=== bac is now known as bac_afk | ||
=== bac_afk is now known as bac | ||
=== mrevell is now known as mrevell-lunch | ||
=== mrevell-lunch is now known as mrevell | ||
=== vednis is now known as mars | ||
barry | #startmeeting | 15:00 |
---|---|---|
MootBot | Meeting started at 09:00. The chair is barry. | 15:00 |
MootBot | Commands Available: [TOPIC], [IDEA], [ACTION], [AGREED], [LINK], [VOTE] | 15:00 |
barry | hello everyone and welcome to this week's ameu reviewer's meeting. who's here today? | 15:00 |
rockstar | me | 15:00 |
mrevell | me | 15:00 |
abentley | me | 15:00 |
adeuring | me | 15:00 |
bigjools | me | 15:00 |
allenap | me, but only half (sprinting in Lexington) | 15:00 |
EdwinGrubbs | me | 15:00 |
abentley | allenap: m ? | 15:01 |
danilos | me | 15:01 |
allenap | abentley: This week it's e | 15:01 |
flacoste | me | 15:01 |
mars | me | 15:02 |
barry | [TOPIC] agenda | 15:02 |
MootBot | New Topic: agenda | 15:02 |
barry | i don't have much today... | 15:02 |
barry | * Roll call | 15:02 |
barry | * Agreement on statuses: | 15:02 |
barry | * needs-reply == needs-fixing | 15:02 |
barry | * merge-approved == approve | 15:02 |
barry | * merge-conditional == approve + comment | 15:02 |
barry | * If there's time, the old boring script | 15:02 |
barry | * Next meeting | 15:02 |
barry | * Action items | 15:02 |
barry | * Queue status | 15:02 |
barry | * Mentoring update | 15:03 |
barry | [TOPIC] * Agreement on statuses: | 15:03 |
MootBot | New Topic: * Agreement on statuses: | 15:03 |
BjornT | me | 15:03 |
gmb | me | 15:03 |
barry | at the asiapac meeting, i explained what we'd agreed from last week on the mapping between our review status and m-p statuses | 15:03 |
barry | everyone there agreed with our mapping | 15:03 |
barry | so i guess that makes it official | 15:03 |
barry | any comments or other thoughts? | 15:04 |
flacoste | can you remind us of that mapping? | 15:04 |
danilos | flacoste: it's up in the agenda | 15:04 |
danilos | :) | 15:04 |
flacoste | doh | 15:04 |
barry | :) | 15:05 |
barry | silence is assent :) | 15:06 |
barry | that's all i have except for the boring stuff. does anybody have anything not on the agenda? | 15:06 |
danilos | yeah | 15:06 |
danilos | I wonder about how do we see if there are branches waiting for review in merge-proposals? | 15:07 |
barry | danilos: the floor is yours | 15:07 |
barry | danilos: they mythical dashboard | 15:07 |
danilos | I've tried digging that up, but was unable to find it once I cleared general queue yesterday | 15:07 |
barry | s/they/the/ | 15:07 |
danilos | ok, so it's actually not there? | 15:07 |
danilos | can we maybe agree to put branches in 'Mature' until it's there? | 15:08 |
danilos | or some other status | 15:08 |
abentley | danilos: Other that this: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~launchpad-pqm/launchpad/devel/+merges ? | 15:08 |
danilos | abentley: that doesn't show me only unassigned ones | 15:09 |
barry | abentley: that's a good page. i can already tell that the separate approve step doesn't work 'cause no one set it ;/ | 15:09 |
* sinzui forgot to type me | 15:09 | |
sinzui | me | 15:09 |
abentley | danilos: All of them will be assigned to Launchpad Developers by default. | 15:10 |
danilos | abentley: ok, so the only missing bit is that we need to update merge proposal statuses to 'Approved', right? | 15:11 |
bac | me | 15:12 |
danilos | and, can we make this URL more visible? I tried getting something along those lines | 15:12 |
abentley | danilos: Right. When they're reviewed, and ready to be merged. | 15:12 |
abentley | danilos: It's the "12 branches proposed for merging into this one." link on https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~launchpad-pqm/launchpad/devel | 15:13 |
danilos | abentley: ok, thanks | 15:13 |
barry | anything else? | 15:13 |
danilos | so, my suggestion would be to make reviewers set "Approved" as well | 15:13 |
danilos | barry: nope, that's it from me | 15:13 |
barry | danilos: + | 15:14 |
barry | + | 15:14 |
abentley | barry: How do I subscribe to the new wiki page? | 15:14 |
barry | jeebus. +1 | 15:14 |
barry | abentley: that's a very good question. i tried to find it and couldn't | 15:14 |
bigjools | you can't! the price of progress ... | 15:14 |
* barry has a BIG LIST of issues with the new wiki | 15:14 | |
abentley | +1. Thought that was already done. | 15:14 |
barry | abentley: go to your profile page, scroll down to subscriptions and add .* to the list :) | 15:15 |
rockstar | abentley: there's a bug for it, we talked about it yesterday. | 15:15 |
barry | rockstar: a bug for wiki subscription? | 15:16 |
barry | someone wake rockstar :) | 15:17 |
barry | anyway... | 15:17 |
barry | if there's nothing else, i just want to run through the outstanding action items from like, last decade | 15:18 |
BjornT | barry: i have a small agenda item as well (or rather a question) | 15:18 |
barry | BjornT: cool, go ahead | 15:18 |
BjornT | when are we going to evaluate how the merge proposals are going, and which issues are the most important (for the LP team as a whole) to fix? | 15:19 |
barry | BjornT: great question. i'm inclined to say let's do the evaluation at the beginning of '09. your thoughts? | 15:20 |
BjornT | barry: well, i was hoping sooner, so that we could get the most important fixes in the next milestone :) | 15:20 |
barry | BjornT: :) | 15:21 |
barry | BjornT: i'm okay with that. what about doing that for the next round of reviewer meetings? | 15:21 |
BjornT | barry: sure | 15:22 |
barry | iow, people should come prepared to discuss/lobby for their top m-p bugs | 15:22 |
bigjools | diffs plz | 15:22 |
barry | we can spend next week's meeting prioritizing them for us | 15:22 |
barry | bigjools: bug numbers plz :) | 15:23 |
bigjools | haha :) | 15:23 |
BjornT | barry: maybe we should tell everyone to pick their 1-2 top bugs, in an attempt to limit the discussions? | 15:23 |
barry | BjornT: yes, good idea | 15:23 |
abentley | barry: We can decide here what lp reviewers consider high priority. Please don't expect the code team to adopt those priorities verbatim. | 15:24 |
flacoste | abentley: that's for sure | 15:24 |
barry | [ACTION] everyone come to next week's meeting with your top 1-2 merge-proposal bug numbers | 15:24 |
MootBot | ACTION received: everyone come to next week's meeting with your top 1-2 merge-proposal bug numbers | 15:24 |
barry | abentley: right | 15:24 |
abentley | barry: Or alternatively, we could have a meeting where thumper was involved. | 15:24 |
barry | abentley: we should do that, but only after we've agreed among ourselves | 15:25 |
abentley | And then the outcome might be clearer. | 15:25 |
barry | abentley: and remember i have asiapac meetings with thumper and co on monday nights (i know you know that :) | 15:25 |
barry | well, /my/ monday nights | 15:25 |
BjornT | abentley: agreed, the priorities we come up with here only serves for guidelines. i don't think thumper needs to be in this meeting. | 15:26 |
abentley | Okay. | 15:26 |
barry | any other topics not on the agenda? | 15:26 |
* bigjools raises hand | 15:27 | |
bigjools | can I nominate a new reviewer? | 15:27 |
barry | bigjools: of course! | 15:27 |
bigjools | good - Muharem wants to start. | 15:27 |
bigjools | he's looking for a mentor right now | 15:28 |
bigjools | OAO | 15:28 |
barry | bigjools: +1. let me know if he can't round someone up | 15:29 |
bigjools | copy that | 15:29 |
barry | anything else? | 15:29 |
barry | 5...4...3...2...1 | 15:30 |
barry | [TOPIC] action items | 15:30 |
MootBot | New Topic: action items | 15:30 |
barry | please tell me if we should continue these or just forget they ever happened | 15:30 |
barry | * flacoste and foundations to look into techniques for eliminating back-patching of schema types (avoiding circular imports) | 15:30 |
* bigjools would love that --^ | 15:30 | |
* barry too, and he doesn't think it's that hard | 15:30 | |
flacoste | hmm, yeah, i forgot about that | 15:30 |
flacoste | barry, patch is welcome ;-) | 15:31 |
barry | flacoste: ah, a challenge! :) | 15:31 |
bigjools | wow, OSS fever :) | 15:31 |
barry | flacoste: sounds like the perfect thing to do while on hold waiting for your isp to un-fsck you | 15:31 |
barry | so we'll continue that one | 15:32 |
barry | * rockstar to take discussion of adding launchpadlib tests for exposed api to ml | 15:32 |
* barry thinks rockstar fell asleep again :) | 15:32 | |
barry | * abentley to investigate current code coverage tools for lp tests | 15:32 |
rockstar | barry, well, we discussed it at the Epic. | 15:33 |
abentley | Current tools don't do what I want. | 15:33 |
barry | rockstar: good. i will remove it from the agenda! thanks | 15:34 |
barry | abentley: cool, you've investigated so i can take it off the agenda :) | 15:34 |
flacoste | rockstar: could you file a bug about allowing launchpadlib to speak directly to the publisher for testing purpose? | 15:35 |
rockstar | flacoste, sure. | 15:35 |
abentley | What I want is a way to know whether a given test command exercises all the new code in a patch. | 15:35 |
flacoste | rockstar: that's the main blocker to allow this | 15:35 |
rockstar | Okay. | 15:35 |
barry | i think that's it. if there are no objections we can end early today | 15:36 |
barry | 5 | 15:36 |
barry | 4 | 15:37 |
barry | 3 | 15:37 |
barry | 2 | 15:37 |
barry | 1 | 15:37 |
barry | #endmeeting | 15:37 |
MootBot | Meeting finished at 09:37. | 15:37 |
barry | thanks everyone! | 15:37 |
bigjools | cheers | 15:37 |
mars | thanks barry | 15:38 |
barry | see ya back at the ranch | 15:38 |
=== mrevell_ is now known as mrevell | ||
=== bac is now known as bac_lunch | ||
=== bac_lunch is now known as bac | ||
=== cprov-lunch is now known as cprov | ||
=== spm_ is now known as spm |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!