asac | crimsun: can you hold back on the major refactoring due to the amd64 plugin that came up until UDS | 00:01 |
---|---|---|
asac | ? | 00:01 |
asac | there are a few things we should consider when seriously touching that package again | 00:01 |
crimsun | asac: sure | 00:01 |
=== fabrice_sp_ is now known as fabrice_sp | ||
gnomefreak | anyone have the master hotmail bug handy? | 09:32 |
gnomefreak | bug 155459 | 10:09 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 155459 in firefox "login hotmail.com" [Low,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/155459 | 10:09 |
gnomefreak | i give up i cant find that bug to save my life | 10:18 |
=== directhe` is now known as directhex | ||
* asac yawns | 12:59 | |
rzr | asac: hi, I need your advice | 15:27 |
rzr | asac: about flashblock, upstream never pull real version into repository's files | 15:27 |
rzr | he uses alpha versions all the time | 15:27 |
rzr | so should we set this by hand (as he does) or uses alpha versions ... | 15:28 |
rzr | #2 option is better for me | 15:28 |
Volans | Hi all :) | 15:54 |
Volans | asac: did you remember that you can't contact all members of a LP group if someone of them hide the email address to others? | 15:55 |
Volans | There was an LP bug open and now a fix was released.... see LP bug 66105 | 15:55 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 66105 in launchpad-registry "Team admin can't contact prospective member who hides e-mail addresses" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/66105 | 15:56 |
Volans | ;) | 15:56 |
asac | Volans: oh | 16:11 |
asac | and what about actual members that are not prospective? | 16:11 |
asac | does that work too? how? | 16:11 |
Volans | asac: sincerly I don't have investigated, just at work now and when I have received the email from LP I have remember that we have spoken about that when organizing the mozillateam meetings ;) | 16:24 |
=== stevel_ is now known as stevel | ||
=== stevel is now known as stevel-smegging- | ||
=== stevel-smegging- is now known as stevel | ||
nxvl | hi! | 17:18 |
nxvl | where can i put an ini that goes to ./usr/lib/firefox-$VERSION/distribution/ so it's version independient? | 17:18 |
Lns | asac: hey, is the newly released FF 3.0.4+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.8.04.1 including the /dev/urandom fix ? I don't see it in the changelog, but i might just not be seeing it.. | 18:45 |
nxvl | asac: ping | 18:55 |
=== fta_ is now known as fta | ||
saivann | asac : ping | 20:25 |
nxvl_ | fta: ping | 20:26 |
fta | nxvl_, pong | 20:50 |
nxvl_ | fta: hi! i'm fighting with a binary package for firefox, which is installing everything into /usr/lib/firefox-VERSION, i already moved the extension to where it should be to be version independendt | 20:51 |
nxvl_ | fta: but still don't know where to put the distribution.ini | 20:51 |
nxvl_ | which is installed in /usr/lib/firefox-VERSION/distribution | 20:52 |
nxvl_ | fta: did you have any idea of where it should go? | 20:52 |
fta | hm, i don't think you should use /usr/lib/firefox-VERSION at all. it's not stable as it changes for each version. | 20:53 |
nxvl_ | yup | 20:53 |
nxvl_ | that's why i want to move it from there | 20:53 |
nxvl_ | but i don't know where to put it | 20:53 |
fta | what do you mean by "binary package for firefox" ? | 20:53 |
nxvl_ | as in i'm trying to get rid of it | 20:53 |
fta | what project is that? | 20:53 |
nxvl_ | is a google toolbar binary package | 20:53 |
fta | it's not an extension? | 20:55 |
nxvl_ | containing an extension | 20:56 |
fta | we have stable paths for extensions and plugins | 20:56 |
nxvl_ | i'm not sure what it does or has | 20:56 |
nxvl_ | fta: did you have a wiki page or something i take a look at? | 20:57 |
=== nxvl_ is now known as nxvl | ||
fta | hm, not for that i'm afraid. we have one for extensions, and one for xulapps | 20:57 |
fta | do you have an install.rdf ? | 20:58 |
* nxvl checks | 21:02 | |
nxvl | yes i have | 21:03 |
fta | so it's an extenson | 21:04 |
fta | you can use the xpi feature from mozilla-devscripts | 21:04 |
fta | i should automagically do everything for you | 21:04 |
fta | -i+it | 21:08 |
fta | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Extensions | 21:09 |
fta | [reed], mconnor: http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/jpeg/MOZCHANGES "Lots of undocumented changes. :(" bad :( | 21:12 |
[reed] | talk to glennmp | 21:12 |
[reed] | oh | 21:12 |
[reed] | jpeg | 21:12 |
[reed] | I dunno | 21:12 |
[reed] | yeah | 21:12 |
[reed] | don't use system-jpeg | 21:12 |
[reed] | ;) | 21:12 |
fta | we don't, but we should | 21:13 |
mconnor | I don't know if that's even still current | 21:13 |
mconnor | that's a five year old comment, likely | 21:13 |
fta | chromium took yours, so it's another copy, bad | 21:13 |
mconnor | hmm | 21:14 |
mconnor | neat | 21:14 |
mconnor | maybe we should be the new system-jpeg :) | 21:14 |
fta | yep maybe, afaik, upstream is dead | 21:14 |
fta | README for release 6b of 27-Mar-1998 | 21:15 |
[reed] | there's a lot of good patches still in bmo for our libjpeg | 21:16 |
[reed] | so, yeah, we probably are the best new owners of system jpeg | 21:16 |
[reed] | :) | 21:16 |
fta | my point is that if those patches are so good, they should be in system lib | 21:16 |
fta | but your patches are not documented | 21:17 |
[reed] | they are in bonsai ;) | 21:18 |
[reed] | and bugzilla | 21:18 |
fta | somewhere in zillions of bugs... | 21:19 |
fta | http://paste.ubuntu.com/74007/ | 21:22 |
[reed] | I know our libjpeg is faster than everybody else's | 21:23 |
[reed] | some smart guy at Intel worked on it | 21:23 |
[reed] | :) | 21:23 |
fta | with your sse/sse2/mmx code, i have no doubt about it | 21:24 |
fta | individual changes are lost :( big merges from the early days | 23:03 |
fta | mozilla bug 299200 | 23:39 |
ubottu | Mozilla bug 299200 in Menus "context menu is out of window" [Normal,Verified: duplicate] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=299200 | 23:39 |
fta | mozilla bug 1025 | 23:43 |
ubottu | Mozilla bug 1025 in GFX "NGLayout crashes on this URL" [Critical,Verified: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1025 | 23:43 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!