| === asac_ is now known as asac | ||
| asac | fta2: libxul-embedding == 1.9 .... libxul-embedding-1.9.1 == 1.9.1 | 14:57 |
|---|---|---|
| fta | asac, ? | 14:57 |
| asac | thats at least my understanding for now | 14:57 |
| asac | 00:15 < fta> how can i force an app using libxul-embedding to use xul 1.9 when I have both xul 1.9 and 1.9.1 installed ? | 14:57 |
| fta | nope, it doesn't work | 14:58 |
| asac | fta: what doesnt work? | 14:58 |
| fta | i build with the 1.9 sdk, so with libxul-embedding but once installed, if i have 1.9.1, this is what is used | 14:59 |
| fta | bug 295490 | 14:59 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 295490 in liferea "Liferea doesn't start with "Aborted" error." [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/295490 | 14:59 |
| asac | oh | 14:59 |
| asac | fta: yeah. fix maxVersion | 14:59 |
| fta | maxVersion in liferea ? | 14:59 |
| asac | 1.9.* was wrong ... should have been 1.9.0.* | 14:59 |
| asac | yeah | 15:00 |
| asac | in the glue code | 15:00 |
| fta | oh | 15:00 |
| fta | cool | 15:00 |
| asac | let me get it ;) | 15:00 |
| asac | sigh. my network is soooooooooooo slow | 15:00 |
| asac | 00:15 < fta> how can i force an app using libxul-embedding to use xul 1.9 when I have both xul 1.9 and 1.9.1 installed ? | 15:00 |
| asac | oops | 15:00 |
| asac | 1293B/s 21min21 | 15:00 |
| asac | i think i have to reset my router | 15:01 |
| asac | bb | 15:01 |
| asac_ | ok lets try ;) | 15:02 |
| asac_ | that worked ;) | 15:03 |
| asac_ | 2s | 15:03 |
| asac_ | fta: ./src/mozilla/mozsupport.cpp | 15:04 |
| asac_ | http://paste.ubuntu.com/72380/ | 15:04 |
| asac_ | ;) | 15:04 |
| asac_ | maybe we should detect that during built | 15:04 |
| fta | damn, this could have saved me some hours :( | 15:06 |
| asac_ | fta: the other way would have been to make ls /etc/gre.d/ first spit out the 1.9.0 conf | 15:07 |
| asac_ | and not the 1.9.1 conf | 15:07 |
| asac_ | (which i expect is the case for you?) | 15:07 |
| asac_ | hmm | 15:07 |
| asac_ | fta: what does ls /etc/gre.d give you? | 15:07 |
| fta | 1.9.0.4.system.conf 1.9.1b2pre.system.conf 2.0a1pre.system.conf libxul0d.conf | 15:08 |
| fta | 1.9.1b2pre-restored.system.conf 1.9a8pre.system.conf.dpkg-bak firefox.conf | 15:08 |
| asac_ | a bit strange. xulrunner just tests file-by-file and first match is used | 15:08 |
| asac_ | so 1.9.0.4.system.conf should have been used. not sure if ls always gives the same order as 'C' dir listings | 15:09 |
| asac_ | though | 15:09 |
| fta | i thought it preferred the newest version, which would make sense | 15:09 |
| asac_ | fta: from what i know it doesnt prefer newest | 15:10 |
| asac_ | e.g. in the past i had to make 1.9.0 configs illegal to test with 1.9.1 | 15:10 |
| asac_ | personally, I agree that newest would make more sense. we should look into fixing this | 15:11 |
| asac_ | http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/xpcom/glue/nsGREGlue.cpp#156 | 15:12 |
| === asac_ is now known as asac | ||
| asac | fta: http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/xpcom/glue/nsGREGlue.cpp#527 | 15:13 |
| asac | so its really just readdir and then match first that suites | 15:13 |
| fta | in my case, 1.9.1 always wins | 15:14 |
| asac | fta: please do a strace -eopen -f liferea | 15:14 |
| asac | and check whether 1.9.0.4.conf is actually looked at | 15:15 |
| asac | otherwise readdir doesnt return in alphabetic order, but inode or something | 15:15 |
| asac | fta: #include <sys/types.h> | 15:21 |
| asac | #include <dirent.h> | 15:21 |
| asac | fta: http://paste.ubuntu.com/72386/ | 15:21 |
| asac | ;) | 15:21 |
| asac | fta: try that code | 15:21 |
| asac | and see which order it gives | 15:21 |
| asac | here it seems like its "random" ;) | 15:21 |
| asac | most likely your 1.9.1 preceeds the 1.9.0 stuff | 15:21 |
| asac | http://paste.ubuntu.com/72387/ | 15:22 |
| asac | ^^ thats my garbage struck dir | 15:22 |
| fta | i'm fighting against a scons | 16:09 |
| armin76 | asac: any idea about my bug? :( | 16:15 |
| asac | armin76: which? | 16:23 |
| asac | armin76: i think you never came back when i looked at a bug ;) | 16:23 |
| asac | but now i forgot | 16:23 |
| armin76 | yeah, had to run fsck on a reiser | 16:24 |
| armin76 | gentoo bug 234110 | 16:24 |
| ubottu | Bug 234110 on http://launchpad.net/bugs/234110 is private | 16:24 |
| armin76 | meh | 16:24 |
| armin76 | bug gentoo 234110 | 16:24 |
| armin76 | stupid bot | 16:24 |
| armin76 | http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=234110 | 16:25 |
| asac | heh | 16:25 |
| ubottu | bugs.gentoo.org bug 234110 in Applications "www-client/mozilla-firefox-3.0* USE=xulrunner - hangs on first start" [Normal,New] | 16:25 |
| asac | armin76: i would guess that those folks have a dirty install | 16:25 |
| armin76 | why? | 16:25 |
| asac | its one of those things that regularly pop up | 16:25 |
| asac | e.g. nothing works -> reinstall works | 16:25 |
| asac | -> compreg.dat in pkglibdir | 16:25 |
| asac | or some other cruft | 16:25 |
| armin76 | saw the strace? | 16:26 |
| asac | armin76: they should attach a strace -eopen -f | 16:26 |
| asac | no | 16:26 |
| asac | only see a huge list of config options ;) | 16:26 |
| armin76 | comment 19 | 16:26 |
| asac | yeah still | 16:27 |
| asac | its meaningless | 16:27 |
| asac | when people strip strace they always post unimportant parts ;) | 16:27 |
| asac | hmm | 16:27 |
| asac | armin76: /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9/components/libpipboot.so | 16:28 |
| asac | whats taht? | 16:28 |
| asac | debug build? | 16:28 |
| asac | armin76: they should attach a complete strace -eopen -f firefox to the bug | 16:29 |
| armin76 | dunno, i have that file, want it? :D | 16:30 |
| armin76 | k, i'll say so, thanks | 16:30 |
| asac | armin76: you ahve that file? | 16:30 |
| asac | armin76: is that a debug build?` | 16:30 |
| armin76 | nop | 16:30 |
| armin76 | e | 16:30 |
| asac | armin76: how do you install stuff? | 16:31 |
| armin76 | make install? :) | 16:31 |
| asac | armin76: well. i wouldnt trust make install to do the right thing for mozilla ;) | 16:32 |
| asac | armin76: that file should be wrapped into libxul.so | 16:32 |
| asac | and not be there | 16:32 |
| asac | dpkg -L xulrunner-1.9 | grep pip | 16:32 |
| asac | /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.0.4/chrome/pippki.manifest | 16:32 |
| asac | /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.0.4/chrome/pippki.jar | 16:32 |
| asac | /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.0.4/components/pipnss.xpt | 16:32 |
| asac | /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.0.4/components/pippki.xpt | 16:32 |
| asac | /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.0.4/components/pipboot.xpt | 16:32 |
| asac | dpkg -L xulrunner-1.9 | grep so$ | 16:32 |
| asac | /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.0.4/libpyxpcom.so | 16:32 |
| asac | /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.0.4/libjemalloc.so | 16:32 |
| asac | /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.0.4/libxpcom.so | 16:32 |
| asac | /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.0.4/libmozjs.so | 16:32 |
| asac | /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.0.4/python/xpcom/_xpcom.so | 16:32 |
| asac | /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.0.4/components/libimgicon.so | 16:32 |
| asac | /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.0.4/components/libdbusservice.so | 16:32 |
| asac | /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.0.4/components/libpyloader.so | 16:32 |
| asac | /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.0.4/libxul.so | 16:33 |
| asac | /usr/lib/xulrunner-addons/plugins/libunixprintplugin.so | 16:33 |
| asac | /usr/lib/xulrunner-addons/plugins/libnullplugin.so | 16:33 |
| asac | /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.0.4/libnssckbi.so | 16:33 |
| asac | sry ;) | 16:33 |
| asac | armin76: which configure flags do you pass? | 16:33 |
| asac | --enable-optimize | 16:33 |
| asac | --disable-debug | 16:33 |
| asac | is important | 16:33 |
| armin76 | sec | 16:33 |
| asac | fta: do you have a built tree lying around for xul 1.9? | 16:34 |
| armin76 | http://rafb.net/p/5ar7KI50.html | 16:34 |
| fta | asac, hm, not sure, i trashed a lot of my stuff to make some room for chromium | 16:35 |
| fta | asac, why ? | 16:35 |
| asac | fta: just wondere where libpipboot.so would be lying around in it ;) | 16:36 |
| asac | building my own 1.9.0 stuff now | 16:36 |
| asac | fta: e.g. gentoo ships /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9/components/libpipboot.so | 16:36 |
| asac | we dont have that | 16:36 |
| asac | ;) | 16:36 |
| asac | we have pipboot.xpt | 16:36 |
| asac | which makes sense and i assume that we have it in libxul.so | 16:36 |
| asac | armin76: do you have libxul.so at all? | 16:36 |
| asac | armin76: urgh. you asked for a paste of the output? ... thats really really long ;) ... attaching would have been more readable i guess | 16:37 |
| fta | asac, i ship components/libpipboot.so in sm2 and tb3, not in xul1.9*/ff3* | 16:38 |
| fta | i see i have it in my openkomodo 5 tree too | 16:39 |
| asac | oh | 16:39 |
| asac | --disable-libxul | 16:39 |
| asac | armin76: ^^ why that? | 16:39 |
| asac | fta: yeah. i think its a libxul component | 16:39 |
| fta | do we need that? | 16:39 |
| asac | so those that dont use libxul, still have it | 16:39 |
| asac | fta: no :) | 16:40 |
| asac | fta: gentoo is doing something a bit wrong imo | 16:40 |
| asac | --with-default-mozilla-five-home=/usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9 | 16:40 |
| asac | i dont think that that is still needed either | 16:40 |
| armin76 | asac: not sure | 16:40 |
| asac | armin76: anyway. lets wait for the strace | 16:41 |
| armin76 | asac: yup, i have it | 16:41 |
| asac | armin76: you have libxul.so ? | 16:42 |
| armin76 | yup | 16:42 |
| armin76 | /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9/libxul.so | 16:42 |
| armin76 | /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9/sdk/lib/libxul.so | 16:42 |
| asac | armin76: and also the .so files? | 16:42 |
| asac | e.g. libpipboot.so | 16:42 |
| armin76 | yup | 16:43 |
| fta | booouh, that's not upstream scheme, it looks like ice* | 16:43 |
| asac | armin76: what size does libxul.so have for you? | 16:43 |
| asac | fta: huh? | 16:43 |
| fta | /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9/sdk/ | 16:44 |
| asac | fta: i dont think that debian ships all components + libxul | 16:44 |
| asac | fta: yeah ... a bunch of distros do it that way | 16:44 |
| armin76 | asac: 132k | 16:44 |
| asac | fta: its a bit of a shame and alrewady caused discussion when people kept using -rpath | 16:45 |
| fta | i'm facing the same problem with chromium | 16:45 |
| asac | armin76: yeah thats tiny. a | 16:45 |
| asac | -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 18201928 2008-11-12 19:49 /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.0.4/libxul.so | 16:45 |
| asac | armin76: but is in line with the --disable-libxul thing | 16:45 |
| asac | not sure why there is libxul.so at all when you built that way | 16:46 |
| asac | armin76: but its definitly not supported upstream | 16:46 |
| armin76 | i'm not sure where does the --disable-libxul thing comes... | 16:46 |
| asac | fta: what do chromium folks do? | 16:46 |
| armin76 | oh, i see it | 16:46 |
| asac | armin76: have you looked at what we pass as configure flags? | 16:47 |
| armin76 | yup, in fact i think i copied it from there :P | 16:47 |
| fta | asac, so far, nothing. binaries are just in the objdir and all libs are static, i'm trying to change that | 16:47 |
| asac | armin76: oh ;) | 16:47 |
| asac | fta: does upstream want to provide ABI tracked libs? | 16:48 |
| asac | otherwise linking them into main binary makes a bit of sense | 16:48 |
| fta | good question | 16:48 |
| fta | the binary is huge | 16:48 |
| fta | > 250MB | 16:48 |
| asac | fta: is that a problem? | 16:48 |
| asac | (on its own ;)) | 16:48 |
| asac | fta: i think we would like to keep v8 in a system lib | 16:49 |
| fta | well, no, in the sense that it runs | 16:49 |
| fta | asac, i already landed some system libs: http://codereview.chromium.org/10626 | 16:50 |
| fta | but most create regressions | 16:50 |
| asac | fta: why are your comments empty? | 16:52 |
| fta | asac, because i just updated the patch | 16:53 |
| asac | ok | 16:53 |
| fta | i like that site, it's nice to do patch reviewing | 16:53 |
| fta | imho, far better than bugzilla | 16:54 |
| asac | yean | 16:54 |
| fta | google splits bugs and patches | 16:54 |
| fta | bugzilla should learn from this ;) | 16:56 |
| fta | [reed], ^^ | 16:56 |
| fta | mconnor, ^^ | 16:56 |
| asac | armin76: what does gentoo do on unemerge? does it track files installed by make install? | 16:59 |
| armin76 | asac: it uses a sandbox system, so it keeps track of everything merged to the real system | 17:02 |
| asac | armin76: do you ship .autoreg? | 17:03 |
| armin76 | asac: http://rafb.net/p/RMgPlv30.html | 17:05 |
| fta | damn, patching those scons files is too much python in unknown territory. i need to step back a little bit. | 17:06 |
| asac | /etc/gre.d/1.8.1.18.conf | 17:06 |
| asac | ? | 17:06 |
| armin76 | hrm...sec | 17:07 |
| asac | ok | 17:07 |
| asac | 1.9 is further down | 17:07 |
| asac | armin76: where is ffox 3? | 17:07 |
| asac | (only see mozilla-firefox) | 17:07 |
| armin76 | asac: http://rafb.net/p/s48RV614.html and mozilla-firefox is ff3 | 17:08 |
| asac | /usr/lib/mozilla-firefox/.autoreg | 17:10 |
| asac | so does that get installed by make instakk | 17:10 |
| asac | ? | 17:10 |
| armin76 | sec | 17:11 |
| armin76 | asac: yes | 17:13 |
| armin76 | was checking if it got installed by some patch, but nope | 17:14 |
| fta | seems impossible to build shared and static at the same time with scons :( | 17:15 |
| * asac wonders why scons is considered better than automake ;) | 17:16 | |
| fta | all in python | 17:16 |
| fta | which is good.... if you like python | 17:16 |
| asac | i dont see how that can qualify as better | 17:17 |
| asac | i think they think that its better because of windows | 17:17 |
| asac | well ... at least those that think that python build system is better ;) | 17:17 |
| fta | scons brings in even more magic than make, debhelper and cdbs combined | 17:18 |
| asac | i hate magic | 17:18 |
| asac | well ... if its pure declarative its good | 17:18 |
| asac | but thats not magic | 17:18 |
| fta | i meant it's even more obscure | 17:19 |
| asac | like maven for java | 17:19 |
| asac | compared to ant | 17:19 |
| asac | lol | 17:19 |
| asac | http://crupp.de/?p=15 | 17:19 |
| asac | rewad the first paragraph | 17:19 |
| asac | the guy said he used autotools by ... | 17:19 |
| asac | "I used hand-written makefiles...." | 17:20 |
| asac | So I looked for alternatives, and decided to settle on SCons instead of GNU Autotools | 17:20 |
| asac | he | 17:20 |
| asac | "And now I decided to revert my decision. Why? Because SCons is far more complicated than it looks, while autoconf/automake is far more simple than it seems." | 17:20 |
| asac | good guy | 17:20 |
| fta | patching v8 build system promises to be a challenge | 17:20 |
| asac | @time | 17:27 |
| ubottu | Current time in Etc/UTC: November 15 2008, 17:27:00 - Next meeting: Americas Regional Board in 2 days | 17:27 |
| asac | @time berlin | 17:27 |
| ubottu | Current time in Europe/Berlin: November 15 2008, 18:27:03 - Next meeting: Americas Regional Board in 2 days | 17:27 |
| armin76 | asac: porting ff to arm? :D | 17:39 |
| fta | armin76, i monitor the arm builds, so far, xul just failed: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19673125/buildlog_ubuntu-jaunty-armel.xulrunner-1.9_1.9.0.3%2Bnobinonly-0ubuntu1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz | 18:04 |
| fta | -so far | 18:05 |
| fta | i was about to say, so far, xul is waiting for gnome, but not anymore | 18:06 |
| armin76 | fta: same as hppa did.... | 18:07 |
| armin76 | failing on cookie stuff wrt warning treated as err | 18:08 |
| fta | like for hppa, i don't have access to arm, so i don't plan to blindly try to fix it | 18:09 |
| armin76 | may want to file a bug, then :) | 18:11 |
| armin76 | fta: or filter -Werror :) | 18:12 |
| fta | no, not the good cure | 18:13 |
| armin76 | in fact | 18:14 |
| armin76 | mozilla bug 417345 | 18:14 |
| ubottu | Mozilla bug 417345 in XPCOM "build broken on sparc" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417345 | 18:14 |
| armin76 | ah, now that i remember | 18:14 |
| armin76 | i did a "patch" for that | 18:15 |
| armin76 | mozilla bug 436133 | 18:15 |
| ubottu | Mozilla bug 436133 in Networking: Cookies "Cookies build failure on hppa" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=436133 | 18:15 |
| armin76 | guess arm needs to be there as well :) | 18:16 |
| armin76 | asac: see the gentoo bug plz | 18:21 |
| fta | probably but i have no idea how arm and armel differs in term of flags | 18:22 |
| * fta is going to lurk in #ubuntu-arm for a while | 18:23 | |
| jdhore1 | What's going on with Firefox 3.0.4 in any version of Ubuntu (specifically Hardy)? | 18:58 |
| armin76 | omg | 19:15 |
| armin76 | asac: OMG BUMB! | 19:15 |
| asac | jdhore1: all ready. security team missed to push it on Thu and since we dont release on Fri we have to wait till Mon | 20:02 |
| jdhore1 | ah | 20:02 |
| asac | armin76: the strace -eopen -f would be helpful regardless of whether it works or not | 20:02 |
| asac | armin76: you have fixes for the alignment issues? | 20:03 |
| asac | we see them on arm now | 20:03 |
| asac | (armel) | 20:03 |
| armin76 | asac: see mozilla bug 436133 | 20:04 |
| ubottu | Mozilla bug 436133 in Networking: Cookies "Cookies build failure on hppa" [Normal,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=436133 | 20:04 |
| armin76 | asac: i punted --disable-libxul and now it works according to the guy | 20:04 |
| asac | armin76: hmm. | 20:05 |
| asac | armin76: still . i think he has garbage in his pkglibdir | 20:05 |
| asac | most likely he will run into issues sooner or later again | 20:06 |
| armin76 | asac: http://rafb.net/p/PiQoTI26.html | 20:15 |
| armin76 | -r0 is with --disable-libxul, -r1 is without | 20:15 |
| asac | yeah | 20:15 |
| asac | armin76: http://paste.ubuntu.com/72517/ | 20:15 |
| armin76 | asac: i don't know about armel, you guys should ask if its safe to run -Wcast-align on arm or not | 20:16 |
| armin76 | s/arm/armel | 20:16 |
| asac | armin76: who would be able to tell that thats "safe" i ngeneral? | 20:17 |
| asac | i mean if it was safe then its a gcc bug that it warns at all ;) | 20:17 |
| armin76 | whoever maintains arm on ubuntu or debian | 20:17 |
| asac | well. debian just did it i think | 20:18 |
| asac | not sure if they seriously considered whether its safe or not ;) | 20:18 |
| armin76 | look the patch i did | 20:18 |
| asac | yeah | 20:19 |
| asac | easy enough to do | 20:19 |
| asac | INTEL_CC? | 20:19 |
| asac | who supports that? ;) | 20:20 |
| armin76 | hppa,ia64 and sparc give errors if stuff is unaligned | 20:20 |
| asac | sure | 20:20 |
| armin76 | i didn't know arm did as well | 20:20 |
| asac | armin76: armel does apparently | 20:20 |
| asac | armin76: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19673125/buildlog_ubuntu-jaunty-armel.xulrunner-1.9_1.9.0.3%2Bnobinonly-0ubuntu1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz | 20:20 |
| armin76 | yup | 20:20 |
| asac | thats where i have the paste from | 20:20 |
| asac | wonder if the code could be fixed to properly case | 20:21 |
| asac | cast | 20:21 |
| armin76 | you are better than me at that | 20:22 |
| armin76 | the difference between debian and ubuntu is that debian isn't using -Werror | 20:23 |
| armin76 | while ubuntu does | 20:23 |
| asac | i remember that they had the same issues on armel when it popped up | 20:23 |
| asac | i think they then just deliberately passed -Wno-error | 20:23 |
| asac | not sure if its really a gcc default | 20:23 |
| asac | http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/xpcom/glue/nsVoidArray.h#193 | 20:25 |
| armin76 | -CXXFLAGS += $(WARNINGS_AS_ERRORS) <- thats from debian | 20:25 |
| asac | http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/xpcom/glue/nsVoidArray.cpp#142 | 20:25 |
| asac | armin76: thats in xulrunner right? | 20:25 |
| armin76 | yes | 20:26 |
| armin76 | they're just doing that on xulrunner-1.9.0.3/netwerk/cookie/src/Makefile.in | 20:27 |
| asac | char mAutoBuf[sizeof(Impl) + (kAutoBufSize - 1) * sizeof(void*)]; | 20:28 |
| armin76 | asac: and btw, sparc is still sigbusing | 20:29 |
| asac | armin76: in cookie? | 20:30 |
| armin76 | no... | 20:31 |
| * armin76 thinks asac has really bad memory | 20:31 | |
| asac | i can confirm that ;) | 20:31 |
| armin76 | mozilla bug 448658 | 20:31 |
| ubottu | Mozilla bug 448658 in Phishing Protection "nsUrlClassifierDBService has bad alignment, causes SIGBUS" [Critical,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=448658 | 20:31 |
| asac | now i remember ;) | 20:31 |
| asac | armin76: but dont remember everythign. didnt we fix that? | 20:32 |
| asac | ;) | 20:32 |
| fta | our gcc has -Wformat -Wformat-security by default now | 20:33 |
| fta | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/CompilerFlags | 20:33 |
| armin76 | asac: not too much, you made me try with some patch that just delayed the sigbus 45 mins | 20:34 |
| fta | on sparc ? | 20:35 |
| armin76 | yeah, see that bug | 20:35 |
| asac | armin76: what was that patch? | 20:35 |
| asac | did i just paste that or post it somewhere? | 20:36 |
| armin76 | one like debian's | 20:36 |
| armin76 | let me see the logs | 20:36 |
| armin76 | asac: you pasted me a patch, and then i saw the debian bug, and you told me that was the patch you pasted | 20:42 |
| armin76 | asac: then you got stuck in the canada thing, but you mainly said that with 45 mins you could live with it, i filed that bug at upstream's bugzilla and you didn't say anything after that | 20:44 |
| asac | oh thats long time ;) | 20:45 |
| armin76 | asac: then we talked about it at the end of september, but you didn't said anything new | 20:47 |
| armin76 | i just asked you if you'd think 3.0.2 will sigbus, since it was released at that time | 20:49 |
| armin76 | and it did, so... | 20:49 |
| armin76 | asac: btw, bumb! | 20:49 |
| armin76 | why you didn't bumb 3.0.4 yet!!!! | 20:49 |
| asac | armin76: in jaunty -> my lazyness in holiday mode | 20:50 |
| asac | everywhere else: | 20:50 |
| asac | 1:02 < asac> jdhore1: all ready. security team missed to push it on Thu and since we dont release on Fri we have to wait till Mon | 20:50 |
| asac | armin76: ^^ | 20:50 |
| asac | armin76: the lines dont match anymore :( | 20:50 |
| armin76 | heh | 20:51 |
| armin76 | go fix the sigbus on sparc :P | 20:51 |
| asac | looking ;) | 20:52 |
| asac | armin76: is it still the same? | 20:52 |
| armin76 | asac: considering that the file(nsurlclassifierdbservice.cpp) hasn't been changed since 25th august, i'd say yes | 20:54 |
| armin76 | well, it got changed today | 20:54 |
| asac | armin76: the lines dont match though | 20:54 |
| armin76 | ah | 20:55 |
| armin76 | the patch fails? | 20:55 |
| asac | no ... the lines in the backtrace dont match anything sensible in the code ;) | 20:55 |
| asac | at lesta the nsTArray line matches ;) | 20:56 |
| asac | http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/xpcom/glue/nsTArray.h#590 | 20:56 |
| armin76 | okay, let me run it again | 20:57 |
| armin76 | but i saw at the logs that you told me it didn't make any sense | 20:57 |
| asac | yeah ;) | 20:57 |
| asac | at least i found the line where the static cast happens | 20:57 |
| asac | (i think) | 20:57 |
| asac | http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/xpcom/glue/nsTArray.h#182 | 20:58 |
| asac | hmm. so what does new Type ... do? | 20:59 |
| asac | (e.g. wihtout ()) | 20:59 |
| asac | new (static_cast<void *>(e)) E; | 21:00 |
| asac | what does that do :)? | 21:00 |
| armin76 | you ask me? :P | 21:00 |
| asac | without assigning it anywhere :/ | 21:00 |
| asac | fta: ^^ ;) | 21:00 |
| asac | http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/xpcom/glue/nsTArray.h#178 | 21:01 |
| asac | fta: any clue if the cast implicitly binds the constructed thing to "e" = | 21:04 |
| asac | = | 21:04 |
| asac | ? | 21:04 |
| fta | nope, i fried my brain earlier today inside a SConstruct file | 21:05 |
| asac | something more simple ;) .... cout ... iostream doesnt have that? | 21:10 |
| asac | ah ... namespace ;) | 21:11 |
| * armin76 is upgrading to jaunty | 21:16 | |
| asac | armin76: dont know. if you have a up-to-date backtrace of sigbus please show | 21:32 |
| armin76 | yeah | 21:32 |
| armin76 | gdb doesn't seem to run fine on jaunty, trying intrepid now | 21:32 |
| asac | armin76: heh. now our toolchain guy kicks me for fixing armel + xulrunner | 21:50 |
| asac | funny thing is that our toolchain needs xulrunner to bootstrap ;) | 21:51 |
| armin76 | you fixed something? :D | 21:51 |
| asac | armin76: no he wants me to fix that | 21:51 |
| armin76 | thats interesting | 21:51 |
| armin76 | ah | 21:51 |
| fta | xulrunner used in the bootstrap ??? | 21:51 |
| asac | i think they made an ugly hack and copied xulrunner binaries from debian for the bootstrapping ;) | 21:51 |
| armin76 | s/for/to | 21:51 |
| asac | fta: yeah :) | 21:51 |
| fta | what for? | 21:51 |
| asac | fta: its not required to be functional, but its required to build the huge gcc package | 21:52 |
| armin76 | i can't remember how i made the backtraces... | 21:52 |
| asac | e.g. gcj provides a plugin ;) | 21:52 |
| fta | lol | 21:52 |
| asac | armin76: you need dbgsym ;) | 21:52 |
| armin76 | yeah...but its not available for sparc | 21:52 |
| asac | fta: this reminds me. we have a new approach -> we go for -dbg packages again for jaunty | 21:52 |
| fta | asac, already done in 3.1 | 21:53 |
| asac | fta: good | 21:53 |
| armin76 | i think i used gentoo for them...hrm... | 21:53 |
| asac | fta: so we have xulrunner-1.9-dbg there? | 21:53 |
| asac | err | 21:53 |
| fta | i was sick about missing dbgsym in ppa :( | 21:53 |
| asac | 1.9.1 | 21:53 |
| asac | ;) | 21:53 |
| asac | fta: i am almost dead because of that ;) | 21:53 |
| fta | yes, xul + ff | 21:53 |
| armin76 | so it wasn't jaunty, it was ff sigbusing at the start :D | 21:54 |
| asac | armin76: heh | 21:54 |
| asac | armin76: somewhere else? | 21:54 |
| asac | fta: well done | 21:55 |
| asac | fta: are they ok? | 21:55 |
| fta | yes | 21:55 |
| armin76 | asac: no clue, no dbg symbols | 21:55 |
| asac | (i assume you already used them with success) | 21:55 |
| asac | armin76: for intrepid there should be dbgsym packages | 21:55 |
| asac | its still in the main component | 21:55 |
| asac | err i mean in intrepid branch (not -updates/-security) | 21:56 |
| armin76 | for sparc? | 21:56 |
| asac | yeah | 21:56 |
| asac | unless it didnt build at all | 21:56 |
| asac | Alpha 1 freeze ahead | 21:57 |
| asac | ;) | 21:57 |
| asac | funny | 21:57 |
| asac | fta: how many uploads did you do for jaunty? | 21:58 |
| fta | none | 21:58 |
| asac | same same | 21:58 |
| asac | http://merges.ubuntu.com/universe.html | 21:58 |
| asac | appears to be easy food in universe | 21:59 |
| fta | persia wants fennec in REVU, but i need xul 1.9.1 in universe 1st | 21:59 |
| asac | everything green | 21:59 |
| asac | in REVU? | 21:59 |
| fta | yep | 21:59 |
| asac | what kind of idea is that? | 21:59 |
| fta | no idea, it seems he wants motu to have a look 1st | 22:00 |
| asac | create an empty ubuntu-dev branch ... request merge there for review ;) | 22:00 |
| fta | ah? | 22:00 |
| fta | eh? | 22:00 |
| armin76 | hardy sparc Failed to build | 22:00 |
| armin76 | fail | 22:00 |
| asac | fta: if he wants the ability for motus to take a look and discuss the packaging, we can do that in launchpad code review | 22:00 |
| asac | no need to use REVU for bzr packages | 22:01 |
| fta | tell him | 22:01 |
| asac | fta: i can do that. though i would rather not put that through motu | 22:01 |
| asac | fta: isnt mozillateam maintainer? | 22:01 |
| fta | it is | 22:01 |
| asac | fta: where is the policy for NEW packages in universe? | 22:02 |
| asac | so trolls are on wiki.ubuntu.com | 22:02 |
| asac | all russian on start page | 22:03 |
| asac | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ | 22:03 |
| asac | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/NewPackages#Packaging%20it%20yourself | 22:04 |
| fta | it means "This page is created for people living in Uzbekistan." | 22:04 |
| asac | fta: ^^ | 22:04 |
| asac | ok sounds at least a bit honourable ;) | 22:04 |
| armin76 | asac: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/intrepid/+source/firefox-3.0 <- i don't see the dbgsym packages | 22:05 |
| asac | fta: ok i dont like the idea to just ignore that policy (though i did in the past for sure - unknowingly) | 22:05 |
| asac | fta: i will talk to MOTU leaders about adapting that policy to allow review of bzr branches through merges to empty branches | 22:05 |
| asac | maybe we should test if that works | 22:06 |
| asac | armin76: they are not there. l00ser | 22:06 |
| armin76 | die! | 22:06 |
| asac | armin76: sec | 22:06 |
| asac | armin76: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs#Crashes | 22:06 |
| asac | adjust the apt lines !!!! | 22:07 |
| asac | ;) | 22:07 |
| asac | i guess that dbgsym archive should be added to software repositories | 22:07 |
| asac | in update manager UI | 22:08 |
| armin76 | asac: there's no sparc binaries! | 22:08 |
| * armin76 shoots asac | 22:08 | |
| asac | hoho | 22:08 |
| armin76 | http://ddebs.ubuntu.com/pool/universe/f/firefox-3.0/ | 22:08 |
| asac | now i really feel ashame ;) | 22:08 |
| * asac shoots around too | 22:08 | |
| fta | i can't push it to revu if xul 1.9.1 is not in 1st | 22:08 |
| asac | fta: heh ;) | 22:08 |
| asac | fta: right | 22:08 |
| fta | it's not that i don't want to, it's a dep | 22:09 |
| asac | fta: so basically this means that xul 1.9.1 has to go through REVU too ;) | 22:09 |
| asac | see how that makes sense | 22:09 |
| fta | oh god | 22:09 |
| asac | fta: will revu complain if you upload with unfullfilled debs? | 22:09 |
| asac | deps | 22:09 |
| asac | or will reviewers just be pissed if they cannot "test" on their own? | 22:10 |
| fta | revu itself no, but reviewers most probably | 22:10 |
| asac | fta: well. reviewers should review not test ;) | 22:10 |
| asac | if they want to test they can do ppa | 22:10 |
| fta | btw, i only used revu twice, it was an horrible experience | 22:10 |
| asac | fta: yeah ;) | 22:11 |
| fta | i had to beg for weeks for reviews | 22:11 |
| asac | fta: well. fennec will be quick i am sure | 22:11 |
| armin76 | lol | 22:11 |
| asac | but that isnt the point | 22:11 |
| asac | those are no MOTU packages ;) | 22:11 |
| armin76 | who can it beeeeee now! | 22:11 |
| asac | those are MT packages and its understood that there isnt much know-how in MOTU | 22:11 |
| asac | fta: how lintian clean are our packages :) :-P | 22:14 |
| asac | ? | 22:14 |
| fta | i guess for xul, it's ugly.. the usr/share vs usr/lib 1st | 22:14 |
| fta | fennec should be quite clean | 22:14 |
| fta | let me try it | 22:15 |
| asac | fta: but fennec ships everything in usr.lib too | 22:15 |
| asac | fta: we should add overrides | 22:15 |
| asac | if we go through REVU i dont want people to start complaining about this kind of stuff | 22:15 |
| asac | that would give me too much heart-pain for sure | 22:15 |
| fta | just 2: | 22:17 |
| fta | W: fennec source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.7.3 (current is 3.8.0) | 22:17 |
| fta | W: fennec: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/fennec | 22:17 |
| === mib_wug8ke is now known as asac_the_bumber | ||
| fta | i don't see the point of a man page for fennec | 22:17 |
| asac | thats ok | 22:18 |
| asac | those dont need to be dealt with | 22:18 |
| asac_the_bumber | you guys packaging fennec? | 22:18 |
| asac | its all there | 22:18 |
| fta | for months, i packaged it in june | 22:19 |
| asac_the_bumber | why? is it fun? :D | 22:19 |
| fta | asac, oh, i want to close mozilla-devscripts 0.11 before i start new devs, could you push it in jaunty for me? | 22:21 |
| asac | its fun + its a proof of concept thing for more complex xulapps | 22:21 |
| asac | fta: what are the changes? | 22:21 |
| fta | asac, quite a lot: http://paste.ubuntu.com/72566/ | 22:22 |
| asac | fta: btw, i was a bit scared during this security update because i didnt keep my eyes on whether we took extra care that orig tarballs are 100% backward compatible (e.g. because of the artwork) | 22:22 |
| asac | fta: so we should definitly take extra care, that whatever we do with the tarballs, they should be compatible ;) | 22:22 |
| asac_the_bumber | permet à tous Bumb | 22:22 |
| asac | so we can use the same for hardy+intrepid+jaunty | 22:22 |
| fta | asac, i think it is | 22:23 |
| asac | fta: i think it is too. just as a reminder that we should keep that in mind ;) | 22:24 |
| asac_the_bumber | Fennec utilisations xul 1.9.1, n'est-ce pas? | 22:24 |
| asac | yeah | 22:24 |
| asac | oui | 22:24 |
| asac | the only word i know ;) | 22:24 |
| asac_the_bumber | yay, ASAC sait français: D | 22:24 |
| asac | asac_the_bumber: so do you have a better backtrace? | 22:25 |
| fta | lol, -sait+connait | 22:25 |
| asac | dico | 22:25 |
| fta | -sait+connait le | 22:25 |
| asac | dicet | 22:25 |
| asac | from me the "latin" n00b ;) | 22:26 |
| asac_the_bumber | ASAC: il ne s'est pas écrasé encore, de manière surprenante, c'est avec 3.0.2 | 22:26 |
| fta | is that from google translate ? | 22:26 |
| asac | please stop non-english languages | 22:26 |
| asac_the_bumber | lol | 22:26 |
| asac | i have a bug open where the reporter uses google translate from russian | 22:26 |
| asac | and insisted that its good to do that and that it would be harsh not to proceed | 22:27 |
| asac_the_bumber | fta: this thing has a translator embedded | 22:27 |
| asac_the_bumber | asac: i said that it didn't crash yet | 22:27 |
| asac_the_bumber | and that i'm using 3.0.2 until the system is upgraded | 22:28 |
| fta | asac, so, m-d, can i close it ? | 22:28 |
| * armin76 tries to build fennec | 22:28 | |
| asac | fta: you can always close ;) | 22:28 |
| asac | i have no feature requests for now | 22:29 |
| asac | except that i would like to move our branches to use in-package variables to define the orig behaviour | 22:29 |
| asac | but thats most likely for 0.12 | 22:29 |
| asac | and we stilll need to support the apps for the old branches of course | 22:29 |
| asac | armin76: take our orig | 22:30 |
| asac | armin76: are you using 3.0.2 without the original patch? | 22:31 |
| asac | (i assume you have it ;)) | 22:31 |
| armin76 | what original patch? | 22:31 |
| asac | armin76: well. the obvious one ;) | 22:31 |
| armin76 | debian's? | 22:31 |
| asac | the one debian has ;) | 22:31 |
| asac | right | 22:31 |
| armin76 | yeah, i think its without 3.0.2 | 22:32 |
| armin76 | err | 22:32 |
| armin76 | its without the patch | 22:32 |
| asac | ok | 22:32 |
| armin76 | we'll see if it crashes on 45 mins | 22:32 |
| asac | wired ;) | 22:32 |
| fta | oh damn, hell, damnation | 22:32 |
| asac | weird | 22:32 |
| fta | ix:~/bzr/mozilla-devscripts$ bzr push | 22:32 |
| fta | Using saved location: bzr+ssh://fta@bazaar.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/mozilla-devscripts/mozilla-devscripts/ | 22:32 |
| fta | bzr: ERROR: KnitPackRepository('bzr+ssh://fta@bazaar.launchpad.net/%7Emozillateam/mozilla-devscripts/mozilla-devscripts/.bzr/repository/') | 22:32 |
| fta | is not compatible with | 22:32 |
| fta | KnitPackRepository('file:///src/bzr/.bzr/repository/') | 22:32 |
| fta | different rich-root support | 22:32 |
| asac | fta: what branch type do you use? | 22:32 |
| asac | err repo type | 22:32 |
| asac | did you upgrade the repo with 0.92 branches inside? | 22:33 |
| fta | i had to upgrade my repo to import chromium from svn | 22:33 |
| asac | thats a bad thing ;) | 22:33 |
| armin76 | 17 + 45 | 22:33 |
| asac | fta: i made that mistake at some point | 22:33 |
| asac | now i have ubuntu_bzr and ubuntu_bzr2 ;) | 22:33 |
| asac | everything was trashed afterwards | 22:33 |
| armin76 | it should crash at 00:05 | 22:33 |
| asac | i think i could recover by reinstantiating the backup .bzr of repo and branches | 22:34 |
| armin76 | 00:07, sorry *g* | 22:34 |
| fta | how come my pushes to the fennec branch worked an hour ago ?? | 22:34 |
| asac | armin76: why 45? | 22:34 |
| asac | thought after the patch it took 45 min | 22:34 |
| asac | fta: mere luck? | 22:34 |
| armin76 | asac: yeah...but now it doesn't crash and i think its without the patch :/ | 22:34 |
| asac | fta: what is different for fennec and mozilla-devscripts (local/remote)? | 22:35 |
| asac | KnitPackRepository doesnt sound like pack-0.92 | 22:35 |
| asac | but i might be wrong | 22:35 |
| asac | sounds more like the even older knit-pack format | 22:35 |
| fta | why did i ever create a global repo | 22:36 |
| fta | huge mistake | 22:36 |
| asac | yeah could be | 22:36 |
| asac | though it is supposed to boost initial checkout of related branches | 22:36 |
| asac_the_bumber | jump in my car | 22:37 |
| asac | fta: just push everything .... then trash everything and start over | 22:37 |
| asac_the_bumber | i wanna take you home | 22:37 |
| fta | I can't push | 22:37 |
| asac | armin76: enable safe-browsing ;) | 22:38 |
| asac_the_bumber | it is... | 22:38 |
| asac | do you see the classifier db growing? | 22:38 |
| asac | maybe you use an already complete profile? | 22:38 |
| asac_the_bumber | where's that? | 22:38 |
| asac | which doesnt import stuff | 22:38 |
| asac_the_bumber | nope, i started over | 22:39 |
| asac | in profile .... class.*sqli | 22:39 |
| rzr | hi guys | 22:39 |
| asac | hi rzr | 22:39 |
| asac_the_bumber | its 7mb now | 22:40 |
| asac | growing? | 22:40 |
| asac_the_bumber | last mod 22:23 | 22:40 |
| rzr | saw my new revision on flashblock ? | 22:40 |
| asac | thats long ago | 22:40 |
| asac_the_bumber | its utc, just 20 mins ago | 22:40 |
| asac | rzr: yep | 22:41 |
| asac | rzr: did you ask for review of the changes? | 22:41 |
| rzr | ok great is it ok ? | 22:41 |
| asac | not looked yet | 22:41 |
| asac | rzr: if you have requested a merge of branches i will look now ;) | 22:41 |
| rzr | i did | 22:41 |
| asac | ok | 22:41 |
| * asac opens merges | 22:41 | |
| rzr | https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-dev/firefox-extensions/flashblock.ubuntu/+merge/1683 | 22:41 |
| fta_ | <fta> ix:~/bzr/fennec.head$ bzr info | 22:41 |
| fta_ | <fta> Repository tree (format: rich-root-pack) | 22:41 |
| fta_ | <fta> ix:~/bzr/fennec.head$ bzr info bzr+ssh://fta@bazaar.launchpad.net/%7Emozillateam/fennec/fennec.head/ | 22:42 |
| armin76 | gonna try without gdb | 22:42 |
| fta_ | <fta> Repository branch (format: unnamed) | 22:42 |
| fta_ | <fta> it doesn't work either | 22:42 |
| rzr | asac: is this the right way to request merges ? | 22:42 |
| asac | rzr: its already merged | 22:42 |
| asac | rzr: i think you did it the wrong way | 22:43 |
| asac | rzr: you have to request a merge on your branch to the ubuntu-dev | 22:43 |
| rzr | right | 22:43 |
| asac | not the other way around (which you did from what i can tell) | 22:43 |
| rzr | i wasnt sure | 22:43 |
| rzr | i suspected i was wrong | 22:43 |
| asac | rzr: well. navigate to your branch and click on propose ofr merge | 22:43 |
| rzr | when I set my branch as target | 22:43 |
| asac | go to your branch and use ubuntu-dev as target | 22:44 |
| asac_the_bumber | asac: it grow from 32k at the beginning to 1.2mb atm | 22:44 |
| rzr | ok this makes sense | 22:44 |
| asac_the_bumber | 2.7mb | 22:44 |
| asac | asac_the_bumber: not sure what you mean. you said 8mb? | 22:44 |
| asac_the_bumber | yeah, i started over without gdb | 22:45 |
| asac | asac_the_bumber: good. must be mere luck or your sparc doesnt care about alignment that much ;) | 22:45 |
| asac | or the patch is applied | 22:45 |
| * asac feels good about using his original ffox profile again ;9 | 22:46 | |
| rzr | There is already a branch merge proposal registered for branch ~rzr/firefox-extensions/flashblock.ubuntu to land on ~ubuntu-dev/firefox-extensions/flashblock.ubuntu that is still active. | 22:46 |
| asac | rzr: where? | 22:46 |
| rzr | i suppose this is the hardy backport | 22:46 |
| rzr | let me cancel it | 22:46 |
| asac | let me check | 22:46 |
| asac_the_bumber | asac: doubt it...i think i tested 3.0.2 and it sigbused...the only thing that has changed is that i now use a kernel 2.6.26 | 22:46 |
| asac | rzr: dont need to i think | 22:46 |
| asac | or does it complain? | 22:47 |
| asac_the_bumber | anyway, 3.0.4 is the one important now | 22:47 |
| rzr | it can't : error | 22:47 |
| asac | rzr: ok then cancel and rerequest | 22:47 |
| asac | we have to create stable branches anyway i think | 22:47 |
| asac | rzr: which revision was released to hardy? | 22:47 |
| fta_ | bzr: ERROR: Cannot convert to format <RepositoryFormatKnitPack1>. Does not support rich root data. | 22:47 |
| asac | rzr: 7? | 22:48 |
| rzr | 12 | 22:48 |
| asac | fta_: i cannot help you ;) ... i did what i said above (backup.bzr) | 22:48 |
| asac | rzr: to hardy? | 22:48 |
| rzr | welll forget about this one | 22:49 |
| rzr | https://code.launchpad.net/~rzr/firefox-extensions/flashblock.ubuntu/+merge/431 | 22:49 |
| asac | rzr: which package version is current in .hardy? | 22:49 |
| rzr | I have to check | 22:49 |
| asac | rzr: why do you include the backport to hardy in that branch? | 22:49 |
| asac | that should be in a separate branch | 22:50 |
| rzr | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/hardy/+source/flashblock/1.3.9a-0ubuntu1 | 22:50 |
| rzr | yes | 22:50 |
| asac | based on the actual hardy released revision | 22:50 |
| asac | oh | 22:50 |
| asac | let me think for a moment | 22:50 |
| rzr | I reverted this since I didnt pushed to a .hardy branch | 22:50 |
| rzr | LP is confusing sometime | 22:51 |
| asac | ok its as i said. we have to create those .hardy branches and then merge from .ubuntu for backports | 22:51 |
| rzr | well can we put this hardy branch on hold | 22:51 |
| rzr | and backport latest one ? | 22:51 |
| asac | rzr: we can. but we need to remove those revisions ;) | 22:51 |
| rzr | which one ? | 22:52 |
| rzr | there are none | 22:52 |
| asac | 11 and 12 | 22:52 |
| asac | https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~rzr/firefox-extensions/flashblock.ubuntu/+merge/431 | 22:52 |
| asac | let me check | 22:52 |
| rzr | ok i understand | 22:52 |
| rzr | then I must push r12 to LP right ? | 22:53 |
| rzr | in a .hardy branch | 22:53 |
| rzr | then we'll sync latest one ? maybe you're busy now are you ? | 22:53 |
| asac | phone | 22:55 |
| asac | rzr: well. i dont mind. to do it properly we should dump revision 11 and 12 | 22:57 |
| asac | push revision 7 to .hardy .... push revision 10 to .intrepid .... then merge .intrepid to .hardy and name that hardy-backports | 22:58 |
| asac | rzr: but i can do that infrastructure stuff for you | 22:58 |
| asac | i have to do that anyway i think | 22:58 |
| rzr | ok please do, but I think I can do this | 22:59 |
| asac | rzr: well. i have to push to the ~ubuntu-dev branches first. if you could give me the revisions that match the released versions for hardy/intrepid that would be helpful | 22:59 |
| rzr | ok | 22:59 |
| === fta_ is now known as fta | ||
| fta | ok, everything recovered | 23:01 |
| asac | :-P | 23:01 |
| fta | asac, m-d closed, rev 190 | 23:02 |
| rzr | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flashblock | 23:02 |
| rzr | hardy 7 : http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~rzr/firefox-extensions/flashblock.ubuntu/revision/7 | 23:02 |
| fta | now, i'm getting rid of that bzr repo | 23:02 |
| rzr | intrepid : looking for 1.3.10a~snapshot20080611-0ubuntu2 | 23:03 |
| asac | rzr: ok i think i have them | 23:03 |
| rzr | I missed to merge ? | 23:03 |
| asac | its 7 for hardy and 11 for intrepid | 23:03 |
| asac | ok | 23:03 |
| asac | so | 23:03 |
| rzr | i dont see it | 23:03 |
| asac | https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-dev/firefox-extensions/flashblock.hardy-backports | 23:04 |
| rzr | not 11 : | 23:04 |
| rzr | http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~rzr/firefox-extensions/flashblock.ubuntu/revision/11 | 23:04 |
| asac | https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-dev/firefox-extensions/flashblock.intrepid-backports | 23:04 |
| rzr | ok then I didnt merge this branch | 23:04 |
| asac | rzr: not sure. i looked at the ~ubuntu-dev brtanch | 23:04 |
| rzr | grr | 23:05 |
| asac | rzr: so ... do the new upstream on top of current .head | 23:05 |
| rzr | I didnt know it existed :) | 23:05 |
| asac | rzr: well. i created them right now | 23:05 |
| rzr | where is head ? | 23:05 |
| asac | rzr: but the ~ubuntu-dev always must be the base for your work | 23:05 |
| asac | rzr: head is always ~ubuntu-dev .... .ubuntu | 23:05 |
| rzr | i then it's ok | 23:05 |
| asac | rzr: no it cant be ok if your revision 11 is different from the ~ubuntu-dev branches ;) | 23:06 |
| asac | rzr: 1. merge new upstream to https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-dev/firefox-extensions/flashblock.ubuntu | 23:06 |
| rzr | I shouldnt commited backport in 'my main' ~rzr/*.ubuntu branch then ? | 23:06 |
| asac | rzr: 2. merge flashblock.ubuntu to flashblock.intrepid-backports | 23:06 |
| asac | rzr: 3. merge flashblock.ubuntu to flashblock.hardy-backports | 23:06 |
| asac | rzr: rzr well. the name of your branch doesnt matter | 23:07 |
| asac | rzr: you need to create one branch for each of the 3 steps above | 23:07 |
| asac | rzr: after they are merged you should delete them from launchpad and locally | 23:07 |
| rzr | ok | 23:07 |
| asac | so you start from ~ubuntu-dev next time again | 23:07 |
| rzr | Is there a document on the workflow , I'll double check it | 23:08 |
| asac | rzr: the workflow is like above ;) | 23:08 |
| asac | 3 steps | 23:08 |
| rzr | ok | 23:08 |
| asac | plain and simple | 23:08 |
| asac | maybe step 0. update .upstream branch | 23:08 |
| asac | rzr: do you have a proper upstream branch? | 23:08 |
| rzr | yes | 23:08 |
| asac | ok | 23:08 |
| asac | rzr: should be quite quick then i guess | 23:09 |
| rzr | but i am on debian, now I'd like to test it to make sure | 23:09 |
| rzr | and when you said : | 23:10 |
| rzr | <asac> rzr: 1. merge new upstream to https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-dev/firefox-extensions/flashblock.ubuntu | 23:10 |
| rzr | I can push to ~ubuntu-dev | 23:10 |
| asac | rzr: no merge to always means: | 23:11 |
| asac | 1. branch the target branch | 23:11 |
| rzr | and request merge ? | 23:11 |
| asac | 2. merge the branch locally | 23:11 |
| asac | 3. push to ~rzr | 23:11 |
| asac | 4. request merge | 23:11 |
| asac | yeah ;) | 23:11 |
| rzr | ok | 23:11 |
| rzr | i wasnt sure | 23:11 |
| asac | the name of the ~rzr branch doesnt matter ... it can match the target ~ubuntu-dev ... but doesnt need to | 23:11 |
| asac | its your choice | 23:11 |
| rzr | ok | 23:12 |
| rzr | let's destroy my current branches then | 23:12 |
| asac | heh ;) | 23:12 |
| rzr | humm upstream is active | 23:15 |
| rzr | I checked | 23:15 |
| asac | does that hinder you from updating the branch? | 23:16 |
| rzr | I think I'll wait a few days , then | 23:16 |
| fta | done, except the root cause, the chromium upstream branch :( | 23:16 |
| rzr | well I can merge last week branch since it seems to work | 23:16 |
| asac | rzr: not sure if we should really wait for upstream being inactive ;) | 23:16 |
| asac | rzr: yes. thats a better idea | 23:16 |
| asac | just merge what you know works | 23:17 |
| asac | and then go on from there | 23:17 |
| rzr | i havent tested deeply since I am mostly on sid | 23:17 |
| rzr | you should hate me :) | 23:17 |
| asac | i dont mind | 23:17 |
| asac | extensions should be more or less distro agnostic | 23:17 |
| rzr | if only we were on a same browser :) | 23:18 |
| rzr | well let's finish this job ... I have some other stuff to be done soon | 23:18 |
| asac | good | 23:18 |
| asac | fta: how messy are nspr/nss branches? | 23:19 |
| asac | fta: did i ever revert the soname stuff somewhere? | 23:20 |
| fta | i updated nspr and nss 2 days ago to match 1.9.0.4 reqs, all fine for me | 23:20 |
| fta | yes | 23:20 |
| fta | weeks ago | 23:20 |
| asac | fta: is that nss.dev? | 23:21 |
| fta | no, nspr.head and nss.head | 23:23 |
| fta | remember we cleaned that up a while ago ? | 23:23 |
| asac | yeah | 23:23 |
| asac | was just confused that an nspr.head overwrite removed a bunch of revisions for me | 23:24 |
| asac | fta: why is .head still at RC ? | 23:25 |
| asac | nss | 23:25 |
| fta | because that's what upstream has | 23:25 |
| asac | really? thought they were at RTM now | 23:25 |
| asac | fta: so .dev isnt used anymore? | 23:26 |
| fta | not by me | 23:27 |
| fta | http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/client.mk | 23:27 |
| fta | NSPR_CO_TAG = NSPR_4_7_3_RTM | 23:27 |
| fta | NSS_CO_TAG = NSS_3_12_2_RC1 | 23:27 |
| asac | ok | 23:27 |
| fta | both are in my ppa | 23:28 |
| asac | fta: ok i am doing bzr push -r 12.1.26 lp:~mozillateam/nss/nss.intrepid now | 23:29 |
| asac | and bzr push -r 36 lp:~mozillateam/nspr/nspr.intrepid | 23:31 |
| fta | intrepid ? | 23:31 |
| fta | it's meant for jaunty | 23:32 |
| asac | fta: sure. i created the stable branch post-mortem ;) | 23:34 |
| asac | see the revisions | 23:34 |
| asac | will --overwrite the .dev branches for now | 23:34 |
| fta | but i didn't close nss/nspr.head yet | 23:34 |
| asac | fta: doesnt matter ;) | 23:36 |
| asac | i just want to fix the .dev branches which are diverged somewhat | 23:36 |
| asac | and we will do a release soonish | 23:37 |
| fta | TypeError: cannot concatenate 'str' and 'instance' objects: | 23:38 |
| fta | i hate python | 23:38 |
| fta | this is list damit, not an instance' objects | 23:39 |
| fta | -list+string | 23:39 |
| asac | hehe | 23:40 |
| asac | you have to use concat(...) | 23:40 |
| asac | dont you? | 23:40 |
| asac | or .str() | 23:40 |
| asac | tostr | 23:40 |
| asac | hmm | 23:40 |
| asac | cant remember ;) | 23:40 |
| rzr | dammit I forgot I cant reboot while I am rsyncing large files | 23:45 |
| fta | hmm, it's a file instance, not a string | 23:46 |
| rzr | let's chroot and test ... erm erm | 23:46 |
| asac | fta: i think python is like java and has a generic string method associated with every object | 23:47 |
| asac | you just have to invoke that explicitly | 23:47 |
| fta | AttributeError: File instance has no attribute 'tostring': | 23:47 |
| asac | with some luck file instance returns the proper things | 23:48 |
| asac | fta: yes. like i said. its str() ... or even str(object) | 23:48 |
| asac | that does that | 23:48 |
| asac | or something like that | 23:48 |
| asac | fta: yeah i think its str(object) | 23:49 |
| asac | that runs the __str__: function | 23:50 |
| asac | but i think its not the right way to get he file path reliably | 23:50 |
| asac | fta: why are we on rc1 again ... i updated to rc2 in revision 78 | 23:51 |
| fta | read the entire version | 23:51 |
| asac | heh | 23:52 |
| asac | ok | 23:52 |
| asac | fta: hmm. so we dont have the final .1 release | 23:52 |
| fta | we missed it | 23:53 |
| asac | obviously ;) | 23:54 |
| armin76 | asac: it crashed | 23:56 |
| armin76 | the sqlite file is 9.8m | 23:56 |
| armin76 | i'll try tommorrow | 23:56 |
| fta | ix:~/bzr/build-area/chromium-v8-0.4.3.1~svn20081105r696$ scons library=shared PREFIX=/usr DESTDIR=debian/tmp install | 23:56 |
| fta | scons: Reading SConscript files ... | 23:56 |
| fta | ['debian/tmp/usr/lib/libv8.so'] | 23:56 |
| fta | \o/ | 23:56 |
| asac | fta: please use -version-info in some way ;) | 23:57 |
| fta | Rome was not built in one day! | 23:57 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!