[03:21] :) === hakr is now known as h[a]kr [05:58] can nominations for bugs be removed? [05:59] as in, completely from the page? [06:01] errrr....wtf? [06:01] Please explain the intrepid task list there? https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.20/+bug/88746 [06:01] Launchpad bug 88746 in linux "ehci_hcd module causes I/O errors in USB 2.0 devices" [High,Confirmed] [06:04] so approving a task, hitting stop before it goes thru, and then declining a task will bring up a box for the task, as well as saying it's declined. That's clever.. [06:09] And now i think i just broke launcphad. [06:09] 40 seconds and counting...where's my oops? [06:09] Error ID: OOPS-1051EC28 [06:09] there we are. [06:11] Error ID: OOPS-1051EA22 === h[a]kr is now known as hakr === hakr is now known as h[a]kr === h[a]kr is now known as hakr [08:47] hi [08:47] i registered a ssh key in launchpad, but bzr launchpad-login still says "The user soc has not registered any SSH keys with Launchpad." [08:47] can someone help me? [08:48] soc: what is your lp id? [08:51] soc: https://launchpad.net/~soc shows that soc isn't a validated user [08:54] mhh, my home is ~soc-krg-nw, altough in the top right it only shows me soc [08:55] soc: so what did you use for launchpad-login? [08:55] weird ... [08:55] soc: use `bzr launchpad-login soc-krg-nw` [08:55] bzr launchpad-login soc-krg-nw works now ... i tried it before, but it said that this user didn't exist or something [08:55] ok, it looks like it works ... [08:55] typo maybe? [08:55] thanks :-) [08:56] np [08:56] that could be ... [08:56] when i have question regarding packaging, what channel would be appropriate? [08:56] as in packing using launchpad for ubuntu? [08:57] or packaging in general [08:57] yes ... [08:57] here is a good place, but I'm not a good person to answer :) [08:57] i don't really undertsand, how i can upload my source to launchpad to build it there [08:57] soc: does it say anything at http://help.launchpad.net ? [08:58] it only suggests something with dput ... but i'm not really sure, it that does the same thing ... [08:58] soc: https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/PPA [08:59] ? [08:59] weird ... so even if i have my source code on launchpad, i have to upload the source ... [08:59] soc: I know some of the theory, but I haven't used it myself [09:00] soc: yes, right now the build process doesn't use branches itself [09:00] soc: that work is underway [09:01] * thumper goes to put the laptop down [09:01] ah ok ... [09:01] that explains a whole lot i didn't undertsand [10:22] ls [10:22] Damn, I hate that. [10:23] Anyway, to distract your attention away from my mistake, I have a question. [10:24] I'm looking at PPAs and haven't been able to find any guidelines on how to specify versions for different distribution versions. [10:25] https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/PPA#Versioning <- this suggests using myapp_1.0-2~ppa1 as the version. [10:25] Can I just put -intrepid -hardy or whatever on the end? [10:42] oojah: the people in #ubuntu-motu are probably the best to answer your question [10:44] Usually people there send people here for PPA stuff, especially PPA versioning. [10:44] Where PPAs match the archive, #ubuntu-motu is indeed a good resource. Where it's not the same, it's not so much. [10:45] well, it's likely to be better than here to explain the principles of versioning, on the basis that Launchpad developers don't work at the weekends [10:49] quite possibly. [10:52] Ok, well I'm in no rush. [10:53] I'll pop over to #ubuntu-motu in a bit and see what they say. If not, then a response on Monday is no bother. [10:53] Thanks [10:55] oojah, The quick answer is that there aren't any rules, other than that each newer release should have a newer version number according to dpkg compare-versions. [10:55] (mind you, that's probably not directly helpful) [10:57] persia: Yeah, that sounds about my understanding. [11:18] Ah, there we go. I've found an answer from bigjools in answers.l.n so I reckon that'll be about as legit as I can get. The answer is to append ~intrepid1 ~hardy1. === hakr is now known as h[a]kr [15:42] Hello all [15:42] Could somebody give me a hint how to stop bounces@canonical.com sending me notices about strings I myself submitted? [15:43] (related to Miro translation) === sale_ is now known as sale === gord_ is now known as gord [17:24] how can i turn a project into a super project in lp? === h[a]kr is now known as hakr [18:08] EdwinGrubbs: want to setup another meetup? [18:08] EdwinGrubbs: I have a presentation on the event scheduler made. [18:13] fta, just file a question requesting it [18:14] beuno, ok, i thought it was possible using the interface. thanks [18:30] done [18:31] https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/51556 [18:41] hm, i was about to file new questions to add some google bug trackers, but i see that bug 78395 already exists for that.. for ~2 years :( [18:41] Launchpad bug 78395 in malone "Support Google Code's issue tracker" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/78395 === _thumper_ is now known as thumper === geser_ is now known as geser [22:22] how do i get a project license reviewed? [22:41] fta: Would suggest that asking via answers.launchpad.net would be appropriate [22:43] spm, ok, thanks. I should really stop asking questions here, the answer is always to file the question on lp ;) [22:55] fta: nah, don't stop asking questions here; I'd suggest you're asking the deeper questions that require a more... considered answer than IRC and the vagaries of whomever is online at the time, will provide [22:56] statik, i just saw you created https://edge.launchpad.net/v8 a while ago. I've made so work in https://edge.launchpad.net/chromium-v8, part of https://edge.launchpad.net/chromium-project, so now there a dupe :( [22:56] spm, well, hmm, ok [22:58] fta: I may not be able to help with the questions ;-) - but the dupe projects I can. Did you want me to remove your dupe? [23:00] spm, well, i was thinking of removing the old one, mine as content associated to it [23:00] spm, problem is the old one have branches too, yet older ones [23:02] fta: hmm. tricky. [23:04] indeed. [23:04] asac wanted all the chromium related project to be named chromium-* so here i am. [23:04] now i'm unsure [23:05] projectS [23:07] IMHO? Stick with what you've got for the time being then. You can always work out the details/differences at a later stage. === RAOF_ is now known as RAOF__ === RAOF__ is now known as RAOF_298