[03:09] <[reed]> fta: lol
[03:09] <[reed]> fta: now, what are you going to do?
[03:31] <gnomefreak> crimsun: if your are still awake can you give me a hand on why my colume gets muted all the time even arter canging it?
[04:11] <gnomefreak> asac: fta: im only here checking email. Did you find anything wwrong with the extensions, ive been trying to get someone to upload them to universe for 2/3 months. i would like to know why.
[04:37] <gnomefreak> anyway im gonna have a drink in hopes i sleep tonight.
[11:09] <armin76> asac: i was wrong...1.9 sigbuses...i think it was beta5 the one that worked fine
[11:20] <BUGabundo_work> hi
[11:20] <BUGabundo_work> http://blogs.adobe.com/penguin.swf/2008/11/now_supporting_16_exabytes.html
[11:20] <BUGabundo_work> mozzila has release an alpha version of flash 64 bits
[11:20] <BUGabundo_work> http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/flashplayer10/
[11:20] <BUGabundo_work> can we have it packaged on a PPA so we can test it on jaunty?
[11:29] <armin76> quick
[11:30] <BUGabundo_work> sorry armin76?
[11:30] <armin76> nothing *g*
[12:28]  * directhex melts
[12:28] <directhex> http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/flashplayer10/releasenotes_64bit.html
[12:29] <directhex> 64 motherloving bits!
[12:30] <BUGabundo_work> too late directhex
[12:30] <BUGabundo_work> already mention it
[12:30] <BUGabundo_work> even emailed the MLK
[12:30] <BUGabundo_work> *ML
[12:31] <directhex> poot
[12:35] <armin76> asac: hrm...and beta5 did as well...weird
[14:51] <asac> fta: did you trash i386 build for nspluginwrapper?
[14:51] <asac> 1.1.0 is available on i386 .... 1.2.0 not
[14:52] <asac> strange
[16:47] <fta2> asac, i didn't, we talked about that already, it's blocked somewhere i don't remember
[16:47] <asac> fta2: yeah. it was added to p-a-s :(
[16:48] <asac> fta2: http://cvs.debian.org/srcdep/Packages-arch-specific?rev=1.712&root=dak&view=markup
[16:48] <fta2> yes, pas
[16:48] <asac> i sent mail to the folks that can commit there
[16:48] <fta2> i asked for it to be fixed a while ago, no new since
[16:49] <asac> fta2: how did you ask?
[16:49] <fta2> irc, they directed me to a list of 3 emails
[16:50] <asac> fta2: yeah most likely the ones in the file
[16:50] <asac> i sent there too now
[16:51] <asac> infinity is in that list. but he is on holiday after the jaunty bootstrapping
[17:00] <mconnor> that sentence is so much funnier before you realize jaunty is 9.04
[17:03] <asac> mconnor: must be native speaker fun ;)
[17:04] <mconnor> asac: its just the idea of jaunty bootstrapping
[17:04] <asac> hehe
[17:04] <asac> is jaunty a rarely used word?
[17:13] <mconnor> asac: its rather uncommon these days
[17:20] <fta2> asac, kees sent me a debdiff to support the new native 64bit flash plugin
[17:20] <fta2> it's also in his ppa
[17:38] <asac> fta: yeah. cant do that until its final
[18:02] <asac> at least till beta
[18:24] <philsf> is asac's word on bug #279802 final? (i.e. nothing to be done in Ubuntu's FF3.0.3, it's a hotmail bug) will the change from 3.0.2 that causes this "regression" will not be reverted?
[19:33] <armin76> asac: hows is it possible that beta5 doesn't sigbuses when running with gdb?
[22:41] <asac> armin76: not sure ;)
[22:46] <fta> asac, not even in jaunty?
[22:51] <asac> fta: alpha flash?
[22:51] <asac> not sure. we need to discuss that
[22:51] <asac> there are a bunch of things
[23:44] <crimsun> fta: I also have a new source package for the 64-bit Flash
[23:45] <crimsun> fta: i.e., I've refactored debian/{config,postinst} to handle both 32- and 64-bit, so if installing on 32, you get the stable, and on 64 the alpha.  I've tested it for new installs and upgrades on hardy and intrepid for both i686 and amd64.
[23:46] <crimsun> asac: yes, it's one thing to consider whether to continue using nspluginwrapper for Flash
[23:49] <asac> crimsun: we want it
[23:49] <asac> have to discuss with nspluginwrapper upstream
[23:49] <asac> want it == not mandatory of course
[23:49] <asac> the idea why we brought this is to prevent crashes of ffox
[23:50] <asac> brough this to i386 i mean ;)
[23:50] <asac> crimsun: are you working on a new package?
[23:50] <asac> crimsun: we have to talk then ;)
[23:50] <asac> crimsun: will you be at UDS?
[23:54] <crimsun> asac: yes, Sunday through Wednesday
[23:55] <fta> crimsun, maybe talk with kees then. and i assume there's no point in me touching that too.
[23:57] <crimsun> fta: just figuring out a local bzr issue, thanks
[23:57] <crimsun> I'll need to add the nspluginwrapper bit back in, then