[02:55] <zsquareplusc> netboot experts awake? i'm almost there but my NFS sever doesn't seem to support nfs over tcp but the livecd insists on tcp
[03:50] <LaserJock> that seems a little better
[15:27] <Guest28987> hyi
[15:28] <Guest28987> can anybody help i have an issue
[15:34] <sbalneav> Morning all
[15:34] <sbalneav> Guest28987: What can I help you with?
[15:41] <Guest28987> having an installation problem
[15:41] <Guest28987> but i think its because i burned ubuntu too quickly onto the cd
[15:42] <Guest28987> the slower the download the better the results of the os
[18:15] <LaserJock> sbalneav: around?
[19:39] <sbalneav> LaserJock: Yessir
[19:41] <LaserJock> sbalneav: have you opened any Hardy tasks?
[19:41] <sbalneav> No, not yet
[19:41] <LaserJock> sbalneav: I noticed that you marked some bugs Fix Commited
[19:41] <sbalneav> I'm going to have some time tonight, so I'll do more triaging, and open some then
[19:42] <sbalneav> Yeah, fix committed upstream
[19:42] <sbalneav> But not in hardy
[19:42] <LaserJock> sbalneav: can you attach those to an "upstream" bug report?
[19:42] <sbalneav> Surely
[19:42] <sbalneav> You around tonight?
[19:42] <LaserJock> probably
[19:43] <sbalneav> ok, if I need some pointers, I'll yelp :)
[19:43] <sbalneav> gnome humour
[19:43] <LaserJock> we normally mark Fix Committed when either 1) we've uploaded but it's not yet hit the mirrors or 2) it will be included in the next upload
[19:44] <LaserJock> Fix Committed makes sense but it would be good to have an upstream bug we can watch to make sure we close the bug when it hits Ubuntu
[19:45] <LaserJock> sbalneav: does that make sense?
[19:46] <sbalneav> Absolutely
[19:46] <LaserJock> k
[19:46] <sbalneav> Sorry I'm mucking up the works with my ham-handedness :)
[19:47] <LaserJock> well, you're not mucking up much of anything
[19:47] <LaserJock> *any* activity is a plus
[19:47] <LaserJock> but it might help us close the bugs in the future if we can track where they are upstream, etc.
[19:47] <sbalneav> Meh, well, I tend to focus purely on the code, and fix problems without doing the necessary "paperwork" in the bug database.
[19:48] <LaserJock> I know what you mean
[19:48] <LaserJock> I do that a lot too
[19:48] <sbalneav> Which, in a shared environment, is't a very good practice.
[19:48] <LaserJock> it also gives, IMO, a bit better view to the users
[19:51] <LaserJock> sbalneav: it looks like you've assigned yourself to stuff you're working on
[19:51] <LaserJock> that really rocks
[19:51] <sbalneav> Well, buck's gotta stop somewhere.
[19:51] <sbalneav> :)
[19:52] <LaserJock> I was noticing that out of our 252 open bugs only 31 are assigned
[19:52] <LaserJock> which is only 12%
[19:52] <LaserJock> :(
[19:53] <sbalneav> Hm
[19:54] <sbalneav> Well, let me whittle down the LTSP ones a bit, and I may be able to cherry pick some bugs in other packages as time allows.
[19:54] <LaserJock> well, ltsp/ldm is a big chunk
[19:54] <sbalneav> Right, and we can get them closed off fairly soon.
[19:57] <LaserJock> sbalneav: oh, when you ask questions or are waiting on a reporter for info do you mark the bug Incomplete?
[20:02] <sbalneav> Yeah.
[20:03] <LaserJock> ok
[20:03] <LaserJock> I saw you were weilding the Invalid hacket nicely ;-)
[20:05] <LaserJock> brb