TheMuso | c | 03:28 |
---|---|---|
=== amitk_ is now known as amitk | ||
=== doko_ is now known as doko | ||
=== BenC1 is now known as BenC | ||
apw | does anyone have a toshiba laptop who might be interested in testing out an intrepid based forward port of the hardy toshiba_acpi module? | 13:58 |
=== sconklin1 is now known as sconklin | ||
Kw4h | i have a question regarding the gspca drivers on ubuntu | 16:05 |
Kw4h | in the sourcecode from both the official gspca driver, and the gspca-source package, my webcam sensor isn't defined right | 16:05 |
Kw4h | after changing it, building the source, and reloading the driver the logs show that it still loads the wrong sensor | 16:05 |
Kw4h | now I changed the 'gspca' module, but the module responsible for the webcam is 'gspca_vc032x' (which is depandant on 'gspca_main') | 16:06 |
Kw4h | does anyone know how those two (gspca and gspca_main) interact? | 16:06 |
BenC | Kw4h: sounds like you have a lot of cruft modules...you should clean things up a bit | 17:02 |
BenC | amitk: ubuntu-jaunty raw rebase pushed | 17:02 |
Kw4h | BenC - this is pretty much a clean Kubuntu installation | 17:02 |
amitk | sweet, cloning now | 17:02 |
BenC | Kw4h: no idea how those things interact then...you are compiling external modules to what we supply stock, so you are bound to get some conflicts | 17:03 |
Kw4h | the 'gspca' module already existed | 17:04 |
Kw4h | I merely recompiled it | 17:04 |
Kw4h | also the gspca_main module came with kubuntu out of the box | 17:04 |
Kw4h | so, what gspca version is distributed by ubuntu then? gspca v2? | 18:29 |
Kw4h | ah... moinejf.free.fr - that one | 18:33 |
=== Guest37439 is now known as fddfoo | ||
=== emgent_ is now known as emgent | ||
=== cropalato_ is now known as cropalato | ||
=== cropalato is now known as ricardo-cropalat | ||
=== ricardo-cropalat is now known as croaplato | ||
=== croaplato is now known as cropalato | ||
=== kirkland` is now known as kirkland | ||
mkrufky | i know there is a nice command that generates a perfectly formatted git pull request against a target tree / branch ... i thought it was git-pull-request, but i thought wrong | 23:32 |
mkrufky | anybody know offhand? | 23:32 |
ogasawara | mkrufky: I think it's git-request-pull ? | 23:34 |
mkrufky | ah, lol | 23:34 |
mkrufky | thanks | 23:34 |
trv__ | hello. I have noticed that by doing a " cat /proc/kallsyms | grep sys_call_table " it returns you the symbol and the address of the sys_call_table. BUT, doing so in debian/redhat(and derivatives), even in vanilla kernel also, returns nothing ! | 23:54 |
trv__ | what's going on ? | 23:54 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!