[00:18] hi [00:18] how do you delete a project [00:19] meoblast001: ask nicely? Preferably with the project named :-) [00:19] meoblast001: File a question at https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad I think [00:19] second question [00:19] Or ask spm :) [00:19] What voodoo do I need to do to make something leave the Failed to Upload status? [00:20] i created a project but never had the resources to complete it [00:20] so im ending it [00:20] oh [00:20] Crap [00:20] I see why this is failing to upload [00:22] NCommander: ? any clues for assisting others, you'd be willing to share? :-) [00:23] Well [00:23] The upshot is I broke Soyuz [00:23] 2008-11-18 23:52:01 WARNING libfbclient2_2.0.4.13130-1.ds1-4ubuntu1_amd64.deb: Version older than that in the archive. 2.0.4.13130-1.ds1-4ubuntu1 <= 2.1.0.17798-0.ds2-1 [00:23] :-) [00:24] Impressive. Most Impressive. :-) === gord_ is now known as gord [00:24] Man, when I break something, I do it in style :-) [00:25] NCommander: ??? I didn't know you were a windows sysadmin? :-P [00:25] lol [00:25] * NCommander remembers when he broke the exchange server [00:25] It's not my fault the contracters built such a shoddy rack [00:26] :-/ [00:26] * spm accuses - you tried to send email via exchange didn't you. tsk tsk tsk. [00:26] No [00:26] I put the server on a new rack [00:26] WHich didn't support the wait [00:26] weight [00:26] and the server crashed [00:26] To the ground [00:26] WaHooo [00:26] Yeah === h[a]kr is now known as hakr [00:27] I think we ended up install Exchange on an old P2 until we could get a replacement server .... [00:28] used to "loosely" support an exchange box running on dec alpha - that was... different. [00:28] I have a IBM RS/6000 that runs Windows NT PowerPC 4 [00:28] With Exchange 4.0 [00:28] masochist? [00:28] yeah [00:28] It's running AIX now === bac is now known as bac_afk [00:34] meoblast001: is removed [00:34] k thanx [00:34] who is spm? a mod? [00:35] or is it mark shuttleworth =P [00:35] A god. [00:35] ie. a LOSA [00:35] meoblast001: No not mark. Launchpad sysadmin. [00:35] whats a sysadmin [00:35] wgrant: :-) [00:35] meoblast001, spm is our ultraintelligent bot [00:35] oh lol [00:36] i dont know who to believe [00:36] Ursinha: when I tink I something suitably rude to respond with I shall. :-P [00:36] spm or Ursinha [00:36] quit playing mind games on me [00:36] spm, lol [00:36] Ursinha: she's nicer [00:36] spm: bot [00:36] meoblast001, sorry :) spm is a Launchpad admin [00:36] hes not a ot [00:36] But spm is Australian... [00:36] he would have responded by now [00:37] meoblast001: I have a random delay loop built in to mess with folks heads - and bad spellingerer as well [00:37] * wgrant SIGTERMs spm. [00:37] And a trained army of Drop Bears [00:38] * meoblast001 segfaults [00:38] Ooh, harsh. [00:38] I am impervious to sigterms - for i am the PID 1 [00:38] wgrant: your pipe connected to the wrong app.. me [00:38] spm: kernel? [00:38] * meoblast001 forces spm to kernel panic [00:38] spm: One can kill init fine! [00:39] ahh [00:39] init [00:39] sudo cp /init.rd /dev/dsp [00:39] wgrant: we had this discussion elsewhere earlier today - my background is more solaris - and on solaris, you can't :-) [00:39] spm: Ah. Solaris. Ew. At least IRIX is now gone from uni, but Solaris still abounds... === kiko-afk is now known as kiko-zzz === hakr is now known as h[a]kr [01:03] spm: did you delete my ssh key? [01:10] meoblast001: ? No [01:10] ok lol [01:11] i figured out the problem === meoblast001 is now known as meo|away [01:59] can I push to a personal branch that's not associated with a project? [01:59] lamalex, sure, that's what +junk is for [01:59] how do I do that? [02:00] bzr push lp:~alexlauni/junk doesn't work [02:00] lamalex, it's +junk [02:00] :) [02:00] lamalex: bzr push lp:~foo/+junk/branch-name [02:01] thanks [02:02] thanks a lot! [02:03] :D === meo|away is now known as meoblast001 [03:32] Are there any statistics kept on release download counts for LP projects? [03:33] It seems potentially really useful to see if a project is becoming more or less popular over releases, as well as which release format is most popular if there are multiple for each version === h[a]kr is now known as hakr [04:16] does launchpad support any way of me personally sorting bugs? so, like categorizing them in my own way? or marking certain bugs as ones I am interested in, but not subscribing and not assigning them? [04:18] Ryan52, subscribing is the best way to mark bugs in which you have an interest. Doing so is best handled with mail filters. [04:18] There's also a facility to subscribe to bugs for a project, for a distro (generally a bad idea), or for a package in a distro. [04:19] I don't know if that might help. [04:21] okay, thanks. [04:45] no, and there is a bug for it [05:04] Ermmm. [05:04] Disabling that account didn't work. [05:04] He's filing lots and lots of bugs filled with crap. [05:05] And then marking them all private. [05:05] WTF [05:05] Well, private bugs can't be closed by annoying busybodies, you see... [05:06] spm: Kill maurizio-live again, pllllease. [05:06] wgrant: was just logging in to do so.... [05:06] persia: Except that they were made private after the filing, so have hundreds of people subscribed. [05:06] spm: Thanks. [05:06] wgrant, Ah. [05:07] I can only see them against Ubuntu, but I saw some against Malone earlier; they're private now. [05:13] wgrant: launchpad bugs & Ubuntu [05:14] spm: aha. [05:18] He seems to be staying dead. [05:20] One prefers the use of the light touch. Sometimes, the sledgehammer is more appropriate. One guess. [05:21] Either way I also sent an email asking to 'Please stop' [05:22] I'm still unable to make sense of those bugs. [05:23] they look like spam to me [05:23] rather... a failed attempt at spamming [05:23] Perhaps. [08:07] i wish projects could be removed from bugs. [08:09] or this ranting guy would go away. [08:09] either wya [08:10] why doesn't the ubuntu bug tracking system automatically email debian's bug tracking system? [08:10] binarymutant: have you *seen* the quality of a lot of ubuntu bugs lately? [08:11] binarymutant: debian would go nuts (and justifiably so) at being asked to support something that is based on their stuff, but has a whole lot of changes, and where users can't even file decent bugs,and can't refrain from ranting on the bug tracker. [08:11] Hobbsee: don't they already have that though? [08:12] binarymutant: have which? oh, the ranting on the bugtracker? [08:12] yes, but that's usually technical ranting - not "this hasn't been fixed. ZOMG UBUNTU SUCKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!ELEVENTYONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" ranting [08:12] Ubuntu could add a ubuntu header to it [08:12] a lot of debian people seem to look at launchpad anyway [08:13] and stuff does get manually filed back [08:13] i do think they're planning something in regard to it, that you'll be able to sanely send bugs upstream. [08:13] well that's good, I was just wondering since it looks like utnuubu looks deserted [08:13] i think that itself is, yes [08:14] thanks for the info Hobbsee [08:14] binarymutant: you're welcome [12:56] I tried to register a rootskel-gtk project (matching a Debian package by the same name for which I want to get a code import) and got this message: "The name 'rootskel-gtk' has been blocked by the Launchpad administrators". [12:56] Can somebody tell me why, please? [12:56] cjwatson: don't launchpad as root, you HACKER [12:56] hah [12:57] hello, everybody. if i create my own branch in launchpad, it have bzr address: lp:~name/+junk/projectname. But how can i create project with address lp:projectname? [12:59] ia: push it to lp:~name/projectname/branchname and then visit code.launchpad.net/projectname where there should be a link to select a branch to be the development focus, assuming that you have appropriate privileges in projectname (e.g. you created the project) [13:00] cjwatson: oh, thanks you. i'll try. === bac_afk is now known as bac === thekorn__ is now known as thekorn === gmb changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Channel logs: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com | Need help? Community help contact: gmb [13:56] hi, still no fix for the kernel too old bug in PPA/jaunty ? [13:56] i'm stuck because of this, an ETA would be nice [13:59] fta2: have you talks to elmo or infinity already ? [14:00] i asked here a few times already === mrevell is now known as mrevell-lunch === mrevell-lunch is now known as mrevell [14:24] elmo, ^^ ? === vednis is now known as mars [14:40] I noticed a glibc upload that should fix it, but it probably needs special love and care to get it installed in the jaunty ppa buildd's. === kiko-zzz is now known as kiko-fud === paolettopn_zzz is now known as paolettopn === shcaesar is now known as Acaesar === Acaesar is now known as shcaesar === kirkland` is now known as kirkland === mrevell_ is now known as mrevell === bac is now known as bac_lunch === gmb changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Channel logs: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com | Need help? Community help contact: -# === gmb changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Channel logs: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com | Need help? Community help contact: - [17:27] I fail at IRC. [17:37] * cody-somerville pets gmb. [17:52] Bug #300000 been filed [17:52] Launchpad bug 300000 in libgtk2-perl "FTBFS fix for libgtk2-perl" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/300000 [17:52] hahahaha [17:52] just announced that in another channel [17:52] * NCommander is proud [17:52] I got it :-) === bac_lunch is now known as bac [18:57] is https://edge.launchpad.net/chromium-project supposed to be a super project ?? i can't attach sub projects to it... lp says it's invalid [18:58] nm, i thought my https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/51556 was already solved, it's not [18:59] kiko-fud, ^^ [18:59] fta: chromium-project is not a superproject: it has series and milestones [19:01] andrea-bs, i requested it to be turned into a super project. see the question above. what should i do then ? [19:01] fta: project groups are created from scratch, see https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+faq/210 [19:02] fta: you should ask to rename chromium-project and then ask to create a project group with this name [19:03] hm; ok. i didn't create it initially. will do what you just said. thanks. [19:08] andrea-bs, once the old project is gone, should i do anything special when i create the new one ? [19:09] fta: no, you shouldn't [19:09] fta: when the new super project will be set up you'll be able to link sub project by yourself [19:11] andrea-bs, yep, i've already linked a few other projects to the mozilla super-project. I'm not sure i understand what is wrong with current one then... just series and milestones? [19:11] fta: do you want to link a project to more than one super project? === leonel_ is now known as leonel [19:14] andrea-bs, i have a bunch of chromium-* that i want to link to chromium-project [19:16] fta: do you want to link them both to chromium-project and mozilla or just to chromium? [19:17] andrea-bs, no, sorry, mozilla is unrelated, forget about it ;) [19:17] fta: thanks; the problem is that chromium-project is currently a "simple" project and not a super project [19:18] fta: and simple projects can't be converted to project groups [19:18] fta: because project groups are created only from scratch [19:19] andrea-bs, i can't recreate it myself then ? [19:21] fta: unfortunately no: project groups can be created only by launchpad admins [19:21] fta: this is why you should file a new question [19:21] andrea-bs, ok, clear, [19:22] andrea-bs, i've updated https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/51556 [19:22] fta: I'm sorry but now I have to go :( [19:22] andrea-bs, np [19:22] too late [19:32] The build of my package failed, I uploaded a fixed source package and nothing has happened [19:32] Do I have to click retry build? [19:33] (I clicked it, see what happens, I hope it doesn't try to rebuild the flawed source package) [19:33] Flimm: no, the new upload should build automatically [19:33] Flimm, how long ago was this? [19:33] minutes? [19:34] it can take a bit [19:35] Got a rejection email, because the source package was different. [19:35] "File epidermis_0.2-0ubuntu0.tar.gz already exists in PPA for David D Lowe, but uploaded version has different contents" [19:36] Do I have to delete the package to rebuild from a fixed source package? [19:36] * beuno pokes cprov-lunch === cprov-lunch is now known as cprov [19:37] Flimm: have you increased the version/revision? [19:37] Flimm: you have repackaged the orig.tar.gz [19:37] Flimm: is that a ubuntu package ? [19:37] No, I didn't change the version number, I just changed the source package [19:37] Package for a project not in Ubuntu [19:38] Flimm: what's your PPA ? [19:38] url, I mean [19:38] https://launchpad.net/~flimm/+archive [19:38] http://ppa.launchpad.net/flimm/ubuntu [19:39] Flimm: oh, it's not a orig, I'm going blind. [19:40] Flimm: you already have that version published in your PPA. [19:41] Not 0.2, the build failed [19:41] Flimm: the rejection message is somewhat misleading for native packages. [19:41] Flimm: doesn't matter, the source version is blacklisted. [19:41] Flimm: you have to increase the version again. [19:41] 0.2-0ubuntu1 ? [19:42] Flimm: yes, that will work. [19:42] OK, thanks [19:43] Flimm: and it's also sane according the ubuntu/debian policy, btw. [19:43] I'm new to packaging, is the .orig.tar.gz called the source package, or is the _source.changes called that? === kiko-fud is now known as kiko-afk [20:17] Well it built, but I can't find the deb === spm_ is now known as spm [20:18] Flimm, give it a bit :) [20:23] beuno: :) I can wait. [20:25] it just seems strange that it's marked as built and published, but still no deb. [20:25] Flimm, I have a bug filed for the impacient, bug 283960 [20:25] Launchpad bug 283960 in soyuz "PPA page should re-assure the user that their binary packages are being published" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/283960 [20:25] Aha! It's there now! [20:25] Thanks ubottu, I'll go mark myself as affected. [20:25] yeah, you know what they say, a watched pot... === spm changed the topic of #launchpad to: Launchpad is going down from 22:00 UTC until 23:59 UTC for a code update | https://launchpad.net/ | Channel logs: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com | Need help? Community help contact: - [21:54] This user seems to be spamming LP: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/~rutadeevacuacion [21:55] maybe LP going down for maintainence will make him stop ;-) [21:55] JontheEchidna, if not, mthaddon will :) [21:55] hehe [21:56] anyway, keep on rocking! === beuno changed the topic of #launchpad to: Launchpad is down from until 23:59 UTC for a code update | https://launchpad.net/ | Channel logs: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com | Need help? Community help contact: - [22:18] darn, and I was about to mark a bug that has an upstream fix [22:28] beuno: from what? [22:28] beuno: stil 22:00? [22:29] LarstiQ, from a while ago ;) [22:29] beuno: the topic reads weirdly :P [22:30] LarstiQ, [22:30] ah === beuno changed the topic of #launchpad to: Launchpad is down until 23:59 UTC for a code update | https://launchpad.net/ | Channel logs: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com | Need help? Community help contact: - [22:30] thanks :) [22:47] anyone who's not sleeping here? :) [22:47] nobody sleeps in the launchpad team [22:47] ever [22:51] beuno: I suspect you're just projecting yourself and Ursinha :-P [22:52] spm, probably. But I have everyone's phone #, so I just make that assumption :) [22:52] beuno, I had a question then :) [22:52] could I pm? [22:53] pygi, sure [22:53] beuno: ... I see.... /me goes to add a block on all calls from South America [22:53] :) [23:02] what just happened at the launchpad code atom feeds? [23:03] epsy, launchpad is down [23:03] :o [23:03] and the feeds went with it [23:03] upgrading [23:03] new shiny things [23:03] hehe [23:04] hm.. perhaps the feeds should be available when the code is updated :p [23:05] any info on the "nw shiny" things? [23:05] epsy, soon enough [23:05] mrevell will unleash those [23:05] oh, OpenID, i see [23:05] * epsy would have liked to see Global ID, but well, nvm :) [23:09] how is the opensourcing roadway going? [23:10] hm? [23:11] cannonical has promised to release launchpad by feb. 2009 or so, if i remember correctly [23:12] i'm seeing many people keeping themselves away from lp just because it's not free software [23:12] epsy: july - oscon, iirc. [23:12] FYI, https://launchpad.net just took ~2 minutes to load. [23:13] and i believe they're open sourcing their private wiki currently, as a starting point. [23:13] Hobbsee, ty! [23:13] jkakar: it's supposed to be down. [23:13] their private wiki? [23:13] didn't they use moinmoin? [23:13] Hobbsee: edge is responding. [23:14] https://edge.launchpad.net/bzr just took 59s to load here. [23:14] jkakar: /topic. It's in the middle of an upgrade. [23:14] Hobbsee: Yes, I understand that. [23:14] epsy: they do, but they have help.launchpad.net, then another internal one, which is private. [23:14] oh yeah, right [23:14] Hobbsee: It's supposed to display a static, "Hey, we're upgrading, come back later please." message. I'm reporting that that isn't happening in case it's an issue that mthaddon or someone else might care about. [23:15] jkakar: oh, right. [23:15] we're talking about the software to run it, not the actual content up there already? [23:15] epsy: for which? the wiki, or launchpad itself? [23:15] wiki [23:16] epsy: Content is being migrated from the private wiki to a public one. [23:16] jkakar: I'm just finishing up the final parts of the release now - so stuff should be coming back [23:16] spm: Okay, cool. [23:16] should be back now [23:17] spm: Looks like https://edge.launchpad.net/bzr is loading faster here (~15s), so perhaps my timing was just "perfect". :) [23:17] at least, the webapp servers === kiko-afk is now known as kiko [23:20] jkakar: try it again tomorrow, when people start crawling launchpad again ;) === gord_ is now known as gord [23:31] epsy: Hobbsee means the content previously on a private wiki [23:34] yes, that, thanks :) === spm changed the topic of #launchpad to: https://launchpad.net/ | Channel logs: http://irclogs.ubuntu.com | Need help? Community help contact: -