[03:28] c === amitk_ is now known as amitk === doko_ is now known as doko === BenC1 is now known as BenC [13:58] does anyone have a toshiba laptop who might be interested in testing out an intrepid based forward port of the hardy toshiba_acpi module? === sconklin1 is now known as sconklin [16:05] i have a question regarding the gspca drivers on ubuntu [16:05] in the sourcecode from both the official gspca driver, and the gspca-source package, my webcam sensor isn't defined right [16:05] after changing it, building the source, and reloading the driver the logs show that it still loads the wrong sensor [16:06] now I changed the 'gspca' module, but the module responsible for the webcam is 'gspca_vc032x' (which is depandant on 'gspca_main') [16:06] does anyone know how those two (gspca and gspca_main) interact? [17:02] Kw4h: sounds like you have a lot of cruft modules...you should clean things up a bit [17:02] amitk: ubuntu-jaunty raw rebase pushed [17:02] BenC - this is pretty much a clean Kubuntu installation [17:02] sweet, cloning now [17:03] Kw4h: no idea how those things interact then...you are compiling external modules to what we supply stock, so you are bound to get some conflicts [17:04] the 'gspca' module already existed [17:04] I merely recompiled it [17:04] also the gspca_main module came with kubuntu out of the box [18:29] so, what gspca version is distributed by ubuntu then? gspca v2? [18:33] ah... moinejf.free.fr - that one === Guest37439 is now known as fddfoo === emgent_ is now known as emgent === cropalato_ is now known as cropalato === cropalato is now known as ricardo-cropalat === ricardo-cropalat is now known as croaplato === croaplato is now known as cropalato === kirkland` is now known as kirkland [23:32] i know there is a nice command that generates a perfectly formatted git pull request against a target tree / branch ... i thought it was git-pull-request, but i thought wrong [23:32] anybody know offhand? [23:34] mkrufky: I think it's git-request-pull ? [23:34] ah, lol [23:34] thanks [23:54] hello. I have noticed that by doing a " cat /proc/kallsyms | grep sys_call_table " it returns you the symbol and the address of the sys_call_table. BUT, doing so in debian/redhat(and derivatives), even in vanilla kernel also, returns nothing ! [23:54] what's going on ?