi> spm: I obviously still have the key and can do whatever is necessary to prove that I own it
[00:05] <teferi> spm: thanks again
[00:05] <spm> teferi: thank me when it's done ;-)
[00:05] <teferi> i've got a package (and another in the works) all set and ready to dput up, this is the last thing standing in my way
[00:22] <spm> teferi: give that  whirl?
[00:22] <spm> I'm about to be afk for a bit - so will chase any further woes on return :-)
[00:23] <teferi> ok, let's try adding the key again
[00:23] <teferi> oh, oh man!
[00:23] <teferi> thanks!
[00:24] <spm> wgrant: yeah merge is the solution. Is more a matter of dotting i's and crossing t's. So to speak :-)
[00:24]  * teferi waits for a response from ppa
[00:26] <wgrant> spm: Right, but surely it's easy with a request signed by the original user's OpenPGP key...
[00:27] <wgrant> teferi: Have you got an email yet?
[00:27] <teferi> upload accepted
[00:27] <teferi> thanks a lot, spm
[00:28] <wgrant> Excellent.
[00:31] <jml> RAOF: http://robrohan.com/2006/10/19/emacs-key-bindings-on-ubuntu/
[00:32] <teferi> oh dear, where are my binary packages? :P
[00:33] <wgrant> teferi: Have they finished building? If so, when?
[00:33] <teferi> yes, they just finished
[00:33] <teferi> but it still says zero binary packages and zero source packages
[00:33] <wgrant> They'll be visible in 7 minutes
[00:33] <teferi> ah, *nod*
[00:33] <teferi> thanks
[00:33] <wgrant> Binaries and sources are published every 20 minutes.
[00:34] <teferi> would be nice to update https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/PPA wi th that
[02:20] <spm> wgrant: re key signing. It Depends. Part of the issue was that the old account in question had been manually killed. "why?" becomes the question.
[02:20] <spm> The other side is that crypto only secures the .. path. It doesn't secure the ends.
[02:21] <spm> Was a real PITA trying to convince DSD of that.... anal retentive crypto; but if you have root access at either end. Who cares.
[02:22] <spm> If you're ever feeling really bored and over your exams (hope they're going well btw!) I can bore you to tears on this stuff.
[02:26] <wgrant> That's a good point?
[02:26] <wgrant> DSD?
[02:26] <jml> spm: DSD needed convincing of that!?
[02:26] <wgrant> (having a break from studying to fix fallout from the power failure that knocked me off Freenode... the server here got rather displeased)
[02:27] <jml> spm: man, to think I thought of working there at one point.
[02:27]  * jml waves hi to clipper
[02:27] <spm> wgrant: Defence Signals Directorate: http://www.dsd.gov.au/
[02:28] <wgrant> Ah. .gov.au. That explains it.
[02:28] <spm> jml: they live in their own little world. Nuff said. :-)
[02:28] <wgrant> And then we've got Senator Conroy...
[02:29] <jml> who has received a letter from me, pleading for sanity
[02:29] <wgrant> Excellent.
[02:29] <spm> We used to live in the real world of actually solving problems; DSD live in the world of stopping anyone from doing anything.
[02:29] <wgrant> I don't think it will work, though.
[02:29] <wgrant> They seem pretty damn serious.
[02:29] <jml> wgrant: no, it won't.
[02:29] <spm> wgrant: Um. They are :-)
[02:29] <jml> wgrant: http://life.mumak.net/2008/10/how-to-write-to-mp.html
[02:29] <spm> And that's about as much about what they do as I'm going to tell - I have no desire to be locked up for 20 years. ;-)
[02:30] <ajmitch> oh do tell :)
[02:30] <spm> jml: posted mine yesterday - finally.
[02:30] <jml> spm: good on you
[02:31] <wgrant> Maybe iiNet's trials will knock some sense into them.
[02:31] <wgrant> We can hope...
[02:31] <jml> oh, is iiNet trialling it?
[02:31] <spm> Chose to write direct to my MP (Bob McMullan) at his local office vs his APH office. "You are my MP sir..."
[02:31] <spm> jml: you haven't read their CEO's ... rant?
[02:31] <ajmitch> here we're just battling insane copyright changes
[02:31] <spm> or quotes there of? Is most impressive
[02:31] <jml> my main gripe about the whole thing is that if Australians wanted it and if it was commercially feasible, we'd be doing it already.
[02:31] <wgrant> They're going to ask if they can trial it, so they can show that is is broken by design.
[02:32] <jamesh> jml: an extra step in that list would be to check to see if the stamps you have are still the right denomination
[02:32] <jml> spm: no, I haven't. URL?
[02:32] <jml> jamesh: heh heh.
[02:32] <wgrant> jamesh: They didn't publicise that change too well.
[02:32] <spm> jml: errr - lets see if I can find it - been an amazing series of threads on this on the sage-au lists
[02:32] <jml> oh wow, sage.
[02:33] <wgrant> http://www.theage.com.au/news/technology/biztech/net-censorship-plan-backlash/2008/11/11/1226318639085.html
[02:33] <spm> wgrant: ta - jml that's it.
[02:33] <jamesh> jml: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/11/12/aussie_firewall_row/
[02:33] <wgrant> That too.
[02:33] <jamesh> the iiNet boss says he'll implement it but publicise how much it slows things down and every time someone bypasses the filters
[02:34] <wgrant> Yep.
[02:34] <spm> If mark newton wasn't raising such a fuss, I'd be tempted to switch to iinet on that alone. ;-)
[02:36] <jamesh> it'd be nice if the stamps were "postage for one letter within Australia" rather than 50c or 55c or whatever
[02:37] <wgrant> spm: Who are you with now?
[02:38] <spm> wgrant: ?? my IRC name doesn't give that away? Internode.
[02:38] <wgrant> kiko: Did you end up rediscovering who was doing the bug scraping, or shall I reinform you?
[02:38] <wgrant> spm: Oh, forgot you weren't cloaked like the rest of the LP people.
[02:45] <DBO> launchpad gave me a permission denied error on my pubkey earlier
[02:45] <DBO> it works fine now
[02:45] <DBO> wtf?
[02:49] <jml> DBO: it's possible that some sort of intermittent network failure occured in the data centre
[02:49] <jml> DBO: or it could be a local config issue on your end
[02:49] <DBO> it works now and all I did was go to dinner =P
[02:49] <jml> DBO: dining is known to solve many problems.
[02:50] <DBO> jml, that would explain it
[03:22] <jml> barry: :P
[03:43] <wgrant> ~>
[03:43] <wgrant> Grr.
[04:38] <newz2000> Hi, I'm trying to upload code to share with a newly created team but it gave me an error that teams cannot have junk branches. What's the best way to share code?
[04:50] <spiv> Make a project for it.
[04:53] <newz2000> hi spiv, if I'm working on a project that has multiple sub-projects should each sub-project be a project in launchpad or can I upload several different (not-related) branches of code to one project?
[04:55] <newz2000> for example, say my project has some code, a website and some docs, each maintained by a diff person. Should that be three different launchpad projects or just one with three different branches?
[04:55] <spiv> newz2000: you can do either
[04:56] <spiv> newz2000: I'd probably lean towards having just one project.
[04:56] <spiv> You can always make new projects and move the branches later if you want.
[04:56]  * wgrant would just have one branch, too.
[04:56] <newz2000> ah, ok. That sounds good, i'll try it now.
[04:57] <newz2000> is it bad form to have a project and team with the same name?
[04:58]  * wgrant looks at launchpad and ~launchpad, and suggests that if they're doing it, it can't be wrong.
[04:58] <newz2000> good point
[04:58] <jamesh> or ~storm and storm
[04:58] <jamesh> or many others
[05:01] <newz2000> I got a javascript error when I clicked "Other/Proprietary" license. setLicensePendingStatus is not defined
[05:01] <newz2000> fyi
[05:51] <Hobbsee> do we have a community help contact yet today?
[05:53] <wgrant> Not at this hou.
[05:53] <wgrant> +r
[05:53] <wgrant> -bad keyboard
[05:54] <Hobbsee> oh yeah, it's still early now, due to DST..
[05:55] <wgrant> Assuming no swaps, it's bigjools today, so it's another 3 hours at least.
[05:56] <cprov> Hobbsee: anything I can help ?
[05:56] <Hobbsee> cprov: no, thanks, it's not soyuz related.
[05:56] <Hobbsee> cprov: but i'd like to know more on the magic diff tool :)
[05:56]  * Hobbsee filed a ticket, requesting someone be unsubscribed from a bug
[05:57] <Hobbsee> er... OOPS-1048EA41 & Error ID: OOPS-1048ED59 ?
[05:57] <cprov> Hobbsee: which `magic diff`  ? we have so many magic components.
[05:58] <Hobbsee> cprov: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/48539
[05:58]  * wgrant would like a button to request an arbitrary debdiff.
[05:58] <wgrant> But I guess Hobbsee wants debdiffs in the queue.
[05:58] <Hobbsee> both would be good :)
[05:58] <cprov> those things are actually easy to implement
[05:58] <Hobbsee> but yes, the queue stuff is what i'd particularly love
[05:58] <Hobbsee> cprov: can we have it for the next release then please?  :D
[05:59] <Hobbsee> would make reviewing much easrier
[05:59] <cprov> right
[05:59] <cprov> Hobbsee: how is the queue-ui doing for you ?
[06:00] <Hobbsee> cprov: pretty good.  Modulo any timeouts of course.
[06:00] <Hobbsee> cprov: it's a bit limiting if you want to accept lots of langpacks, though.
[06:00] <Hobbsee> (because there's no "select all" checkbox)
[06:01] <cprov> yes, we all like gmail ;)
[06:01] <Hobbsee> otoh, i think i can only accept 8(?) at a time anyway, so maybe it's a good thing there's no checkbox
[06:03] <cprov> damm slow.
[06:04] <Hobbsee> hm?
[06:06] <Hobbsee> cprov: on the subject of gmail, have you tried mobile gmail?  From memory, i don't think that actually has checkboxes.
[06:07] <cprov> Hobbsee: yes, but I don't remember how it deletes multiple messages.
[06:07] <cprov> s/deletes/selects
[06:08] <Hobbsee> i don't think it does :)
[06:09] <Hobbsee> in fact, you can't even clear out all spam.
[06:11]  * Hobbsee wonders what https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/297388 actually is, and why she wanted to load it
[06:11] <cprov> Hobbsee: ehe, bug or feature ?
[06:11] <Hobbsee> oh, well, that's no help then.
[06:11] <Hobbsee> cprov: well, i'd guess bug :P
[06:11] <Hobbsee> cprov: although possibly feature, based on how they want to keep all mail
[06:12] <cprov> Hobbsee: pretty much as we keep all *your* packages.
[06:12] <Hobbsee> cprov: that's true.
[06:13] <wgrant> That's the bug where spm was a bit over-deletionist.
[06:13] <Hobbsee> ahhh.
[06:13] <Hobbsee> is it supposed to be so over-deleted that it's oopsing out?
[06:13] <wgrant> And that is some *odd* capitalisation.
[06:13] <spm> Hobbsee: Not as such no...
[06:13] <wgrant> I don't think so, but it has been since a couple of minutes after it was mentioned here.
[06:14] <Hobbsee> spm: is it worth filing as a question, or do they all get looked at anyway?
[06:14] <wgrant> The bugtask seems to have vanished, which would explain why it oopses.
[06:14] <Hobbsee> the weird thing is...it's a quick oops.  it's not a timeout.
[06:14] <spm> Hobbsee: it surely can't hurt - if only that we don't lose it - but I'll probably be chasing myself tomorrow as well.
[06:15] <Hobbsee> wgrant: i thought those showed up as differnet oopses (like "lp can't find the page you were looking for")
[06:15] <wgrant> The bug exists.
[06:15] <wgrant> The bugtask does not.
[06:15] <Hobbsee> cprov: sweet :)
[06:15] <spm> 'bugs' within the DB are a lot more complicated that I earlier thought - and we head smashed pretty hard into those complications
[06:15] <Hobbsee> oh, right.  I see.
[06:15] <wgrant> Heh.
[06:16] <spm> 'heh' doesn't even get close to describving the cursing :-)
[06:16] <wgrant> I suppose there are subscriptions and notifications and blah blah that need deleting.
[06:16]  * Hobbsee throws spm a few red snakes (as in, the lollies) for breaking it
[06:16] <spm> pretty much
[06:16] <wgrant> ON DELETE CASCADE!
[06:16] <spm> oh gawd - *more* sugar. :-) Has been a bit of a sugar overload day for me... suspect I'll be bouncing off walls for hours yet.
[06:17] <Hobbsee> spm: well, you could save them for tomorrow :P
[06:17] <spm> wgrant: I just look after things - db decisions are not my problem. :-P
[06:17] <spm> Hobbsee: or give them to our 5yo and watch HIM bounce off walls.... ;-)
[06:19] <Hobbsee> spm: and besides, they won't melt on you
[06:19] <spm> lol. indeed they do not. Nor in your hand either.
[06:19] <Hobbsee> spm: no, don't do that.
[06:19] <Hobbsee> spm: you will regret that
[06:19] <spm> snakes to a small child? as in.
[06:19] <Hobbsee> well, sending them on a sugar high, at all
[06:26] <spm> heh. Trust me - a sugar high is not something we try to put him on - the come down is painful all round :-)
[06:26] <Hobbsee> heh heh heh.  yes.
[07:32] <Mez> flacoste: hello :D
[07:33] <Mez> I guess that my arguments for the OpenID thing swayed you :D yay :D
[07:37] <wgrant> What's the solution? Don't stop people from shooting themselves in the foot if they decide to use their sensible LP OpenID?
[07:40] <Mez> possibly... I don't know what they've decided, but they're going to be allowing the "sensible" LP OpenID
[07:40] <Mez> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad-foundations/+bug/294634
[07:41] <Mez> !botsnack
[07:42] <Mez> good bot
[08:44] <kripken> I am having no luck uploading large (30MB) release files to Launchpad. After a while, it always says "Sorry, there was a problem connecting to the Launchpad server." Is it just me?
[08:49] <thekorn> flacoste: thanks for fixing the API on staging
[10:32] <Hobbsee> wow!
[10:33] <Hobbsee> who did the work on the package field, when changing a bug to a different package?  It actually shows the binaries for each of the sources now!
[11:42] <savvas> hello, does anyone know how to provide a gpg key for my PPA?
[11:43] <bigjools> savvas: do you mean https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/125103 ?
[11:44] <savvas> I'm getting the "Warning: The following packages could not be authenticated:" error
[11:44] <savvas> ah thanks bigjools
[11:44] <bigjools> savvas: yes that's normal, see the bug :)
[11:44] <Hobbsee> bigjools: oh, interesting fix.
[11:44] <mpt> wgrant, wow, you've been hitting the "Report a bug" button pretty hard :-)
[11:45] <Hobbsee> mpt: that's a feature :P
[11:45] <bigjools> mpt: harder than you? surely not :)
[11:45] <wgrant> mpt: Erm, yes. I do that occasionally.
[11:45] <mpt> good work
[11:45]  * Hobbsee has been fixing bugs instead
[11:45] <wgrant> But I then get told I should have hit it harder and split them up :P
[11:47] <mpt> Hm, yeah, I don't think bug 297531 should have been marked incomplete
[11:48] <wgrant> I would have thought those things could all be most easily done in one hit, which was why I put it in one bug.
[11:48] <bigjools> Hobbsee: probably the only sane fix
[11:48] <Hobbsee> bigjools: indeed.
[11:50] <mpt> Compare bug 253317, reported by our erstwhile project manager :-)
[11:51] <wgrant> Yay, silbs.
[11:51] <wgrant> silbs wants to bring QA sanity to bug statuses.
[11:51] <wgrant> mpt: Ahaha, nice.
[11:53] <wgrant> Oh yeah, most of the teams involved in bug #297505 are Canonical-related.
[11:55]  * wgrant hopes you can't ignore silbs.
[11:55] <wgrant> I like the last three bugs.
[11:58] <wgrant> mpt: Is there a reason that Bug/+subscribe survived your reign with a single option button with continue/cancel buttons, rather than just Subcribe and Cancel buttons?
[11:59] <mpt> wgrant, lack of person-hours mostly, there are bug reports on both those things
[12:00] <wgrant> Right, as long as it wasn't intentionally kept.
[12:00] <mpt> nooooo
[12:01] <mpt> definitely not
[12:01] <wgrant> Good, good.
[12:20] <NCommander> Is sparc's other builder ever going to return?
[12:22] <bigjools> NCommander: I don't know, let me find out
[12:23] <NCommander> bigjools, thank you. I'd be depressed to see sparc die as an architecture due to dead builders
[12:23] <wgrant> I wonder if hppa will catch up before armel does.
[12:24] <NCommander> someone take a screenshot, we'll never see a build queue over 8,000 again until after the next port is bootstrapped
[12:26] <bigjools> :)
[12:46] <persia> Sometimes we get close when we open a new release archive, but that's admittedly usually only in the 4000 range.
[12:47] <danilos> mdke: hey, if you've got time, I'd like to check if fix for bug #282695 is correct, can you please browse to https://translations.staging.launchpad.net/ubuntu/intrepid/+source/ubuntu-docs and see if link "Download translations" works for you (I've removed you from the ubuntu-translation-coordinators team on staging only :)
[12:53] <joshuablount> Morning lp:~people
[12:54] <joshuablount> Is there a good way to programmatically tell what bug emails are for what project? I'm setting up some rules for thunderbird to sort incoming stuff, but there doesn't seem to be anything about the project a bug is related to in the emails...
[12:54] <salgado> joshuablount, have you checked the X-Launchpad header?
[12:55] <wgrant> X-Launchpad-Bug: product=yourprojectnamehere
[12:56] <joshuablount> salgado, wgrant: I spoke to quickly, just noticed this.
[12:56] <joshuablount> Thanks!
[12:56] <salgado> np
[12:56] <bigjools> NCommander: some hardware died, it's being sorted out.
[12:57] <NCommander> wooo
[13:21] <geser> can somebody tell me why LP thinks that r-cran-fimport got superseded? see https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/jaunty/i386/r-cran-fimport/+index
[13:21] <geser> no published version anymore of it
[13:21] <geser> it's an arch:all package
[13:22] <geser> and got binary NEWed yesterday
[13:22] <danilos> mdke: never mind that, I've managed to test this myself, thanks :)
[13:41] <NCommander> bigjools, I've got an LP question
[13:41] <NCommander> bigjools, well, SOyuz, more specifically
[13:42] <NCommander> bigjools, can Soyuz pin a repo to pin priority 200 (in the Release file), so a repo could be enabled, but nothing installed by default?
[13:44] <bigjools> NCommander: why would you want to do that?
[13:45] <NCommander> bigjools, there is some talk about changing how the Backports repo works in this respect, essentially because pinning is PITA to do with APT, I'm hoping for the Jaunty cycle to implement some mechanism to allow a backport installation without having to install the entire repo
[13:45] <NCommander> sorta like a graphical frontend to apt-get -t hardy-backports install *backport*
[13:45] <NCommander> I wanted to know from a technical perspective if this was even possible
[13:46] <bigjools> NCommander: I don't see why not, it's just meta data about the archive right?
[13:46] <NCommander> Its a line in the Release file if memory serves
[13:51] <mfoniso> I'm trying to import my ssh keys into launchpad, but it keeps getting refused, with the message that the keys are "...known to be compromised"
[13:52] <bigjools> mfoniso: you need to generate new keys
[13:52] <mfoniso> I'm on ubuntu and have reinstalled the openssh suite, regenerated new ketys
[13:52] <mfoniso> but they still don't work
[13:53] <mfoniso> bigjools: how do I go about that, 'cos I still encounter the same problems after generating new keys
[13:53] <bigjools> mfoniso: are you sure you're sending the new keys?
[13:53] <bigjools> completely remove the old ones, they are worthless
[13:54] <mfoniso> I'm pretty sure I'm sending the new keys, and I did remove all the old stuff..
[13:54] <mfoniso> in fact, I deleted everything in ~/.ssh/ just to make sure
[13:54] <mfoniso> uninstalled openssh (since it was a supposed compromised version)
[13:54] <bigjools> that message can only happen if ssh-vulnkey says it's a bad key
[13:54] <mfoniso> reinstalled ssh and generated new keys
[13:54] <bigjools> try that locally and see what it says
[13:55] <mfoniso> ssh-vulnkey says "Unknown (no blacklist information)..."
[13:57] <mfoniso> ok, the ubuntu security advisory says to destroy the key and create a new one, lemme try that  (again)
[13:58] <mfoniso> bigjools: does deleting the public and private keys should accomplish said destruction?
[13:58] <bigjools> mfoniso: unless you have any more copies, yep
[13:59] <flacoste> thekorn: my pleasure, sorry, that it took so long
[13:59] <flacoste> Mez, wgrant: yeah, the OpenID to use with launchpad will be the profile page
[14:00] <mfoniso> ok
[14:00] <flacoste> Mez: and yes, your social argument about the "social" aspect of the identity really made the difference
[14:01] <flacoste> Mez: our OpenID system was really designed as a single-sign on system, which is different, fortunately, the two aspects can work with each other through the magic of delegation
[14:02] <mfoniso> bigjools: I just deleted id_rsa and id_rsa.pub, created new keys (via ssh-keygen) launchpad still gives the sames message
[14:03] <bigjools> mfoniso: that is odd
[14:03]  * mfoniso thinks so too
[14:03] <mfoniso> I've done this over and over
[14:03] <mfoniso> I have no idea what I'm doing wrong
[14:03] <bigjools> mfoniso: the code in LP that checks it is calling ssh-vulnkey (I have the code in front of me)
[14:03] <bigjools> mfoniso: so it's still seeing your old key somehow
[14:04] <mfoniso> but why?
[14:04] <bigjools> mfoniso: do you have any id_dsa keys?
[14:05] <mfoniso> nope
[14:06] <bigjools> hmmm
[14:07] <persia> mfoniso, What happens when you try ssh-vulnkey on your local system?
[14:08] <bigjools> he did alreadu
[14:08] <bigjools> already
[14:09] <mfoniso> no blacklist information
[14:09] <mfoniso> the ubuntu security advisory says in this scenario, to create new keys
[14:10] <bigjools> mfoniso: and you're definitely pasting the contents of your new ~/.ssh/id_rsa.pub file?
[14:10] <persia> mfoniso, do you have openssh-blacklist and openssh-blacklist-extra installed?
[14:10] <persia> bigjools, Which blacklist files does LP use?
[14:11] <bigjools> persia: whatever Hardy has installed
[14:11] <bigjools> persia: it uses ssh-vulnkey
[14:11] <persia> bigjools, Yep, and ssh-vulnkey relies on blacklist files.
[14:12] <persia> I don't think they are force-installed for every machine though.
[14:12] <mfoniso> bigjools: yeah, pasting the contents of ~/.ssh/id_rsa.pub
[14:12] <mfoniso> persia:I don't have those installed
[14:13] <mfoniso> I know they were there initially
[14:13] <mfoniso> but I did a couple of uninstalls/installs
[14:13] <persia> mfoniso, Try installing just openssh-blacklist and see if ssh-vulnkey says something different.
[14:13] <mfoniso> they aren't there right now
[14:13] <bigjools> mfoniso: can you try generating a DSA one instead?
[14:13] <mfoniso> it'll say COMPROMISED.. but I'll do it anyway
[14:13] <mfoniso> bigjools: ok
[14:15] <mfoniso> bigjools: same message from LP
[14:15] <bigjools> mfoniso: what version of openssh are you using?
[14:15] <mfoniso> ﻿persia:funny... apt-get says "openssh-blacklist is already at newest version"
[14:16] <mfoniso> ssh -v gives me : "OpenSSH_4.6p1 Debian-5ubuntu0.6, OpenSSL 0.9.8g 19 Oct 2007"
[14:16] <bigjools> mfoniso: can you pastebin me the public key you're using
[14:17] <mfoniso> bigjools: ok, and it appeas my version of openssh isn't the latest version...
[14:17] <mfoniso> i expected that "apt-get install" would grab the latest version
[14:18] <bigjools> mfoniso: are you on intrepid?
[14:18] <mfoniso> nope
[14:18] <mfoniso> hardy
[14:18] <mfoniso> can't upgrade just yet, I'm currently on a slow connection
[14:18] <bigjools> mfoniso: my hardy box has OpenSSH_4.7p1
[14:19] <mfoniso> if I uninstall openssh, and reinstall it via apt-get, would that get the latest version?
[14:19] <bigjools> it should upgrade anyway
[14:19] <mfoniso> or does that depend on the sources in my sources file?
[14:19] <bigjools> yes - what do you have enabled?
[14:20] <mfoniso> everything :-)
[14:21] <mfoniso> hey hey hey... LP just accepted the key I was about to paste for you.. and it's the same key I tried a while ago ...
[14:21] <bigjools> !
[14:21] <mfoniso> but I don't feel comfortable not knowing what's going on
[14:21] <bigjools> you need to upgrade openssh-client BTW, not openssh
[14:22] <mfoniso> ok
[14:22] <mfoniso> I just noticed something...
[14:22] <persia> The version in hardy should be fine.  No need to upgrade.
[14:23] <mfoniso> the public key starts like so "ssh-rsa AAAAB3Nza..."
[14:23] <bigjools> persia: well he doesn't have the latest
[14:24] <mfoniso> when I paste it in LP, the text right after "ssh-rsa" get moved to a new line...
[14:24] <mfoniso> as though the space is converted to a newline
[14:24] <mfoniso> and I think that's what's happening (as opposed to the display just being wrapped)
[14:25] <mfoniso> and LP complains when I try to upload it
[14:25] <persia> 4.6p1 is the version from 7.10 (gutsy).  Odd.
[14:25] <mfoniso> but it accepts it after I manually remove the space, and add it again with spacebar.
[14:26] <bigjools> mfoniso: copy & paste - gotta love it
[14:26] <mfoniso> thanks for your time guys, I really appreciate it
[14:26] <bigjools> you're welcome
[14:27] <mfoniso> but I still wanna see what ssh-vulnkeys has to say...
[15:49] <gnomefreak> anyone give me a hint why my merge request was rejected?
[15:49] <beuno> gnomefreak, URL?
[15:49] <gnomefreak> beuno: one sec
[15:51] <gnomefreak> beuno: merging https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~gnomefreak/firefox-extensions/firegpg.ubuntu into ~dev branch let me get full name of branch
[15:52] <gnomefreak> https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-dev/firefox-extensions/firegpg.ubuntu
[15:52] <beuno> gnomefreak, https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~gnomefreak/firefox-extensions/firegpg.ubuntu/+merge/1671
[15:52] <gnomefreak> oh
[15:52] <gnomefreak> beuno: why did i get rejection email
[15:52] <gnomefreak> and my proposed merge 4 emails
[15:53] <beuno> gnomefreak, uhm, can you forward it to me?
[15:53] <beuno> you shouldn't get reject emails
[15:53] <gnomefreak> beuno: yep need address
[15:53] <beuno> gnomefreak, argentina@gmail.com
[15:54] <gnomefreak> ok ill send you rejection one any of the rest?
[15:54] <beuno> just the rejection one
[15:54] <beuno> I don't know why you got 4, but 2 is normal
[15:55] <gnomefreak> beuno: 2 was me requesting and one was lp and other was reject. so i sent you only the important one
[15:55] <gnomefreak> universe-bugs is rejection email
[15:57] <beuno> gnomefreak, hm, the mailing list is rejecting the email
[15:57] <beuno> maybe the email list is set as the contact address for the team that owns the trunk?
[15:57] <gnomefreak> beuno: should it be?
[15:58] <gnomefreak> its  a ~ubuntu-dev branch not sure what universe has to do with LP branches since branch doesnt say universe or main or any of the above
[15:58] <beuno> gnomefreak, well, I don't know, but I do know that if these emails get sent to a list it isn't subscribed to, then the mailing list will reject them
[15:58] <beuno> so it's not really Launchpad rejecting
[15:59] <gnomefreak> ok thanks ill find out why the list
[15:59] <beuno> np
[16:44] <Mez> flacoste: Yeah, but as I said, to me, it's not an identity if it's used just for signon...
[16:45] <flacoste> Mez: right
[20:10] <xlyz> ﻿anyone kowns how to download updated translations from launchpad with bzr?
[21:12] <spm> wgrant: OT for channel: http://today.ninemsn.com.au/videoindex.aspx 'firewalls under fire' - Mark Newton was interviewed this morning by Today. Enjoy, or not :-)
[21:13] <fta>  * State: Chroot problem
[21:13] <fta>  * Architecture: lpia
[21:13] <fta>  * Archive: fta PPA
[21:13] <fta> logs say "FATAL: kernel too old"
[21:14] <fta> (jaunty)
[21:15] <persia> fta, Known issue.  Attempts have been made to fix it (although perhaps not entirely successful).  Try a rebuild.  If that doesn't work, ignore it for a bit.
[21:16] <fta> ok, thanks
[21:44] <wgrant> spm: Ew, I've now watched a segment of Today. I feel dirty.
[21:44] <spm> wgrant: spray-n-wipe your eyeballs? ;-)
[21:45] <wgrant> But it was actually a fairly sane interview.
[21:45] <wgrant> Surprising.
[21:46] <spm> yeah - apparently should be some stuff in the 7.30 report sometime next week too. Interesting times...
[21:46] <wgrant> matsubara_: "might be disclosing"... oh, you are. It's fairly interesting too.
[21:46] <wgrant> Good.
[21:47] <wgrant> Most ppeople still aren't aware...
[21:48] <matsubara_> wgrant: ?
[21:49] <wgrant> matsubara_: The mailing list privacy thing.
[21:49] <spm> wgrant: I've seen some... "challenging" discussions around the lack of comment from the ACS as well. Cynical me is not surprised, but it's an "interesting" (in the Yes Minister sense) non-position for them to take.
[21:49] <matsubara_> ah right.
[21:52] <wgrant> OTOH LP people seem to like making completely harmless bugs private.
[21:53] <wgrant> It doesn't even contain a snippet of code or design.
[22:30] <fta> persia, it's now on i386 too (iridium), retry doesn't help
[22:30] <fta> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19627521/buildlog_ubuntu-jaunty-i386.liferea_1.4.18-0ubuntu3%7Efta1_CHROOTWAIT.txt.gz
[22:30] <persia> fta, Hrm.  Dunno what to say then.  It's probably not really fixed.
[22:30] <fta> obviously
[22:30] <wgrant> I'm sure infinity will sort it out soon.
[22:31] <fta> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19625242/buildlog_ubuntu-jaunty-lpia.xulrunner-1.9.1_1.9.1%7Eb2%7Ehg20081113r21632%2Bnobinonly-0ubuntu1%7Efta1_CHROOTWAIT.txt.gz